Project Management migration

Migrate from ActiveCollab to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between ActiveCollab and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

ActiveCollab logo

ActiveCollab

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

71%

10 of 14

objects map 1:1 between ActiveCollab and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from ActiveCollab to Asana is a deliberate platform choice: ActiveCollab bundles project management, time tracking, and invoicing into a single subscription for agencies and consultancies, while Asana focuses exclusively on work coordination and task management without native financial tracking. The migration is straightforward for record data but requires explicit decisions on time entries, billable utilization, and invoicing data because Asana has no native billing layer. We migrate Projects to Asana Projects, Tasks with their hierarchy intact, Discussions as task comments, Notes as task descriptions, Time Entries as custom number fields on tasks, and Attachments via the Asana API. Project Templates migrate as standard Projects. Task Dependencies transfer but Asana has documented bugs in Timeline view where dependent tasks do not recalculate correctly when the predecessor is moved; we flag this risk and recommend post-migration dependency audit. ActiveCollab Workflow Automations and Project Templates do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory of active automations for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana Rules.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

ActiveCollab logo

ActiveCollab

What's pushing teams away

  • Some teams outgrow the platform when they need deep customization, advanced reporting, or a richer marketplace of integrations beyond Zapier, Slack, and webhooks.
  • The mobile application receives criticism for being less complete than the desktop experience, with some features unavailable on iOS and Android.
  • Power users from enterprise-grade PM tools report that reporting and analytics dashboards lack the depth needed for executive-level project visibility.
  • Workflow automation rules are functional but limited compared to dedicated automation platforms, causing teams focused on process-heavy operations to look elsewhere.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How ActiveCollab objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a ActiveCollab object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

ActiveCollab

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Projects map to Asana Projects with project name, status (active/archived), description, category, and budget metadata preserved. Project owner maps to the Asana project member with admin role. We resolve the project-level owner by email match against the Asana workspace members. Archived projects in ActiveCollab migrate as archived projects in Asana. Project budget figures transfer to a custom number field budget__c since Asana has no native budget object.

ActiveCollab

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Tasks map to Asana Tasks with task name, description (rich text), due date, start date, assignees, priority, and completion status preserved. Task order within sections and lists is preserved using Asana's task ordering API. The critical mapping decision is whether each task is being moved or copied from its source project; moving a task in ActiveCollab disconnects it from the source project entirely, and we confirm this with the customer before migration and log every move operation in the audit trail.

ActiveCollab

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Subtasks map to Asana Subtasks with their own assignee and completion status. The parent-child relationship is preserved by setting the Asana parent task reference. Subtask assignees transfer independently of the parent task assignee, matching ActiveCollab's behavior where subtasks can have different owners than their parent.

ActiveCollab

Discussion

maps to

Asana

Task Comment

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Discussions (threaded comment chains attached to Projects or Tasks) map to Asana Task Comments. Author, timestamp, and content transfer. Project-level Discussions migrate as comments on a placeholder task labeled 'Project Discussion' within the migrated project, since Asana does not have a native project-level discussion thread. Discussion threads maintain chronological ordering by original timestamp.

ActiveCollab

Note

maps to

Asana

Task Description or Project Brief

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Notes are free-form text records that live at the Project level and can be pinned. We migrate Note content as either the Asana project Brief (for pinned notes) or as a dedicated task titled 'Note: [original note name]' within the project for unpinned notes. Note authorship and creation date are preserved in the task description header. Asana has no native project-level note object, so we choose the representation that best preserves accessibility and searchability for the customer's team.

ActiveCollab

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (number) on Task

lossy
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Time Entries (with job type, billable flag, duration, and linked task) have no native Asana equivalent. We create a custom number field time_logged_hours__c on the Asana Task and populate it with the total logged hours aggregated per task. The billable flag from ActiveCollab maps to a custom enum field time_billable__c with values billable/non-billable. Job type maps to a custom enum field time_job_type__c. Teams that rely on ActiveCollab's billable utilization dashboard should plan a dedicated time-tracking tool post-migration.

