Project Management migration

Migrate from Resource Management by Smartsheet to Jira

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Resource Management by Smartsheet and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.

Resource Management by Smartsheet logo

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Source

Jira

Destination

Jira logo

Compatibility

80%

8 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Resource Management by Smartsheet and Jira.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Resource Management by Smartsheet to Jira is a schema restructure, not a direct record copy. Smartsheet uses Sheets as the project container with Rows representing tasks and a standalone Resource Management API for People and Assignments; Jira uses Projects containing Issues with a flat, configurable hierarchy of Epics, Stories, Tasks, and Subtasks. We flatten Smartsheet Row hierarchies into Jira Issue types, map People objects to Jira User accounts with allocation percentages stored as custom fields, and translate Phases to Jira Labels or a custom Phase picklist. Automation rules, Resource Management timer entries older than one week, and Attachments cannot migrate; we deliver a written automation audit log for manual rebuild and export all accessible time data via CSV during discovery before the one-week lock window closes. Jira has no native capacity planning view, so resource utilization data migrates as structured custom fields rather than a native allocation dashboard.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Resource Management by Smartsheet logo

Resource Management by Smartsheet

What's pushing teams away

  • Project/role-level resourcing only — independent reviewers note the tool 'is not as strong when you need detailed task-level resourcing or highly complex dependency management', so professional-services-automation buyers often migrate to Kantata or Mavenlink.
  • No native mobile app — field-heavy teams and PMs who travel cite this as a recurring complaint on Software Advice and Research.com.
  • Time-entry adoption is hit-or-miss — utilization data becomes unreliable when staff don't log time consistently, undermining the very forecasts the platform is purchased to produce.
  • Steep learning curve and complex interface for the wide feature set — managing large teams or many concurrent projects becomes inefficient, pushing teams toward simpler resource tools like Float, Runn, or monday Work Management.
  • Cost ceiling — the Resource Management add-on is gated behind higher Smartsheet tiers, with per-user pricing and premium-feature gating making TCO 'a bit steep' (Research.com), particularly for teams that don't otherwise use Smartsheet.

Choosing

Jira logo

Jira

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-standard tool with deep Git integration and sprint reporting that engineering teams already know, reducing onboarding friction for new hires.
  • Highly customizable workflows and status schemes let business teams model complex approval chains without writing code.
  • Strong ecosystem of Atlassian Marketplace apps means specialized capabilities like time tracking or portfolio management are one install away.
  • Free tier with up to 10 users and unlimited issues gives small teams a no-cost entry point to validate the platform before committing budget.
  • Visibility features — boards, backlog grooming, sprint reports, and dashboards — give leadership a shared view of what is planned, in progress, blocked, and done.

Object mapping

How Resource Management by Smartsheet objects map to Jira

Each row shows how a Resource Management by Smartsheet object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Sheet (Project Container)

maps to

Jira

Jira Project

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet Sheets are the primary project container and map directly to Jira Projects. We create Jira Projects in the destination Cloud or Data Center instance using the Jira REST API before any Issue migration. Each project gets a configured Issue type scheme that maps Smartsheet Row types (tasks, milestones) to the appropriate Jira Issue types (Story, Task, Epic). Sheet-level metadata (name, description, start date, end date) migrates to the Jira Project's Description and Jira's native Start date and Due date fields on the top-level Issue.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Row (Task)

maps to

Jira

Issue

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet Rows map to Jira Issues. Row name becomes Issue Summary; Row cells become Issue fields. Parent-child Row hierarchies (subtasks within rows) map to Jira Subtask-Parent Issue relationships using Issue Links. Predecessor/successor dependencies from Smartsheet dependencies columns map to Jira Issue Links of type Blocks or Blocked By. Jira requires each Issue to have a valid Project and Issue Type, so we map the primary row type to the default Issue Type in the project's Issue Type scheme.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

