Project Management migration

Migrate from Artemis 7 to Jira

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Artemis 7 and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.

Artemis 7 logo

Artemis 7

Source

Jira

Destination

Jira logo

Compatibility

90%

9 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Artemis 7 and Jira.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Artemis 7 to Jira is a structural migration complicated by the absence of a documented API on the source side. Artemis 7 lacks published endpoints, API key management, or developer documentation, which means we extract data through CSV exports or structured table scraping. We then reconstruct the full task hierarchy (parent-child relationships), consolidate per-project custom field names into Jira's global custom field registry, and map Artemis milestones to Jira Versions or Epic target dates. Gantt dependencies (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start) are stored as metadata in Artemis 7 and require explicit Jira issue link creation during migration. Attachment URLs are platform-bound and non-portable; we list them separately for the customer's admin to re-upload post-migration. Workflows, automations, and project templates do not migrate as configuration; we deliver a written inventory for manual rebuild. Jira's permission schemes (Browse Projects, Issue Security) are applied per migrated project based on Artemis role assignments.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Artemis 7 logo

Artemis 7

What's pushing teams away

  • Customers migrate to modern PPM platforms (Planview, Broadcom Clarity, ChangePoint, Smartsheet, Monday) when their Aurea entitlement leaves them on legacy versions without compelling new-feature releases.
  • Aurea's acquisition model concentrates many legacy enterprise tools into one portfolio and customers report concerns about long-term roadmap investment in any single product line.
  • No publicly indexed API documentation, complicating integration with modern devops and finance toolchains.
  • Sales-led pricing with no published tiers makes it hard to benchmark cost against newer per-user PPM vendors.
  • Limited public review footprint (very few G2/Capterra reviews and minimal community discussion) makes peer due diligence difficult.

Choosing

Jira logo

Jira

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-standard tool with deep Git integration and sprint reporting that engineering teams already know, reducing onboarding friction for new hires.
  • Highly customizable workflows and status schemes let business teams model complex approval chains without writing code.
  • Strong ecosystem of Atlassian Marketplace apps means specialized capabilities like time tracking or portfolio management are one install away.
  • Free tier with up to 10 users and unlimited issues gives small teams a no-cost entry point to validate the platform before committing budget.
  • Visibility features — boards, backlog grooming, sprint reports, and dashboards — give leadership a shared view of what is planned, in progress, blocked, and done.

Object mapping

How Artemis 7 objects map to Jira

Each row shows how a Artemis 7 object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Artemis 7

Project

maps to

Jira

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 Projects map directly to Jira Projects. The project name, description, status (active/archived), and start/end dates migrate as-is. We create Jira Projects in the destination instance before any issue migration begins. Jira project keys are derived from the Artemis 7 project name acronym or a customer-specified prefix during scoping.

Artemis 7

Task

maps to

Jira

Issue (Task or Story)

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 Tasks map to Jira Issues. The task name becomes Summary, status maps to Jira status (To Do, In Progress, Done), assignee resolves via email match to Jira User, and dates map to Due Date. Subtasks (child records with a parent reference) map to Jira Subtask issues with the parent issue linked via the Parent link field. We reconstruct the full parent-child hierarchy during migration by resolving parent references and setting Issue Type to Subtask for nested items.

Artemis 7

Milestone

maps to

Jira

Version (Release)

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 Milestones (date-driven markers with a name and due date associated with a Project) map to Jira Versions. The milestone name becomes Version name, due date becomes Release Date, and a description field carries any additional milestone context. Jira Versions can be marked Released or Unreleased to reflect milestone completion state. Jira's Fix Version field on Issues then links issues to the migrated milestone.

Artemis 7

Resource

maps to

Jira

User + Project Role

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 Resource records (user name, role, availability) map to Jira User accounts with project Role assignments. The user's availability percentage does not have a direct Jira equivalent (Jira assigns users to issues individually). We map Artemis resource roles to Jira project roles (Administrators, Members, Viewers) or custom project roles if the customer defines them. Capacity and allocation tracking requires Jira Time Tracking to be enabled post-migration.

Artemis 7

Time Entry

maps to

Jira

Worklog

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 time entries (hours logged against a task and user) map to Jira Worklog records on the corresponding Issue. We map hours logged to Time Spent in Jira's time tracking format (e.g., 4h 30m), and the Artemis entry date becomes the Worklog started date. Jira requires Time Tracking to be enabled on the destination project. Billing rates from Artemis 7 are preserved as a custom field on the worklog since Jira does not natively store billing rates per entry.

