Project Management migration

Migrate from Teamwork.com to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Teamwork.com and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Teamwork.com logo

Teamwork.com

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

64%

9 of 14

objects map 1:1 between Teamwork.com and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-3 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Teamwork.com to Asana is a structural migration driven by two recurring themes: teams that downsized and found Teamwork.com's per-user pricing unjustifiable without the PSA billing layer, and teams that outgrew the performance overhead of Teamwork.com's hierarchical data model. The migration requires restructuring Task Lists as Asana Sections, converting Milestones to Asana's Milestone feature or tagged tasks depending on the destination plan, and resolving the absence of native time tracking in Asana. Time Entries from Teamwork.com carry billable flags, hourly rates, and duration data that have no direct Asana equivalent — we map them to custom fields or a companion lookup table and advise on Timely or Harvest integration. Teamwork.com Automations, Project Templates, and Client Portal access do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of every active automation for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana Rules.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Teamwork.com logo

Teamwork.com

What's pushing teams away

  • Performance degrades noticeably as workspace size grows, with users reporting slower run times once multiple concurrent projects accumulate significant task volumes.
  • UI changes happen regularly and some frequently-used features become buried under new menu structures or require multi-step hover interactions to access.
  • Most advanced features including Custom Fields, billing, and workload management require upgrading to paid tiers, locking core functionality behind per-user costs.
  • Onboarding curve is steep for non-technical team members who need to understand the distinction between Projects, Tasks, Lists, and Milestones before the tool feels intuitive.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Teamwork.com objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Teamwork.com object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Teamwork.com

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Projects map 1:1 to Asana Projects. Project status (Active, On Hold, Completed) maps to Asana's project archived state (false = active, true = archived) with color-coding preserved where supported. Start date and end date transfer to Asana's Project Start Date and Project Due Date fields. Project-level custom fields map to Asana project custom fields on a field-by-field basis; see Custom Fields row for scope merging notes.

Teamwork.com

Task List

maps to

Asana

Section

lossy
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Task Lists are section headers within a Project that carry ordering and optional start/due dates. They have no direct Asana equivalent — Asana uses Sections as the grouping construct within Projects. We map each Teamwork.com Task List to an Asana Section within its parent Project, preserving list-level ordering and start/due date as a Section description note. List-level Milestones (milestones attached to a Task List rather than a standalone date) are flagged during scoping and converted to individual milestone tasks within the Section.

Teamwork.com

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Tasks map to Asana Tasks with full metadata: assignees, due dates, priority, estimated time, and description. The task hierarchy (parent task ID, child subtask IDs) is preserved as Asana's parent task reference and subtasks field. Priority values (low, normal, high, urgent) in Teamwork.com map to Asana's Custom Fields priority enum if available or to a custom numeric sort field. Task List association is resolved to the target Section during migration.

Teamwork.com

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Task (as subtask field)

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Subtasks are distinct API objects carrying their own assignees, due dates, and completion state. In Asana, subtasks are a field on a parent Task rather than a separate object. We flatten the Subtask hierarchy by creating each Subtask as a Task in its own right, then linking it to the parent Task via Asana's subtasks field. Individual Subtask assignees and dates are preserved. Note that Asana's parent task completion does not cascade to subtasks, matching Teamwork.com behavior; we do not implement auto-complete propagation.

Teamwork.com

Milestone

maps to

Asana

Milestone (or tagged Task)

lossy
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Milestones are date-driven project markers, optionally linked to specific tasks. Asana Milestones are available on Starter and above plans as a distinct feature. We map milestones to Asana Milestones within the parent Project where the Asana plan supports it, preserving milestone name and target date. Milestones with no date or with list-level attachment are converted to tasks with a Milestone tag. Linked task associations are preserved as task dependency notes. Teams on Asana Enterprise can use Goals as milestone grouping structures, which we note as a post-migration option.

Teamwork.com

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields or Lookup Table

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Time Entries carry billable/non-billable flags, hourly rates, and logged durations linked to tasks or projects. Asana has no native time tracking. We map Time Entries to a custom fields group on the related Asana task (total logged hours, billable flag, hourly rate) or deliver them as a separate Time Entries table in a written inventory with task ID lookup keys. Customers who need ongoing time tracking are advised to integrate Timely or Harvest post-migration, both of which have native Asana integrations. Time Entry data is fully extracted from Teamwork.com regardless of destination strategy.

Teamwork.com

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Custom Fields exist at project-level and site-wide (task and project) scopes. Asana Custom Fields are project-level only with no site-wide equivalent. We retrieve both scopes via Teamwork.com V2 API, merge them by name, and map to Asana project-level custom fields. Dropdown-type custom fields carry an options array that we preserve as Asana enum options. If the same field name exists as both a project-level and site-wide field in Teamwork.com, we flag the conflict and map to separate Asana fields with a naming convention. Teamwork.com Custom Field data only exists if the source account is on a Premium-tier plan or above.

Teamwork.com

Tag

maps to

Asana

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

Tags in Teamwork.com are simple string labels applied across Projects and Tasks. Asana Tags are workspace-level labels that can be applied to any task. We map tags 1:1 by name, preserving the full tag set across the workspace. Tags used for cross-cutting categorization migrate as-is; tags used for billing classification (Teamwork.com) are flagged and mapped to the Time Entry strategy.