People (Resources)

maps to

Jira

Jira User

1:1
Fully supported

Resource Management People objects (name, role, email, availability) map to Jira User accounts. We match People by email against the Jira destination User directory. Allocation percentages per project from Resource Management are not a native Jira field, so we store them as a structured custom field (RM Allocation %) on each Issue after the assignee is resolved. Any Person without a Jira User account is added to a provisioning queue for the customer's Jira admin before Issue migration begins.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Assignment (Person to Row)

maps to

Jira

Issue Assignee + Custom Field

1:many
Fully supported

Each Resource Management Assignment links a Person to a Row with hours and allocation percentage. We map the assignee to Jira's native Assignee field and store the allocation hours as a custom Number field (RM Allocation Hours) and allocation percentage as a custom Number field (RM Allocation %) on the Issue. If a Person has multiple assignments across rows, each becomes a separate Jira Issue with the same assignee.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Phase

maps to

Jira

Labels or Custom Select Field

lossy
Fully supported

Smartsheet Phases are hierarchical groupings of Rows within a project. Jira has no native Phase concept. We offer two migration strategies during scoping: Phase as Jira Labels (one label per Phase name applied to all Issues within that Phase grouping) or a Phase custom Select field pre-populated with Phase names. The customer chooses based on whether they want Phase data filterable via JQL. Phase ordering is preserved by setting the earliest Row start date within the Phase as the Phase grouping anchor.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Portfolio

maps to

Jira

Jira Project Set or JQL Filter

1:1
Fully supported

Resource Management Portfolios aggregate multiple projects with capacity and timeline summaries. Jira does not have a native Portfolio object, but Jira Premium includes Advanced Roadmaps (previously Structure) which supports multi-project views. We export the Portfolio's project list and key metrics (total hours, utilization percentage) as a structured CSV inventory for the customer's admin to configure in Advanced Roadmaps or a linked Confluence page. Portfolio dashboards are not replicated natively.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Custom Fields (Column Types)

maps to

Jira

Jira Custom Fields

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet column types (Text, Date, Contact List, Dropdown, Multi-Select Dropdown, Checkbox, Number, Duration, Formula) map to equivalent Jira custom field types. We pre-create all custom fields in the destination Jira project before Issue migration. Contact List columns map to Jira User Picker; Dropdown maps to Jira Select; Multi-Select Dropdown maps to Jira Multi-Select. Formula columns are exported as their computed value and stored as read-only text fields in Jira since Jira does not support computed columns on Issues.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Dependencies (Predecessor/Successor)

maps to

Jira

Issue Links (Blocks/Blocked By)

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet row-level predecessor/successor dependencies export as dependency relationships. Jira Issue Links of type Blocks and Blocked By carry the same information. We resolve the target Issue key for each dependency using the Row's position in the migrated project and create the link via the Jira Issue Links API. Cyclical dependencies (A blocks B, B blocks A) are flagged as a gotcha and broken into a single-direction link during migration.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Comments (Discussions)

maps to

Jira

Issue Comments

1:1
Fully supported

Smartsheet Row-level Discussion and Comment entries migrate to Jira Issue Comments. Each comment thread from a Row becomes a chronological comment thread on the corresponding Jira Issue. Comment author maps to Jira User by email match; timestamp preserves the original date. Comments containing @mentions are preserved as plain text since Jira mention syntax differs.

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Time Entries

maps to

Jira

Custom Fields + External Time Tracking

1:1
Mapping required

Resource Management timer entries that are still editable (within the one-week lock window) are exported via CSV during discovery before migration begins. We import hours logged per assignment as a custom Number field (Hours Logged) on the Jira Issue and as a structured CSV handoff for the customer's admin to import into a Jira-compatible time tracking tool such as Tempo or the native Jira time tracking feature if enabled on the destination plan.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Resource Management by Smartsheet logo

Resource Management by Smartsheet gotchas

High

API access is gated behind Business/Enterprise plans

High

Automation rules cannot be migrated programmatically

High

Time entries lock after one week in Resource Management

Medium

Rate limit of 300 req/min on main API, 120 req/min on Resource Management API

Medium

Attachments and Groupings are excluded from all export paths

Jira logo

Jira gotchas

High

Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration

High

Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms

Medium

Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin

Medium

Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption

Medium

Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026

Pair-specific challenges

  • Jira has no native resource management or capacity planning

    Resource Management by Smartsheet's core value is its capacity planning view: real-time allocation percentages, cross-project utilization, and availability tracking. Jira has no equivalent native feature. Jira Work Management includes basic assignment but no utilization or capacity dashboard. We handle this gap by storing allocation percentages and availability data as custom fields on Jira Issues and providing a structured inventory of all People and Assignments for the customer to configure in Advanced Roadmaps or a third-party resource management app post-migration. This is a functional gap, not a data loss gap, but it changes how teams plan capacity after cutover.

