Project Management migration

Migrate from ProofHub to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between ProofHub and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

ProofHub logo

ProofHub

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

91%

10 of 11

objects map 1:1 between ProofHub and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from ProofHub to Microsoft Project is a structural migration from a cloud collaboration platform to a desktop-first and cloud-hybrid scheduling tool. ProofHub stores work as Projects containing Tasklists, Tasks, and Subtasks with flat unlimited-user pricing; Microsoft Project organizes work as Projects containing Summary Tasks, Tasks, and Milestones with per-user monthly licensing. The core task hierarchy maps 1:1, but ProofHub's built-in proofing markup, threaded discussions, chat, and notes have no native Microsoft Project equivalents and do not migrate as content. We export from ProofHub via CSV (Essential tier) or REST API (Ultimate Control tier), transform task relationships into predecessor-successor pairs, and reconstruct the Gantt dependency graph in the destination MPP or Project Online PWA. Workflows, custom automation rules, and proofing approval chains do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild. Microsoft Project Online (cloud/PWA) retires September 30, 2026, so cloud-destination migrations should target Project for the Web or Planner integration routes before that cutoff.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

ProofHub logo

ProofHub

What's pushing teams away

  • File management is difficult to sort and clean, with reviewers noting that large document libraries become disorganized over time.
  • The Essential plan caps projects at 40, pushing growing teams toward the Ultimate Control tier or an alternative platform sooner than expected.
  • Some users report the interface lacks full intuitiveness, requiring a non-trivial learning investment before the team reaches productivity.
  • Lack of advanced automation compared to tools like ClickUp or Monday.com drives teams with heavy workflow automation requirements to switch.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How ProofHub objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a ProofHub object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

ProofHub

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project

1:1
Fully supported

ProofHub Projects map 1:1 to Microsoft Project files (MPP) or Project Online project sites. We preserve project name, description, start date, and target end date. ProofHub's project-level custom fields migrate to Microsoft Project's built-in Project Summary fields or enterprise custom fields if using Project Online. Archived or completed ProofHub projects can be migrated as reference MPPs or kept in a closed-projects SharePoint library.

ProofHub

Tasklist

maps to

Microsoft Project

Summary Task

1:1
Fully supported

ProofHub Tasklists map to Microsoft Project Summary Tasks at the top level of the task hierarchy. The Tasklist name becomes the Summary Task name, and child Tasks inherit the Summary Task as their parent. Tasklist ordering is preserved via WBS sequence in the destination. If the customer uses nested Tasklists, we flatten the hierarchy to two levels (Summary Task + Tasks) because Microsoft Project does not natively support three-level summary nesting without custom WBS coding.

ProofHub

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

ProofHub Tasks map to Microsoft Project Tasks. We preserve task name, start date, finish date, duration (computed from start and finish), priority, and assignment (resource). Task description migrates to the Task Notes field. Status values (Not Started, In Progress, Completed) map to Microsoft Project's percent complete and status fields. Recurring task rules from ProofHub are stored as custom fields in the destination because Microsoft Project handles recurrence through its own recurring task dialog, not as metadata on the individual task.

ProofHub

Subtask

maps to

Microsoft Project

Subtask (Outline Level 2+)

1:1
Fully supported

ProofHub Subtasks map to Microsoft Project outline children of the parent Task. The parent-child relationship is preserved via the Task Hierarchy outline level. Subtask assignees migrate as Resource Assignments with units. If a Subtask has its own due date, we set a separate finish constraint in Microsoft Project to maintain the deadline signal. Subtasks without explicit start/due dates inherit from the parent Task.

ProofHub

Milestone

maps to

Microsoft Project

Milestone

1:1
Fully supported

ProofHub Milestones map to Microsoft Project Milestones (Tasks with zero duration). We preserve milestone name, due date, and any linked tasks. Milestones without a date are assigned the maximum finish date of their linked tasks. In Project Online, milestones appear in the project summary task row and in portfolio views.

ProofHub

Gantt Dependencies

maps to

Microsoft Project

Predecessor-Successor Links

1:1
Fully supported

ProofHub task dependencies (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Finish) map to Microsoft Project predecessor fields. We extract the dependency graph from ProofHub's task relationship exports, convert link types, and write predecessor-successor pairs into the destination MSP file. Lag time, lead time, and constraint types (Must Start On, As Late As Possible, etc.) do not export from ProofHub's standard CSV and are flagged as requiring manual review in the destination Gantt after migration.

