Project Management migration

Migrate from WeTrack to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between WeTrack and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

WeTrack logo

WeTrack

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

33%

4 of 12

objects map 1:1 between WeTrack and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

6-8 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

WeTrack uses a nested hierarchy of Projects, Tasks, and Subtasks built around event-delivery timelines, plus specialized modules for Risk Registers and Sustainability tracking. Asana uses a flat Project-and-Task model with optional subtasks and dependencies but no native Risk or ESG objects. We map WeTrack's Projects to Asana Projects, preserve the Subtask hierarchy under Tasks, and reconstruct Risk Register likelihood and impact values as custom fields on a custom Risk object in Asana. Sustainability ESG metrics map to a custom ESG object with metric and value fields. WeTrack has no public API documentation, so data extraction requires coordination with WeTrack support or manual CSV exports from the live UI. We do not migrate automations, risk templates, or event-specific integrations as code; we deliver written inventories for the customer admin to rebuild post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

WeTrack logo

WeTrack

What's pushing teams away

  • Limited third-party integration flexibility, with one reviewer noting the platform should allow more seamless integration with external tools.
  • Low review volume and sparse public documentation make it difficult to assess the platform's current state and roadmap before committing.
  • The platform's niche focus on major events means small teams or organisations running fewer, smaller projects may find the feature set over-engineered for their needs.
  • Post-acquisition by Momentus Technologies, some existing customers report uncertainty about pricing changes and support continuity.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How WeTrack objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a WeTrack object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

WeTrack

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

WeTrack Projects map 1:1 to Asana Projects. The Project name, description, date range, and status fields transfer directly. WeTrack's RAG status on the Project level maps to a pre-created color-coded custom field in Asana. Sections in the Asana Project are created to mirror WeTrack's task grouping if present in the export. Projects without active tasks are migrated as empty containers with all metadata intact.

WeTrack

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

WeTrack Tasks map 1:1 to Asana Tasks within the parent Project. Start date maps to Asana Start Date, due date maps to Due Date, and the task name and description fields transfer directly. Assignee is resolved by email against the Asana User mapping. The WeTrack task status (Active, Complete) maps to Asana completion state. If Dependencies are enabled in the destination Asana Workspace, we set the dependency relationship for tasks that reference other tasks.

WeTrack

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Subtask or Task with dependency

lossy
Fully supported

WeTrack Subtasks are child records under a parent Task with auto-sync date inheritance. Asana supports native subtasks within a task, or tasks can be linked as separate records with a Finish-to-Start dependency. The migration design choice is made during scoping: native subtask mapping preserves the WeTrack hierarchy exactly but limits subtask depth; dependency mapping creates a flat task structure with explicit links. Both approaches preserve the parent-child linkage. We flag which approach was chosen in the mapping spec before migration begins.

WeTrack

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

WeTrack attachments of all types (documents, images, PDFs) are extracted as file references and metadata from the export. We map file name, upload date, and uploader to Asana Attachment records and attach them to the correct Task. Actual file content is transferred if the export contains downloadable URLs; if the export is metadata-only, we document the attachment list for manual re-upload post-migration.

WeTrack

Risk Register

maps to

Asana

Risk (custom object)

lossy
Fully supported

WeTrack Risk Registers use industry-standard Inherent Likelihood and Impact fields with template risks. Asana has no native risk object, so we create a custom Risk object with Likelihood (enum: Very Low, Low, Medium, High, Very High), Impact (enum: Very Low, Low, Medium, High, Very High), Risk Owner (user reference), and Mitigation Plan (text) fields. Risk records from WeTrack are migrated into this custom object. RAG status on the Risk Register maps to the calculated RAG value (Likelihood x Impact) stored as a read-only formula field or enum in the destination.

WeTrack

Sustainability/ESG Records

maps to

Asana

ESG Record (custom object)

lossy
Mapping required

WeTrack's Sustainability module tracks ESG indicators and metric values. Asana has no native ESG object. We create a custom ESG object with Metric Name (text), Metric Value (number), Unit (enum: tCO2e, kWh, m3, kg, percentage), Reporting Period (text), and Notes (text) fields. ESG records are migrated as instances of this object, linked to the relevant Project via a lookup field. The customer configures the ESG schema in Asana before migration if they are on Asana Premium or Enterprise.

WeTrack

Job Category

maps to

Asana

Custom dropdown field or Tags

lossy
Fully supported

WeTrack Job Categories restrict valid options on task fields to prevent data entry errors. If the category set is finite and fixed (under 500 options), we map them to a single-select custom dropdown field in Asana. If the set is open-ended, we use Asana Tags as the mapping target. We validate option counts during scoping and flag any categories that exceed Asana's per-field option limit.