  • Time entries older than seven days lock in Resource Management

    The Resource Management built-in timer locks time entries after seven days, making them read-only in the native interface. We request a full CSV export of all billable hours and assignment allocations during the discovery call before this window closes. If the migration timeline extends past the one-week mark, entries from the past week become unrecoverable via API. We flag this risk during scoping and accelerate the data extraction step accordingly. Customers who rely on historical utilization data must complete time entry export before migration begins.

  • CSV import to Jira drops history and does not support custom field contexts

    The Atlassian-supported CSV import path for Jira drops all issue history (created date, updated date, changelog), comment timestamps, and worklog attribution. Custom fields imported via CSV may fail silently if their context is not configured to apply to the target Issue types in the project's issue type scheme. We use the Jira REST API instead of CSV bulk import for all Issues with custom field data, preserving created and updated timestamps and handling custom field context validation during migration. CSV is used only as a supplemental reference for data reconciliation.

  • Smartsheet automation rules and Resource Management workflows do not migrate

    Smartsheet automation rules (alerts, reminders, approval chains) are not exposed via Smartsheet's public REST API and cannot be programmatically exported. We log every automation found during discovery and provide a written automation audit log with trigger, conditions, actions, and recommended Jira Automation Rules equivalent. The customer's Jira admin rebuilds them post-migration. Resource Management workflows (request approval chains, resource booking approvals) similarly require manual configuration in Jira's native approval capabilities or a marketplace app.

  • Attachments and file links are excluded from Smartsheet API responses

    Smartsheet explicitly excludes Attachment files from all export and API paths. Customers using Attachment and Discussion features on rows must use Smartsheet's native Backup tool to download binary files separately before migration begins. We do not migrate binary attachments as part of the standard scope. We preserve the sheet structure including grouped row ordering and custom column metadata, but grouping logic must be recreated in Jira using Labels or a custom field. File URLs that point to Smartsheet-hosted attachments will break after cutover; we flag these as a post-migration cleanup item.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Resource Management by Smartsheet to Jira data migration

  1. Discovery and source plan verification

    We audit the source Resource Management account to determine whether it is standalone or connected to Smartsheet sheets, and verify the Smartsheet plan tier (Pro, Business, Enterprise) since API access requires Business or higher. We extract People (resources), Assignments, Phases, and Portfolio data via the Resource Management API at api.rm.smartsheet.com. For sheets connected to Resource Management, we pull row data and column definitions from the main Smartsheet API. We request a CSV export of all time entries during the discovery call before the one-week lock window closes. We log all automation rules and dependency configurations as part of the discovery output.

  2. Jira destination setup and schema design

    We work with the customer's Jira admin to configure the destination Jira Cloud or Data Center environment. This includes creating Jira Projects for each Smartsheet sheet, configuring Issue Type schemes (Epic, Story, Task, Subtask mapping), pre-creating all custom fields with correct types and contexts, and setting up project-level permission schemes. We define the Phase migration strategy (Labels or custom Select field) based on the customer's preference during scoping. Jira Premium or Data Center is recommended for teams needing Advanced Roadmaps for capacity planning post-migration.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full test migration into a Jira Sandbox or development environment using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager and Jira admin reconcile record counts (Sheets in, Projects created; Rows in, Issues created; Assignments in, Assignees resolved), spot-check field mapping for 25-50 randomly sampled Issues against the Smartsheet source, and verify that dependency links resolved correctly. Any custom field context errors, missing issue type mappings, or Phase mapping corrections are resolved in this phase before production migration begins.

