Project Management migration

Migrate from Allfred to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Allfred and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

Allfred logo

Allfred

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

50%

5 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Allfred and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Allfred and Microsoft Project serve different project management paradigms. Allfred is an agency operations platform built around Kanban boards, Client-Brand hierarchies, and Contractor assignment tracking. Microsoft Project is an enterprise scheduling tool built around Gantt charts, critical path analysis, and formal resource leveling. These architectural differences shape every aspect of the migration. Allfred has no published API, so we work from the Settings → Account → Data Export bundle, which we request as close to migration start as possible to capture the freshest snapshot. We transform Kanban column structure into task groupings or custom fields in Microsoft Project, merge Allfred's distinct Client and Brand entities into summary tasks or custom fields on project tasks, and resolve the Contractor-to-Resource mapping with a custom cost rate lookup. We do not migrate Allfred's automations or Kanban board configurations as code; we deliver a written map of both for the customer's PMO admin to rebuild in Microsoft Project.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Allfred logo

Allfred

What's pushing teams away

  • Occasional loading delays during platform updates frustrate teams during active project work when seconds matter
  • Limited third-party integrations outside SharePoint forces agencies to rebuild workflows or abandon tools they already rely on
  • Smaller ecosystem and community compared to established PM platforms like Monday.com or Asana means fewer pre-built templates and workflow recipes
  • Onboarding takes days to weeks depending on team size, which can feel slow for smaller agencies wanting immediate access
  • G2 rating of 4.7 with only 53 reviews suggests a relatively small customer base, making peer references and case studies harder to find

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How Allfred objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a Allfred object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Allfred

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Allfred Projects map directly to Microsoft Project project files or Project Online project records. We extract project name, description, status, start date, finish date, and assigned team members. Allfred's project-level custom fields migrate to Microsoft Project custom fields (Text1-30, Number1-20, Flag1-20) that we configure during the destination schema setup phase. Microsoft Project's project summary task is used as the equivalent of Allfred's project-level overview.

Allfred

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Allfred Tasks map to Microsoft Project Tasks with Name, Start, Finish, Duration, Priority, and Notes preserved. Subtasks in Allfred become child Summary Tasks in Microsoft Project with their own subtasks nested beneath. Task hierarchy is preserved through the parent_id references in the Allfred export. We flag any Allfred tasks that reference milestone-like behavior (zero duration markers) and map them to Microsoft Project milestone tasks.

Allfred

Client

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Field or Summary Row

lossy
Fully supported

Allfred's distinct Client object has no direct Microsoft Project equivalent. We map Clients to a custom text field (ClientName__c) on project tasks, or we create a Client-level summary task at the top of the project plan as a grouping row. The customer chooses the strategy during scoping. Client contact information (name, email, phone) migrates to the project summary task notes or a custom ContactInfo__c field.

Allfred

Brand

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Allfred Brands sit under Clients and store brand name, logo, and brand guidelines. Since Microsoft Project does not have a Brand entity, we map Brands to a custom text field (Brand__c) on the relevant tasks. If the customer manages multiple brands per project, we configure Brand as a multi-select custom field or as separate task groupings under the project plan. The Allfred Brand-to-Client relationship is preserved by linking tasks to the Client-level summary row.

Allfred

Contractor

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource

1:many
Fully supported

Allfred Contractors store name, contact details, and hourly rate. Microsoft Project Resources store name, type (Material or Work), standard rate, overtime rate, and calendar. We map each Contractor to a Resource with the Allfred hourly rate set as the Standard Rate. If Contractors have varying rates per project, we create a Resource custom field (ContractorRate__c) and document the per-project rate assignments for manual entry post-migration. Allfred's Contractor assignment history on tasks maps to Resource Assignments in Microsoft Project with Units and Work values calculated from task duration.

Allfred

Kanban Board

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Groups or Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Allfred Kanban boards expose column names, column order, and task-to-column assignments via the data export. Microsoft Project has no native Kanban representation. We transform the Kanban structure into task groupings (using outline levels or summary tasks per column) or into a custom Text field (KanbanColumn__c) that preserves the original column assignment on each task. The customer selects the preferred representation during scoping. WIP limits from Kanban columns cannot be enforced in Microsoft Project and are documented as a PMO process note.

Allfred

Team Member

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource (Work type)

1:1
Fully supported

Allfred Team Members (internal staff) map to Microsoft Project Work-type Resources with the team member's name, email, and role preserved. We resolve Team Members by email against the Allfred export and create Resource records with Default Booking Type set to Committed. If a Team Member is also listed as a Contractor in Allfred, we create a single Resource record and flag it for the customer to set the appropriate cost rate.

