Project Management migration

Migrate from Tidy Build to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Tidy Build and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Tidy Build logo

Tidy Build

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

42%

5 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Tidy Build and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Tidy Build to Asana crosses a structural boundary: Tidy Build is construction job-costing software with native support for materials, cost centres, Quotes, Purchase Orders, and Supplier records; Asana is a general-purpose work management platform with Tasks, Subtasks, Sections, and Projects as its primary objects. There is no native cost-tracking or job-costing layer in Asana, so Quotes, Purchase Orders, and Supplier records do not migrate as native objects. We extract these as structured CSV exports and deliver them alongside the migration so your admin can attach them as custom records, link them to Projects, or store them in a connected tool. We migrate Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Users, Custom Fields, and Time Entry data through the Asana REST API with rate-limit handling and parent-record lookup resolution. Workflows and automation rules do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of every Tidy Build rule for your admin to rebuild in Asana Rules or through a partner.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Tidy Build logo

Tidy Build

What's pushing teams away

  • Lack of public documentation or structured user guides makes self-service onboarding difficult, with users reporting they cannot find answers without contacting support.
  • User interface limitations and missing features for documenting and supporting certain project types, particularly for firms with complex or non-standard construction workflows.
  • Performance and usability complaints in G2 reviews where users describe the tool as functional but lacking refinement, especially around mobile and on-site use cases.
  • Desire for more comprehensive CRM-style features or deeper accounting integration beyond what the current Xero connection provides, pushing users toward platforms with broader functionality.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Tidy Build objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Tidy Build object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Tidy Build

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Tidy Build Projects map to Asana Projects as the primary container. We preserve project name, status, project group, cost centres, and budget metadata as custom fields on the Asana Project. Tidy Build's cost_centre and budget_total values become numeric custom fields in Asana. Project-level relationships to Quotes, Tasks, Expenses, and Times are preserved by nesting under the same Asana Project.

Tidy Build

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Tidy Build Tasks and Subtasks migrate to Asana Tasks and Subtasks. Status, assignees, due dates, and description migrate directly. Task Assignments linking a Task to a User become Asana assignee fields. Where Subtasks exist as a separate object in Tidy Build, we nest them under the parent Task in Asana by resolving the parent_id reference at migration time.

Tidy Build

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Time Tracking Add-on or Custom Fields

lossy
Fully supported

Tidy Build Time Entries carry date, duration, charge rate, and optional Task reference. Asana does not have a native per-entry time-tracking object unless the Time Tracking add-on ($10/seat/mo) is enabled. We migrate Time Entries as Task-level custom fields (start time, end time, duration, rate) when the add-on is not in scope, or as native Time Tracking entries when it is. If the customer enables the add-on post-migration, we re-import the historical entries against the correct Tasks.

Tidy Build

Expense

maps to

Asana

Task with custom expense fields

lossy
Fully supported

Tidy Build Expenses link to Projects with amount, category, date, and description. We represent Expenses in Asana as Tasks with a custom Expense Status field (Open, Approved, Rejected), expense category as a single-select custom field, amount as a numeric custom field, and the original Tidy Build expense description in the Task notes. The migrated Task is assigned to the corresponding Asana Project.

Tidy Build

Customer

maps to

Asana

Project custom field or Tag

1:1
Fully supported

Tidy Build Customer records hold contact details, addresses, and billing information. Asana does not have a native CRM-style Account or Contact object. We migrate Customer records as Asana Tags (one per Customer) with the customer's name, primary contact, email, and address stored as Tag fields. Alternatively, Customers can be stored as custom field values on the Projects they relate to, with the customer's name, contact, and billing details as text custom fields.

Tidy Build

Supplier

maps to

Asana

Tag or custom field reference

1:1
Fully supported

Tidy Build Supplier records hold vendor contact information and link to Material Items and Purchase Orders. Asana has no native vendor or supplier object. We migrate Suppliers as Asana Tags or as custom field values on Purchase Order Tasks, preserving supplier name, contact email, and address. The customer decides during scoping whether to use Tags or custom fields based on reporting needs.

