Project Management migration

Migrate from AceProject to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between AceProject and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

AceProject logo

AceProject

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between AceProject and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from AceProject to Asana is a data-centric migration that preserves your historical project structure, task assignments, and time tracking while taking advantage of Asana's active development, broader integration ecosystem, and more responsive interface. AceProject structures work under a Project with Tasks holding Assignees, Dependencies, Estimates, and Custom Fields; we map those to Asana Projects, Tasks, and custom fields. Subtasks are reconstructed as nested Asana tasks. Time entries and Expenses carry over as task-level custom fields or notes since Asana does not have native time tracking or expense objects. Document metadata migrates as file attachment references. Task dependencies map to Asana dependencies, though teams should note Asana's known limitation where dragging a milestone does not always cascade date changes correctly across all dependent tasks. We do not migrate AceProject workflows, expense approval rules, or built-in reports — we deliver a written inventory of these for your admin to rebuild in Asana.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

AceProject logo

AceProject

What's pushing teams away

  • Slow load times and infrequent feature updates leave teams wanting a more responsive, actively developed platform.
  • No self-hosted or on-premises option forces reliance on the vendor's cloud, which limits control for regulated industries.
  • Lack of open source status means teams cannot self-modify or audit the codebase, unlike competitors such as OpenProject.
  • Limited third-party integrations require additional tooling to connect with modern CRM, ERP, or DevOps workflows.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How AceProject objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a AceProject object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

AceProject

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Projects map directly to Asana Projects. The project name, description, status, start date, and due date transfer as standard Asana project fields. Custom project-level fields in AceProject map to Asana custom fields created on the project before migration. We preserve the project hierarchy if the account uses parent-child project grouping.

AceProject

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Tasks map to Asana Tasks within the corresponding project. Assignee, due date, start date, estimated hours, priority, status, and description transfer directly. Task description migrates as the Asana task description field. Custom task fields in AceProject (Boolean, Date, List, Numeric, Text, User types) require pre-creation of equivalent Asana custom fields; we create these before the task import phase and map values by field name.

AceProject

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Subtask (nested Task)

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Subtasks nested under Tasks map to Asana subtasks (tasks with a parent_task reference). We flatten the AceProject tree structure during export and reconstruct it in Asana using the parent Task GID as the parent reference. Nested subtasks (sub-subtasks) map to Asana subtasks with their direct parent as the parent_task.

AceProject

User

maps to

Asana

User (member of project)

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Users map to Asana Users by email address. We export all user records including name, email, and user-level custom fields. Post-import, we add each migrated user to the corresponding Asana project as a member. Note: Asana's free tier restricts project member counts, so we flag the destination Asana plan during scoping if the project has more than 15 members on a free or Starter plan.

AceProject

Dependency

maps to

Asana

Dependency

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Task dependencies map to Asana Dependencies. We export the dependency type (finish-to-start, start-to-start, etc.) and the linked Task ID, then create Asana dependency records with the correct blocking and blocked task references. Teams should note that Asana has documented limitations where dragging a milestone task does not always cascade date changes correctly to all downstream dependent tasks.

AceProject

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Custom Field or Note

lossy
Fully supported

AceProject Time Entries record hours, dates, billing rates, and task association. Asana has no native time tracking object in its core PM platform — time tracking requires the optional Asana Time Tracking add-on or a third-party integration. We migrate time entry data as a custom multi-value field (Date + Hours + Notes) on the corresponding task, or as a task note if custom fields are not preferred. The customer chooses the format during scoping.

AceProject

Expense

maps to

Asana

Custom Field or Note

lossy
Fully supported

AceProject Expense records include amount, category, currency, date, and task association. Asana has no native expense object. We migrate expense data as a custom multi-value field on the task or project, preserving amount, category, and date. Expense approval workflows and per diem rules do not migrate; these are documented as part of the automation inventory.

AceProject

Document

maps to

Asana

Attachment (file reference)

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Documents store files attached to Projects or Tasks with version history. We export document metadata (filename, upload date, uploader, version) and file reference URLs. File content transfer depends on whether AceProject hosts the files or links to external storage. If files are hosted in AceProject, we download them and re-upload to Asana as project or task attachments. If AceProject links to external URLs, we preserve the URL as a link attachment.

AceProject

Custom Field (Task)

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject task custom fields support Boolean, Date, List, Numeric, Text, and User types. These map to Asana custom fields of equivalent type. List fields become Asana Dropdown; Boolean becomes a Checkbox (custom field) or a single-select with Yes/No options. User-type fields in AceProject map to Asana People fields. All destination custom fields must exist in Asana before task import begins; we create them during the schema pre-creation phase.

AceProject

Custom Field (User)

maps to

Asana

User Custom Fields

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject User-level custom fields migrate as key-value pairs. Asana User profiles support custom fields in the Profile section. We map text, date, and list custom fields to their Asana equivalents. Numeric and Boolean fields map to Number and Checkbox user custom fields respectively. User custom fields in Asana are workspace-level and appear on all user profiles.

AceProject

Comment

maps to

Asana

Comment

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject document and task Comments migrate to Asana task Comments. We export comment text, author, and timestamp. Comment threading in AceProject is flattened during migration — nested replies become top-level comments in Asana ordered by timestamp. Rich text formatting in AceProject comments is simplified to plain text or basic HTML-safe formatting in Asana comments.

