ERP migration

Migrate from Certinia ERP Cloud to Epicor Prophet 21

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Certinia ERP Cloud and Epicor Prophet 21. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Epicor Prophet 21.

Certinia ERP Cloud logo

Certinia ERP Cloud

Source

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Compatibility

57%

8 of 14

objects map 1:1 between Certinia ERP Cloud and Epicor Prophet 21.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

6-10 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Certinia ERP Cloud is a Salesforce-native financial management and PSA platform for service businesses, layering Financial Management objects (Ledger, AR/AP, Billings, Revenue Recognition) over standard Salesforce CRM objects (Accounts, Contacts, Opportunities). Epicor ERP is a manufacturing-first platform with Kinetic and Prophet 21 product lines built around inventory, bills of materials, routings, and shop-floor scheduling. This migration is not a record copy; it is a cross-architecture translation where Certinia's project-centric, multi-entity financial model must be mapped into Epicor's inventory-centric, production-schedule-driven structure. We migrate Accounts (Customers), Contacts, Projects, Billing Events, Budgets, Assignments, Milestones, GL Entries, Invoices/Billings, Fixed Assets, and open AP/PO records. We deliver a written inventory of Salesforce managed Workflows (deprecated December 2025) and Certinia PSA automations for the customer's team to rebuild in Epicor because neither platform's automation engine migrates across architectures. Multi-entity structures require manual setup in Epicor before ledger entries can be posted, and we stage that sequencing to avoid reference errors during import.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Certinia ERP Cloud logo

Certinia ERP Cloud

What's pushing teams away

  • Implementation requires significant planning and configuration work; organizations with complex multi-subsidiary structures report lengthy setup timelines.
  • Subscription pricing scales with user count, making it costly for growing services firms that need many billers or project staff without proportional revenue.
  • The platform's tight Salesforce coupling means customers inherit Salesforce platform limits and release dependencies, which can constrain highly customized deployments.
  • Some customers report that PSA resource management and forecasting features, while functional, lack the depth of purpose-built professional services tools like Kantata or Projector PSA.

Choosing

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-specific design for wholesale distributors, not a general-purpose ERP repurposed for distribution — distributors choose P21 because it matches their replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Strong inventory control with automated replenishment, lot and serial tracking, and multi-warehouse management appeals to distributors with complex stock requirements and tight margin pressure.
  • Responsive customer support cited across G2 and Gartner reviews, with Epicor's 90% retention rate reflecting long-term customer satisfaction in a market where switching costs are high.
  • Cloud deployment on Microsoft Azure provides the flexibility to scale user counts and warehouse locations without on-premise infrastructure investment.
  • The Software Development Kit lets distributors personalize P21 to their specific business processes without modifying the application source code, preserving upgrade paths.

Object mapping

How Certinia ERP Cloud objects map to Epicor Prophet 21

Each row shows how a Certinia ERP Cloud object lands in Epicor Prophet 21, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Certinia ERP Cloud

Accounts (Customers)

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Customer

1:1
Fully supported

Certinia Accounts (extended Salesforce Account objects) map to Epicor Customer records. We preserve the billing address, shipping address, and any multi-entity assignment fields. Customer type (prospect, customer, competitor) maps to Epicor's Customer Type code. The Certinia Account Name becomes the Epicor Customer Name, and we preserve Account Number as a reference field for audit continuity. Dedupe resolution uses Company + Tax ID as the Epicor key.

Certinia ERP Cloud

Contacts

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Person

1:1
Fully supported

Certinia Contacts (standard Salesforce Contact objects) map to Epicor Person records linked to the corresponding Epicor Customer. We preserve contact roles, email addresses, phone numbers, and any custom fields. The primary Contact relationship in Certinia maps to the Primary Ship To Person in Epicor. We note that Epicor's Person object does not have an Opportunity attachment model; opportunity linkage happens at the Order level rather than at the Contact level.

Certinia ERP Cloud

Projects

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Project (Job) or Estimate

lossy
Mapping required

Certinia PSA Project records have no native Epicor equivalent because Epicor is not a PSA platform. We map Projects to Epicor Project (job costing) or Estimate records depending on the project type. Time-and-materials project budgets map to Epicor Estimate with quantity and cost breakdowns. Fixed-fee projects map to Epicor Project with revenue recognition milestones tracked as Project Phase milestones. We preserve project status, start and end dates, and the multi-dimensional analysis fields (region, department) from Certinia as Epicor Project Phase or Task codes.