Tidy Build

Material Item

maps to

Asana

Custom field or CSV export

lossy
Fully supported

Tidy Build Material Items carry pricing levels, categories, and location assignments. Asana has no native inventory or material object. We migrate the material hierarchy as structured CSV export with item name, SKU, pricing level, category, and location. For active use, we create Asana custom fields on the relevant Purchase Order Tasks referencing material values. The CSV export is delivered alongside the migration as a supplemental data file.

Tidy Build

Quote

maps to

Asana

Task with Quote custom fields + CSV export

lossy
Fully supported

Tidy Build Quotes have their own lifecycle state (draft, sent, approved, lost) and contain line items with pricing. Asana has no native Quote object. We migrate Quote metadata (customer, project, total value, status, date) as custom fields on an Asana Task with a Quote Status enum custom field. Quote line items are included in the CSV export delivered alongside the migration. The customer's admin links the CSV to the relevant Asana Project or attaches it to the Quote Task.

Tidy Build

Purchase Order

maps to

Asana

Task with PO custom fields + CSV export

lossy
Fully supported

Tidy Build Purchase Orders contain supplier references, line items, quantities, and approval status with open/closed state. We migrate PO metadata as custom fields on an Asana Task with a PO Status enum custom field. Supplier reference is resolved to the corresponding Supplier Tag. Line items and quantities are included in the CSV export. The customer decides whether to use separate Asana Projects per PO or aggregate POs under a single procurement Project.

Tidy Build

User

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

Tidy Build User accounts include name, email, role, and time profile. Manager versus Team user roles from Tidy Build are preserved as a custom field on the Asana User record (tidy_user_role__c). We match Users by email. Any Tidy Build User without a matching Asana User account goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes.

Tidy Build

Custom Fields (Project level)

maps to

Asana

Project custom fields

lossy
Fully supported

Tidy Build supports custom fields on Projects. We detect custom field definitions via the Tidy Build API schema, map each to the equivalent Asana custom field type (text, number, date, single-select enum), and apply the values to the migrated Project records. Custom field definitions are created in the Asana workspace before the migration phase begins.

Tidy Build

Custom Fields (Material level)

maps to

Asana

Custom fields or CSV column

lossy
Fully supported

Tidy Build supports custom fields on Material Items. We migrate these as columns in the Material Items CSV export. If the customer requests active material lookup from within Asana Tasks, we create custom fields on the relevant Purchase Order Tasks and populate them from the material data.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Tidy Build logo

Tidy Build gotchas

High

API must be enabled per organisation before migration

Medium

User-role tier limits affect migration scoping

Medium

No publicly documented API rate limits for bulk extraction

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • No native cost tracking or job costing in Asana

    Tidy Build's primary value is construction job costing: materials, labour rates, cost centres, Quotes, and Purchase Orders are first-class objects. Asana has no native cost-tracking, inventory, supplier, or quote object. We represent these as Tasks with custom fields plus structured CSV exports. If the customer requires live cost tracking in Asana, they need to enable the Asana budget add-on or integrate a third-party cost management tool. We flag this during scoping and confirm the representation strategy before any data moves.

  • Tidy Build API must be activated per organisation before migration

    Tidy Build's Developer API is not enabled by default on all accounts. The API feature must be explicitly activated for an organisation by contacting Tidy. If we begin a migration scoping call and the API is not active, the migration timeline stalls until Tidy enables the feature. We confirm API availability during the pre-migration audit and request activation with Tidy on the customer's behalf if needed.

  • No documented API rate limits for Tidy Build extraction

    The Tidy Build API documentation does not specify rate limits for GET, POST, PUT, or DELETE operations. We run a low-concurrency extraction at scoping to detect throttling behaviour, then tune worker thread count accordingly. If 429 responses appear, we implement exponential backoff and reduce concurrency to avoid disrupting the customer's production use during migration. This adds a probing step to the discovery phase.

  • Asana custom field creation requires workspace-level setup before migration

    Asana custom fields are workspace-level objects that must be created before Tasks or Projects can be assigned values. We create all required custom field definitions (expense status, quote status, po status, material references, cost fields, manager role) in the destination Asana workspace during the schema design step, before any data import begins. If custom fields are added mid-migration, existing records without values must be updated individually.

