HRMS migration

Migrate from Grove HR to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Grove HR and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Grove HR logo

Grove HR

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Grove HR and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Migrating from Grove HR to Bullhorn is a cross-domain move from an HRIS into an ATS/CRM built for staffing firms. Grove HR stores the complete employee lifecycle: profile, leave entitlements, onboarding checklists, recruitment pipeline, performance reviews, goals, training records, and documents. Bullhorn organises its data around Candidates, Jobs, and Placements with a recruiting workflow optimised for external hiring rather than internal HR administration. There is no direct object-to-object mapping between these two schemas; the Employee record becomes the foundation for Bullhorn Candidate, the Grove HR recruitment pipeline maps to Bullhorn Jobs and Placements, and leave balances, performance reviews, goals, and training data require Bullhorn custom objects or a documented manual-recreation plan. We do not migrate Grove HR onboarding workflows, leave approval state machines, or performance review cycles as functional automation; we deliver a written inventory of each for the customer's Bullhorn admin to rebuild post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Grove HR logo

Grove HR

What's pushing teams away

  • Smaller integration marketplace compared to established players limits connectivity to payroll providers and third-party tools.
  • Newer platform with a shorter track record means some teams outgrow capabilities as they scale beyond 250 employees.
  • Lack of a documented public API makes it difficult to build custom automations or extract data programmatically for migration projects.
  • Some users report the platform works well for both small and large companies but lacks depth in advanced features like complex org structures.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How Grove HR objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a Grove HR object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Grove HR

Employee

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Grove HR Employee records form the basis of the Bullhorn Candidate object. We map firstName, lastName, email, phone, jobTitle, startDate, employmentStatus, and department to Bullhorn Candidate's corresponding standard fields. The employee's employment status (active, on leave, terminated) maps to Bullhorn's status and dateLastNote fields. Any Grove HR custom fields on Employee (for example, employee ID, cost centre, shift pattern) map to Bullhorn custom fields on Candidate. This is the anchor record for the entire migration; all other HR objects resolve back to it via a CandidateID lookup.

Grove HR

Leave/Time Off

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Object

1:1
Fully supported

Grove HR leave balances (annual entitlement, sick leave, parental leave, accrued balance, carried-over balance) and historical request records have no native Bullhorn equivalent. We create Bullhorn custom objects scoped to Candidate—one per leave type—and store entitlement, balance, and last-approved-request date as custom fields. Leave approval status and approver details are stored as additional fields. Bullhorn ATS is limited to 2 custom objects; Growth and Enterprise editions allow up to 10. If the customer has more leave types than the destination edition permits, we consolidate into a single LeaveBalances custom object with a leaveType picklist and per-type balance fields, or we flag overflow types for manual reconciliation.

Grove HR

Recruitment/Candidate

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate + Job + Placement

1:many
Fully supported

Grove HR candidate records from the recruitment pipeline map to Bullhorn Candidate. The Grove HR pipeline stage (application received, screening, interview, offer, hired) maps to Bullhorn's candidateStatus and to a corresponding Job Order's hiring pipeline stage. When Grove HR records represent a successfully placed candidate, we create a Bullhorn Placement record linked to the Candidate and the Job Order. If the placement includes compensation details (salary, commission rate, start date), these map to Bullhorn Placement's payRate, billRate, and startDate fields.

Grove HR

Onboarding/Offboarding

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Job Order + Custom Object + Written inventory

lossy
Mapping required

Grove HR onboarding checklists are task templates assigned per employee. Offboarding has its own checklist variant. Bullhorn does not have a native onboarding checklist model; Job Orders support task assignments but not reusable template-based checklists. We decompose the assigned checklist tasks (task name, assignee, due date, completion status) and map them to a Bullhorn custom object OnboardingTasks scoped to the Candidate record, or we document them as a Bullhorn Onboarding (Able) setup plan for the customer's admin. The checklist template itself is not a transferable object; we deliver a written inventory of all active templates with their task structure for rebuild.

