Project Management migration

Migrate from Azor to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Azor and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Azor logo

Azor

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

92%

11 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Azor and Asana.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

2-3 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Azor and Asana differ fundamentally in export capability. Azor has no REST API, webhook system, or bulk export endpoint; projects and tasks must be pulled manually from individual project views or downloaded as CSV from each project. Asana's data model is richer: it supports sub-tasks, native custom fields on all plans, task dependencies, and multiple project views including List, Board, Calendar, and Timeline. We use Azor's CSV exports or screen-based sampling as the extraction layer, transform the data to Asana's task structure (flattening any sub-tasks that had no native representation in Azor), and import via the Asana API. We do not migrate Azor comments or attachments because Azor does not expose them in any documented format. Automations and workflows are not migrated; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Azor logo

Azor

What's pushing teams away

  • The user interface is described as dated and not modern, which creates friction for teams expecting the visual polish of newer PM tools like monday.com or Asana.
  • Azor lacks native mobile applications, offering only a mobile browser experience, which frustrates field or remote teams that need full offline functionality on iOS or Android.
  • The platform has no documented API or webhook system, which blocks teams that need to automate reporting, sync with other tools, or extract data in bulk.
  • Scaling costs are a pain point: at 100 users the price reaches $499/month, which becomes less competitive compared to Asana's per-seat model at that team size.
  • The platform does not expose comments or attachments in any export format, making it difficult to preserve full project history when switching to a new tool.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Azor objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Azor object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Azor

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Azor projects map directly to Asana projects. We preserve the project name, description, creation date, and any folder or group labels as project Tags or a project-level custom field. Because Azor has no workspace or team concept, we ask the customer during scoping which Asana Team or workspace each project belongs to before import. Projects are loaded first as the top-level container so that task imports have a valid parent project ID.

Azor

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Azor tasks map 1:1 to Asana tasks with title, description, due date, and assignee preserved. The Asana API requires a valid project_gid at task creation, which we resolve from the project mapping. Tasks with no assignee are flagged and left blank or assigned to the migration service account pending reassignment in Asana. Task completion status migrates as a boolean to Asana's completed field.

Azor

Task (nested)

maps to

Asana

Sub-task

1:1
Fully supported

If Azor's source data contains flattened sub-task records identifiable by a naming convention (e.g., parent task title as prefix) or by a project-specific attribute, we reconstruct the parent-child relationship and import as Asana sub-tasks under their parent task. We flag which records were flattened and document the naming convention used so the customer's admin can verify the hierarchy post-migration. If no identifiable sub-task structure exists in Azor, all tasks are imported as top-level Asana tasks.

Azor

Tag

maps to

Asana

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

Azor tags migrate to Asana Tags. We extract tags as a comma-separated string or array from Azor's export and map each unique tag to an Asana Tag with the same name. Tags that do not already exist in Asana are created at import time. Tags serve as the primary vehicle for carrying Azor attribute data forward since Azor has no native custom field layer.

Azor

User

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

Azor user display names and email addresses map to Asana Users. We resolve users by email match against the destination Asana organization's user table. Any Azor user without a matching Asana User is flagged in the reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before task import resumes. Role and permission levels are not exposed in Azor's data model and cannot be migrated; we document this gap in the scope document.

Azor

Task Status

maps to

Asana

Task Status or Section

1:1
Mapping required

Azor's fixed status set per project (To Do, In Progress, Done) maps to Asana Sections within the project or to a custom task-status field depending on the customer's preference. We confirm the preferred mapping during scoping. Any non-standard Azor statuses are flagged for manual review before import to prevent Asana validation errors.

Azor

Task Assignment

maps to

Asana

Assignee

1:1
Fully supported

Azor tasks assigned to a single user map to Asana's assignee field. Azor does not support multi-assignee tasks, so no split or merge logic is required. Unassigned tasks in Azor migrate as unassigned in Asana. We resolve assignee references using the User email mapping established in the User object step.

Azor

Due Date

maps to

Asana

Due Date

1:1
Fully supported

Azor due dates migrate directly to Asana due_date in ISO 8601 format. Tasks with no due date in Azor migrate as null in Asana. We do not migrate time-of-day (due_at) since Azor does not expose time components in its date fields. If the customer needs time tracking on due dates, we recommend setting the due date to the task start and using a custom time field in Asana.

