Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Matilda Workspace and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
Matilda Workspace
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
10 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Matilda Workspace and Asana.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from Matilda Workspace to Asana is a migration from an early-stage all-in-one with a rapidly evolving schema to a mature, widely-adopted project management platform with stable API documentation and an established enterprise feature set. Matilda organizes work across Teamspaces containing Projects, Tasks, Docs, and integrated Chat threads, but its 2024 launch date means key modules like Tables and Customers lack stable schemas, limiting migration scope. We export Projects and Tasks with their hierarchy intact, preserve Docs as structured content, convert Chat thread metadata to task comments or a linked document archive, and resolve custom field types against Asana's custom fields API. Auto-schedule dependencies from Matilda's AI engine are exported as explicit date fields rather than treated as scheduled truth, because Asana runs its own scheduling engine. Workflows and Automations built in Matilda do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Matilda Workspace object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Matilda Workspace
Teamspace
Asana
Workspace or Organization
lossyMatilda Teamspaces define permission boundaries and contain all child objects. We map each Teamspace to an Asana Workspace or Organization, depending on whether the destination Asana tenant is structured as a single org or multiple workspaces. Team-level permission scoping in Asana is configured post-migration by the customer's admin based on the original Teamspace membership. If multiple Teamspaces exist with overlapping member sets, we flag the scope for review before mapping.
Matilda Workspace
Project
Asana
Project
1:1Matilda Projects with start/end dates, status, and linked Tasks map directly to Asana Projects. Project-level custom properties migrate to Asana custom fields scoped at the project level. We preserve the project description as the Asana project Notes field and map Matilda project status (active, archived) to Asana project archived state. Auto-schedule dates from Matilda are exported as explicit Start Date and Due Date fields rather than relying on Asana's Timeline auto-schedule to replicate the same sequence.
Matilda Workspace
Task
Asana
Task
1:1Matilda Tasks with assignees, due dates, status, subtasks, and description map to Asana Tasks. Task status values from Matilda map to Asana completion state (complete/incomplete). Subtasks in Matilda are mapped as linked subtasks under the parent Asana Task using Asana's subtask relationship, preserving the hierarchy as a nested structure rather than flattening to a flat list. Assignee resolution uses email matching against the destination Asana workspace members.
Matilda Workspace
Subtask
Asana
Subtask
1:1Matilda subtasks map to Asana subtasks within the parent Task. Subtask-level assignees, due dates, and completion status migrate as fields on the child task. If a Matilda subtask contains further nested subtasks beyond two levels, we flatten the deeper hierarchy into a linked parent-child chain to avoid depth limits in Asana's task model.
Matilda Workspace
Doc
Asana
Project Brief or Custom Section
1:1Matilda Docs are rich-text documents embedded within Projects. We export doc content as structured HTML and import as an Asana Project Brief (using the Brief description field) or as a linked Google Doc, Notion page, or Confluence page depending on the customer's documentation strategy. Doc-to-task links migrate as task descriptions referencing the original doc name and URL path. We do not migrate embedded images or file attachments within Docs as part of the Doc object migration; those are handled under the Attachments object.
Matilda Workspace
Chat Thread
Asana
Task Comments or Document Archive
lossyMatilda integrates Chat threads per-project. Asana has no native chat object, so we export thread metadata and message content as a chronological log (author, timestamp, body) and deliver it as a CSV or JSON archive. Customers choose whether to link the archive to the corresponding Asana Project as a custom field reference, convert high-signal messages into task comments, or store the archive in a linked document tool. Rich context linking between chat messages and specific tasks requires field-level remapping and is scoped at discovery.
Matilda Workspace
Custom Field
Asana
Custom Field
1:1Matilda custom fields on Projects and Tasks migrate to Asana custom fields. We inventory all custom field types during discovery (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox, multi-select) and generate a field-mapping table that maps each Matilda field to the equivalent Asana field type. Asana custom fields are accessible via the Asana API at task, project, portfolio, and workspace levels. Custom field values on Tasks and Projects are set during the Task and Project import phases respectively.
Matilda Workspace
Attachment
Asana
Attachment
1:1Matilda attachments on Tasks and Docs store file references within the platform. We export attachment metadata (filename, URL, uploader, timestamp) and re-link files to the destination Asana task if the customer has an attached storage service (Google Drive, Dropbox, SharePoint) configured, or provide a download package of all exported files with a mapping table linking each attachment to its parent task. Direct file hosting within Asana is not available as a migration target; files must be hosted externally and linked.
Matilda Workspace
User Assignment
Asana
User
1:1Matilda task assignee and project membership records map to Asana workspace Users. We resolve assignees by email address match against the destination Asana workspace. Any Matilda user without a matching Asana User record goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before the assignment import phase. Active and inactive user status is preserved as a custom field for visibility.