ActiveCollab

Expense

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (number) or External Reference

lossy
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Expense records (amount, category, date, receipt attachment reference) have no native Asana equivalent. We migrate expense amount as a custom number field expense_amount__c and category as a custom enum field expense_category__c on the parent project. Receipt attachment references transfer as URLs pointing to the migrated attachment in Asana. For teams with complex expense reporting, we recommend a dedicated expense management tool post-migration.

ActiveCollab

Label

maps to

Asana

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Labels are tag strings applied to Tasks and Projects for filtering. We preserve the full label vocabulary and recreate each as an Asana Tag within the destination workspace. Label assignments transfer to the migrated tasks. Some destination platforms require pre-creation of tags before bulk import; we create all labels during the schema setup phase before any task migration begins. Color metadata from ActiveCollab Labels maps to Tag color in Asana.

ActiveCollab

Project Template

maps to

Asana

Project

lossy
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Project Templates bundle a named set of Tasks, subtasks, and Discussions. We migrate the template structure as a new Asana Project with a naming convention indicating its template origin (e.g., '[Template] Original Name'). The template is fully populated in Asana so it can be duplicated via Asana's native duplicate-project feature for new projects going forward. The customer may choose to clean up the template name post-migration.

ActiveCollab

Task Dependency

maps to

Asana

Dependency

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab finish-to-start task dependencies with automated downstream date updates map to Asana Dependencies in Timeline view. Asana supports finish-to-start, start-to-finish, start-to-start, and finish-to-finish dependency types. However, Asana has documented bugs in Timeline view where dependent tasks do not recalculate correctly when the predecessor is moved (red arrows appear and dependent tasks start earlier than specified). We flag this risk in the migration scope and recommend a post-migration dependency audit. We preserve the original ActiveCollab dependency graph structure regardless of Asana's known recalculation issues.

ActiveCollab

Recurring Task

maps to

Asana

Task (recurrence rule as text note)

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Recurring Tasks use a recurrence rule defined at creation time. We migrate generated task instances as discrete tasks in Asana with a custom text field recurrence_rule__c documenting the original recurrence pattern. The recurrence-rule editing interface does not migrate; the customer's admin recreates recurring tasks manually in Asana using Asana's native repeat feature if automation is desired.

ActiveCollab

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab files are uploaded via a single /upload-files API endpoint and referenced by UUID elsewhere. We download attachments to our staging storage and re-upload them to the destination Asana project using the Asana Attachments API (upload_file endpoint). Attachment references on tasks and projects transfer as Asana Attachment records linked to the migrated parent record. File names and upload dates are preserved. File size limits are enforced per Asana's 100MB per-file limit.

ActiveCollab

User and Member

maps to

Asana

Workspace Member

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Members (paid seats) and Clients (free collaborators) map to Asana workspace members. We resolve ActiveCollab users by email match against the destination Asana workspace. ActiveCollab's Owner, Member, Member+, Client+, and Client roles have no direct Asana equivalent; we assign all migrated users as Members in Asana and note that permission granularity (project-level versus workspace-level) requires post-migration admin configuration. Guest access in Asana maps to Client-level access in ActiveCollab.

ActiveCollab

Workflow Automation (Pro tier)

maps to

Asana

Rules (Premium feature)

lossy
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Pro-tier automations (trigger-action rules such as 'when task assigned, notify user X') have no direct Asana equivalent. Asana Rules use a different trigger-action model with different action types. We do not migrate automations as code. We capture automation configurations as structured records and deliver a written inventory of every active ActiveCollab automation with its trigger, conditions, actions, and recommended Asana Rules equivalent. The customer's admin rebuilds them in Asana Rules post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

ActiveCollab logo

ActiveCollab gotchas

High

Task move-vs-copy disconnects from source project

High

APPLICATION_UNIQUE_KEY required for self-hosted migrations

Medium

UTF8MB4 encoding must be preserved through the export and import pipeline

Medium

Pro+ tier gates invoicing data — not all workspaces have it

Medium

Cloud migration requires SSH and MySQL credentials to ActiveCollab support

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Task move-vs-copy disconnects from source project permanently

