Project Management migration

Migrate from Matilda Workspace to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Matilda Workspace and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Matilda Workspace logo

Matilda Workspace

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

83%

10 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Matilda Workspace and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Matilda Workspace to Asana is a migration from an early-stage all-in-one with a rapidly evolving schema to a mature, widely-adopted project management platform with stable API documentation and an established enterprise feature set. Matilda organizes work across Teamspaces containing Projects, Tasks, Docs, and integrated Chat threads, but its 2024 launch date means key modules like Tables and Customers lack stable schemas, limiting migration scope. We export Projects and Tasks with their hierarchy intact, preserve Docs as structured content, convert Chat thread metadata to task comments or a linked document archive, and resolve custom field types against Asana's custom fields API. Auto-schedule dependencies from Matilda's AI engine are exported as explicit date fields rather than treated as scheduled truth, because Asana runs its own scheduling engine. Workflows and Automations built in Matilda do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Matilda Workspace logo

Matilda Workspace

What's pushing teams away

  • Users report missing features compared to mature tools like Jira, particularly around advanced reporting, custom workflows, and enterprise-scale integrations.
  • The platform's recent launch (2024) raises concerns about long-term reliability, customer support responsiveness, and whether the product roadmap will be sustained.
  • Some users express frustration that promised features like Tables and Customers CRM are still marked as "coming soon" after initial launch timelines passed.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Matilda Workspace objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Matilda Workspace object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Matilda Workspace

Teamspace

maps to

Asana

Workspace or Organization

lossy
Fully supported

Matilda Teamspaces define permission boundaries and contain all child objects. We map each Teamspace to an Asana Workspace or Organization, depending on whether the destination Asana tenant is structured as a single org or multiple workspaces. Team-level permission scoping in Asana is configured post-migration by the customer's admin based on the original Teamspace membership. If multiple Teamspaces exist with overlapping member sets, we flag the scope for review before mapping.

Matilda Workspace

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda Projects with start/end dates, status, and linked Tasks map directly to Asana Projects. Project-level custom properties migrate to Asana custom fields scoped at the project level. We preserve the project description as the Asana project Notes field and map Matilda project status (active, archived) to Asana project archived state. Auto-schedule dates from Matilda are exported as explicit Start Date and Due Date fields rather than relying on Asana's Timeline auto-schedule to replicate the same sequence.

Matilda Workspace

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda Tasks with assignees, due dates, status, subtasks, and description map to Asana Tasks. Task status values from Matilda map to Asana completion state (complete/incomplete). Subtasks in Matilda are mapped as linked subtasks under the parent Asana Task using Asana's subtask relationship, preserving the hierarchy as a nested structure rather than flattening to a flat list. Assignee resolution uses email matching against the destination Asana workspace members.

Matilda Workspace

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda subtasks map to Asana subtasks within the parent Task. Subtask-level assignees, due dates, and completion status migrate as fields on the child task. If a Matilda subtask contains further nested subtasks beyond two levels, we flatten the deeper hierarchy into a linked parent-child chain to avoid depth limits in Asana's task model.

Matilda Workspace

Doc

maps to

Asana

Project Brief or Custom Section

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda Docs are rich-text documents embedded within Projects. We export doc content as structured HTML and import as an Asana Project Brief (using the Brief description field) or as a linked Google Doc, Notion page, or Confluence page depending on the customer's documentation strategy. Doc-to-task links migrate as task descriptions referencing the original doc name and URL path. We do not migrate embedded images or file attachments within Docs as part of the Doc object migration; those are handled under the Attachments object.

Matilda Workspace

Chat Thread

maps to

Asana

Task Comments or Document Archive

lossy
Fully supported

Matilda integrates Chat threads per-project. Asana has no native chat object, so we export thread metadata and message content as a chronological log (author, timestamp, body) and deliver it as a CSV or JSON archive. Customers choose whether to link the archive to the corresponding Asana Project as a custom field reference, convert high-signal messages into task comments, or store the archive in a linked document tool. Rich context linking between chat messages and specific tasks requires field-level remapping and is scoped at discovery.

Matilda Workspace

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda custom fields on Projects and Tasks migrate to Asana custom fields. We inventory all custom field types during discovery (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox, multi-select) and generate a field-mapping table that maps each Matilda field to the equivalent Asana field type. Asana custom fields are accessible via the Asana API at task, project, portfolio, and workspace levels. Custom field values on Tasks and Projects are set during the Task and Project import phases respectively.

