Project Management migration

Migrate from Resource Management by Smartsheet to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Resource Management by Smartsheet and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Resource Management by Smartsheet logo

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Resource Management by Smartsheet and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Resource Management by Smartsheet to Asana is a schema re-platforming from a spreadsheet-rooted work management model to a task-centric collaboration platform. Resource Management by Smartsheet organizes work in Sheets with a separate Resource Management module for people allocation, portfolio-level capacity views, and phase scheduling. Asana uses Projects as the primary container with Tasks, Subtasks, Sections, and native workload management; there is no direct Phase object, so Resource Management Phases map to milestones or parent-task groupings depending on project structure. Allocation hours and percentage assignments from Resource Management transfer into Asana custom numeric fields on tasks, since Asana lacks a native resource allocation model. We export time entries via the Resource Management Reports CSV during discovery before the one-week lockout closes. Automation rules (alerts, reminders, approval workflows) do not migrate; we deliver an automation audit log with Asana Rules equivalents. Attachments are excluded from Smartsheet's export paths and require separate download via Smartsheet Backup.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Resource Management by Smartsheet logo

Resource Management by Smartsheet

What's pushing teams away

  • Project/role-level resourcing only — independent reviewers note the tool 'is not as strong when you need detailed task-level resourcing or highly complex dependency management', so professional-services-automation buyers often migrate to Kantata or Mavenlink.
  • No native mobile app — field-heavy teams and PMs who travel cite this as a recurring complaint on Software Advice and Research.com.
  • Time-entry adoption is hit-or-miss — utilization data becomes unreliable when staff don't log time consistently, undermining the very forecasts the platform is purchased to produce.
  • Steep learning curve and complex interface for the wide feature set — managing large teams or many concurrent projects becomes inefficient, pushing teams toward simpler resource tools like Float, Runn, or monday Work Management.
  • Cost ceiling — the Resource Management add-on is gated behind higher Smartsheet tiers, with per-user pricing and premium-feature gating making TCO 'a bit steep' (Research.com), particularly for teams that don't otherwise use Smartsheet.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Resource Management by Smartsheet objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Resource Management by Smartsheet object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Sheet (Project)

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet Sheets map to Asana Projects as the primary work container. The sheet name becomes the project name, and sheet-level custom columns map to project-level custom fields in Asana. Dependencies between rows (predecessor/successor) map to Asana dependency relationships (Waiting on / Blocking) if the project uses the dependencies feature, or are reconstructed as dependency tasks if not. We validate that the Asana workspace and team are configured before project import begins.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Row (Task)

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet rows map to Asana tasks. The row name becomes the task name, row description maps to task description, and due date maps to the task due date. Row-level custom columns (text, number, date, dropdown) map to Asana custom fields scoped to the project. Row status (checked/unchecked) maps to Asana task completion. Dependencies (predecessor links) map to Asana dependencies (Blocking/Waiting On) if enabled on the Asana project.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Phase

maps to

Asana

Milestone or Parent Task Grouping

1:many
Fully supported

Smartsheet Phases are hierarchical groupings within a Resource Plan with start and end dates. Asana does not have a native Phase object. We map phases to Asana milestones (if the phase marks a key deliverable) or to parent tasks with subtasks (if the phase contains sub-tasks). The mapping choice is made during scoping based on how the customer uses phases in Resource Management. Phase dates become milestone due dates or parent task start/end dates.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Resource Plan

maps to

Asana

Project Custom Fields (allocation)

1:many
Fully supported

Smartsheet Resource Plans aggregate allocation data across multiple projects and people. Each Resource Plan maps to a set of Asana custom numeric fields on the related projects, storing allocation percentage, hours-per-day, or fixed hours per assignee per phase. We extract allocation records from the Resource Management API, pivot them by person and project, and write them as task-level or project-level custom fields. Asana's Workload view then consumes these custom fields for capacity visualization.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

People (Resource)

maps to

Asana

Team Member (Asana user)