WeTrack

RAG Status Field

maps to

Asana

RAG custom single-select field

lossy
Fully supported

WeTrack RAG updates run on predictable schedules and cascade from parent tasks to subtasks via auto-sync. Asana has no native RAG equivalent. We create a color-coded custom single-select field (Red, Amber/Yellow, Green, Grey for not applicable) and map WeTrack RAG values directly. Inherited RAG values on subtasks that originate from parent cascade are flagged during migration to distinguish them from explicitly set subtask values. Post-migration, Asana users should update the custom field manually or via an Asana Rule; there is no native cascade automation.

WeTrack

Incident Report

maps to

Asana

Incident (custom object)

lossy
Fully supported

WeTrack Incident Reports are operational records that track incidents during event delivery. Asana has no native incident object. We create a custom Incident object with Incident Title (text), Severity (enum: Low, Medium, High, Critical), Status (enum: Open, Investigating, Resolved, Closed), Description (text), and Reported Date (date) fields. Any attachments from the incident record are mapped as files on the Incident record. The customer provisions the Incident custom object schema in Asana before migration.

WeTrack

User and Owner

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

WeTrack user accounts and task owners are referenced by email and ID. We match WeTrack owners to Asana workspace members by email address. Any WeTrack Owner without a matching Asana User is placed in a reconciliation queue; the customer's admin provisions the missing Asana User before record import resumes. Inactive or orphaned WeTrack users are flagged for deactivation or reassignment in Asana.

WeTrack

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

WeTrack supports custom fields on Projects and Tasks with varying data types. We validate each WeTrack custom field's type and create a corresponding Asana custom field before migration. Text fields map to Asana text custom fields, numbers to number custom fields, and dates to date custom fields. Single-select custom fields require an additional API step: we query the destination Asana Workspace to retrieve the enum GID for each option value before writing any records, because Asana's API requires the enum GID rather than the option label for single-select field values.

WeTrack

Configuration Record

maps to

Asana

Flagged for manual rebuild

lossy
Fully supported

WeTrack read-only configuration records (template risk registers, ESG measurement templates, workflow rules scoped to event delivery) cannot be extracted as data during the export. We flag every read-only configuration record identified during scoping and document it in the migration handoff with the recommended manual rebuild steps in Asana. No configuration record is silently skipped; each one appears in the inventory document with a rebuild recommendation.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

WeTrack logo

WeTrack gotchas

High

No publicly documented API endpoint reference

Medium

Post-acquisition product positioning is unclear

Medium

Custom fields may not be exportable via standard reports

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • WeTrack has no publicly documented API for data extraction

    WeTrack does not publish a developer API reference or public REST endpoint. We cannot programmatically read or write WeTrack data without a documented endpoint. We resolve this by coordinating directly with WeTrack's support or account management team during scoping to request a read-only data export. If a formal export is not available, migration requires manual CSV or spreadsheet extraction by the customer from the live UI. Manual extraction limits what objects we can reliably transfer, adds time to the discovery phase, and may not include all custom field data present in the UI. We cross-reference any export against the live UI to identify fields that appear in the UI but are absent from the export and flag those for manual re-entry.

  • Asana has no native Risk Register or RAG status equivalent

    WeTrack's Risk Register module with Inherent Likelihood and Impact fields and its RAG status cascading across tasks have no direct Asana equivalent. Asana has no built-in risk object and no native RAG status field. We resolve this by creating custom objects and custom fields in Asana, but this requires schema pre-configuration in the destination workspace before migration begins. The customer must be on Asana Premium or Enterprise to create custom objects. Additionally, Asana has no native cascade logic, so RAG values inherited from parent tasks must be explicitly set on each child subtask during migration; post-migration, users update the RAG custom field manually or via an Asana Rule.

  • Asana single-select custom fields require enum GIDs, not labels

    When writing records to Asana via the API, single-select and multi-select custom field values must use the global ID (GID) of the enum option, not the plain text label. WeTrack's custom fields may include single-select dropdowns with string values that appear as plain text in exports. If we write the plain text label directly to Asana's API for a single-select field, the record is rejected. We handle this by querying the destination Asana Workspace custom field definitions before writing any records, building a local mapping of option label to enum GID, and resolving each WeTrack dropdown value through that map before inserting. This adds one API call per custom field to the migration pipeline.

  • WeTrack ESG and Incident modules have no Asana equivalent

    WeTrack's Sustainability module with ESG metric records and the Incident Report module are purpose-built for event delivery operations. Asana has no native objects for ESG tracking or incident management. We map these to custom objects (ESG Record, Incident) with custom fields, but the destination schema must be pre-created by the customer in Asana before migration. If the customer is on Asana Basic ($10.99/user/month), custom objects are not available; they must upgrade to Premium or Enterprise. We confirm the customer's Asana tier during discovery and flag any ESG or Incident migration scope that depends on a tier upgrade.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful WeTrack to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and data export coordination

    We coordinate with the customer's WeTrack account team or support to obtain read-only data exports across all object types: Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Attachments, Risk Registers, ESG Records, Job Categories, and Custom Fields. We cross-reference export contents against the live WeTrack UI to identify any fields present in the UI but absent from the export. We document the Risk Register schema (Likelihood and Impact field names and value sets), the ESG metric definitions, and any Incident Report fields. If WeTrack cannot produce a formal export, we guide the customer through manual CSV extraction from the UI and flag any records that cannot be exported for manual re-entry. The discovery output is a written migration scope, data export plan, and custom object design for Asana.