  4. Owner and user provisioning

    We extract every distinct Person from the Resource Management People API and match by email against the destination Jira User directory. People without a matching Jira User are placed in a provisioning queue. The customer's Jira admin provisions the missing accounts (active or inactive based on whether the person is still with the organization) before production migration resumes. Jira's Assignee field is required on all Issue creates, so this step gates the Issue migration phase.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in dependency order: Jira Projects and schema (created via API), Jira Users (validated from provisioning step), Jira Issues (rows mapped to issues with Assignee resolved from People mapping, custom fields populated, Phase as Labels or Select applied), Issue Links (dependency links from predecessor/successor relationships), Issue Comments (discussion threads from Smartsheet rows), Time Entry data (as custom fields and CSV handoff for external time tracking tools). We use Jira's REST API with exponential backoff on rate limit responses (typically 100 req/min for Jira Cloud) and batch operations for bulk Issue creation.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation handoff

    We freeze writes to the source Resource Management account during the cutover window and run a final delta migration of any rows or assignments modified during the migration. We validate that all Issues have the correct Project, Issue Type, Assignee, and custom field values, then hand off the written automation audit log and dependency documentation to the customer's Jira admin. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Smartsheet automations or Resource Management workflows as Jira Automation Rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate configuration engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Resource Management by Smartsheet logo

Resource Management by Smartsheet

Source

Strengths

  • Spreadsheet-grade familiarity reduces onboarding friction for Excel-competent teams
  • Generous per-sheet limits of 20,000 rows and 500,000 cells per sheet for large datasets
  • Gantt chart and dependency tracking are widely praised as best-in-class within the spreadsheet-PM category
  • Strong per-seat licensing means unlimited sheets per user without per-sheet fees
  • Native integration with Smartsheet core product provides a unified work management ecosystem

Weaknesses

  • Performance degrades noticeably on sheets with heavy cross-sheet formulas or dense dependency trees
  • Automation rules are not exposed via API, making workflow migration impossible without manual rebuild
  • Native time tracking in Resource Management locks entries after one week, losing historical data
  • API access requires Business or Enterprise plan, restricting programmatic access for Pro-tier customers
  • Customer support receives consistent criticism for slow resolution and unresponsiveness
Jira logo

Jira

Destination

Strengths

  • Deeply customizable workflows and status schemes with no hard limits on workflow complexity or number of custom statuses.
  • Strong agile ceremony support: sprint planning, backlog grooming, velocity tracking, and burndown charts for Scrum teams.
  • Industry-standard developer tool with native Git integration linking commits, pull requests, and deployments to issues.
  • Large Atlassian Marketplace with thousands of plugins extending time tracking, portfolio management, and reporting capabilities.
  • Free tier available for up to 10 users with unlimited issues, enabling evaluation before committing to a paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Excessive configurability creates a steep learning curve; cross-team consistency is hard to maintain without strict governance.
  • Performance degrades with large backlogs, complex custom fields, and heavily nested issue hierarchies.
  • Reporting requires additional configuration or paid plugins; out-of-the-box analytics are limited for business users.
  • Jira lacks native sprint management, requiring Jira Software for true agile team features.
  • Teams outside engineering resist adoption due to UI complexity, leaving the all-in-one promise unfulfilled for cross-functional organizations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Resource Management by Smartsheet and Jira.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Resource Management by Smartsheet: 300 requests/min per token on main Smartsheet API; 120 requests/min on Resource Management API.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Resource Management by Smartsheet exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Resource Management by Smartsheet to Jira migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Resource Management by Smartsheet to Jira data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Resource Management by Smartsheet to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Resource Management by Smartsheet to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Straightforward migrations with fewer than 5,000 rows across fewer than 10 sheets and no complex custom field types land between three and five weeks. Migrations with large assignment histories, multi-phase project structures, Jira projects requiring custom field context configuration across multiple issue types, or a delta migration of entries modified during the migration window move to eight to twelve weeks. Jira's custom field context limitation (fields must be explicitly available to each Issue type in a project) is the most common timeline driver on complex migrations.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Resource Management by Smartsheet.
Land in Jira, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day