Project Management migration

Migrate from Work as Team to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Work as Team and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Work as Team logo

Work as Team

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

71%

10 of 14

objects map 1:1 between Work as Team and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Work as Team to Asana is a schema translation, not a simple record copy. Teamwork uses a two-layer List structure above Tasks that has no direct Asana equivalent — Lists do not map 1:1 to Sections or board columns. We resolve the structure gap during scoping, flattening List hierarchies into Asana Sections where they represent groupings, or into separate projects where they represent distinct workstreams. Milestones migrate as Tasks with a due date and a milestone-flag custom field. Time entries present a known gap: Asana has no native time-tracking object, so we preserve time data in custom fields and recommend a time-tracking integration (Harvest, Toggl) post-migration. Client permissions, client-facing portals, invoicing, and billing features do not migrate — these are Work as Team-specific capabilities with no Asana equivalent. We deliver a written inventory of all active Teamwork automations (called Rules) for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana Rules.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Work as Team logo

Work as Team

What's pushing teams away

  • List structure is Teamwork-specific and doesn't map 1:1 to standard PM tools, complicating migration to Asana, ClickUp, Monday, or Jira.
  • Per-user pricing scales steeply for large teams — Scale tier at $69.99/user/month is enterprise-grade pricing.
  • Engineering-team workflows lag specialist tools like Linear or Jira on Git integration, sprint velocity, and code-review hooks.
  • Real-time collaborative document editing is limited compared to integrated document platforms like Notion or Confluence.
  • Catalog name 'Work as Team' is ambiguous — confirm with the firm that they actually use Teamwork.com (the platform at teamwork.com) versus a similarly-named tool.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Work as Team objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Work as Team object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Work as Team

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team Projects map directly to Asana Projects. Project name, description, start date, and deadline migrate as-is. We map the Project privacy setting (internal vs client-facing) to Asana's project-level visibility and Guest-addition flag. If the Work as Team project has a company-linked client, we document the client contact for manual Guest addition post-migration.

Work as Team

List

maps to

Asana

Section or Project

1:many
Fully supported

Work as Team Lists present a structural gap: they are a first-class container layer above Tasks with no Asana equivalent. We evaluate each List during scoping. Lists that function as logical groupings within a project map to Asana Sections. Lists that represent distinct workstreams or deliverables with their own timelines map to separate Asana Projects under a Team-level folder. We flag the strategy per project during discovery and present it in the scope document before migration begins.

Work as Team

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team Tasks map to Asana Tasks with title, description (rich text), due date, start date, and priority preserved. Subtasks in Work as Team map to Asana Subtasks (one level only; grand-subtasks are flattened into a single subtask chain or promoted to sibling Tasks with a parent-link custom field). Task status in Work as Team (Not Started, In Progress, Waiting, Complete) maps to Asana task completion state (open vs completed).

Work as Team

Milestone

maps to

Asana

Task with Milestone custom field

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team Milestones have no direct Asana object. We create an Asana Task with the milestone name, the milestone due date, and a custom field Milestone (checkbox or text) set to True. The milestone task is added to the correct project. If Work as Team milestones have a description, we migrate it to the task description.

Work as Team

Task List (per-task)

maps to

Asana

Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team supports per-task checklists (individual items within a Task). These migrate to Asana Subtasks within the parent Task. Each checklist item becomes a subtask with the same title. Completion state maps directly. Checklist ordering is preserved by subtask sequence.

Work as Team

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Custom fields on Task

lossy
Fully supported

Asana has no native time-tracking object. We migrate Work as Team time entries as custom fields on the related Task: Time Logged (number field in hours), Billable (checkbox), and Time Entry Notes (text). This preserves the historical record but requires a third-party time-tracking integration (Harvest, Toggl, Clockify) for ongoing logging. We document the custom field schema and recommend an integration during handoff.

Work as Team

Task Dependency

maps to

Asana

Dependency

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team task dependencies (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Finish) map to Asana dependencies using the Asana Dependences app (formerly a third-party integration, now available natively on Advanced and Enterprise; we document the equivalent approach for Starter using the Relationships feature). Lag time in Work as Team maps to a custom Lag Days field on the dependency relationship.