ProofHub

Kanban Board

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Stage Field + Table/Grouping

lossy
Fully supported

ProofHub Kanban board columns represent task stages. We map each column to a Microsoft Project custom Text1 field labeled Stage. The board layout is preserved as a grouped table view (Group By Stage) that reconstructs the Kanban column feel in a flat task list. Stage names and card order do not map as a visual board because Microsoft Project has no native Kanban view. Customers can recreate a Power Automate flow to generate a Planner or SharePoint-based Kanban from the Stage field if a visual board is required.

ProofHub

Discussion

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Notes (converted)

1:1
Fully supported

ProofHub threaded Discussions attached to a Project or Task migrate as appended text in the Microsoft Project Task Notes field. Author name, timestamp, and message body concatenate into a structured text block. Thread nesting is flattened to a chronological list. There is no native discussion or chat feature in Microsoft Project desktop or Project Online PWA; the content survives as static notes but loses threading and reply notification capability.

ProofHub

Notes

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Notes or Project Summary Notes

1:1
Fully supported

Project-level and task-level Notes migrate to Microsoft Project's Notes field. Rich-text formatting in ProofHub Notes converts to plain text with hyperlinks preserved as URL text. Large Notes blocks are truncated at 4,000 characters per the Task Notes field limit and the remainder is flagged for a secondary document reference.

ProofHub

Time Entry

maps to

Microsoft Project

Assignment Work Field

1:1
Fully supported

ProofHub time entries (hours, date, user, task) map to Microsoft Project Assignment work values on the resource assignment row. We compute Assignment Work as hours × resource units and set Assignment Remaining Work for open entries. Billable/non-billable flags from ProofHub migrate to custom Assignment fields (Text1 = Billable/Non-Billable). ProofHub's timesheet approval status is not a Microsoft Project field and is flagged for manual re-approval in the destination system.

ProofHub

Custom Fields

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

ProofHub custom task and project fields map to Microsoft Project custom fields of matching type (Text, Number, Date, Flag). We pre-create the custom fields in the destination Project Online tenant or MPP template before import. Custom fields referencing other records (e.g., a custom Client field pointing to a Companies record) are de-normalized to the referenced record name as a text string because Microsoft Project custom fields do not support cross-object lookups.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

ProofHub logo

ProofHub gotchas

High

Essential plan project count cap is not obvious in onboarding

Medium

API access requires Ultimate Control plan upgrade

Medium

File version history and proofing annotations do not export cleanly

Low

Task dependencies export as plain-linked records without lag or lead times

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Proofing markup and approval decisions do not migrate

    ProofHub's built-in proofing module stores annotation coordinates, approval decisions, version chains, and reviewer comments against files. Microsoft Project has no proofing module and no equivalent object model for annotation markup. We export the latest file version and the proofing decision (Approved/Rejected) as a custom field flag on the related Task, but all annotation coordinates, version history, and approval chain content are lost. Teams that rely on ProofHub's proofing workflow for design review must re-establish the approval process in a separate tool (SharePoint approval flows, Adobe Acrobat, or a dedicated proofing platform) post-migration.

  • Essential plan export is CSV-only with no API access

    ProofHub's REST API is gated to the Ultimate Control plan at $89/month. Teams on the Essential plan ($45/month) cannot programmatically export data and must use CSV task export, manual file downloads, and browser-based screenshot capture for attachments. We advise upgrading to Ultimate Control before migration begins if the account has more than 500 records, attachments, or time entries to move. CSV exports from Essential do not include file attachment URLs, custom field values for subtasks, or dependency relationships in a single-pass format.

  • Kanban board visual layout has no direct equivalent

    ProofHub's Board view organizes tasks by custom stage columns with card-level details. Microsoft Project has no native Kanban view. We translate board columns to a custom Stage text field and generate a grouped Table view in the destination, but the visual card layout, drag-and-drop column behavior, and WIP limit enforcement do not carry over. Teams relying on Kanban for daily standups or sprint tracking should plan to use Microsoft Planner (included in many M365 licenses) alongside Project for visual task tracking, or configure a Power Automate flow to sync the Stage custom field to a Planner board.

  • Task dependency lag and lead times are lost

    ProofHub exports task predecessors and successors as plain-linked pairs without lag days, lead times, or constraint type data. Microsoft Project stores these as separate fields (Lag, Constraint Type, Constraint Date) on the predecessor link row. We preserve the dependency direction and task pair. Scheduling nuance—including finish-to-start links with negative lag (lead), start-to-start with offset, or tasks under a Must Start On constraint—requires manual review in the destination Gantt chart after migration. We flag all tasks with non-standard link types in the migration inventory.