  2. Asana schema design and custom object provisioning

    We design the Asana destination schema in a Sandbox environment. This includes creating Projects with the appropriate sections, building custom objects for Risk, ESG, and Incident Records with all required custom fields, and creating the RAG status single-select custom field with color-coded options. We configure subtask behavior at the workspace level (native subtasks vs. Dependencies) based on the customer's choice during scoping. We verify that the customer's Asana tier supports the required custom object count and field types. Schema validation happens in Sandbox before any production migration begins.

  3. Export extraction and mapping validation

    We work with the customer's WeTrack team to extract the full data export across all object types. We review export headers against the live UI to catch missing fields, validate custom field type assignments against the Asana schema design, and identify orphaned or incomplete records. We build the field-level mapping document linking each WeTrack column to its Asana destination field and custom field GID. We extract attachment references and metadata separately for Asana Attachment creation. We identify any records that require manual CSV extraction and consolidate them into a supplemental import plan.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into an Asana Sandbox using the extracted WeTrack data. The customer's project manager or admin reviews record counts in Asana (Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Risk records, ESG records) against WeTrack source counts. We spot-check 25 to 50 random records for field-level accuracy, paying particular attention to RAG status cascade behavior, subtask parent linkage, and Risk Register likelihood and impact values. Any orphaned tasks (no parent), unmapped custom fields, or GID resolution failures are corrected in the mapping document before production migration. The customer signs off on the sandbox results before we proceed.

  5. User and owner provisioning

    We extract every distinct WeTrack Owner referenced on Projects, Tasks, Risk Registers, and Incident Reports and match by email against the Asana Workspace members. We create teams in Asana that mirror the WeTrack organizational structure where applicable. Owners without a matching Asana User are placed in a reconciliation queue. The customer's admin provisions any missing Asana Users before production migration begins. This step must complete before any record import because Asana requires OwnerId references on most standard object records.

  6. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Projects first (as containers), then Tasks with parent references resolved, then Subtasks (as native subtasks or as separate tasks with Dependencies set), then Risk custom object records, ESG custom object records, and Incident records. Custom field enum GIDs are resolved from the local mapping built during schema design before each batch write. Attachment metadata is mapped after all primary records are confirmed in Asana. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  7. Cutover, validation, and rebuild handoff

    We freeze writes in WeTrack during cutover, migrate any records modified during the migration window as a final delta, and enable Asana as the system of record. We disable or restrict WeTrack access for the migration team. We deliver the written inventory of every WeTrack automation, Risk Register template, and event-specific integration to the customer's admin, with recommended Asana equivalents for each. We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve reconciliation issues raised by the customer's team. We do not rebuild WeTrack automations as Asana Rules or Flows within migration scope; that is a separate engagement or internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

WeTrack logo

WeTrack

Source

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for large-scale event delivery with a data model designed around complex, multi-phase project timelines.
  • Integrated Planning, Risk, Sustainability, and Operations modules avoid the need for separate tools.
  • Auto-syncing of parent task dates to subtasks and predictable RAG update schedules reduce manual coordination overhead.
  • Mobile app provides full suite access on any device for field and operations teams.
  • Designed after the London 2012 Olympics with a track record across high-profile sporting and exhibition events.

Weaknesses

  • Limited public API documentation makes automated migration scripting and third-party integrations difficult to develop.
  • Small team size (11-50 employees per Crunchbase) and low web activity signals suggest a product that may be under-resourced post-acquisition.
  • Sparse independent reviews (single Capterra rating of 4.0) make it hard to gauge real-world customer satisfaction reliably.
  • No self-serve pricing page means prospective customers must contact sales, adding friction to the evaluation and migration planning process.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across WeTrack and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    WeTrack: Not publicly documented..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    WeTrack doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your WeTrack to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about WeTrack to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during WeTrack to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your WeTrack to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most WeTrack to Asana migrations complete in six to eight weeks for standard project and task data with under 500 Projects and no custom object reconstruction. Migrations that include Risk Register mapping, ESG metric preservation, large subtask hierarchies, or manual CSV extraction coordination extend to ten to sixteen weeks. The primary variable is not migration processing time but the time required to extract data from WeTrack, which has no public API and depends on WeTrack support team cooperation or customer-driven manual export.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from WeTrack.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day