Matilda Workspace
Project Member
Asana
Project Team Member
1:1Matilda project-level member assignments map to Asana Project members. We preserve the member role (owner, member, commenter, viewer) as the closest Asana Project membership level available. Matilda's permission-aware knowledge graph at the project level does not map to a granular permission model in Asana at the project level; permission scoping is handled at the Organization and Team level in Asana.
Matilda Workspace
Tables
Asana
None (deferred)
1:1Matilda Tables is listed as coming soon with no stable, publicly documented schema. We do not migrate Tables objects until the feature reaches general availability and the schema is documented. We flag this as a deferred object in the pre-flight report and revisit during a post-GA migration if the customer requires it.
Matilda Workspace
Customers
Asana
None (deferred)
1:1Matilda Customers CRM is listed as coming soon with no stable schema. We do not migrate Customers records. If the customer has active CRM data in Matilda, we recommend migrating to a dedicated CRM tool (Salesforce, HubSpot) as a separate migration engagement and linking the CRM records to Asana Projects via custom fields.
| Matilda Workspace | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teamspace | Workspace or Organizationlossy | Fully supported | |
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Subtask | Subtask1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Doc | Project Brief or Custom Section1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Chat Thread | Task Comments or Document Archivelossy | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Field1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User Assignment | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Project Member | Project Team Member1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Tables | None (deferred)1:1 | Not supported | |
| Customers | None (deferred)1:1 | Not supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Matilda Workspace gotchas
Tables and Customers modules are not yet generally available
Early-stage platform with limited public API documentation
Auto-schedule and AI Copilot generate derived data that may not export cleanly
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and workspace audit
We audit the source Matilda workspace across Teamspace count, Project count, Task volume with subtask nesting depth, Doc count and approximate page length, custom field inventory with type classification, Chat thread volume and linking patterns, and user count with assignment density. We pair this with an Asana destination review: confirming the Organization or Workspace structure, identifying any existing Projects that may conflict with imported names, and inventorying existing custom fields to avoid duplicate creation. The discovery output is a written migration scope document listing all objects in scope, deferred objects, and any pre-migration configuration required in Asana.
Schema pre-creation in Asana
We pre-create the Asana destination schema before any data import. This includes creating any missing custom fields (matched by name and type from the Matilda inventory), verifying project structure templates if the customer uses Asana project templates, and confirming Team and Organization membership aligns with Matilda Teamspace membership. If the destination Asana is a new tenant, we recommend creating the initial Organization structure and inviting the migration team as members before schema pre-creation begins. Custom fields are deployed via the Asana API using the POST /custom_fields endpoint scoped to the target workspace.
Export and data extraction from Matilda
We extract data from Matilda via the documented export path available in the workspace settings. If API access is available and documented, we use it with rate-limit handling and pagination. If the API is undocumented or rate-limited, we fall back to Matilda's UI-based CSV and JSON export. We extract Projects first (as the container for Tasks), then Tasks with parent references resolved, then custom field values attached to each Task, then Doc content as HTML, then Chat thread metadata. Each extraction phase produces a reconciliation count (rows exported) against the discovery estimate. Discrepancies above 5% trigger a re-extraction before the next phase begins.
Data transformation and mapping
We transform extracted data against the mapping table generated during scoping. Task status values convert to Asana completion state. Subtask parent references resolve to Asana subtask relationships. Matilda custom field values map to the pre-created Asana custom field IDs. AI-generated schedule dates (from Matilda's auto-schedule) are written as explicit Start Date and Due Date fields on Tasks. Chat thread messages are converted from the raw export format to a structured archive with parent task references preserved as a custom field. Docs are exported as HTML and stored with a project-level reference rather than as native Asana briefs unless the customer selects the brief option during scoping.
Import into Asana in dependency order
We import into Asana in dependency order: Projects first, then Tasks (with parent Task ID references resolved for subtasks), then custom field values set on Tasks, then custom field values set on Projects, then Doc archive references, then Chat thread archive references. We use the Asana REST API with batch endpoints where available and handle rate limits with exponential backoff. Each import phase produces a row-count reconciliation report. Owner assignment (user email to Asana User ID) is resolved via a pre-built lookup table before the assignment import phase. Tasks with unresolvable assignees are imported with the assignee field blank and flagged in the reconciliation report.
Cutover, validation, and automation inventory handoff
We freeze Matilda workspace writes during the cutover window, run a delta migration of any records modified during the migration run, then confirm Asana as the system of record. We deliver a reconciliation report comparing Matilda record counts against imported Asana record counts for each object type. We deliver a separate automation inventory document listing every Matilda Automation or trigger-based workflow with its trigger conditions, actions, and a recommended Asana equivalent (Asana Rules, or manual process documentation if no direct equivalent exists). We do not rebuild Matilda Automations as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement. We support a one-week post-cutover window for reconciliation issues raised by the customer's project team.
Platform deep dives
Matilda Workspace
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Matilda Workspace and Asana.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Matilda Workspace: Not publicly documented..
Data volume sensitivity
Matilda Workspace doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Matilda Workspace to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Matilda Workspace to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Matilda Workspace
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.