Azor

Project Group or Folder

maps to

Asana

Project Tags or Team

1:1
Fully supported

Azor uses a simple project list hierarchy with folder or group labels. We map these labels to Asana Project Tags for visibility, or to Team membership if the customer prefers organizing by Asana Teams. We confirm the organizational preference during scoping. Projects within a folder group maintain their relative order during import.

Azor

Custom Attributes (stored in text fields)

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields

lossy
Mapping required

Azor has no native custom field layer. Any customer-specific attributes stored in text fields, notes, or custom columns in Azor are identified during scoping, documented in a field map provided by the customer, and pre-created in Asana as custom fields before import. We request this field map at least five business days before the migration start date to allow time for Asana custom field schema setup.

Azor

None (Comments not available)

maps to

Asana

Task Comments

1:1
Fully supported

Azor does not expose comments via any documented export or API. We cannot migrate task-level discussion history. We include a pre-migration checklist item requiring the customer to acknowledge this data gap and consider a manual export of critical comment threads before the engagement begins. Asana comment history on migrated tasks will start fresh post-migration.

Azor

None (Attachments not available)

maps to

Asana

Task Attachments

1:1
Fully supported

Azor does not expose file attachments via any documented export format. We do not migrate attachments and flag this gap in the scope document. If the customer has attachments stored in Azor, we recommend they download them manually or export them to a shared storage location before migration and re-attach them in Asana post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Azor logo

Azor gotchas

High

No API means no bulk data export

High

No documented export format for comments or attachments

Medium

Free plan limits and per-seat pricing model

Medium

No sub-task or dependency model

Low

Custom fields not a native feature

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Azor has no API — extraction is manual

    Azor has no documented public API, REST endpoint, or webhook system. We cannot programmatically pull data in bulk. Extraction relies on CSV downloads from individual Azor project views or screen-based sampling for projects without a clean CSV export. This adds scoping time and limits the speed of the data pull phase. We recommend the customer identifies the 5-10 most critical projects for migration before we begin extraction and confirms that CSV downloads are available from all required project views.

  • Comments and attachments are not migratable

    Azor does not expose task-level comments or file attachments in any documented export format. Customers who rely on task discussion history or uploaded documents will lose that data unless they export it manually before the migration engagement begins. We include a pre-migration checklist item requiring the customer to acknowledge this gap and, where possible, download comment and attachment data independently for manual re-entry in Asana post-migration.

  • Sub-tasks require flattening before import

    Azor has no native sub-task or dependency model; all tasks are flat. If the customer has managed sub-task-like records using naming conventions, indentation, or linked rows in Azor, we reconstruct the parent-child relationship and import as Asana sub-tasks. We flag which records were flattened and document the naming convention used. If no sub-task structure exists in the Azor source, all records import as top-level Asana tasks and the customer rebuilds any hierarchy manually in Asana.

  • Asana API rate limits require chunked imports

    Asana's REST API enforces rate limits of 1,500 requests per minute on the standard tier. For migrations with hundreds of tasks, we implement batch chunking and rate-limit handling with exponential backoff. Attachments over 100 MB are skipped per Asana API constraints, which is not an issue for Azor migrations (no attachments migrate) but is a known constraint for any file imports the customer adds manually post-migration.

  • Custom attributes need a pre-built field map

    Azor has no native custom field layer, so any customer-specific attributes stored in text fields or notes must be identified during scoping and mapped manually to Asana custom fields. We request the customer provide a written field map at least five business days before migration begins. Without this map, we store Azor attribute values as task descriptions or tags, which may require restructuring in Asana after migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Azor to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and extraction planning

    We review the customer's Azor account to identify all projects, task counts, user counts, and any attributes stored in text fields or tags that represent custom data. We confirm whether CSV exports are available from each project view and identify projects that require screen-based sampling. We provide the customer with a pre-migration checklist that includes exporting comments and attachments manually if that data must be preserved, identifying which Asana Team each Azor project maps to, and providing a custom field map if any Azor text-field attributes require migration to Asana custom fields.