Grove HR

Performance Reviews

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Object

1:1
Fully supported

Grove HR performance review cycles contain structured rating fields, reviewer assignments, comments, and overall scores per employee. Bullhorn has no native performance review object. We create Bullhorn custom objects scoped to Candidate—one per review cycle—and store review period, reviewer name, rating fields, overall score, and comments as custom fields. In-progress or draft reviews are flagged in a separate reconciliation note since only completed reviews are migrated. If the customer has more than two review cycles per year and the Bullhorn edition limit is reached, we consolidate by year or flag overflow for post-migration manual entry.

Grove HR

Goals

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Object

1:1
Fully supported

Grove HR goals are linked to employees with progress tracking, due dates, and linked key results. Bullhorn has no native goal-tracking module. We create a Bullhorn custom object Goals scoped to Candidate and store goal title, description, progress percentage, due date, and key results as custom fields. Orphaned goals (no active employee owner) are flagged for manual review and either assigned to a designated admin or excluded from migration with a count delivered in the reconciliation report.

Grove HR

Training Records

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Object

1:1
Fully supported

Grove HR training modules and employee completion records (module name, completion date, score, status) are stored per employee. We map these to a Bullhorn custom object Training scoped to Candidate. Training course content (video files, slides, SCORM packages) does not migrate; only the enrollment record (who completed what, when, with what result) transfers. If the customer uses a separate learning management system, we flag the training records as suitable for a cross-system reference rather than Bullhorn storage.

Grove HR

Company/Organisation

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ClientCorporation

1:1
Mapping required

Grove HR stores company-level settings, departments, and locations. Bullhorn uses ClientCorporation to represent client companies in the recruiting relationship. We map Grove HR departments and locations to Bullhorn ClientCorporation fields (name, address, city, country) and create separate ClientCorporation records for each distinct Grove HR location if the customer's Bullhorn workflow tracks client offices. If Grove HR stores the customer's own organisation as a company record, that maps to a ClientCorporation with a flag indicating it is the customer's own entity rather than a recruitment client.

Grove HR

Time & Attendance

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Object or Note

1:1
Mapping required

Grove HR clock-in/out events, timesheets, and overtime flags are used for payroll calculation in some Grove HR configurations. Bullhorn is not a time-and-attendance system; it records placement hours worked for billing purposes on Placement records. We export timesheet summary data (total hours per period, overtime flags) and map it to a Bullhorn custom object Timesheets scoped to Candidate, or we attach it as a Note to the Candidate record. Raw clock-in/out events are typically out of scope unless the customer has a specific billing need tied to placement hours.

Grove HR

Documents (Contracts, Payslips)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate ContentDocument

1:1
Mapping required

Employee documents (contracts, offer letters, payslips) export from Grove HR as binary files linked to each employee record. We import these as Bullhorn ContentDocument records attached via ContentDocumentLink to the corresponding Candidate record. Document content is not parsed or transformed. Customers should confirm Bullhorn's storage limits and document retention policies before committing to a full document migration, as Bullhorn charges for storage above the org allowance. We deliver an inventory of document types and sizes before the migration to allow informed scoping decisions.

Grove HR

Custom Fields

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Fields on relevant Bullhorn objects

lossy
Mapping required

Grove HR custom fields are defined on Employee and other objects. We detect all custom field definitions during scoping, map each to a Bullhorn custom field on the equivalent object (Candidate, ClientCorporation, Job, Placement), and pre-create the Bullhorn field schema before any data import. Bullhorn enforces field-type constraints (text, number, picklist, date, checkbox, etc.) and per-field edit-type limits. We validate the Grove HR field type against Bullhorn's available custom field types and flag any that require a Bullhorn custom object instead of a simple custom field. Custom field mapping is delivered in a written data dictionary before extraction begins.

Grove HR

Owner

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

User

1:1
Fully supported

Grove HR owners (HR admins, line managers assigned to onboarding checklists, leave approvers) are referenced on employee records and checklist tasks. We resolve Grove HR owners by email against Bullhorn User records in the destination org. Any owner without a matching Bullhorn User goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's Bullhorn admin to provision before record migration proceeds. Inactive Grove HR users are mapped to inactive Bullhorn Users to preserve historical assignment without giving former employees system access.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Grove HR logo

Grove HR gotchas

High

No public API documentation means migrations are file-based

Medium

Leave balance accuracy at cutover requires manual verification

Medium

Onboarding and offboarding checklists are template-bound

Low

Payslip and contract documents export as binary blobs

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • No native HRIS objects in Bullhorn requires custom object strategy upfront