  • Tidy Build user-role tier limits require reconciliation during migration

    Tidy Build plans cap Manager Users and Team Users separately (Essentials: 1 Manager, max 30 Team; Turbo: 2-3 Managers, max 50 Team). Some accounts may have created users as Team Members to stay within budget. We preserve the Manager/Team designation as a custom property (tidy_user_role__c) on the Asana User record. Asana's permission model is different from Tidy Build's, so we assign the highest applicable Asana permission level to each migrated user and flag any accounts requiring manual review.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Tidy Build to Asana data migration

  1. Pre-migration audit and API activation

    We audit the Tidy Build account for API availability, record volumes (Projects, Tasks, Time Entries, Expenses, Quotes, Purchase Orders, Materials, Suppliers, Customers, Users), active custom field definitions, and any workflow rules or automation patterns. If the Tidy Build API is not yet enabled, we contact Tidy on the customer's behalf to request activation. We run a low-concurrency extraction probe to detect throttling behaviour and calibrate worker thread count for the full migration. The audit output is a written migration scope with record counts per object and a custom field inventory.

  2. Destination schema design

    We design the Asana destination schema: Projects per Tidy Build Project, Tasks per Tidy Build Task and Subtask, custom fields for Quotes, Purchase Orders, Expenses, and Time Entries, Tags for Customers and Suppliers, and workspace-level custom field definitions. We configure the Material Items and Quote line item CSV export structure during this step. Schema is validated in an Asana sandbox workspace before production migration begins.

  3. User provisioning and reconciliation

    We extract every distinct Tidy Build User and match by email against the destination Asana workspace. Manager/Team role designations are preserved as a tidy_user_role__c custom field. Users without a matching Asana account go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision. Migration cannot proceed past this step because Task assignee fields require valid Asana User references.

  4. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users first (validated against the reconciliation queue), then Projects, then Tasks and Subtasks with parent_id resolution, then Expenses as Tasks with custom fields, then Time Entries as Tasks or Time Tracking entries, then Quotes and Purchase Orders as Tasks with CSV exports, then Customers and Suppliers as Tags, then Material Items as CSV export, and finally Custom Fields with their values. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  5. Cutover, delta sync, and handoff

    We freeze writes to Tidy Build during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then hand over the Asana workspace as the system of record. We deliver the supplemental CSV exports for Material Items, Quote line items, and Purchase Order line items alongside the migration. We deliver a written inventory of every Tidy Build workflow rule for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana Rules. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Tidy Build logo

Tidy Build

Source

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for construction job costing with native support for materials, labour rates, and expense tracking against Projects.
  • Multi-tier user model with separate Manager and Team user roles, limiting cost for firms that only need site-staff access.
  • Material hierarchy with categories, items, pricing levels, and locations, supporting complex supplier and inventory structures.
  • REST API covering the full data model including Projects, Materials, Quotes, Tasks, Times, and Expenses for custom integrations.
  • Xero integration for accounting sync, keeping financial data connected to the project control layer.

Weaknesses

  • No publicly documented API rate limits, making it difficult to plan bulk migration workloads without manual testing against the customer's account.
  • API access requires contacting Tidy to have the feature enabled per-organisation, adding a prerequisite step before migration can begin.
  • Documentation and user guides are sparse, with G2 reviewers explicitly flagging the lack of proper documentation as a friction point.
  • Manager user limits on lower plans constrain how many administrative accounts a growing firm can have, potentially requiring plan upgrades to support new hires in management roles.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Tidy Build and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Tidy Build: Not publicly documented. Tidy International does not publish per-endpoint quotas in the open developer docs; in practice rate limits are confirmed once the integration is enabled on a customer tenant..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Tidy Build doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Tidy Build to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Tidy Build to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Tidy Build to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Tidy Build to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 5,000 Tasks, 500 Projects, and straightforward material and supplier structures. Migrations with large material hierarchies, multi-level supplier structures, high time-entry volumes (over 50,000 entries), or Quote and Purchase Order exports requiring custom field re-modelling move to eight to twelve weeks because of CSV export structuring, custom field creation scope, and the discovery and reconciliation phases.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Tidy Build.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day