    In ActiveCollab, moving a Task to another Project disconnects it from the source project entirely — it ceases to exist there. Comments on the task move with it. Copying creates a brand-new, unrelated Task in the destination project. When migrating to Asana, we must confirm with the customer which behavior applies to each task group before migration. Moving tasks results in a permanent structural change that cannot be reversed in Asana without re-exporting from ActiveCollab. We log every move operation explicitly in the migration audit trail so the customer has a record of the intended outcome. Copy operations are reversible in Asana by deleting the duplicate, but the original remains in ActiveCollab.

  • Asana Timeline dependency bugs cause incorrect date recalculation

    Asana has documented bugs in Timeline view where dependent tasks do not recalculate correctly when the predecessor is moved manually. Tasks produce red arrows (indicating a dependency conflict) and start earlier than specified, with the errors appearing randomly across the dependency chain. ActiveCollab's task dependency engine handles downstream date updates automatically without this known issue. When migrating projects that rely on dependency-driven scheduling, we flag this risk, migrate the dependency graph faithfully, and recommend a post-migration audit of all dependency chains in Timeline view. Asana support has acknowledged this bug but a fix timeline has not been published.

  • Invoicing and billable utilization data has no native Asana equivalent

    ActiveCollab Pro+ tier invoicing features (invoices, line items, tax codes, payment status) and billable utilization metrics have no native Asana representation. Asana is a work coordination platform without a billing or financial layer. We flag any Pro+ tier invoice data during scoping and discuss representation strategy: invoice records can be stored as attachments, line-item data as custom fields, and billable utilization as calculated custom fields on projects. Many teams choose to adopt a dedicated invoicing tool (Wave, FreshBooks, or QuickBooks) post-migration and link it via Zapier or native integration. Pro+ tier subscriptions should be cancelled at migration cutover to avoid paying for unused billing features.

  • APPLICATION_UNIQUE_KEY required for self-hosted migrations

    Self-hosted ActiveCollab instances use an APPLICATION_UNIQUE_KEY stored in config/config.php to uniquely identify the installation. Without this key, the database export cannot be reattached to a fresh ActiveCollab install (relevant if the customer needs a rollback path). We extract this key from the source config before initiating the database export and include it in the migration package as a named parameter. Self-hosted migrations also require SSH and MySQL credentials coordinated through ActiveCollab's support team for the manual import step.

  • Role and permission granularity differs between platforms

    ActiveCollab's five-role system (Owner, Member, Member+, Client+, Client) with per-project permission overrides has a different structure from Asana's workspace-member, project-member, and guest model. ActiveCollab Clients (free collaborators) map to Asana Guests, but Member+ and Client+ roles have no direct equivalent in Asana's permission model. We migrate users with their correct access level designation and note that project-level permission inheritance requires post-migration admin configuration in Asana. Teams with complex agency-client permission requirements should plan a permissions audit as part of the migration project.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful ActiveCollab to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and scope confirmation

    We audit the source ActiveCollab workspace across tier (Plus/Pro/Pro+), record counts for each object, active project templates, label vocabulary, workflow automation count, time-entry volume, and any Pro+ invoicing data. We confirm whether the instance is cloud-hosted or self-hosted (requiring APPLICATION_UNIQUE_KEY extraction) and whether any attachments exceed Asana's 100MB per-file limit. The discovery output is a written migration scope including object counts, a flag for Pro+ invoicing data requiring representation strategy, and a go/no-go on the migration timeline. We also identify which Asana tier the customer needs: Free (up to 15 users, basic features) or Premium ($10.99/user/month for custom fields, portfolios, and workload management).