    Grove HR stores leave balances, performance reviews, goals, training records, and onboarding tasks as core HRIS features. Bullhorn is an ATS/CRM with no equivalent native objects for any of these. We resolve this gap by creating Bullhorn custom objects scoped to Candidate for each HR data type. However, Bullhorn ATS edition limits customers to 2 custom objects; Growth and Enterprise editions allow up to 10. If the customer's Grove HR configuration uses more leave types, multiple annual review cycles, and training tracking simultaneously, they may exceed the ATS-tier limit. We identify all required custom objects during scoping and confirm the customer's Bullhorn edition can accommodate the full schema before migration begins. If it cannot, we recommend a Bullhorn upgrade or a manual-recreation plan for lower-priority HR data.

  • Grove HR file-based exports require support co-ordination and pre-validation

    Grove HR does not publish a REST API. All data extraction is file-based: CSV or XLS exports generated from within the product, sometimes requiring Grove HR support to produce a complete export bundle. Field naming in the export files may not match the data dictionary labels shown in the UI, and export files may omit fields that exist in the database. We prepare a data dictionary before extraction by reviewing a sample export against the Grove HR data model, identifying any missing or misnamed columns, and co-ordinating with Grove HR support to generate a corrected export. Customers should request the export as early in the migration project as possible because export generation can take one to five business days depending on Grove HR's support response time.

  • Onboarding and offboarding checklists do not migrate as reusable templates

    Grove HR organises onboarding and offboarding as company-level checklist templates with task assignments and completion states per employee. Bullhorn has no checklist template model. We export the assigned task list (task name, assignee, due date, completion status, completion date) per employee as a snapshot. The template structure itself is not exportable as a reusable object. The customer's Bullhorn admin rebuilds each checklist as Bullhorn Onboarding (a separate paid add-on, formerly Able) or as a manual task list. We deliver a written inventory of all active templates with their task structure, assignees, and completion rules as the rebuild reference. Leave approval state machines similarly do not migrate; any leave approved between extraction and Bullhorn go-live must be reconciled manually or via a supplemental import.

  • Leave balances are snapshots that require a cutover reconciliation window

    Leave entitlements in Grove HR are dynamic: they recalculate based on accrual rate, carry-over rules, and Bradford Factor triggers. When we extract leave balance snapshots at cutover, the numbers are accurate only at that moment. Any leave approved or taken between extraction and Bullhorn go-live is not reflected in the migrated balance. We schedule the final extraction within 24 hours of the Bullhorn go-live date and flag the cutover window explicitly in the migration plan. For customers with high leave volume in the migration window, we recommend a supplemental import of approved leave requests post-go-live.

  • Bullhorn storage limits may affect document migration scope

    Employee documents (contracts, payslips, offer letters) export from Grove HR as binary files. Bullhorn stores files as ContentDocument records subject to org-level storage limits that vary by edition. We audit the total document volume and file size during scoping and confirm whether Bullhorn storage can accommodate the full document set or whether documents should be migrated selectively (only active employee documents, for example) with older records archived separately. Documents attached to inactive employees are typically deferred unless the customer has a specific compliance retention requirement.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Grove HR to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and Bullhorn edition confirmation

    We audit the source Grove HR account across all objects: employee count and profile completeness, leave type configurations and historical request volume, recruitment pipeline records and active job order count, performance review cycles and total review records, training module count and enrollment records, document count and file size, and all custom field definitions. We pair this with a Bullhorn edition review to confirm the custom object limit can accommodate the HR data set. The discovery output is a written migration scope with object counts, recommended Bullhorn custom object schema, a list of any Bullhorn edition upgrade requirements, and a preliminary data dictionary flagging export-format uncertainties that require Grove HR support co-ordination.

  2. Bullhorn custom object schema design

    We design the Bullhorn custom object schema based on the discovery output. Each Grove HR HRIS concept (leave balances, performance reviews, goals, training records, onboarding task snapshots, timesheet summaries) maps to a Bullhorn custom object scoped to Candidate, with field names, types, and edit types matched to the source data. Bullhorn ATS customers limited to 2 custom objects receive a consolidated schema proposal during scoping before any schema is deployed. We deploy the custom object schema to a Bullhorn Sandbox first for field validation and to confirm the data shape before production deployment.