1:1
Fully supported

Resource Management People records (name, email, role, availability, allocation) map to Asana workspace members. We extract people from the Resource Management API and match by email against the destination Asana workspace members. Unmatched people are held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to invite before import proceeds. Role and availability data map to Asana custom fields (text and percentage respectively) on the user profile or project.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Assignment (allocation record)

maps to

Asana

Task assignee + custom allocation field

lossy
Fully supported

Resource Management assignment records link a person to a phase or task with an allocation mode (percent, hours_per_day, fixed hours) and duration. We map the assignee to the Asana task assignee field, and store the allocation value in a custom numeric field on the task. The allocation mode (percent vs hours) is preserved as a label in the custom field description. This preserves the allocation data for Workload view consumption without requiring a third-party resource management integration.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Portfolio

maps to

Asana

Portfolio

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet Portfolios aggregate multiple Resource Plans and show capacity, timeline, and utilization across the organization. Asana Portfolios provide a similar cross-project overview with status, progress, and custom fields. We export the portfolio's project list and summary metrics from Resource Management and create corresponding Asana Portfolios with the same project membership. Portfolio-level capacity and utilization numbers are not native to Asana and are documented as manual inputs post-migration.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Task custom fields or subtask

1:1
Fully supported

Resource Management time entries record hours logged against tasks or phases. The native timer locks entries after one week, making it critical to export via Reports CSV during discovery. We map time entries to a custom number field (hours logged) on the relevant Asana task, or create a time-logging subtask if the customer requires granular entry history. Entries that were already locked before discovery are noted as unrecoverable in the scoping document.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Custom Column/Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet column types (Text, Number, Date, Contact List, Dropdown, Checkbox, Symbol) map to Asana custom field types of the corresponding type. Contact List columns map to Asana person-type custom fields. Dropdown and Symbol columns map to Asana enum (multi-select or single-select) custom fields. We preserve column type metadata and option lists during transformation. Required-column constraints in Smartsheet do not automatically replicate in Asana and are flagged for manual configuration post-migration.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Comment / Discussion

maps to

Asana

Task Stories / Comments

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet row-level Discussions map to Asana task stories (the activity feed) as comment entries. We export discussion text, author, and timestamp from the Smartsheet API and write them as Asana stories with the author attributed to the matching Asana workspace member. Rich-text formatting in Smartsheet comments is simplified to plain text for Asana compatibility.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Report

maps to

Asana

Manual reconstruction

lossy
Fully supported

Smartsheet Reports aggregate data across multiple sheets and support filtered or computed views. Asana does not have a native reporting layer beyond Portfolio dashboards. We export report data as-is to CSV during discovery and deliver it as a reference document for the customer to rebuild as Asana Portfolios, Google Sheets summaries, or a BI tool connection. Complex computed reports with cross-sheet formulas do not have a direct Asana equivalent.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Automation Rule

maps to

Asana

Manual rebuild in Asana Rules

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet automation rules (alerts, reminders, approval workflows, conditional formatting triggers) are not exposed via the Resource Management or Smartsheet REST API. We cannot migrate them programmatically. During discovery, we log every automation found and deliver an automation audit log with each rule's trigger, conditions, and actions documented alongside a recommended Asana Rules equivalent. The customer's admin rebuilds these in Asana Rules (Premium and above) post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Resource Management by Smartsheet logo

Resource Management by Smartsheet gotchas

High

API access is gated behind Business/Enterprise plans

High

Automation rules cannot be migrated programmatically

High

Time entries lock after one week in Resource Management

Medium

Rate limit of 300 req/min on main API, 120 req/min on Resource Management API

Medium

Attachments and Groupings are excluded from all export paths

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Resource Management API access requires Business or Enterprise plan

    Smartsheet's Resource Management API (api.rm.smartsheet.com) is accessible only to accounts on the Business or Enterprise plan. If the source account is on a Pro plan, we cannot authenticate against the Resource Management API and must rely on CSV exports from the Reports interface. Reports exports omit allocation detail, attachment references, and may truncate historical data. We verify plan tier during scoping and adjust extraction strategy accordingly, noting any data inaccessible without a plan upgrade.

  • Time entries lock after seven days in Resource Management

    The Resource Management built-in timer locks time entries after seven days, making them read-only for standard users. We request a CSV export of all billable hours and assignment allocations via the Reports export during the discovery call before this window closes. If the migration is delayed, entries from the past week become unrecoverable. We flag this risk in the scoping document and recommend scheduling the discovery call promptly after signing.

  • Smartsheet automation rules are not exposed via API

    Smartsheet automation rules (triggers, conditions, actions) are not accessible through the public REST API. We cannot migrate them as code. During discovery, we log every automation found and provide an automation audit log listing the trigger type, conditions, actions, and a recommended Asana Rules equivalent. The customer's admin rebuilds these in Asana Rules manually post-migration. This is a significant effort for sheets with dozens of rules.

  • Attachments and Groupings are excluded from all Smartsheet export paths

    Smartsheet's native export and API responses explicitly exclude Attachment files and row Groupings. We flag this in the scoping document and direct customers to use Smartsheet's Backup tool for binary files before migration. We preserve sheet structure including grouped row ordering but note that grouping logic must be recreated manually on the destination. Any file attachments must be re-uploaded to Asana manually after cutover.

