Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Resource Management by Smartsheet and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
8 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Resource Management by Smartsheet and Asana.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
4-6 weeks
Overview
Moving from Resource Management by Smartsheet to Asana is a schema re-platforming from a spreadsheet-rooted work management model to a task-centric collaboration platform. Resource Management by Smartsheet organizes work in Sheets with a separate Resource Management module for people allocation, portfolio-level capacity views, and phase scheduling. Asana uses Projects as the primary container with Tasks, Subtasks, Sections, and native workload management; there is no direct Phase object, so Resource Management Phases map to milestones or parent-task groupings depending on project structure. Allocation hours and percentage assignments from Resource Management transfer into Asana custom numeric fields on tasks, since Asana lacks a native resource allocation model. We export time entries via the Resource Management Reports CSV during discovery before the one-week lockout closes. Automation rules (alerts, reminders, approval workflows) do not migrate; we deliver an automation audit log with Asana Rules equivalents. Attachments are excluded from Smartsheet's export paths and require separate download via Smartsheet Backup.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Resource Management by Smartsheet object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Sheet (Project)
Asana
Project
1:1Smartsheet Sheets map to Asana Projects as the primary work container. The sheet name becomes the project name, and sheet-level custom columns map to project-level custom fields in Asana. Dependencies between rows (predecessor/successor) map to Asana dependency relationships (Waiting on / Blocking) if the project uses the dependencies feature, or are reconstructed as dependency tasks if not. We validate that the Asana workspace and team are configured before project import begins.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Row (Task)
Asana
Task
1:1Smartsheet rows map to Asana tasks. The row name becomes the task name, row description maps to task description, and due date maps to the task due date. Row-level custom columns (text, number, date, dropdown) map to Asana custom fields scoped to the project. Row status (checked/unchecked) maps to Asana task completion. Dependencies (predecessor links) map to Asana dependencies (Blocking/Waiting On) if enabled on the Asana project.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Phase
Asana
Milestone or Parent Task Grouping
1:manySmartsheet Phases are hierarchical groupings within a Resource Plan with start and end dates. Asana does not have a native Phase object. We map phases to Asana milestones (if the phase marks a key deliverable) or to parent tasks with subtasks (if the phase contains sub-tasks). The mapping choice is made during scoping based on how the customer uses phases in Resource Management. Phase dates become milestone due dates or parent task start/end dates.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Resource Plan
Asana
Project Custom Fields (allocation)
1:manySmartsheet Resource Plans aggregate allocation data across multiple projects and people. Each Resource Plan maps to a set of Asana custom numeric fields on the related projects, storing allocation percentage, hours-per-day, or fixed hours per assignee per phase. We extract allocation records from the Resource Management API, pivot them by person and project, and write them as task-level or project-level custom fields. Asana's Workload view then consumes these custom fields for capacity visualization.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
People (Resource)
Asana
Team Member (Asana user)
1:1Resource Management People records (name, email, role, availability, allocation) map to Asana workspace members. We extract people from the Resource Management API and match by email against the destination Asana workspace members. Unmatched people are held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to invite before import proceeds. Role and availability data map to Asana custom fields (text and percentage respectively) on the user profile or project.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Assignment (allocation record)
Asana
Task assignee + custom allocation field
lossyResource Management assignment records link a person to a phase or task with an allocation mode (percent, hours_per_day, fixed hours) and duration. We map the assignee to the Asana task assignee field, and store the allocation value in a custom numeric field on the task. The allocation mode (percent vs hours) is preserved as a label in the custom field description. This preserves the allocation data for Workload view consumption without requiring a third-party resource management integration.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Portfolio
Asana
Portfolio
1:1Smartsheet Portfolios aggregate multiple Resource Plans and show capacity, timeline, and utilization across the organization. Asana Portfolios provide a similar cross-project overview with status, progress, and custom fields. We export the portfolio's project list and summary metrics from Resource Management and create corresponding Asana Portfolios with the same project membership. Portfolio-level capacity and utilization numbers are not native to Asana and are documented as manual inputs post-migration.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Time Entry
Asana
Task custom fields or subtask
1:1Resource Management time entries record hours logged against tasks or phases. The native timer locks entries after one week, making it critical to export via Reports CSV during discovery. We map time entries to a custom number field (hours logged) on the relevant Asana task, or create a time-logging subtask if the customer requires granular entry history. Entries that were already locked before discovery are noted as unrecoverable in the scoping document.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Custom Column/Field
Asana
Custom Field
1:1Smartsheet column types (Text, Number, Date, Contact List, Dropdown, Checkbox, Symbol) map to Asana custom field types of the corresponding type. Contact List columns map to Asana person-type custom fields. Dropdown and Symbol columns map to Asana enum (multi-select or single-select) custom fields. We preserve column type metadata and option lists during transformation. Required-column constraints in Smartsheet do not automatically replicate in Asana and are flagged for manual configuration post-migration.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Comment / Discussion
Asana
Task Stories / Comments
1:1Smartsheet row-level Discussions map to Asana task stories (the activity feed) as comment entries. We export discussion text, author, and timestamp from the Smartsheet API and write them as Asana stories with the author attributed to the matching Asana workspace member. Rich-text formatting in Smartsheet comments is simplified to plain text for Asana compatibility.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Report
Asana
Manual reconstruction
lossySmartsheet Reports aggregate data across multiple sheets and support filtered or computed views. Asana does not have a native reporting layer beyond Portfolio dashboards. We export report data as-is to CSV during discovery and deliver it as a reference document for the customer to rebuild as Asana Portfolios, Google Sheets summaries, or a BI tool connection. Complex computed reports with cross-sheet formulas do not have a direct Asana equivalent.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Automation Rule
Asana
Manual rebuild in Asana Rules
1:1Smartsheet automation rules (alerts, reminders, approval workflows, conditional formatting triggers) are not exposed via the Resource Management or Smartsheet REST API. We cannot migrate them programmatically. During discovery, we log every automation found and deliver an automation audit log with each rule's trigger, conditions, and actions documented alongside a recommended Asana Rules equivalent. The customer's admin rebuilds these in Asana Rules (Premium and above) post-migration.
