Project Management migration

Migrate from AceProject to monday Work Management

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between AceProject and monday Work Management. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in monday Work Management.

AceProject logo

AceProject

Source

monday Work Management

Destination

monday Work Management logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between AceProject and monday Work Management.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from AceProject to monday.com is a structural migration: AceProject uses a project-centric hierarchy with Projects at the top containing Tasks and Subtasks, while monday.com uses a board-centric model with Boards containing Groups and Items. We resolve that schema difference during scoping by mapping each AceProject to a monday.com Board or to a folder-and-board structure depending on the customer's preferred granularity. Task dependencies transfer as monday.com dependency columns. Time entries migrate as a dedicated Time Tracking column type on each board. Expense records move into a custom Expenses integration or a linked board depending on the destination plan. Workflows, automations, and document attachments do not migrate as code or files; we deliver a written inventory of every AceProject workflow and automation for the customer's admin to rebuild in monday.com, and we flag file transfer constraints upfront so that document migration is scoped correctly before any data moves.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

AceProject logo

AceProject

What's pushing teams away

  • Slow load times and infrequent feature updates leave teams wanting a more responsive, actively developed platform.
  • No self-hosted or on-premises option forces reliance on the vendor's cloud, which limits control for regulated industries.
  • Lack of open source status means teams cannot self-modify or audit the codebase, unlike competitors such as OpenProject.
  • Limited third-party integrations require additional tooling to connect with modern CRM, ERP, or DevOps workflows.

Choosing

monday Work Management logo

monday Work Management

What's pulling them in

  • Lowest onboarding friction of any mid-market PM tool — drag-and-drop boards and colorful UI mean non-technical team members contribute from day one without training.
  • Highly customizable board structure lets teams model their actual workflow rather than forcing a predefined template onto their process.
  • Generous free forever plan with two seats lets small teams or solo users validate the platform before committing budget or migrating data from elsewhere.
  • Integrations with Slack, Zoom, Google Drive, and CRM tools keep monday.com as a coordination hub rather than requiring teams to switch context constantly.
  • Multiple view modes — Kanban, Calendar, Gantt, Map, Chart — give different team members the visualization they prefer without switching tools.

Object mapping

How AceProject objects map to monday Work Management

Each row shows how a AceProject object lands in monday Work Management, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

AceProject

Project

maps to

monday Work Management

Board or Folder

lossy
Fully supported

Each AceProject becomes a monday.com Board. For organizations with many small projects, we recommend creating a Folder per AceProject with related Boards inside; for organizations with one major project per workspace, a direct Board-per-Project structure maps more cleanly. The customer chooses the strategy during scoping. Project metadata (name, status, start date, end date) maps to Board name, Board status, and timeline columns.

AceProject

Task

maps to

monday Work Management

Item

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Tasks map 1:1 to monday.com Items. The Task name becomes the Item title, Assignee maps to the Person column, Due Date maps to the Date column, and Priority maps to a Status or Label column. Custom Task fields (Boolean, Date, List, Numeric, Text, User types) map to equivalent monday.com column types. Estimates from AceProject map to the Numbers or Duration column in monday.com Pro.

AceProject

Subtask

maps to

monday Work Management

Item (nested in Group)

1:many
Fully supported

AceProject Subtasks are nested under Tasks in a parent-child hierarchy. monday.com does not have a native subtask nesting model. We flatten the hierarchy during export, creating separate Items for each Subtask and linking them back to the parent Item via a Lookup column or the Item's dependency column. The parent Item retains the top-level task fields; Subtask Items carry only their name, assignee, and status.

AceProject

Task Dependency

maps to

monday Work Management

Dependency Column

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject task dependencies with type and linked Task ID map to monday.com's Dependency column (available on Pro tier and above). We export the dependency type (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, etc.) and the linked Task ID, then resolve the target Item in the monday.com board during import. If the destination plan is Standard ($12/seat), dependencies are documented in a written plan and the customer rebuilds them manually using the Dependency column after upgrading or as a separate scope.

AceProject

User

maps to

monday Work Management

User

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Users map directly to monday.com workspace members. We export by email match and resolve against the monday.com workspace User list. AceProject custom User fields map to monday.com custom columns on the user profile board. Note: AceProject does not auto-assign imported Users to Projects — we flag this during scoping and advise manual project membership before or after import to prevent orphaned task assignments.

AceProject

Time Entry

maps to

monday Work Management

Time Tracking Column (Items)

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Time Entries recorded against Tasks map to monday.com Time Tracking column values logged per Item (Pro tier required). We export hours, dates, and billing rates and create Time Tracking entries linked to the corresponding Item. If the destination plan is Standard, we map time entries to a Numbers column with a manual tracking procedure. Rate and currency fields migrate directly unless the destination account uses a different currency, which requires a mapping note for the customer.