  • Asana lacks a native Phase or Resource Allocation object

    Resource Management Phases and allocation records have no direct Asana equivalent. We reconstruct phases as milestones or parent-task groupings, and allocation data as custom numeric fields on tasks consumed by Asana's Workload view. This is functional but requires upfront design decisions during scoping. If the customer's Resource Plans contain complex multi-person allocation rules across many phases, the mapping design phase extends by one to two weeks to ensure accurate representation.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Resource Management by Smartsheet to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and plan tier verification

    We audit the source Resource Management account to confirm the plan tier (Business or Enterprise required for API access), enumerate all Resource Plans, Projects (Sheets), Phases, People, Assignments, and time entries. We export existing time entries via Reports CSV before the one-week lockout closes. We log every automation rule found in the source sheets and document them for the automation audit log. We inventory custom column types, dependency relationships, and attachment locations. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with record counts, allocation mapping design, and a risk register.

  2. Allocation mapping design and Asana workspace setup

    We design the allocation mapping strategy during a working session with the customer's admin. This covers how Resource Plan allocation records (percent, hours_per_day, fixed) map to Asana custom numeric fields, how phases map to milestones or parent-task groupings, and how people match to Asana workspace members. We create the Asana projects with correct team assignment, enable dependencies and milestones on each project, and define the custom field schema before any data import. This schema deploys into the production Asana workspace first.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into an Asana sandbox workspace (or a parallel non-production team) using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager and resource manager reconcile project structures, task counts, assignment accuracy, and allocation field values against the source Resource Management data. They spot-check 25-50 records per object type and sign off the mapping before production migration begins. Any mapping corrections—particularly around phase representation and allocation field naming—happen here.

  4. People and assignment import with allocation data

    We import Resource Management People records as Asana workspace members (matched by email) and store role and availability in Asana custom fields on the user's profile or on project-level fields. We then import task assignments by resolving the Resource Management assignment records: the assignee maps to the Asana task assignee field, and the allocation value (hours or percentage) writes to the custom allocation field we designed in step two. Assignment import runs after member provisioning and before task import so that assignee resolution succeeds on the first pass.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: workspace members (validated), projects (from Resource Management sheets), tasks (from sheet rows with dependency relationships preserved), milestones (from Resource Management phases), custom field values (from resource allocation records), time entry summaries (from the pre-exported Reports CSV), and comments (from Smartsheet Discussions). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We use Asana's bulk task creation endpoints with rate-limit handling (1,500 req/min on Business and Enterprise tiers) and exponential backoff.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation handoff

    We freeze Resource Management writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then designate Asana as the system of record. We deliver the automation audit log listing every Smartsheet automation rule with its trigger, conditions, actions, and a recommended Asana Rules equivalent. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Smartsheet automation rules in Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that work is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Resource Management by Smartsheet logo

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Source

Strengths

  • Spreadsheet-grade familiarity reduces onboarding friction for Excel-competent teams
  • Generous per-sheet limits of 20,000 rows and 500,000 cells per sheet for large datasets
  • Gantt chart and dependency tracking are widely praised as best-in-class within the spreadsheet-PM category
  • Strong per-seat licensing means unlimited sheets per user without per-sheet fees
  • Native integration with Smartsheet core product provides a unified work management ecosystem

Weaknesses

  • Performance degrades noticeably on sheets with heavy cross-sheet formulas or dense dependency trees
  • Automation rules are not exposed via API, making workflow migration impossible without manual rebuild
  • Native time tracking in Resource Management locks entries after one week, losing historical data
  • API access requires Business or Enterprise plan, restricting programmatic access for Pro-tier customers
  • Customer support receives consistent criticism for slow resolution and unresponsiveness
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Resource Management by Smartsheet and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Resource Management by Smartsheet: 300 requests/min per token on main Smartsheet API; 120 requests/min on Resource Management API.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Resource Management by Smartsheet exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Resource Management by Smartsheet to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Resource Management by Smartsheet to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Resource Management by Smartsheet to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Resource Management by Smartsheet to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and six weeks for accounts with fewer than 50 projects, 200 resources, and straightforward allocation structures. Migrations with complex multi-phase Resource Plans, hundreds of allocation records per project, custom column type conversions, or multiple automation rules extend to eight to twelve weeks because of the allocation mapping design phase, phase-to-milestone reconciliation, and time-entry coordination window.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Resource Management by Smartsheet.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day