Project Management migration

Migrate from ProWorkflow to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between ProWorkflow and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

ProWorkflow logo

ProWorkflow

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

71%

10 of 14

objects map 1:1 between ProWorkflow and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

ProWorkflow and Asana serve different primary use cases. ProWorkflow is a professional services automation platform with integrated time tracking, invoicing, and margin forecasting built around Projects and Items. Asana is a work management platform with multiple views (List, Board, Timeline, Calendar, Gantt), native Goals and Portfolio tracking, and a well-documented REST API with published rate limits. The migration is primarily a schema simplification: Projects map to Projects, Tasks map to Tasks, Milestones map to Tasks with a milestone flag, and Time Entries map to Asana time tracking custom fields. The significant gaps are financial—ProWorkflow Items, Invoices, margin calculations, and the financial forecasting suite have no direct Asana equivalent, so we deliver a written inventory of these records for the customer to handle separately. Custom Forms export as HTML blobs that cannot be parsed into structured Asana fields. We do not migrate Workflows, automations, or project templates as functional code; we deliver a written map of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

ProWorkflow logo

ProWorkflow

What's pushing teams away

  • Custom reporting requires manual field selection and produces results that are difficult to interpret — one reviewer called the custom reporting process ambiguous and error-prone.
  • The Classic-to-Nexus migration introduced navigation changes and data representation differences that disrupted established workflows for long-term users.
  • Gantt chart export to PDF does not render a readable timeline, making it unsuitable for client-facing documentation without a workaround.
  • The platform lacks a public bulk API with documented rate limits, limiting automation options for large teams with complex integration needs.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How ProWorkflow objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a ProWorkflow object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

ProWorkflow

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

ProWorkflow Projects are the top-level container and map 1:1 to Asana Projects. We preserve the project name, description, start date, due date, status, and any project-level custom fields. ProWorkflow project status values (Active, On Hold, Completed) map to Asana project membership status. The project owner from ProWorkflow becomes the project lead in Asana.

ProWorkflow

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

ProWorkflow Tasks map directly to Asana Tasks. We carry task name, description, status, due date, assignees, sub-tasks, and tags. ProWorkflow task hierarchy (parent task with sub-tasks) migrates as parent-task and subtask relationship in Asana. ProWorkflow status values (Not Started, In Progress, Complete) map to Asana's completion state. Assignees resolve by email match against the Asana destination workspace.

ProWorkflow

Milestone

maps to

Asana

Task (with milestone flag)

1:1
Fully supported

ProWorkflow Milestones map to Asana Tasks marked as milestones using the milestone flag. We preserve the milestone name, target date, and any linked invoice flag from ProWorkflow. The milestone task in Asana has no assignees by default; if the ProWorkflow milestone has an owner, we set that user as the assignee on the Asana task. The ProWorkflow milestone date becomes the due date on the Asana milestone task.

ProWorkflow

Item

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields on Task

lossy
Fully supported

ProWorkflow Items are the financial unit carrying Time Allocated, Time Spent, Manual Completion %, and Margin % fields. Items do not have a direct Asana equivalent because Asana has no native financial tracking. We carry Item financial fields as Asana custom fields on the parent Task: Time Allocated maps to a Number field (hours), Time Spent maps to a Number field (hours), Manual Completion % maps to a Percentage field, and Margin % maps to a Percentage field. Nexus-version financial values that differ from Classic are flagged for customer review before import.

ProWorkflow

Client

maps to

Asana

Member or Guest in Asana Workspace

1:1
Fully supported

ProWorkflow Client records map to Asana workspace members. We map client name, primary contact name, email, phone, and address. ProWorkflow's unlimited free client access means these records exist but are not billable seats. In Asana, all migrated users consume a seat. We flag the total client count during scoping so the customer understands the Asana seat cost impact before migration begins.

ProWorkflow

Contractor

maps to

Asana

Member in Asana Workspace

1:1
Fully supported

ProWorkflow Contractor records map to Asana workspace members. Contractor assignments on tasks and time entries resolve by email match to the Asana destination. Contractors in ProWorkflow are free and unlimited; in Asana they consume a paid seat on all tiers except the free tier (which limits to 15 members total). We separate contractor records from staff user records and flag the contractor seat count for billing clarity.

ProWorkflow

Staff User

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

ProWorkflow Staff Users are the billable seats and map 1:1 to Asana workspace members. We resolve each staff user by email match. Any ProWorkflow staff user without a matching Asana account goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import. Role information from ProWorkflow is stored as a custom field in Asana since Asana does not have a native role concept beyond Admin and Member.

ProWorkflow

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Time Tracking Custom Field on Task

1:1
Fully supported

ProWorkflow Time Entries (Hours, Description, Date, Billable flag, linked Task/Item) carry over as Asana time tracking data. Asana's native time tracking feature is available on Business and Enterprise tiers; if the destination Asana workspace is on Starter or Advanced, we create custom fields: hours (Number), date (Date), description (Text), and billable flag (Checkbox). Time entries link to the migrated task by matching the ProWorkflow task reference to the Asana task GID.