AceProject

Expense

maps to

monday Work Management

Custom Board or Expenses Integration

lossy
Fully supported

AceProject Expense records tied to Projects and optionally to Tasks have no native monday.com equivalent. We recommend creating a dedicated Expenses board linked to the Project board via an Item column or external ID, with expense records stored as Items. The customer chooses between a manual Expenses board setup (no third-party dependency) or connecting via an Expensify or similar integration. We flag the expense field visibility constraint in AceProject (admin-level export required) during scoping.

AceProject

Document

maps to

monday Work Management

File Column or External Link

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Documents associated with Projects export as metadata and file references. monday.com's File column stores file content directly in the board. We migrate document metadata (name, upload date, associated project) and attempt file content transfer based on whether the files are accessible via the export. For inaccessible files, we provide a written document inventory with URLs and advise re-attaching in monday.com post-migration.

AceProject

Custom Field (Task)

maps to

monday Work Management

Column

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Task custom fields (Boolean, Date, List, Numeric, Text, User types) map to equivalent monday.com column types. Critical constraint: AceProject custom fields only render values in the new interface; we detect the interface version during scoping and recommend switching to the new AceProject interface before running the export if custom field values appear blank, to avoid silent data gaps in the migration.

AceProject

Custom Field (User)

maps to

monday Work Management

User Profile Column

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject User-level custom fields export as key-value pairs and map to monday.com user profile custom columns. User profile columns display within the People column in boards. We export all User custom fields alongside the standard User records and resolve them during User import.

AceProject

Comment

maps to

monday Work Management

Updates Column

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject document and task comments migrate to monday.com Updates (the activity feed on each Item). We export comment text and author, creating an Update entry per comment. Comment threading is simplified — nested threads are flattened into a linear comment history in the Updates column. The original author attribution is preserved by tagging the monday.com user by email match.

AceProject

Task Estimate

maps to

monday Work Management

Duration or Numbers Column

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject task Estimates (hours or days) map to monday.com's Duration column on Pro plan or a Numbers column on Standard. We preserve the estimate value and the unit (hours/days) as documented in the export. The customer confirms the unit mapping during scoping since AceProject uses configurable estimate units and monday.com Duration columns are expressed in days by default.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

AceProject logo

AceProject gotchas

High

Task import does not auto-assign users to Projects

Medium

Custom fields only visible in the new interface

Medium

CSV import requires DOS-style CRLF line endings

Low

Expense field visibility gated by user role

monday Work Management logo

monday Work Management gotchas

High

Subitems have no bulk export endpoint

High

API complexity budget constrains query depth

Medium

Daily call limits vary sharply across plan tiers

Medium

Automation and integration rules do not export via API

Low

Saved views are not exposed via API

Pair-specific challenges

  • monday.com has no native subtask nesting model

    AceProject organizes work hierarchically: Projects contain Tasks, and Tasks contain Subtasks. monday.com Items live in a flat list within Groups; there is no native subtask nesting. We flatten the AceProject subtask hierarchy by creating separate Items for each Subtask and linking them to the parent Item via a Lookup or Dependency column. This preserves the relationship but requires configuration of the column type in monday.com before migration. Teams expecting a 1:1 subtask copy without this step will see a flat task list with no parent-child structure.

  • Custom field values only visible in AceProject's new interface

    AceProject's classic interface displays a custom field's label but renders no value — actual field values only appear in the new interface. We determine which interface version the account uses at the time of export. If the account has not migrated to the new interface, we flag all custom field values as potentially unresolvable and recommend switching to the new interface before running the export to ensure data completeness. Skipping this step results in blank custom field values migrating as nulls.

  • Workflows, automations, and sequences do not migrate

    AceProject workflows and any automation sequences (if present) do not have a direct monday.com equivalent in migration scope. monday.com uses a recipe-based automation builder with triggers and actions; AceProject's workflow model is simpler and event-driven. We deliver a written inventory of every AceProject workflow and automation with its trigger, conditions, and actions, and the customer's admin rebuilds them in monday.com's automation builder post-migration. This is a known scope boundary for all migrations regardless of source.

  • Expense records require a custom board or third-party integration

    AceProject includes built-in expense tracking tied to Projects and Tasks. monday.com has no native expense object — expense data has no direct column type. We create a linked Expenses board structure and migrate expense metadata (amount, currency, category, date, project reference, task reference) as Items. If the customer relies on expense reporting for billing or financial visibility, they should plan for a separate expense workflow post-migration, either through monday.com's Integrations (Expensify, QuickBooks) or a custom-built expense board with automated reporting.

  • Dependency column requires Pro tier or above

    AceProject task dependencies (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, etc.) map to monday.com's Dependency column, which is available on the Pro plan ($19/seat/month) and above. If the destination monday.com account is on the Standard plan ($12/seat), we document every dependency in a written plan and flag that dependencies cannot be enabled without upgrading. We confirm the destination plan tier during scoping and advise upgrading before migration if dependencies are critical to the project structure.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful AceProject to monday Work Management data migration

  1. Discovery and interface version check

    We audit the source AceProject account across projects, tasks, subtasks, users, time entries, expenses, custom fields, and task dependencies. We identify the AceProject interface version (classic or new) because custom field values only appear in the new interface. We extract the complete project-task-subtask hierarchy, dependency graph, and user list, and we confirm the exporting account has admin privileges to bypass the expense visibility restriction. The discovery output is a written migration scope, source record counts, and a confirmation of which interface version is active.