  3. File-based export co-ordination and schema validation

    We co-ordinate with Grove HR support to generate the complete data export bundle. This step typically takes one to five business days depending on Grove HR's support response time and the export complexity. We receive the export files and validate them against the data dictionary: checking that all expected columns are present, flagging any fields with missing or null values in more than 10 percent of records, and identifying any Grove HR objects that were not included in the export. A validation report is delivered to the customer before extraction is considered complete. Any missing objects or fields are escalated to Grove HR support with specific field names and record IDs.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Bullhorn Sandbox using production-like data volume. The customer reconciles record counts against the Grove HR source (employee count in, candidate count out; leave request count in, custom object record count out), spot-checks 25-50 random records for field-level accuracy, and reviews the custom object data shape in Bullhorn. The customer's Bullhorn admin validates that the custom object field layout is usable and that candidate records display correctly. Any mapping corrections are made before production migration begins. This step typically runs for one to two weeks including the reconciliation review cycle.

  5. Owner reconciliation and User provisioning

    We extract every distinct Grove HR user referenced as an owner on employee records, onboarding tasks, and leave approval records and match by email against the Bullhorn destination org's User table. Users without a matching Bullhorn account are placed in a reconciliation queue. The customer's Bullhorn admin provisions any missing users as active (for current Grove HR users) or inactive (for former employees retained for historical assignment accuracy). Migration cannot proceed past the User provisioning step because Candidate OwnerId references are required and must resolve to a valid Bullhorn User at the time of insert.

  6. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order. ClientCorporation records are imported first (from Grove HR departments and locations). Candidate records are imported second with the employee-to-candidate field mapping applied. Bullhorn Job Orders are created for each active Grove HR recruitment pipeline. Bullhorn Placement records are created for hired candidates, linking back to Candidate and Job. Custom object records (leave balances, performance reviews, goals, training, onboarding tasks, timesheets) are imported last because they hold a Candidate lookup. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Documents are imported in parallel with candidate records via Bullhorn ContentDocument and ContentDocumentLink.

  7. Cutover, validation, and workflow rebuild handoff

    We freeze writes to Grove HR during cutover and run a final delta import of any records modified during the migration window (leave requests approved, onboarding tasks completed, performance reviews finalised). Bullhorn becomes the system of record once the delta import is confirmed. We deliver the onboarding checklist template inventory and the leave approval state machine documentation to the customer's Bullhorn admin for rebuild in Bullhorn Onboarding or as manual task processes. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Grove HR workflows, leave approval state machines, or performance review cycles as Bullhorn automation; those are separate rebuild tasks for the customer's admin team or a Bullhorn implementation partner.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Grove HR logo

Grove HR

Source

Strengths

  • Comprehensive 40+ tool HR suite covering core HR needs in a single platform without third-party integrations.
  • UK employment law compliance built in from the start, including statutory pay calculators and Bradford Factor.
  • Automated onboarding and offboarding checklists reduce manual HR administrative overhead.
  • Affordable per-employee pricing model accessible to small and medium businesses.
  • Leave management with automated workflows, real-time balance tracking, and team calendar visibility.

Weaknesses

  • No documented public API or rate limits publicly available, limiting programmatic data extraction.
  • Smaller third-party integration marketplace compared to BambooHR and other established HRIS platforms.
  • Relatively new platform founded in 2018 with a shorter track record than competitors.
  • Limited bulk export tooling means manual or supported migration may be required.
  • No mobile app mentioned in available documentation, limiting employee self-service on mobile devices.
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Grove HR and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Grove HR: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Grove HR doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Grove HR to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Grove HR to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Grove HR to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Grove HR to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Grove HR to Bullhorn migrations land between four and six weeks for accounts with fewer than 150 employees, a modest recruitment pipeline, and fewer than four HR data types requiring Bullhorn custom objects. Migrations with larger candidate volumes (over 500 recruitment records), multiple active job orders, more than four HR custom object types, or a significant document archive move into eight to fourteen weeks because of export co-ordination time with Grove HR support, Bullhorn custom object schema design and validation, and the reconciliation review cycle in a Bullhorn Sandbox.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Grove HR.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day