Matilda Workspace

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda attachments on Tasks and Docs store file references within the platform. We export attachment metadata (filename, URL, uploader, timestamp) and re-link files to the destination Asana task if the customer has an attached storage service (Google Drive, Dropbox, SharePoint) configured, or provide a download package of all exported files with a mapping table linking each attachment to its parent task. Direct file hosting within Asana is not available as a migration target; files must be hosted externally and linked.

Matilda Workspace

User Assignment

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda task assignee and project membership records map to Asana workspace Users. We resolve assignees by email address match against the destination Asana workspace. Any Matilda user without a matching Asana User record goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before the assignment import phase. Active and inactive user status is preserved as a custom field for visibility.

Matilda Workspace

Project Member

maps to

Asana

Project Team Member

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda project-level member assignments map to Asana Project members. We preserve the member role (owner, member, commenter, viewer) as the closest Asana Project membership level available. Matilda's permission-aware knowledge graph at the project level does not map to a granular permission model in Asana at the project level; permission scoping is handled at the Organization and Team level in Asana.

Matilda Workspace

Tables

maps to

Asana

None (deferred)

1:1
Not supported

Matilda Tables is listed as coming soon with no stable, publicly documented schema. We do not migrate Tables objects until the feature reaches general availability and the schema is documented. We flag this as a deferred object in the pre-flight report and revisit during a post-GA migration if the customer requires it.

Matilda Workspace

Customers

maps to

Asana

None (deferred)

1:1
Not supported

Matilda Customers CRM is listed as coming soon with no stable schema. We do not migrate Customers records. If the customer has active CRM data in Matilda, we recommend migrating to a dedicated CRM tool (Salesforce, HubSpot) as a separate migration engagement and linking the CRM records to Asana Projects via custom fields.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Matilda Workspace logo

Matilda Workspace gotchas

High

Tables and Customers modules are not yet generally available

Medium

Early-stage platform with limited public API documentation

Medium

Auto-schedule and AI Copilot generate derived data that may not export cleanly

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Tables and Customers modules are not generally available

    Matilda Workspace advertises Tables (Airtable-style database) and Customers (CRM) as upcoming features. Both lack a stable, publicly documented schema as of migration scoping. We skip any workspace objects referencing these modules and surface them in the pre-flight report. Migrating incomplete or schema-undefined object references creates orphan records in Asana. We flag these as deferred objects and do not include them in the migration scope until GA is confirmed and the schema is published. If the customer's workspace depends heavily on these modules, we recommend waiting for GA before committing to a migration date.

  • AI Copilot task generation does not map to Asana automation

    Matilda's AI Copilot auto-generates task hierarchies, project outlines, and subtasks from minimal input. Auto-schedule infers task sequencing and dependency chains. When migrating out of Matilda, these AI-generated relationships are not transferable as automation equivalents in Asana. We preserve task hierarchy (subtask nesting) and dependency links as explicit Asana fields so that the destination data is usable without relying on Asana's Timeline auto-schedule to replicate the same sequence. The customer's project manager reviews the exported task structure and re-prioritizes or re-sequences as needed. AI-generated content that exists as task descriptions or doc content migrates as standard text.

  • Matilda Chat threads have no native Asana equivalent

    Matilda integrates Chat threads directly within Projects, linking conversations to specific work items. Asana has no native chat object; discussions happen in Slack or in task comments. We export Chat thread content as a structured archive (JSON or CSV with author, timestamp, body), but the contextual linking between chat messages and tasks requires manual reconstruction in Asana. Customers choosing to convert high-value chat messages to task comments do so based on a per-thread decision during the migration review phase. We do not attempt to auto-convert all messages because the signal-to-noise ratio in chat threads is not predictable.

  • Limited public API documentation for Matilda export

    Matilda Workspace was founded in 2024 and its public API surface area is not comprehensively documented in third-party sources. Export workflows that rely on API access may face undocumented rate limits, authentication changes, or schema shifts between product updates. We validate API availability during discovery and fall back to UI-based export (CSV download via Matilda's export feature) where API access is restricted or undocumented. Large workspaces (over 10,000 records) that require API access should request early access to any Matilda developer preview APIs before scoping begins.

  • Asana requires Organization or Workspace structure for migration eligibility

    According to Asana's migration documentation, at least one of the source or destination spaces must be an Organization. A Personal Projects workspace cannot be used as a source or destination domain. If the customer's Matilda workspace is structured as a personal workspace and the destination Asana tenant is also a workspace without Organization status, the migration scope requires clarification. We identify the workspace type during discovery and recommend upgrading to an Organization in Asana before migration begins if both sides are workspace-scoped.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Matilda Workspace to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and workspace audit

    We audit the source Matilda workspace across Teamspace count, Project count, Task volume with subtask nesting depth, Doc count and approximate page length, custom field inventory with type classification, Chat thread volume and linking patterns, and user count with assignment density. We pair this with an Asana destination review: confirming the Organization or Workspace structure, identifying any existing Projects that may conflict with imported names, and inventorying existing custom fields to avoid duplicate creation. The discovery output is a written migration scope document listing all objects in scope, deferred objects, and any pre-migration configuration required in Asana.