  2. Board structure design and project-to-board mapping

    We design the monday.com destination structure. Each AceProject becomes a Board, and we confirm whether the customer prefers a folder-per-project or flat board-per-project layout. We design the column schema for each board, mapping AceProject task fields (Assignee, Due Date, Priority, Estimate) to monday.com column types (Person, Date, Status, Duration/Numbers). Custom fields from AceProject map to equivalent monday.com column types. If dependencies are critical, we confirm the destination plan is Pro or above. The schema is validated in a test board before production migration begins.

  3. User provisioning and project membership setup

    We export AceProject Users by email and match them against monday.com workspace members. Any User without a matching monday.com account goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer to provision. We flag the AceProject constraint that user import does not auto-assign those users to Projects, and we advise adding all project members to each monday.com Board manually before or after item import to ensure assignees resolve correctly on migrated tasks.

  4. Data export with interface validation and file transfer

    We run the admin-level AceProject CSV export under an administrator account to capture all expense records. If the account uses the classic interface, we flag this before export and recommend switching to the new interface to ensure custom field values populate. We convert CSV files to UTF-8 encoding (AceProject uses DOS-style CRLF internally, which we handle during pre-flight). We attempt file content transfer for Documents. Files that are inaccessible are documented in a separate file inventory for manual re-attachment in monday.com post-migration.

  5. Dependency graph and hierarchy resolution

    We resolve the AceProject task dependency graph during the transform phase. Each dependency record (task A depends on task B) is mapped to a monday.com Dependency column entry with the correct Item reference. Subtask hierarchy is flattened: each Subtask becomes a separate Item with a Lookup or Dependency link back to its parent Task Item. Time entries are mapped to the Time Tracking column on the corresponding Items. Expense records are mapped to a dedicated Expenses board linked via an Item ID or external reference column.

  6. Production migration and reconciliation

    We run the production migration in dependency order: Users first (validated), then Boards with column schema, then Items with assignees and custom fields, then Time Tracking entries, then Expenses. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. We validate that assignee lookups resolve in the target Board, that dependency columns are populated correctly, and that Time Tracking totals match the source time entry sums. We deliver a written Workflow and Automation inventory document to the customer's admin for post-migration rebuild in monday.com's automation builder. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild workflows or configure third-party integrations as standard scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

AceProject logo

AceProject

Source

Strengths

  • Free tier available for small teams to trial without upfront cost.
  • Includes time tracking, expense management, and Gantt charts without add-ons.
  • Built-in chat and file commenting consolidate communication.
  • Admin-level CSV export covers Projects, Tasks, and Timesheets.
  • Drag-and-drop dashboard for quick project status visibility.

Weaknesses

  • No self-hosted or on-premises deployment option.
  • Not open source, limiting code auditability and customization.
  • Slow page load times reported across multiple reviews.
  • Feature release cadence is infrequent compared to competitors.
  • Third-party integration ecosystem is limited.
monday Work Management logo

monday Work Management

Destination

Strengths

  • Drag-and-drop board UI with near-zero learning curve for non-technical users entering project data for the first time.
  • 20+ column types and unlimited custom columns let teams model arbitrarily complex data structures without developer help.
  • Multi-view support — Kanban, Gantt, Calendar, Timeline, Chart, Map — satisfies different team members without forcing a single layout.
  • Automations cover common trigger-action patterns for teams without dedicated developers to write custom scripts.
  • Free plan for 2 seats and a 14-day trial on all paid tiers make evaluation risk-free before committing to migration scope.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing with no enterprise flat-rate option means costs scale linearly with headcount, making it expensive at 50+ seats.
  • Subitems lack bulk API access, making them problematic for CRM-style use cases where contact records live as subitems under a company board.
  • Automations and advanced views are gated behind Pro and Enterprise tiers, creating feature deserts on entry-level plans.
  • Dependency column is visually limited — no critical path, no auto-rescheduling, and cross-board dependencies require manual link management.
  • No native document management; docs, wikis, and knowledge bases require a separate integration or third-party workaround.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across AceProject and monday Work Management.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    AceProject: Not publicly documented — typical SaaS limits assumed and confirmed during scoping..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    AceProject doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your AceProject to monday Work Management migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about AceProject to monday Work Management data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during AceProject to monday Work Management migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your AceProject to monday Work Management migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts with fewer than 30 projects and 5,000 tasks with no complex dependency graph or expense data. Migrations with task dependencies, expense records requiring a separate linked board, large user bases (over 100 users), or multi-workspace destinations move to five to eight weeks because of dependency graph resolution, expense normalization, and the board-per-project versus folder-per-project structural decision.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from AceProject.
Land in monday Work Management, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day