| Resource Management by Smartsheet | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sheet (Project) | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Row (Task) | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Phase | Milestone or Parent Task Grouping1:many | Fully supported | |
| Resource Plan | Project Custom Fields (allocation)1:many | Fully supported | |
| People (Resource) | Team Member (Asana user)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Assignment (allocation record) | Task assignee + custom allocation fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Portfolio | Portfolio1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Time Entry | Task custom fields or subtask1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Column/Field | Custom Field1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comment / Discussion | Task Stories / Comments1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Report | Manual reconstructionlossy | Fully supported | |
| Automation Rule | Manual rebuild in Asana Rules1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Resource Management by Smartsheet gotchas
API access is gated behind Business/Enterprise plans
Automation rules cannot be migrated programmatically
Time entries lock after one week in Resource Management
Rate limit of 300 req/min on main API, 120 req/min on Resource Management API
Attachments and Groupings are excluded from all export paths
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and plan tier verification
We audit the source Resource Management account to confirm the plan tier (Business or Enterprise required for API access), enumerate all Resource Plans, Projects (Sheets), Phases, People, Assignments, and time entries. We export existing time entries via Reports CSV before the one-week lockout closes. We log every automation rule found in the source sheets and document them for the automation audit log. We inventory custom column types, dependency relationships, and attachment locations. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with record counts, allocation mapping design, and a risk register.
Allocation mapping design and Asana workspace setup
We design the allocation mapping strategy during a working session with the customer's admin. This covers how Resource Plan allocation records (percent, hours_per_day, fixed) map to Asana custom numeric fields, how phases map to milestones or parent-task groupings, and how people match to Asana workspace members. We create the Asana projects with correct team assignment, enable dependencies and milestones on each project, and define the custom field schema before any data import. This schema deploys into the production Asana workspace first.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into an Asana sandbox workspace (or a parallel non-production team) using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager and resource manager reconcile project structures, task counts, assignment accuracy, and allocation field values against the source Resource Management data. They spot-check 25-50 records per object type and sign off the mapping before production migration begins. Any mapping corrections—particularly around phase representation and allocation field naming—happen here.
People and assignment import with allocation data
We import Resource Management People records as Asana workspace members (matched by email) and store role and availability in Asana custom fields on the user's profile or on project-level fields. We then import task assignments by resolving the Resource Management assignment records: the assignee maps to the Asana task assignee field, and the allocation value (hours or percentage) writes to the custom allocation field we designed in step two. Assignment import runs after member provisioning and before task import so that assignee resolution succeeds on the first pass.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: workspace members (validated), projects (from Resource Management sheets), tasks (from sheet rows with dependency relationships preserved), milestones (from Resource Management phases), custom field values (from resource allocation records), time entry summaries (from the pre-exported Reports CSV), and comments (from Smartsheet Discussions). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We use Asana's bulk task creation endpoints with rate-limit handling (1,500 req/min on Business and Enterprise tiers) and exponential backoff.
Cutover, validation, and automation handoff
We freeze Resource Management writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then designate Asana as the system of record. We deliver the automation audit log listing every Smartsheet automation rule with its trigger, conditions, actions, and a recommended Asana Rules equivalent. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Smartsheet automation rules in Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that work is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.
Platform deep dives
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Resource Management by Smartsheet and Asana.
Object compatibility
1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Resource Management by Smartsheet: 300 requests/min per token on main Smartsheet API; 120 requests/min on Resource Management API.
Data volume sensitivity
Resource Management by Smartsheet exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Resource Management by Smartsheet to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Resource Management by Smartsheet to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Resource Management by Smartsheet
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.