Work as Team

File Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team file attachments migrate to Asana Attachments. We apply Asana's 100MB per-file limit during export: any Teamwork attachment exceeding 100MB is flagged for the customer to host externally (SharePoint, Google Drive, Dropbox) with the link stored in a custom URL field on the task. File metadata (filename, upload date, uploader) is preserved in the Asana Attachment record.

Work as Team

Team Member

maps to

Asana

Member (Workspace User)

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team workspace members map to Asana workspace members. We resolve by email match. Any Teamwork member without a matching Asana user is placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before production migration. Member role (Admin, Project Manager, Member, Guest) maps to Asana team-level permissions during project sharing.

Work as Team

Client Company

maps to

Asana

Guest or Organization Contact

lossy
Fully supported

Work as Team's client companies and their portal access have no direct Asana equivalent. We migrate client contacts as Asana Guests (Starter and above) with explicit project-level sharing rather than a portal. Client contact email, name, and company are preserved. We document each client's projects for manual Guest invitation post-migration.

Work as Team

Tag

maps to

Asana

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team tags migrate to Asana tags. Both platforms use a tag-as-label model. Tag names and colors migrate where color is supported in the export. Tags used across multiple projects in Teamwork become project-level tags in Asana if they were project-scoped, or global tags if they were workspace-scoped.

Work as Team

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team custom fields (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox, currency, user) map to Asana custom fields of the equivalent type. Dropdown options in Work as Team migrate to Asana enum options. We flag any custom field that references a Lookups to another entity (e.g., linking a Task to a Client) as a custom lookup field in Asana or as a text field with the reference value stored, depending on the target Asana plan.

Work as Team

Comment

maps to

Asana

Comment

1:1
Fully supported

Work as Team task comments migrate to Asana task comments. Comment body, author (resolved by email to Asana User), and timestamp migrate as-is. Mentions in Work as Team comments do not resolve in Asana and are migrated as plain text with the @username preserved in brackets for manual remediation.

Work as Team

Rule (Automation)

maps to

Asana

Rule (Asana Automation)

lossy
Fully supported

Work as Team automations (Rules) do not migrate as code. We audit every active Rule during discovery, document its trigger, conditions, and actions, and deliver a written inventory with a recommended Asana Rule equivalent. Asana's Rules engine uses a different trigger model (record-created, record-updated, date-arrived, form-submitted) from Teamwork's (action-based within project). The customer's admin rebuilds Rules in Asana Rules post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Work as Team logo

Work as Team gotchas

High

Task Lists are Teamwork-specific groupings

High

Client portal user access requires careful mapping

Medium

Time entries are tied to tasks and billing

Medium

Profitability and resource management data is tier-gated

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • List-to-Section mapping requires manual project-level decisions

    Work as Team Lists do not map 1:1 to Asana Sections. A List in Teamwork can function as a task group within a project (which maps to a Section) or as a distinct deliverable stream with its own timeline (which should become a separate Project in Asana). We evaluate each project's List structure during discovery and present a per-project mapping recommendation. Migrations that skip this step result in Asana projects with misaligned Sections that do not reflect the original work breakdown, or project structures that are too granular because every List became a project.

  • Time entries have no native landing in Asana

    Work as Team includes native time tracking, timesheets, billable rates, and time budgets as built-in features on all plans. Asana has no time-tracking object on any tier. We preserve time-entry data in custom fields on the migrated Tasks, but ongoing time logging requires a third-party integration (Harvest, Toggl, Clockify). If the customer's team relies on timesheet approval, capacity planning, or billable rate reporting from Work as Team, those workflows do not transfer. We recommend an integration setup during the post-migration handoff.

  • Client portal and permission model has no direct equivalent

    Work as Team's client-facing portal with granular per-project permissions, custom branding, and client-only views has no Asana equivalent. We migrate client contacts and their associated projects, then recreate access using Asana Guest accounts and per-project sharing settings. But the portal experience (custom domain, branded client dashboard, client-only task visibility) does not migrate. Customers relying on the portal for client collaboration need to either use Asana Guest sharing or adopt a different client-facing workflow.

  • CSV-based imports can misalign dropdown custom field values

    Asana's CSV importer has a documented bug where dropdown custom field values can be offset by one position during import, assigning the wrong value to tasks even when the preview shows the correct mapping. We avoid CSV import for custom field migrations and use the Asana API directly with explicit enum option matching by option GID rather than by label position. This adds development time but eliminates the offset risk. For teams using only the CSV importer, we recommend a spot-check audit of 50+ records after import to catch any misaligned values.