Teamwork.com

Comment

maps to

Asana

Stories (task comments)

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Comments attach to Tasks with author attribution, formatted text, and timestamps. Asana Stories serve the same purpose on Tasks. We extract full comment text and author name, creating an Asana Story entry for each comment in chronological order. @mentions in Teamwork.com are preserved as text and noted for manual recreation in Asana Conversations or as @mentions if the mentioned user is an Asana workspace member. Replies within comment threads preserve nesting via the parent Story reference.

Teamwork.com

Team

maps to

Asana

Team

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Teams are grouping constructs holding multiple Users, with project-level permission assignments. Asana Teams are workspace-level groupings of people used to organise projects and control access. We map each Teamwork.com Team to an Asana Team, preserving the team name and populating it with matched Asana workspace members. Project-level role assignments (Team = Admin, Member, Guest on a specific project) require post-migration recreation in Asana because Asana permissions are Team-scoped, not project-plus-team scoped.

Teamwork.com

User

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Users carry name, email, role, hourly cost rate, and working hours. We map Users to Asana workspace members by email as the dedupe key. The Teamwork.com hourly cost rate transfers to a custom field on the Asana user profile or, if not supported, to a Staff Cost Rates lookup document. Any Teamwork.com User without a matching Asana workspace member goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision.

Teamwork.com

Client

maps to

Asana

Custom Field or Lookup Table

lossy
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Clients are top-level entities owning multiple Projects, carrying contact info, billing rates, and a client portal user account. Asana has no native client object. We map Client records to a custom field on the related Project (Client Name, Client Contact, Client Billing Rate) and deliver a written Client-to-Project lookup table for reference. Customer Portal access from Teamwork.com (Enterprise feature) requires rebuild via Asana's Enterprise Customer Portal offering, which we document in the automation inventory.

Teamwork.com

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment (URL reference)

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Attachments link files to Tasks, Projects, or Posts with name, type, size, and uploader metadata. Asana Attachments are linked resources (Google Drive links, Dropbox links, uploaded files) attached to Tasks. We extract attachment URLs and metadata, writing them as URL attachments in Asana where the attachment type is a direct link, or noting upload-file attachments as a separate blob migration step depending on the customer's Asana storage allowance.

Teamwork.com

Invoice

maps to

Asana

Lookup Table (not migrated)

lossy
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Invoices carry client associations, line items, tax configurations, and payment status. Asana has no native invoice object. We extract invoice header and line item data into a written Invoice Inventory document keyed by client and project, preserving invoice number, date, amount, and payment status. The customer recreates invoices in their accounting tool of record (QuickBooks, Xero, FreshBooks) post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Teamwork.com logo

Teamwork.com gotchas

High

Custom Fields are locked behind the Premium subscription tier

Medium

API returns different field sets depending on endpoint version

Medium

Project-level and site-wide custom fields are distinct schema entities

Low

Completing parent tasks does not cascade to subtasks

Low

Rate limits are per-user-seat multiplier, not fixed

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Asana has no native time tracking, creating a structural gap for billable data

    Teamwork.com's native time entries with billable flags, hourly rates, and duration have no Asana equivalent. Asana removed the built-in timesheet feature several years ago and now requires a third-party integration (Harvest, Timely, or Toggl) for time tracking. We cannot replicate the Teamwork.com time entry object as a native Asana object. During scoping, we determine whether to map time entry data to custom fields on tasks (a limited but immediate solution), deliver a separate time entries lookup table keyed by task ID, or plan a Harvest or Timely integration post-migration. Customers who rely on billable hour tracking for client billing must treat this as a separate implementation, not a migration step.

  • Teamwork.com Automations do not migrate to Asana Rules

    Teamwork.com Automations use event-based triggers (task created, status changed, time logged) with specific condition-action pairs that are not structurally compatible with Asana Rules. The trigger vocabulary, condition types, and available actions differ significantly. We do not migrate automations as code. We extract every active Automation from Teamwork.com via the V2 API, document the trigger, conditions, actions, and associated project, and deliver a written Automation Inventory with recommended Asana Rule equivalents for the customer's admin to rebuild post-migration. Automations requiring rebuild typically number 5-30 on a medium workspace and represent a significant post-migration admin investment.

  • Custom Field API reads require V2 endpoint with explicit flag

    Teamwork.com maintains parallel API versions (V1, V2, V3) with different field coverage. The V1 /projects/{projectId}.json endpoint does not support includeCustomFields=true; the V2 custom fields endpoint must be called explicitly for custom field retrieval. We route all custom field reads through V2 and all other object reads through V3. Mixing endpoint versions within a single migration run can cause silent field omission in project records. Additionally, Custom Fields exist only on Premium and above accounts — Starter plan accounts have no accessible custom field data via API even if the field values appear in the UI.

