Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Planview AgilePlace and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.
Planview AgilePlace
Source
Trello
Destination
Compatibility
7 of 13
objects map 1:1 between Planview AgilePlace and Trello.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
2-4 weeks
Overview
Moving from Planview AgilePlace to Trello is a structural migration shaped by two platform philosophies: AgilePlace is built for enterprise Kanban at scale with hierarchical Lanes, per-lane WIP limits, cross-board card dependencies, and role-gated custom fields; Trello is an Atlassian-owned board tool with a flat list structure, workspace-level custom fields, no native cross-board dependency support, and a free-tier cap of 10 boards per Workspace. We resolve these differences during scoping and transformation rather than after import. Board hierarchy from AgilePlace (Lanes and Swimlanes) flattens into multiple Trello Boards or into a single Board with labeled Lists. Card Dependencies use a separate API relationship in AgilePlace and require a Power-Up or manual rebuild in Trello for cross-board links. Custom field definitions export alongside card data and must be recreated at the workspace level in Trello, which changes their scope from per-board to org-wide. We do not migrate Card Automation, Board Automation, or any workflow logic; we deliver a written inventory of these for your admin to rebuild in Trello Butler.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Planview AgilePlace object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Planview AgilePlace
Board
Trello
Board + List
lossyAgilePlace Boards contain Lanes and Swimlanes that create a hierarchical workflow view. Trello has a flat List structure within each Board with no native Swimlane concept. We flatten the board-to-lane hierarchy into one of two strategies during scoping: map each AgilePlace Board to a Trello Board with Lists representing each Lane, or consolidate multiple AgilePlace boards into a single Trello Board with Lists representing both the board name and lane. The customer's team structure and expected board count in Trello determine which strategy applies. Board background colors and lane color coding map to Trello List headers or board cover colors as close equivalents.
Planview AgilePlace
Card
Trello
Card
1:1AgilePlace Cards migrate to Trello Cards preserving title, description (rich text), due dates, created and modified timestamps, and board position. Card body content is preserved as-is. Card priority indicators (low, medium, high, critical) map to Trello label colors if labels are configured for priority. WIP status migrates as card metadata but Trello does not enforce WIP limits natively, so lane-level WIP status is preserved as a custom field or note for team reference.
Planview AgilePlace
Custom Field
Trello
Custom Field
lossyCustom Fields in AgilePlace are defined per-board and may carry role-gated edit permissions. Trello defines custom fields at the workspace level (Business Class and above). During migration, we export both the field definitions and all card-level values, then recreate the field definitions in Trello at the workspace level. This changes their scope from per-board to org-wide, which may require the customer to consolidate or rename fields if names冲突 occurs across boards. Role-gating on custom fields does not replicate in Trello.
Planview AgilePlace
Card Type
Trello
Label
1:manyAgilePlace Card Types are board-level taxonomy that classify work items (for example, Bug, Feature, Task, Spike). Trello uses Labels for card classification, which are flat string tags without hierarchical taxonomy. We map each AgilePlace Card Type to a Trello Label with a matching name and color. If the destination Trello workspace already uses Labels for another purpose, we coordinate with the customer to avoid conflicts during scoping. Card Type inheritance and sub-types collapse into a single label level in Trello.
Planview AgilePlace
Card Dependency
Trello
Card Connection
1:1Parent-child card links in AgilePlace are stored as a separate API relationship and can reference cards across different boards. We export these as a dependency table keyed by AgilePlace card ID and map them during the destination import. Within-board dependencies can be recreated using Trello Power-Ups such as the Dependencies Manager. Cross-board dependencies cannot be natively represented in Trello; we flag these in a reconciliation report and recommend the customer either consolidate dependent cards onto one board or use a Power-Up with cross-board support. This is a known limitation of the destination platform.
Planview AgilePlace
Comment
Trello
Comment
1:1Card comments migrate as Trello Card comments with author attribution preserved via email-to-user matching. Comment timestamps and threading structure are preserved as the comment order within the card. If the comment author has no matching Trello account, the comment is attributed to the migrating user with a note indicating the original author email.
Planview AgilePlace
Task (Sub-task)
Trello
Checklist
1:1AgilePlace Tasks are child objects within a Card, each with its own completion status and assignee. We import these as Trello Checklists on the destination Card, preserving each task's completion checkbox state and the assignee's email. If a task has no assignee in AgilePlace, it migrates as an unchecked checklist item. The parent card-to-task relationship is preserved at the Trello Card level by attaching the full checklist during card import.
Planview AgilePlace
Tag
Trello
Label
1:1AgilePlace Tags are flat string labels on cards. We map these to Trello Labels, which serve the same organizational function. Tag color coding in AgilePlace maps to Label color where applicable. If Trello Labels are already in use for Card Types, we coordinate with the customer during scoping to determine whether Tags and Card Types share a Label namespace or whether Tags should be stored as a custom field instead.
Planview AgilePlace
User / Assignee
Trello
Member
1:1Card assignee mapping is performed by email address. We match each AgilePlace assignee email against Trello workspace members. Any assignee without a matching Trello account is placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer to provision before the record import resumes. Archived or inactive AgilePlace users are flagged separately and can be mapped to inactive Trello members or to a placeholder user.