Artemis 7

Gantt Dependency

maps to

Jira

Issue Link

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 Gantt dependencies (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Finish) are stored as relationship metadata. Jira supports Blocks, Blocked By, Depends On, and duplicate link types. We map Finish-to-Start to Blocks, Start-to-Start to a custom link type or Blocks with note, Finish-to-Finish to a custom link type, and Start-to-Finish to a custom link type. Unsupported dependency types are flagged in the migration report for the customer's admin to resolve manually post-migration.

Artemis 7

Custom Field (per-project)

maps to

Jira

Custom Field (global)

lossy
Fully supported

Artemis 7 custom fields exist per-project and are not centrally managed. We export all custom fields as key-value pairs per project during scoping, then consolidate unique field names across all active projects. Fields with the same name but different data types across projects require manual customer confirmation before mapping. We create Jira global custom fields of the appropriate type (text, number, date, select, multi-select) before migration and associate them with relevant projects. Duplicate field names with conflicting data types are the most common source of import errors and are flagged explicitly.

Artemis 7

Attachment URL

maps to

Jira

Flagged for Re-upload

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 stores file attachments as URLs referencing its own internal file service. These URLs expire or break when the user account is deprovisioned and are not portable across systems. We do not include attachment URLs in the migrated dataset. We produce a separate attachment flag list (list of Artemis 7 attachment URLs, associated task name, and project name) so the customer's admin can manually re-upload files to the Jira issue post-migration. This list is delivered as a CSV alongside the migration output.

Artemis 7

Project Status

maps to

Jira

Project Status

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 project status (active, on-hold, completed, archived) maps to Jira project status. Jira project states include Well-managed, Unmanaged, and Archived. Active and On-hold map to Well-managed; Completed maps to Archived. The customer confirms the mapping during scoping since Artemis status naming conventions vary.

Artemis 7

Task Priority

maps to

Jira

Priority

1:1
Fully supported

Artemis 7 task priority levels (typically 1-5 or Low/Medium/High/Critical) map to Jira Priority values. We confirm the source priority scale during scoping and map to Jira's standard priorities (Highest, High, Medium, Low, Lowest) or to a custom Priority scheme if one exists in the destination Jira instance.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Artemis 7 logo

Artemis 7 gotchas

High

No documented public API for Artemis 7

High

Attachment URLs are platform-bound and non-portable

Medium

Custom fields are per-project, not global

Low

Minimal review footprint limits evidence base

Jira logo

Jira gotchas

High

Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration

High

Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms

Medium

Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin

Medium

Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption

Medium

Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026

Pair-specific challenges

  • Artemis 7 has no documented API requiring export-based migration

    Artemis 7 lacks published API endpoints, API key management, or developer documentation. All data extraction relies on CSV exports or structured table scraping from the Artemis 7 interface. Column headers may be inconsistent across different project pages, and there is no way to pull data programmatically for delta synchronization. We ask customers to provide a full export during scoping and validate header consistency before transformation begins. Any changes made in Artemis 7 during the migration window require a supplemental export.

  • Per-project custom fields require manual consolidation before Jira import

    Artemis 7 allows custom fields to be defined independently per project with no global registry. During scoping we ask the customer to identify all active projects and consolidate unique custom field names. Fields with the same name but different data types across projects are the most common source of import errors. Jira requires global custom fields to be created before any data loads, so we finalize the Jira custom field schema before production migration begins. We flag any duplicate field name conflicts and ask the customer to confirm resolution before we proceed.

  • Attachment URLs are platform-bound and non-portable

    Artemis 7 stores attachments as URLs pointing to its own internal file service. These URLs are not portable across systems and break when the user account is deprovisioned. We do not include attachment URLs in the migrated dataset. We deliver a separate CSV listing each attachment URL, its associated task name, project name, and file size for the customer's admin to re-upload to the corresponding Jira issue post-migration. This is a manual step that the customer's admin must complete after Jira is live.

  • Jira permission schemes may restrict issue visibility post-migration

    When migrating to Jira Cloud, the Permissions Scheme used by the project enforces permissions in the cloud instance. If Artemis 7 role assignments do not map cleanly to Jira project roles and groups, migrated users may not see migrated issues. We review Artemis 7 resource roles during scoping, map them to Jira project roles (Administrators, Members, Viewers) or custom roles, and configure the corresponding permission scheme before migration. If the customer used Artemis 7 permission levels that have no Jira equivalent, we flag the gap and the customer's admin resolves it post-migration.

  • Gantt dependency types do not map 1:1 to Jira issue links

    Artemis 7 Gantt dependencies support Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, and Start-to-Finish relationship types. Jira natively supports Blocks and Blocked By (equivalent to Finish-to-Start), but the other three dependency types require either a custom Issue Link type or manual resolution post-migration. We map what we can, flag unsupported dependency types in the migration report, and let the customer's admin decide whether to recreate them as Jira issue links or document them as project plan notes.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Artemis 7 to Jira data migration

  1. Export extraction and scoping

    We ask the customer to provide a full data export from Artemis 7 covering all active projects, tasks, milestones, resources, time entries, and custom fields. We review the export for column header consistency across projects, identify per-project custom field names and data types, and flag any data quality issues (null assignees, missing dates, orphaned child tasks). We deliver a scoping document summarizing the record counts per object, any custom field consolidation requirements, and a migration timeline estimate before any transformation work begins.