  • File attachments exceeding 100MB require external hosting

    Asana enforces a 100MB per-file attachment limit. Work as Team allows larger files. Any attachment in Teamwork exceeding 100MB is flagged during export, and we store the file in a customer-managed location (Google Drive, SharePoint, Dropbox) with the link in a custom URL field on the task. This is not data loss but does require the customer to have an existing file-hosting solution or to set one up during the migration window.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Work as Team to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and List-structure audit

    We audit the source Work as Team workspace across all projects, Lists, Tasks, subtasks, milestones, time entries, files, members, clients, tags, and custom fields. We run a Work as Team API export to capture all records in structured form (not CSV, to avoid the dropdown offset bug). We evaluate every project's List structure and classify each List as a Section candidate, a standalone project candidate, or a flatten-to-tasks candidate. We also audit active Rules (automations) for the rebuild inventory. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with a per-project List strategy, a custom field mapping table, and a Rules inventory.

  2. Asana workspace setup and schema pre-creation

    We create the Asana workspace structure before any data migration: Teams, Projects (mirroring the Work as Team project structure), Sections (based on the List strategy), custom fields (with types matched to Work as Team field types), and Tags. We set up the Milestone custom field on any project that contains Work as Team milestones. We configure Guest access settings for any client contacts that will be invited post-migration. Schema is validated in a staging Asana workspace before production migration begins.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a staging Asana workspace using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager or operations lead reconciles: project count and naming, task count per project, List-to-Section mapping correctness, milestone-flag presence, time-entry custom field population, and tag assignment. We resolve any mapping corrections before production migration. This step also serves as a training opportunity for the customer's team to review the Asana structure before cutover.

  4. File export and external hosting setup

    We export all Work as Team file attachments, flagging any file exceeding 100MB. For oversized files, we coordinate with the customer to establish an external hosting location (SharePoint, Google Drive, Dropbox) and generate share links. The links are stored in a custom URL field on the related Asana task during migration. Files under 100MB are uploaded directly to Asana attachments.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Team Members (validated against provisioning), Projects (created first), Sections (created within projects), Milestones (as Tasks with Milestone flag), Tasks (with parent subtasks, dependencies, and custom fields), Comments (linked to tasks), Tags, Time entries (as custom fields on tasks), and Files (under 100MB via API attachment; over 100MB via link in custom URL field). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. Rules are not migrated; we deliver the Rules inventory document for admin rebuild in Asana Rules.

  6. Cutover, validation, and handoff

    We freeze Work as Team write access during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We run a post-migration audit: project count, task count, subtask count, milestone count, time-entry field population rate, comment count, and attachment count. We deliver the Rules rebuild inventory, the time-tracking integration recommendation, the client-access setup guide, and a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Work as Team Rules as Asana Rules; that is a separate admin task documented during handoff.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Work as Team logo

Work as Team

Source

Strengths

  • Native time tracking integrated with tasks and billing.
  • Unlimited client portal users on Deliver and higher tiers.
  • Multiple project views (Gantt, table, board, calendar).
  • Tiered pricing from Free to Enterprise.
  • Resource management and profitability tracking on Scale tier.

Weaknesses

  • Teamwork-specific Task List structure complicates migration.
  • Per-user pricing scales steeply at higher tiers.
  • Engineering workflow lags specialist tools on Git integration.
  • Limited real-time collaborative document editing.
  • Catalog name 'Work as Team' is ambiguous and needs confirmation.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Work as Team and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    C

    Work as Team: Per-project and per-account limits documented in Teamwork's API docs; typically generous for normal usage but throttled on bulk operations..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Work as Team exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Work as Team to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Work as Team to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Work as Team to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Work as Team to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for workspaces under 10,000 Tasks and 50 Projects with straightforward List hierarchies. Migrations with deep List nesting across dozens of projects, milestone-heavy structures (over 500 milestones), large time-entry histories, or client-portal permission complexity move to six to ten weeks because of the List-to-Section flattening analysis, milestone-flag custom field work, and time-entry custom-field reconciliation.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Work as Team.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day