Planview AgilePlace
WIP Limit
Trello
Custom Field
lossyWIP limits in AgilePlace are defined per Lane on a board. Trello does not have a native WIP limit feature. We preserve WIP limit values as a card custom field in Trello or as a card description note so teams can reference the original limit values. If the customer uses a WIP limit Power-Up in Trello, we document the values for manual configuration post-migration. This is a manual step outside the automated migration scope.
Planview AgilePlace
Card Attachment
Trello
Card Attachment
1:1File attachments on AgilePlace cards are downloaded and re-uploaded to the destination Trello Card. We handle this in a separate pass after card content is loaded. Large attachment volumes increase migration duration and require storage capacity planning. Atlassian's Trello storage limits apply; we flag any attachments that exceed Trello's per-file size limits during discovery.
Planview AgilePlace
Card Timestamps
Trello
Card Custom Fields
lossyAgilePlace card timestamps (created, updated, moved-to-lane) are preserved as Trello Card custom fields or as Card description metadata, depending on the destination Trello plan. These timestamps are critical for teams using cycle-time calculations and historical reporting. We do not overwrite Trello's native card creation date during import; the source timestamps are stored as supplemental fields to maintain historical accuracy for analytics.
Planview AgilePlace
Integrations Metadata
Trello
Card Description Note
lossyIntegration references in AgilePlace (Jira issue links, GitHub commit references, external URLs) are stored as card metadata. These linked external records do not migrate. We log the original reference URLs as a note in the Trello Card description so teams can manually re-establish the external link if needed. This is a known limitation: the integration connection itself does not transfer and requires reconfiguration in the destination tool.
| Planview AgilePlace | Trello | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Board | Board + Listlossy | Fully supported | |
| Card | Card1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Card Type | Label1:many | Fully supported | |
| Card Dependency | Card Connection1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comment | Comment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task (Sub-task) | Checklist1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Tag | Label1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User / Assignee | Member1:1 | Fully supported | |
| WIP Limit | Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Card Attachment | Card Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Card Timestamps | Card Custom Fieldslossy | Fully supported | |
| Integrations Metadata | Card Description Notelossy | Not supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Planview AgilePlace gotchas
Card Automation cannot mirror or copy cards between boards natively
Custom field permissions are role-gated, not globally editable
Relations Summary fields can display ERROR for large record sets
Reporting API is tier-gated to Advanced and Enterprise editions
Portfolios integration requires Planview Hub as a separate license
Trello gotchas
Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint
Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData
API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration
Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership
Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and tier gap analysis
We audit the source AgilePlace instance for active tier (Teams, Scaled Teams, or Custom), board count, card volumes, Lane and Swimlane structure, custom field definitions, Card Type taxonomy, and dependency graph spanning boards. We cross-reference this against the customer's intended Trello tier (free, Standard, or Premium) and flag the minimum tier required based on board count, custom field requirements, and Power-Up dependencies. The discovery output is a written scope, a board-to-board or board-to-list mapping strategy, and a custom field reconciliation plan.
Board structure mapping and flattening strategy
We design the destination Trello structure based on the chosen mapping strategy: one Trello Board per AgilePlace Board with Lists per Lane, or consolidated boards. Lane colors map to List header colors or board backgrounds. Swimlanes with nested cards are flattened to a single level within their corresponding List. We validate the board count against the target Trello Workspace tier before creating any destination structure. This step requires customer sign-off on the board strategy because it affects how teams navigate work in Trello after migration.
User reconciliation and member provisioning
We extract every distinct AgilePlace user and card assignee by email address and match against the Trello Workspace member list. Any assignee without a matching Trello account enters a reconciliation queue. The customer provisions missing workspace members before record migration begins. Archived or inactive AgilePlace users are flagged separately for inactive member handling in Trello.
Card and custom field migration
We migrate Cards in dependency order within each Board, resolving Card Type-to-Label mapping, Tag-to-Label mapping, assignee resolution, and custom field value mapping. Custom field definitions are recreated at the Trello Workspace level before card values are written. Due dates, created timestamps, and moved-to-lane timestamps are preserved as supplemental custom fields on each Card. Card attachments are downloaded from AgilePlace and uploaded to the destination Card in a separate pass after card content is loaded.
Dependency resolution and checklist migration
We process Card Dependencies after all cards are loaded, using the temporary ID mapping table created during card import. Within-board parent-child links are recreated using the Dependencies Power-Up. Cross-board links are documented in a reconciliation report with the source and destination board and card references, enabling the customer's admin to handle these manually in Trello or consolidate the dependent cards. AgilePlace sub-tasks migrate as Trello Checklists with completion state preserved.
Cutover, validation, and automation inventory delivery
We freeze writes to AgilePlace during cutover, run a delta pass for any cards modified during the migration window, and enable Trello as the system of record. We deliver a row-count reconciliation report comparing imported card counts, custom field value counts, and checklist item counts against the source export. We deliver the Card Automation and Board Automation inventory document to the customer's admin for rebuild in Trello Butler. We do not rebuild automations inside the migration scope.
Platform deep dives
Planview AgilePlace
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Trello
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Planview AgilePlace and Trello.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Planview AgilePlace: Not publicly documented on the public-facing API page.
Data volume sensitivity
Planview AgilePlace doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Planview AgilePlace to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Planview AgilePlace to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Planview AgilePlace
Other ways to arrive at Trello
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.