Allfred

Custom Fields

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Fields (Text, Number, Date, Flag)

lossy
Mapping required

Allfred allows per-project custom fields without a global schema, meaning the same logical field may exist with different names or types across projects. We extract all custom field definitions during discovery, deduplicate them by logical name and type, and map them to Microsoft Project's fixed custom field slots (Text1-30, Number1-20, Date1-10, Flag1-20, OutlineCode1-10). Customers review and approve the per-project field map before we proceed, as mismatched field types cause data loss or validation errors in Microsoft Project.

Allfred

File Attachments

maps to

Microsoft Project

Document URLs or SharePoint Integration

1:1
Mapping required

Allfred's unlimited file storage with 2GB per-file limit means large creative assets may exist. We export file attachment URLs as-is. For files stored via Allfred's SharePoint integration, we preserve the SharePoint URL references. Microsoft Project (desktop) does not host files natively; Project Online uses SharePoint document libraries. We migrate SharePoint URLs as hyperlinks in task notes or as a document library link on the project summary task. Files exceeding typical SharePoint upload limits (250MB) are flagged for manual re-upload via SharePoint's native tools.

Allfred

Settings and Preferences

maps to

Microsoft Project

Documentation Only

1:1
Mapping required

Allfred exports workspace configuration, notification preferences, and integrations as JSON. We extract these for documentation purposes but do not import them into Microsoft Project, which has a different settings model. We deliver a written settings inventory covering Allfred notification rules, integration endpoints, and workspace preferences that the customer's admin uses to configure equivalent settings in Microsoft Project and the surrounding Microsoft 365 environment.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Allfred logo

Allfred gotchas

High

No publicly documented API for bulk data export

Medium

Custom fields have no fixed global schema

Medium

SharePoint integration files export as URL references only

Low

Loading delays during platform updates cause brief outages

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Allfred has no API; we work from a manual data export bundle

    Allfred does not publish a REST or GraphQL API for programmatic data access. All migration source data comes from Settings → Account → Data Export, which is a manual download initiated by the customer. The export captures a point-in-time snapshot; any records created or modified after the export are not included. We request a fresh export immediately before migration scoping to minimize stale data risk. Customers must ensure the exporting user has full data access in Allfred so that all project, task, and client records are included in the bundle. If the export is missing records due to access restrictions, we flag the gap and request a re-export before proceeding.

  • Kanban board structure requires manual PMO interpretation in Microsoft Project

    Allfred Kanban boards use columns like To Do, In Progress, Review, Done with task-to-column assignments stored in the export. Microsoft Project has no native Kanban representation. We transform the column assignments into a custom text field on each task, but the WIP limits, column-level permissions, and visual Kanban workflow that teams rely on in Allfred are lost. We document the original Kanban structure in the migration deliverable and recommend the customer rebuild Kanban-style task board views using Microsoft Planner (part of Microsoft 365) for day-to-day task management while using Microsoft Project for formal schedule management.

  • Per-project custom field schema requires customer review before import

    Allfred allows custom fields to be created independently per project without enforcing a global schema. The same logical field (e.g., Client Budget) may appear as a Number field in one project and as a Text field in another. We extract all custom field definitions, deduplicate by logical name, and propose a unified field type mapping. The customer must review and approve the mapping before we proceed, as Microsoft Project's custom field types are fixed at creation. If a field type mismatch exists across projects, we split it into separate custom fields (e.g., ClientBudget_Number__c and ClientBudget_Text__c) and document the split.

  • Contractor hourly rates map to Resources but do not auto-calculate task cost

    Allfred Contractors store a single hourly rate per contractor. In Microsoft Project, Resources store Standard Rate, Overtime Rate, Per Use Cost, and Cost accumulator. We map the Allfred hourly rate to the Resource Standard Rate. However, Microsoft Project calculates task cost based on Work multiplied by the Resource rate (Work = Duration × Units). If Allfred task duration is stored as a simple date range rather than a duration with hours, the Work value in Microsoft Project may not reflect the actual contractor spend. We flag any Allfred tasks where the Contractor hours worked is stored separately and recommend the customer enter actual work values manually post-migration or use Microsoft Project's Resource Usage view to reconcile.