ProWorkflow

Invoice

maps to

Asana

Inventory Only

lossy
Fully supported

ProWorkflow Invoices generated from Milestones and Items do not migrate as functional Asana records because Asana has no native invoicing or billing feature. We extract the invoice data (client, amount, status, line items, date) as a structured JSON inventory document and deliver it alongside the migration. The customer's admin uses this to set up invoicing in a dedicated accounting tool (QuickBooks, Xero, Stripe, or similar) post-migration.

ProWorkflow

Custom Field (dropdown-based)

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (dropdown or multi-select)

1:1
Fully supported

ProWorkflow Advanced plan Custom Fields (dropdown-based, key-value selections) map to Asana custom fields. Single-select dropdown fields in ProWorkflow map to Asana single-select custom fields; multi-select dropdown fields map to Asana multi-select custom fields. We carry the field definition (name, type) and all selected values. Any ProWorkflow custom field without a matching option in Asana is created during migration with the source options preserved.

ProWorkflow

Custom Form

maps to

Asana

Text Field (unparsed)

lossy
Fully supported

ProWorkflow Custom Forms are HTML blobs injected into a Project page, available on Advanced plan. They have no structured schema. We extract the raw HTML as a text blob and store it in an Asana custom field (Text type) on the project. We flag all projects with Custom Form content during scoping and alert the customer that form rendering will not be preserved in Asana; the HTML appears as plain text. If the customer needs form functionality, they use Asana's native form builder (available from Starter tier) as the replacement.

ProWorkflow

Project Template

maps to

Asana

Project Template (documentation only)

lossy
Fully supported

ProWorkflow Project Templates (pre-built milestones, tasks, and items for recurring engagements) do not migrate as functional templates in Asana because Asana's template feature covers projects and tasks but not the ProWorkflow-specific quote and invoice template types. We document each Project Template as a structured migration handoff: the template name, its task hierarchy, milestone structure, and pre-filled financial field values. The customer's admin recreates templates manually in Asana or uses a third-party template tool.

ProWorkflow

Tag

maps to

Asana

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

ProWorkflow Tags are label-based metadata on tasks and projects and map 1:1 to Asana Tags. We carry tags as string arrays and apply them to the corresponding migrated tasks. Asana tags are workspace-level and can be applied across projects. Tag color from ProWorkflow maps to Asana tag color if the source field is present; otherwise a default color is assigned.

ProWorkflow

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

ProWorkflow task and project attachments are stored by reference URL. We migrate attachment metadata (filename, file type, uploader name, upload date) and attempt to re-link or re-upload files where the source storage remains accessible. If the original ProWorkflow storage becomes inaccessible after the source org is decommissioned, we document the attachment inventory with URLs so the customer's admin can source the files manually. Asana supports attachments up to 100MB per file on Business and Enterprise tiers.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

ProWorkflow logo

ProWorkflow gotchas

High

Classic-to-Nexus schema divergence on Item financial fields

Medium

Custom Forms are HTML blobs with no structured schema

Medium

No public bulk API — migration throughput is UI-constrained

Low

Client/contractor access does not create billable seat records

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • ProWorkflow financial data has no Asana equivalent

    ProWorkflow Items (Time Allocated, Time Spent, Manual Completion %, Margin %), Invoices, and the financial forecasting suite do not have direct Asana counterparts. Asana has no native accounting, invoicing, margin tracking, or financial forecasting. We carry Item financial fields as custom fields on tasks and extract Invoice data as a structured JSON inventory document. The customer must select a separate accounting or financial tracking tool post-migration and import the invoice inventory there. Teams migrating from ProWorkflow without accounting for this gap will lose visibility into project profitability at cutover.

  • Nexus Item financial fields may calculate differently from Classic

    ProWorkflow's Nexus version (launched March 2025) changed how Item financial fields calculate, particularly Manual Completion % and Margin %. Forecast values that depended on these fields in Classic may differ from Nexus exports. We flag all Item records with non-default financial values during extraction and surface the discrepancy in a pre-migration review so the customer can decide whether to accept Nexus calculated values or adjust source data before export. Migrations sourced from Nexus that skip this review may produce financial summaries that do not match the customer's expectations.

  • No bulk API in ProWorkflow constrains migration throughput

    ProWorkflow does not publicly document a bulk export or batch API with rate limits. All migration reads go through the standard REST API with undocumented throttling. We pace extraction conservatively and chunk large projects into individual task-level calls to avoid triggering throttling responses. For organizations with more than 5,000 tasks, we schedule migration in off-peak hours and run a staged extraction over multiple days. This extends timeline estimates for large orgs and may require a longer cutover freeze window.