  • Parent task completion does not cascade to subtasks in either platform

    Teamwork.com does not auto-complete subtasks when a parent task is marked complete, which is non-standard compared to most PM platforms. Asana similarly does not cascade parent completion to subtasks. We replicate this behavior exactly during migration so that destination task completion states match the source. Customers who expect parent-auto-complete (a common assumption with new PM platform adoption) should be aware that both platforms require manual subtask completion or a custom automation rule to propagate completion state downward.

  • Project-to-board stage mapping is a manual step post-import

    Teamwork.com's native importer documentation notes that tasks imported from Asana do not map to Board stages — that is a known limitation in the reverse direction. In the Teamwork.com-to-Asana direction, Tasks are imported into the List view by default. If the source workspace used Board view heavily, tasks land in the List view and must be manually reorganised into Board sections, or the customer must configure a custom Rule to auto-assign tasks to Board columns based on status or tag. We flag the Board reorganisation as a post-migration step and provide a written Board reorganisation checklist grouped by project.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Teamwork.com to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and workspace audit

    We audit the Teamwork.com workspace across subscription tier (Free, Deliver, Grow, Scale), project count, Task List structure per project, task hierarchy depth (including Subtask nesting levels), active Milestone count, Time Entry volume, Custom Field definitions (both project-level and site-wide), active Automations, Tags, and Client records. We also map Team membership and project-level team assignments. The discovery output is a written migration scope document listing every object type, estimated record counts per type, and a Custom Field map noting which definitions require Premium-tier access on the source.

  2. Schema design and section strategy

    We design the Asana destination schema. This includes provisioning Teams mapped from Teamwork.com Teams, Projects with start/due dates, and a Section strategy per project derived from the Teamwork.com Task List hierarchy. We pre-create any project-level Custom Fields in Asana with types matched to Teamwork.com field definitions (text, number, enum, date). Milestone conversion strategy is agreed upon during this step: use Asana native Milestones or tagged milestone tasks. Time Entry mapping strategy is confirmed: custom fields on tasks, a companion lookup document, or external tool integration plan.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into an Asana sandbox workspace using production-like data volume. The customer's project managers reconcile record counts per project (Tasks in, Subtasks in, Milestones in, Sections in), spot-check 20-30 random tasks against the Teamwork.com source, and verify Section ordering matches the original Task List order. The Sandbox sign-off is required before production migration begins. Any Section naming conflicts or Milestone conversion issues are resolved here.

  4. User and Team provisioning

    We extract every distinct Teamwork.com User and match by email against the Asana workspace membership list. Team memberships are mapped to Asana Team rosters. Any Teamwork.com User without a matching Asana workspace member is placed in a reconciliation queue. The customer's Asana admin provisions missing workspace members (active or inactive based on whether the Teamwork.com user is still active) before the production migration phase begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Teams first, then Projects (with dates and status), then Sections (from Task Lists), then Tasks (with parent-subtask hierarchy resolved), then Subtasks, then Milestones (with conversion strategy applied), then Tags, then Comments, then Custom Fields (merged from both scopes and written to project-level fields), then Time Entries (mapped per agreed strategy), then Client associations (as project custom fields), then Attachments (as URL references). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze writes to Teamwork.com during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the Automation Inventory document and Board Reorganisation checklist to the customer's admin team. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any task-to-section mapping issues or missing Milestone conversions raised by the project management team. We do not rebuild Teamwork.com Automations as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that work is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Teamwork.com logo

Teamwork.com

Source

Strengths

  • Tight integration between time tracking, billing rates, and project budgets enables profitability reporting without exporting to external tools.
  • Multiple simultaneous views on the same project data (Gantt, board, list, table) serve different team member working styles without context switching.
  • Client portal gives external stakeholders visibility without exposing internal project tooling or requiring email chains.
  • 150+ native integrations including HubSpot, QuickBooks, Salesforce, and NetSuite reduce the need for data duplication across tools.
  • AI-powered smart scheduler and resource assignments help teams identify capacity gaps before committing to new project work.

Weaknesses

  • Performance slows noticeably once workspaces accumulate multiple concurrent projects with hundreds of tasks and time entries.
  • UI undergoes frequent design updates that sometimes relocate frequently-used features, creating a persistent adjustment burden for power users.
  • Feature tier gating means custom fields, billing, and workload views are locked behind per-user Premium costs, limiting adoption for budget-constrained teams.
  • No native Gantt dependency automation means task chain sequencing requires manual maintenance or third-party add-ons.
  • Minimum user requirements on paid tiers (3+ users reported) make the platform impractical for very small solo or two-person agencies.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Teamwork.com and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Teamwork.com: Rate limits scale with user seat count; base quota units per hour multiplied by number of seats on the account.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Teamwork.com exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Teamwork.com to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Teamwork.com to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Teamwork.com to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Teamwork.com to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 15 projects and 2,000 tasks typically complete in two to three weeks for straightforward structure mapping without time entry reconstruction. Migrations with extensive Task List hierarchies, milestone-heavy project plans, large time entry histories (over 50,000 entries), or multi-Team workspace structures extend to five to eight weeks because of hierarchy flattening, Milestone conversion logic, and rate-table preservation work. Workspace scoping during discovery determines the timeline range with reasonable accuracy.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Teamwork.com.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day