  • Allfred automations and workflows do not migrate

    Allfred's automation features (task triggers, notification rules, Kanban column rules) are Allfred-native and have no equivalent in Microsoft Project's desktop or Project Online products. Microsoft Project Online uses Power Automate for workflow automation, but Power Automate workflows must be rebuilt from scratch with different triggers, connectors, and logic. We do not migrate automations as code. We deliver a written inventory of every Allfred automation with its trigger conditions, actions, and notification settings, along with a recommended Power Automate equivalent. The customer's admin rebuilds these post-migration. This is a common source of expectation gaps in agency-to-enterprise PM migrations.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Allfred to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Discovery and data export

    We audit the Allfred account across all active projects, tasks, subtasks, clients, brands, contractors, team members, and Kanban board structures. We review per-project custom field definitions and identify any SharePoint-linked files. We then request a fresh data export from Settings → Account → Data Export, initiated by the customer, capturing the most recent point-in-time snapshot. We verify the export is complete by spot-checking record counts against the in-platform view. Any missing records trigger a re-export with elevated access before migration scoping proceeds.

  2. Kanban structure mapping and Gantt strategy

    We analyze the Allfred Kanban board exports across all projects, documenting column names, column order, WIP limits, and task-to-column assignments. We present the customer with three migration options: (1) custom text field per task storing the original column, (2) outline-level grouping per column as summary tasks, or (3) a combination. The choice affects how many custom field slots are consumed and how the project plan looks in Microsoft Project. We also assess whether any Allfred Kanban boards represent sequential workflows that should be converted to predecessor/successor dependencies in Microsoft Project.

  3. Custom field reconciliation and schema design

    We extract all Allfred custom field definitions from every project, deduplicate by logical name and data type, and propose a unified mapping to Microsoft Project's fixed custom field slots (Text1-30, Number1-20, Date1-10, Flag1-20). The customer reviews the mapping document and approves or adjusts field type assignments. We configure the approved custom fields in Microsoft Project or Project Online before any data import. Any custom fields that cannot be mapped due to type conflicts are flagged and split into separate fields with a naming convention that preserves the logical relationship.

  4. Resource and contractor reconciliation

    We extract all Allfred Contractors and Team Members and match them by name. Contractors with hourly rates map to Microsoft Project Resources with Standard Rate set. Team Members map to Work-type Resources with Default Booking Type set to Committed. Any Allfred contractor without an hourly rate is flagged for the customer to provide the rate before Resource import. We verify that the total number of Resources does not exceed the customer's Project Plan licensing tier limits (Project Plan 1 allows up to 250 resources; Plan 3 and Plan 5 have higher limits).

  5. Project and task import in dependency order

    We import data in the correct dependency order: Resources first (so assignment lookups are satisfied), then Projects (as project files or Project Online project records), then Tasks (in hierarchy order preserving parent-child relationships), then Custom Field values (per the approved mapping). For each project, we apply the Kanban column mapping chosen in step 2. Client and Brand associations are written to custom fields on tasks. File attachment URLs are preserved in task notes or as SharePoint document links. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. We run the import into a test project first to validate custom field rendering before processing all projects.

  6. Cutover, delta reconciliation, and automation handoff

    We freeze writes in Allfred during the cutover window, run a final delta import of any records modified after the last full export, then deliver the migration package to the customer. We deliver the automation inventory document covering Allfred automations, notification rules, and Kanban board configurations with recommended Power Automate equivalents. We do not rebuild automations inside the migration scope. We support a one-week post-cutover window for reconciliation of any data issues reported by the PMO team. We do not provide post-migration admin training, Microsoft Project coaching, or workflow rebuild as standard scope; these are separate engagements.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Allfred logo

Allfred

Source

Strengths

  • Unlimited file storage removes storage anxiety for creative and media-heavy agency teams
  • SharePoint integration lets Microsoft 365 shops keep files in their existing ecosystem
  • Step-by-step onboarding with hands-on data import reduces setup friction for new teams
  • 24/7 support ensures distributed teams across time zones get timely assistance
  • 4.7 rating on G2 from 53 reviews indicates generally satisfied customers despite loading delay complaints

Weaknesses

  • Only 53 G2 reviews suggests a relatively small and unproven customer base compared to established PM platforms
  • Limited third-party integrations beyond SharePoint requires workarounds or abandoned tools for complex tech stacks
  • Occasional loading delays during updates disrupt active work sessions
  • No publicly documented API for programmatic data access limits automation possibilities
  • Onboarding takes days to weeks depending on team size, slower than self-serve alternatives
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Allfred and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Allfred: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Allfred doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Allfred to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Allfred to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Allfred to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Allfred to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 20 projects and 5,000 tasks with a straightforward Kanban structure and consistent custom field definitions. Migrations with per-project custom fields spanning multiple schema definitions, Contractor records requiring Resource pool population, or large file attachment libraries move to six to ten weeks because of custom field mapping review, Resource reconciliation, and SharePoint URL resolution. The Allfred manual export step adds one to three days to the timeline since it requires the customer's action and cannot be automated.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Allfred.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day