  2. Custom field consolidation and Jira schema design

    We consolidate unique custom field names from all Artemis 7 projects, identify naming collisions with different data types, and ask the customer to confirm resolution. We then design the Jira global custom field schema (field names, types, and project associations). We create Jira Projects, configure the appropriate permission scheme based on Artemis resource roles, enable Time Tracking on projects with time entries, and set up the Version (Release) structure based on Artemis milestones. Jira project keys are derived from project name acronyms or customer-specified prefixes.

  3. Transformation and dependency reconstruction

    We transform the Artemis 7 export into Jira-compatible CSV format. Task hierarchy (parent-child relationships) is reconstructed as Jira Subtask issues. Gantt dependencies are mapped to Jira Issue Links where supported; unsupported dependency types are flagged. Artemis 7 priority levels are mapped to Jira Priority values. Milestones become Jira Versions with release dates. Resource records are mapped to Jira Users by email match, and Artemis roles map to Jira project roles or custom roles.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Jira Sandbox or development environment using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager or admin reconciles record counts (projects in, issues in, versions in, worklogs in), spot-checks 25-50 issues against the Artemis 7 source, and validates that parent-child hierarchy, assignees, and due dates are correct. Custom field values are spot-checked for data type consistency. The customer signs off the sandbox migration before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jira Projects (created first), Versions (milestones mapped as releases), Users (resolved by email), Issues (parent issues created before subtasks), Issue Links (dependencies reconstructed after all issues exist), Worklogs (time entries linked to resolved issues), and Custom Fields (values loaded after custom field schema is finalized). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We flag any Artemis 7 attachment URLs for the customer's admin to re-upload post-migration.

  6. Cutover, validation, and handoff

    We freeze Artemis 7 access during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Jira as the system of record. We deliver the attachment re-upload flag list, a written inventory of any unsupported Gantt dependency types, and the Jira custom field schema document. We do not migrate Artemis 7 workflows or project templates as configuration. The customer's admin rebuilds any automation requirements in Jira using the migration inventory as a reference. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Artemis 7 logo

Artemis 7

Source

Strengths

  • Covers the full project lifecycle from planning through delivery within a single interface
  • Includes resource allocation, budget tracking, and risk management as standard features
  • Offers Kanban boards alongside traditional Gantt and list views
  • Supports client-facing portals for stakeholder visibility
  • Integrates with email and calendar systems for task notifications

Weaknesses

  • Almost no publicly available customer reviews, making independent validation difficult
  • No published API documentation or developer portal for programmatic access
  • Feature set appears modest compared to established PM platforms like Asana, Monday, or Smartsheet
  • Limited information available on data export formats and migration tooling
Jira logo

Jira

Destination

Strengths

  • Deeply customizable workflows and status schemes with no hard limits on workflow complexity or number of custom statuses.
  • Strong agile ceremony support: sprint planning, backlog grooming, velocity tracking, and burndown charts for Scrum teams.
  • Industry-standard developer tool with native Git integration linking commits, pull requests, and deployments to issues.
  • Large Atlassian Marketplace with thousands of plugins extending time tracking, portfolio management, and reporting capabilities.
  • Free tier available for up to 10 users with unlimited issues, enabling evaluation before committing to a paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Excessive configurability creates a steep learning curve; cross-team consistency is hard to maintain without strict governance.
  • Performance degrades with large backlogs, complex custom fields, and heavily nested issue hierarchies.
  • Reporting requires additional configuration or paid plugins; out-of-the-box analytics are limited for business users.
  • Jira lacks native sprint management, requiring Jira Software for true agile team features.
  • Teams outside engineering resist adoption due to UI complexity, leaving the all-in-one promise unfulfilled for cross-functional organizations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Artemis 7 and Jira.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Artemis 7: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Artemis 7 doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Artemis 7 to Jira migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Artemis 7 to Jira data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Artemis 7 to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Artemis 7 to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 10 projects and 5,000 tasks with no complex Gantt dependency reconstruction. Migrations with complex multi-level task hierarchies, per-project custom field name collisions requiring manual consolidation, or large time-entry histories (over 10,000 entries) move to six to ten weeks. Jira's own migration documentation confirms that enterprise Jira migrations with hundreds of thousands of issues routinely take weeks to months depending on data volume and configuration scope.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Artemis 7.
Land in Jira, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day