AceProject

Workflows and Email Reminders

maps to

Asana

Rules (Asana)

lossy
Fully supported

AceProject email reminders and basic task notification workflows do not migrate as automation code. We audit every active workflow and email reminder configuration and document it as a written inventory with trigger, conditions, and action details. This inventory is handed to the customer for rebuild in Asana Rules (available at Premium and above) or Asana's advanced automation features. Workflow rebuild is outside standard migration scope.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

AceProject logo

AceProject gotchas

High

Task import does not auto-assign users to Projects

Medium

Custom fields only visible in the new interface

Medium

CSV import requires DOS-style CRLF line endings

Low

Expense field visibility gated by user role

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Asana dependency date cascading has documented edge cases

    Asana's Timeline view does not always cascade date changes correctly when a milestone or predecessor task is moved. Reported in the Asana community forum as a known bug where finish-to-start dependencies produce incorrect red-arrow warnings after manual drag operations. We import dependencies as finish-to-start by default, but we flag this limitation to the customer and advise testing critical path timelines in Asana after migration. For projects with complex dependency chains, we recommend validating the full cascade behavior in a test project before cutover.

  • AceProject custom field values only render in the new interface

    AceProject's classic interface displays custom field names but renders no values — actual field values only appear in the new AceProject interface. We determine which interface version the account uses at the time of export. If the account has not migrated to the new interface, we flag all custom field values as potentially unresolvable and recommend switching to the new interface before running the export to ensure data completeness. This affects both task and user custom fields.

  • Time entries and expenses require a format decision upfront

    Asana has no native time tracking or expense objects. AceProject time entries and expense records must be mapped to Asana custom fields or task notes. We support both approaches, but the format must be decided during scoping because custom fields must be created in Asana before task import. If the customer plans to use Asana's Time Tracking add-on, we can configure the migration to prepare data for that integration. If no add-on is planned, we use multi-value custom fields to carry hours, dates, and amounts per task.

  • Task import does not auto-assign users to Asana projects

    When importing tasks via CSV, AceProject does not automatically add imported user records to the target project's member list. We detect all user references in the task import scope during scoping and flag any users who do not yet have project membership. We add migrated users to the corresponding Asana project as members before task import begins. This prevents orphaned task assignments where the Assignee exists in Asana but cannot be resolved in the project context.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful AceProject to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and source audit

    We audit the AceProject account via the admin Export Data tool across all projects, tasks, subtasks, users, time entries, expenses, documents, and custom fields. We identify which interface version (classic or new) the account uses to confirm custom field value completeness. We extract dependency chains and flag any dependency cycles. We document active workflows, email reminder configurations, and expense approval rules for the automation inventory. The discovery output is a written migration scope with record counts, custom field inventory, and dependency graph summary.

  2. Asana workspace setup and custom field pre-creation

    We create the destination Asana workspace, configure project structure, and pre-create all custom fields before any data import. This includes custom fields for AceProject task custom fields (mapped by type), user custom fields, and placeholder fields for time entries and expenses if the customer selects the custom field format. Projects are created in Asana in the same hierarchy as the AceProject source. We create Asana dependencies for the task import scope during this phase so that the dependency graph is ready when tasks land.

  3. User migration and project membership

    We migrate AceProject Users to Asana Users by email address. All migrated users are added to their corresponding Asana projects as members before task import begins. If the destination Asana plan has member limits (e.g., 15 members on the free plan), we flag this during scoping and recommend upgrading before migration. We validate that each user's email address exists in Asana or can be provisioned by the customer's admin.

  4. Task and subtask import with dependency resolution

    We import AceProject Tasks into Asana Projects using Asana's bulk import API, preserving assignee, due date, start date, description, and custom field values. Subtasks are imported as nested tasks with parent_task references resolved to the migrated parent task's Asana GID. Dependencies are created as Asana dependency records after parent task GIDs are confirmed. We run import in batches to handle rate limits and use exponential backoff on API throttling responses. Each batch emits a row-count reconciliation report.

  5. Time entries, expenses, and document metadata

    Time entries and expenses are migrated as custom field values (multi-value Date + Hours or Amount fields) on the corresponding tasks, or as structured task notes if the customer did not select custom fields. Document metadata is imported as Asana attachment references or link attachments. If AceProject files are hosted locally in AceProject, we download and re-upload to Asana. We validate attachment count and file size limits against the destination Asana plan's storage allocation.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation inventory handoff

    We freeze AceProject writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We validate record counts across Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Users, and Attachments against the source. We deliver the automation inventory document covering all AceProject workflows, email reminders, and expense approval rules to the customer's admin for rebuild in Asana Rules or Asana's advanced automation features. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any data quality issues reported by the team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

AceProject logo

AceProject

Source

Strengths

  • Free tier available for small teams to trial without upfront cost.
  • Includes time tracking, expense management, and Gantt charts without add-ons.
  • Built-in chat and file commenting consolidate communication.
  • Admin-level CSV export covers Projects, Tasks, and Timesheets.
  • Drag-and-drop dashboard for quick project status visibility.

Weaknesses

  • No self-hosted or on-premises deployment option.
  • Not open source, limiting code auditability and customization.
  • Slow page load times reported across multiple reviews.
  • Feature release cadence is infrequent compared to competitors.
  • Third-party integration ecosystem is limited.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across AceProject and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    AceProject: Not publicly documented — typical SaaS limits assumed and confirmed during scoping..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    AceProject doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your AceProject to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about AceProject to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during AceProject to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your AceProject to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 500 tasks and 10 projects with no complex dependency chains. Migrations with large time entry histories (over 10,000 entries), multiple custom field types, complex dependency chains across 50+ tasks, or multi-project portfolios move to six to ten weeks because of dependency graph traversal, custom field pre-creation, and multi-phase validation. The timeline also depends on the customer's review and sign-off cadence between each phase.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from AceProject.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day