  2. Asana workspace and schema setup

    We create the Asana workspace structure based on the customer's organizational requirements: Teams for departmental groupings, Projects for each Azor project, and any custom fields identified in the field map. Custom fields are created in Asana before any task import so that field IDs are available during the transform phase. We confirm the task status mapping (Section-based vs custom field) with the customer's admin and pre-create any Tags that exist in Azor.

  3. Data extraction from Azor

    We extract project and task data from Azor using CSV downloads from each project view or, where CSV is not available, screen-based sampling with structured data capture. User lists are extracted separately. Tags are captured as comma-separated values per task. We validate the extraction against the Azor data view to confirm accuracy and flag any projects or tasks that could not be extracted cleanly for manual review.

  4. Data transform and sandbox migration

    We transform the Azor extract into Asana API-compatible payloads: projects first, then users for assignee resolution, then tasks with parent project IDs, assignee IDs, due dates, and tags resolved. Any sub-task flattening is applied using the documented naming convention. We run a sandbox migration into an Asana sandbox workspace (or the production workspace with a test project) and reconcile record counts before proceeding to production. The customer's admin spot-checks 20-30 tasks and confirms the tag and assignee mapping before we proceed.

  5. Production migration

    We run the full production migration in dependency order: Projects first, then Tasks with all field mappings resolved. Tags are created and linked during task import. Any custom attributes are mapped to the pre-created Asana custom fields using the customer-provided field map. Each phase emits a reconciliation report showing records imported versus records expected. We pause between phases to allow the customer's admin to review and sign off.

  6. Cutover and handoff

    We freeze writes to Azor during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration, then confirm that Asana is the system of record. We deliver a written inventory document covering migrated record counts, any records skipped due to extraction limitations (comments, attachments, custom attributes without a field map), and a section for the customer's admin to plan the rebuild of any project templates or organizational structures that exist in Azor but do not migrate as configuration.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Azor logo

Azor

Source

Strengths

  • Cross-platform deployment — Azor runs on desktop, mobile, and cloud, with Mac and Windows native support per the vendor's site, suitable for hybrid creative agency setups.
  • FileMaker-based fundament — the underlying database engine is mature and stable, and the rights-management and SSL-encrypted data transfer model gives smaller agencies enterprise-grade security without dedicated IT.
  • Single environment that covers projects, tasks, time tracking, invoicing, quotations, document management, and CRM — useful for creative agencies that previously juggled separate tools for each function.
  • Multi-user collaboration scales to a documented 999 simultaneous users, which is well beyond what most independent and mid-sized agencies require.
  • TakeOff configuration assistance during onboarding reduces the cold-start cost of setting up the schema, role permissions, and workflow templates.

Weaknesses

  • Pricing is opaque — the vendor publishes only an entry annual figure and routes everything else through sales, which makes side-by-side budget comparisons with Asana, Monday, or ClickUp difficult.
  • Feature surface is narrower than mainstream PM platforms — ITQlick's comparison flags missing native issue tracking, project planning, and advanced scheduling capabilities.
  • FileMaker dependency means deeper integrations with modern SaaS tools (Slack, GitHub, JIRA, modern BI tools) typically require custom FileMaker scripting rather than out-of-the-box connectors.
  • Mobile experience is functional but inherits FileMaker's interaction model, which feels dated next to mobile-first competitors built for tablet and phone PM use.
  • Public reviewer footprint is thin (limited verified G2/Capterra reviews), making third-party validation of feature claims harder during evaluation.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate Project Management migration. 4 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Azor and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    D

    4 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Azor: No public API exists.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Azor doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Azor to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Azor to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Azor to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Azor to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Azor to Asana migrations complete in two to three weeks for teams under 20 users with fewer than 50 projects and no complex custom attribute mapping. Migrations with 50+ projects, explicit sub-task hierarchy reconstruction, or customer-provided custom field maps requiring schema setup in Asana extend to four to six weeks. The Azor extraction phase (CSV downloads or screen-based sampling) typically takes three to five business days depending on project count and is performed before any import begins.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Azor.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day