  • Custom Forms become plain text HTML in Asana

    ProWorkflow Custom Forms accept raw HTML injected into a Project page and have no structured schema. We extract the HTML as a text blob and cannot parse it into structured Asana custom fields. The destination workspace receives the HTML as plain text on a project-level field. Asana's native form builder (Starter tier and above) is the replacement, but form logic, conditional fields, and rendering are not preserved. We flag all Projects with Custom Form content during scoping and include the raw HTML in the migration handoff documentation.

  • Asana dependency date-shift bug can affect migrated timelines

    Asana has a documented bug where dependent tasks do not always shift to the correct date when the predecessor task is moved manually via drag-and-drop. The Asana support team has confirmed this issue affects complex timelines with dependency chains. Teams migrating from ProWorkflow with heavy use of task dependencies and milestone-linked schedules may encounter this bug post-migration. We document the bug and recommend Asana's Timeline view for dependency visualization rather than relying on automatic date cascading. This is an Asana product issue, not a migration defect.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful ProWorkflow to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and source org audit

    We audit the ProWorkflow source org across version (Classic vs Nexus), plan tier (Professional/Advanced/Enterprise), project count, task count, time entry volume, and financial record inventory (Items, Invoices, Project Templates). We identify all custom fields, custom forms, client and contractor records, and any non-default Item financial values. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with record counts, a list of records that cannot migrate functionally (invoices, forms, templates), and a Nexus financial-field flag report if applicable.

  2. Asana workspace setup and custom field provisioning

    We create the Asana destination workspace structure including team hierarchy, project folders, and portfolio grouping aligned with the ProWorkflow project layout. We provision all Asana custom fields upfront—single-select, multi-select, number, percentage, text, and date fields—matching the ProWorkflow custom field definitions. If the destination workspace is on Starter or below, we configure custom fields to replicate the time tracking data that would otherwise use Asana's native time tracking feature on Business and Enterprise.

  3. User reconciliation and seat mapping

    We extract every distinct ProWorkflow user (staff, contractor, client) by email and match against the Asana destination workspace. Staff users and contractors map to Asana workspace members; clients map to Asana members or guests depending on the destination tier. We flag the total seat count and the client/contractor breakdown so the customer understands the Asana billing impact. Any ProWorkflow user without a matching Asana account enters a reconciliation queue for the admin to provision.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into the Asana destination workspace using production-like data volume. The customer reviews a reconciliation report covering Projects in, Tasks in, Milestones in, Time Entries in, Tags in, and Custom Field values populated. We spot-check 20-30 records against the ProWorkflow source and correct any mapping errors before scheduling the production migration. Nexus financial field discrepancies are reviewed with the customer at this stage.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record order: Projects first, then Tasks with milestone flag set, then Subtasks, then Time Entries linked to tasks, then Tags. Custom Field values populate during task import. Custom Forms extract as HTML text blobs and attach to their parent project. Invoice data exports as a structured JSON inventory document delivered alongside the migration. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and template rebuild handoff

    We freeze ProWorkflow writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the Project Template handoff document, the Invoice inventory JSON, and the Custom Form HTML blobs to the customer's admin. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any record-linking or field-population issues. We do not rebuild ProWorkflow templates, workflows, or automations as functional Asana equivalents; the template rebuild is a manual admin task documented in the handoff.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

ProWorkflow logo

ProWorkflow

Source

Strengths

  • Native time tracking per task with no additional configuration or plugin required.
  • Project templates with pre-built milestones and tasks that duplicate across recurring engagements.
  • Free and unlimited client and contractor portal access on all tiers.
  • Integrated financial suite with margin forecasting and direct milestone-to-invoice conversion.
  • Per-staff-user pricing model that scales predictably as external collaborators do not count against the seat limit.

Weaknesses

  • Custom reporting is widely described as ambiguous to configure and difficult to interpret in output.
  • No publicly documented bulk API or rate limits, limiting automated migration throughput.
  • Gantt chart PDF export renders with formatting issues, reducing its utility for client-facing deliverables.
  • Classic-to-Nexus migration introduced data representation changes that require post-migration re-validation of financial fields.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across ProWorkflow and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    ProWorkflow: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    ProWorkflow doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your ProWorkflow to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about ProWorkflow to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ProWorkflow to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your ProWorkflow to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for organizations under 500 Projects and 5,000 Tasks with no large financial record inventory. Organizations with more than 5,000 Tasks, over 50,000 time entries, or a Nexus-source org with non-default Item financial fields extend to six to ten weeks because of extraction pacing, Nexus financial-field flagging, and template documentation scope. The migration runs in stages: discovery and audit (3-5 business days), sandbox migration and reconciliation (5-10 business days), production migration (1-3 days), and cutover validation (2-3 days).

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from ProWorkflow.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day