  • Microsoft Project Online retires September 30, 2026

    Microsoft has announced that Project Online (the PWA cloud variant) retires on September 30, 2026, with new customer sales ended October 1, 2025. If the destination is Project Online PWA, the migration should target Project for the Web (Planner-integrated cloud) or a hybrid MPP-plus-SharePoint model to avoid a second migration within 24 months. We confirm the destination variant during scoping and adjust the import route accordingly.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful ProofHub to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Discovery and export route selection

    We audit the source ProofHub account for plan tier (Essential or Ultimate Control), project count, task and subtask volume, attachment file count and total size, time entry count, custom field definitions, dependency relationship count, and Kanban board column names. If the account is on Essential, we recommend an Ultimate Control trial or temporary upgrade for API export access. We confirm the destination variant (desktop MPP, Project Online PWA, or Project for the Web) and map the import route accordingly. The discovery output is a written scope document with record counts per object and a migration schedule.

  2. Schema design and custom field pre-creation

    We pre-create all custom fields in the destination Microsoft Project environment before any data import. For Project Online, we provision enterprise custom fields via the PWA settings or CSOM API. For desktop MPP destinations, we configure custom fields in the MPP template file before import. We define the Stage custom field for Kanban mapping, Billable/Non-Billable flags for time entry data, and any customer-specific custom fields (Client, Region, Contract Type). We also configure the WBS code mask if the customer uses WBS-based project numbering.

  3. Export, transformation, and sandbox validation

    For Ultimate Control accounts, we pull Projects, Tasklists, Tasks, Subtasks, Milestones, Time Entries, and Custom Fields via the ProofHub REST API. For Essential accounts, we generate multi-pass CSV exports covering the same object set. We transform the export into Microsoft Project-compatible format (MPP XML or CSV with column mapping for Project Import Wizard). Dependencies are reconstructed as predecessor-successor links. A test import runs against a sandbox MPP file or a trial Project Online tenant; the customer spot-checks 20-30 tasks for accuracy before production migration begins.

  4. File and proofing export

    We download all files attached to ProofHub Projects, Tasks, and Discussions as a structured zip archive organized by Project and Task. File version chains and proofing markup annotations are captured as a separate manifest documenting the version history, approval status, and annotation count per file. We attach the latest file version to the corresponding Task in the destination via SharePoint document library linking (for Project Online) or as a local file reference in the MPP. The proofing decision (Approved/Rejected) is written to a custom Stage or Text field on the Task.

  5. Production import and dependency validation

    We import the transformed project data into the production Microsoft Project environment. For Project Online, we use the PWA CSOM API or Project Import Wizard with the XML map. For desktop MPP, we use the MSP Import Wizard or direct XML merge. We validate the dependency graph by spot-checking 25 tasks for correct predecessor links, confirming milestone dates match the max finish of linked tasks, and verifying time entry hours aggregate correctly per task. The customer reviews the imported Gantt in edit mode before marking as baseline.

  6. Cutover, baseline, and workflow rebuild inventory

    We set the Microsoft Project baseline after cutover to capture the migrated schedule as the comparison reference point. We deliver a written Workflow and Automation Inventory listing every ProofHub custom workflow, rule, and Kanban WIP limit requiring rebuild in the destination. We do not rebuild workflows in Microsoft Project; that work is handled by the customer's admin using Power Automate or Project Online scheduling rules. We support a five-business-day post-migration window for reconciliation questions before closing the engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

ProofHub logo

ProofHub

Source

Strengths

  • Flat-rate unlimited-users pricing across all tiers with no per-seat penalties.
  • Built-in proofing, markup, and approval tools eliminate the need for a separate design review application.
  • Multiple views—Gantt, Table, Board/Kanban, and Calendar—ship in-core without add-ons.
  • Native CSV import/export for tasks and direct import bridges from Asana and Basecamp.
  • Centralized collaboration (discussions, chat, notes, files) reduces reliance on external communication tools.

Weaknesses

  • File management and organization become difficult at scale, with no built-in cleanup or bulk-sort utilities.
  • Essential plan limits projects to 40, constraining larger teams or those managing multiple simultaneous programs.
  • Limited advanced automation features compared to platforms like ClickUp or Monday.com.
  • API access is gated to Ultimate Control plan, restricting programmatic data access for teams on the lower tier.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across ProofHub and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    ProofHub: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    ProofHub doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your ProofHub to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about ProofHub to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ProofHub to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your ProofHub to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Simple migrations with up to 10 projects, 2,000 tasks, and a CSV export route complete in three to five weeks. Migrations with API-driven export, more than 15 projects, complex cross-task dependencies, time entry reconstruction, and a Project Online cloud destination require six to twelve weeks. The Essential-plan CSV-only export adds two to three days of manual scoping work compared to an API-driven export on Ultimate Control.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from ProofHub.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day