  2. Schema pre-creation in Asana

    We pre-create the Asana destination schema before any data import. This includes creating any missing custom fields (matched by name and type from the Matilda inventory), verifying project structure templates if the customer uses Asana project templates, and confirming Team and Organization membership aligns with Matilda Teamspace membership. If the destination Asana is a new tenant, we recommend creating the initial Organization structure and inviting the migration team as members before schema pre-creation begins. Custom fields are deployed via the Asana API using the POST /custom_fields endpoint scoped to the target workspace.

  3. Export and data extraction from Matilda

    We extract data from Matilda via the documented export path available in the workspace settings. If API access is available and documented, we use it with rate-limit handling and pagination. If the API is undocumented or rate-limited, we fall back to Matilda's UI-based CSV and JSON export. We extract Projects first (as the container for Tasks), then Tasks with parent references resolved, then custom field values attached to each Task, then Doc content as HTML, then Chat thread metadata. Each extraction phase produces a reconciliation count (rows exported) against the discovery estimate. Discrepancies above 5% trigger a re-extraction before the next phase begins.

  4. Data transformation and mapping

    We transform extracted data against the mapping table generated during scoping. Task status values convert to Asana completion state. Subtask parent references resolve to Asana subtask relationships. Matilda custom field values map to the pre-created Asana custom field IDs. AI-generated schedule dates (from Matilda's auto-schedule) are written as explicit Start Date and Due Date fields on Tasks. Chat thread messages are converted from the raw export format to a structured archive with parent task references preserved as a custom field. Docs are exported as HTML and stored with a project-level reference rather than as native Asana briefs unless the customer selects the brief option during scoping.

  5. Import into Asana in dependency order

    We import into Asana in dependency order: Projects first, then Tasks (with parent Task ID references resolved for subtasks), then custom field values set on Tasks, then custom field values set on Projects, then Doc archive references, then Chat thread archive references. We use the Asana REST API with batch endpoints where available and handle rate limits with exponential backoff. Each import phase produces a row-count reconciliation report. Owner assignment (user email to Asana User ID) is resolved via a pre-built lookup table before the assignment import phase. Tasks with unresolvable assignees are imported with the assignee field blank and flagged in the reconciliation report.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation inventory handoff

    We freeze Matilda workspace writes during the cutover window, run a delta migration of any records modified during the migration run, then confirm Asana as the system of record. We deliver a reconciliation report comparing Matilda record counts against imported Asana record counts for each object type. We deliver a separate automation inventory document listing every Matilda Automation or trigger-based workflow with its trigger conditions, actions, and a recommended Asana equivalent (Asana Rules, or manual process documentation if no direct equivalent exists). We do not rebuild Matilda Automations as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement. We support a one-week post-cutover window for reconciliation issues raised by the customer's project team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Matilda Workspace logo

Matilda Workspace

Source

Strengths

  • Combines Docs, Projects, Tasks, Chat, and Customers in a single interconnected workspace
  • AI Copilot auto-generates task hierarchies, project outlines, and subtasks from minimal input
  • Auto-schedule engine handles task sequencing and dependency resolution automatically
  • Free tier with unlimited users reduces barrier to entry for small teams
  • Context Engine maintains permission-aware relationships between all workspace objects

Weaknesses

  • Platform launched in 2024 with a small team—long-term product stability is unproven
  • CRM (Customers) and database (Tables) modules are still marked as "coming soon"
  • Limited public API documentation makes programmatic export and migration more complex
  • Smaller user base means fewer community templates, integrations, and third-party resources than established PM tools
  • G2 reviews note missing enterprise features compared to Jira or monday.com for complex workflow requirements
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Matilda Workspace and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Matilda Workspace: Not publicly documented..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Matilda Workspace doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Matilda Workspace to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Matilda Workspace to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Matilda Workspace to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Matilda Workspace to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for workspaces under 5,000 Tasks and 200 Projects with standard custom field configurations and no Doc export scope. Migrations with large Doc volumes, deep subtask nesting, Chat thread metadata export, or multiple Teamspaces to map separately move into seven to twelve weeks because of content transformation, multi-phase dependency resolution, and extended reconciliation. Matilda's early-stage API documentation may also add discovery time if the export path requires fallback to UI-based extraction.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Matilda Workspace.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day