  2. Schema setup in Asana

    We create the Asana workspace structure before any data migration. This includes creating Projects for each ActiveCollab project, setting up Sections within projects to match ActiveCollab task lists, creating all custom fields (time_logged_hours__c, time_billable__c, time_job_type__c, expense_amount__c, expense_category__c, recurrence_rule__c, budget__c) and pre-populating Tag values from the ActiveCollab label vocabulary. Project Templates from ActiveCollab are created as Projects with a [Template] prefix. We configure project-level permissions to match the intended access model, noting where ActiveCollab's granular per-project overrides require manual admin configuration post-migration.

  3. User and owner reconciliation

    We extract every distinct ActiveCollab user (Members and Clients) and match by email against the destination Asana workspace. All ActiveCollab users are provisioned as Asana Members (for paid-seat equivalents) or Guests (for Client-level equivalents). ActiveCollab task assignees and project owners resolve by email match. Any ActiveCollab user without a matching Asana account goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes. Permission granularity differences are flagged but not resolved during migration — the customer's admin configures project-level access in Asana post-migration.

  4. Record migration in dependency order

    We run migration in the following order: Projects (base container), Tasks with parent-project resolved and subtasks nested, Discussions migrated as task comments, Notes as task descriptions or project briefs, Time Entries aggregated as custom fields on tasks, Labels mapped to Tags, Attachments downloaded from ActiveCollab and re-uploaded to Asana via the Attachments API, and Task Dependencies recreated as Asana Dependencies. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. Time entries are aggregated per task rather than as individual records since Asana has no time-entry object. Pro+ invoicing data is handled per the representation strategy agreed upon during discovery.

  5. Sandbox test migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a test Asana workspace using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager and admin reconcile record counts across all objects, spot-check 25-50 random tasks against the ActiveCollab source, verify attachment integrity, and validate that label assignments and time-entry totals are correct. Any mapping corrections are documented and applied before production migration begins. The sandbox test also surfaces Asana Timeline dependency behavior with the customer's actual dependency graphs, which is critical given Asana's documented recalculation bugs.

  6. Production cutover and automation handoff

    We freeze ActiveCollab writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified since the sandbox test, then enable Asana as the system of record. We disable ActiveCollab Pro+ subscriptions to stop billing for unused features. We deliver the Workflow and Automation Inventory document (for Pro-tier automations), the Project Template rebuild guide, and the Role-Permission mapping notes to the customer's admin team. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. Post-migration admin work (rebuilding automations in Asana Rules, configuring permissions, setting up recurring tasks) is outside standard migration scope and is documented for the customer's team or a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

ActiveCollab logo

ActiveCollab

Source

Strengths

  • Combines task management, time tracking, invoicing, and reporting under one subscription without requiring third-party add-ons.
  • Self-hosted deployment gives teams full control over their data and infrastructure while using the same feature set as the cloud version.
  • Project templates, task dependencies, and recurring tasks are native features that require no configuration or scripting.
  • Roles and permissions system supports five predefined roles with per-project overrides, making client onboarding straightforward for agencies.

Weaknesses

  • The mobile app is functionally limited compared to the web interface, with several features absent on iOS and Android clients.
  • Workflow automation is basic trigger-action logic; teams requiring complex conditional logic or multi-step process automation find it insufficient.
  • Reporting and analytics are focused on operational metrics; executive-level dashboards and data exports are limited in scope.
  • The platform lacks a native marketplace or plugin ecosystem, meaning integrations beyond Zapier, Slack, and Google Workspace require custom API work.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across ActiveCollab and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    ActiveCollab: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    ActiveCollab doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your ActiveCollab to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about ActiveCollab to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ActiveCollab to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your ActiveCollab to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for workspaces under 5,000 tasks and 50 projects with no Pro+ tier invoicing data. Migrations with large time-entry histories (over 100,000 time-entry records), self-hosted ActiveCollab instances requiring database export coordination, Pro+ tier invoicing data that must be reconstructed as custom fields, or complex project templates requiring manual recreation in Asana move to seven to twelve weeks because of the schema design, attachment staging, and permission configuration work.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from ActiveCollab.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day