Certinia ERP Cloud

Budgets

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Project Budget or Estimate Line

lossy
Mapping required

Certinia PSA Budget records (rate-based, fixed, expense-only) map to Epicor Estimate lines or Project budget allocations depending on type. Rate-based budgets with resource cost rates become Epicor labor and material Estimate lines with pricing. Fixed budgets preserve the total contract value and phase distribution. Expense-only budgets map to Epicor miscellaneous charge Estimate lines. We flag any budget types with custom approval thresholds for manual review because Epicor's budget approval workflow requires separate configuration.

Certinia ERP Cloud

Assignments

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Project Labor or Resource Allocation

lossy
Mapping required

Certinia PSA Assignment records (Resources linked to Projects with booking dates and allocation percentages) map to Epicor Project Labor records or Resource Group allocations. We preserve booking dates, allocation percentage, and skill assignments as Epicor Resource Skill codes. We note that Epicor's resource scheduling is calendar-based rather than percentage-based; the translation requires a duration and hours model that may differ from Certinia's allocation model. Customer-specific billing rates from Certinia assignments map to Epicor Quote or Order pricing rules.

Certinia ERP Cloud

Milestones

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Project Phase or Task

1:1
Mapping required

Certinia PSA Milestone objects (project deliverable due dates and completion status) map to Epicor Project Phase records with Task sub-records. Milestone dependencies (successor/predecessor) are captured as Certinia relationship records and translated to Epicor Task predecessors using the project's WBS structure. Due dates, completion status, and milestone type (billing, deliverable, review) map to Epicor Phase percent complete and Task comments. Milestones without a corresponding Epicor Project (Estimate-based billing) are staged for review before import.

Certinia ERP Cloud

Billing Events

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Invoice or Order Billing Lines

lossy
Mapping required

Certinia PSA Billing Events (time-entry driven or milestone-driven invoice generation) map to Epicor Invoice records for recognized revenue and to Epicor Order records for billing events tied to project phases. We preserve the billing event header, line items (hours, expenses, materials), and the billing rule type. Recognized revenue from Certinia Billing Events maps to Epicor AR Invoice records. We flag any custom billing rule configurations (progress billing percentages, hold-back terms) for manual review because Epicor's billing rule setup is separate from the invoice record.

Certinia ERP Cloud

General Ledger Entries

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

GL Journal or GL Account Balance

lossy
Mapping required

Certinia GL Entries (with multi-dimensional analysis fields for region, department, project) map to Epicor GL Journal records. We stage the data after entity and account code setup in Epicor to prevent undefined entity reference errors. Multi-currency entries from Certinia are translated using Epicor's currency conversion rules configured at the Company level. We flag any Certinia account codes that do not have a corresponding Epicor GL account number and generate a remapping table for the customer's finance team to validate before posting.

Certinia ERP Cloud

Invoices / Billings

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

AR Invoice

1:1
Mapping required

Certinia Invoices (generated from Billing Events or contracts) map to Epicor AR Invoice records with header and line items preserved. Open invoices migrate with their payment status and aging; paid invoices migrate as historical records. Linked payment records require AR record migration in the same run to maintain open-invoice integrity. We preserve invoice numbers, invoice dates, due dates, and all line item descriptions and amounts. Tax codes are mapped to Epicor Tax Usage codes.

Certinia ERP Cloud

Fixed Assets

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Fixed Asset Register

1:1
Fully supported

Certinia Financial Management Fixed Asset records map directly to Epicor Fixed Asset records with depreciation schedules, asset categories, and book values preserved. We transfer asset acquisition date, depreciation method (straight-line, declining balance), useful life, and current book value. Asset categories map to Epicor Asset Class codes. Accumulated depreciation transfers as a separate GL journal entry to the accumulated depreciation account.

Certinia ERP Cloud

Purchase Orders / Payables

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

PO and AP Invoice

1:1
Mapping required

Certinia Purchase Orders and AP records map to Epicor PO and AP Invoice records. We migrate open POs with vendor assignments and approval status. Approval history is not accessible via Certinia's API and does not transfer; we document this gap in the handoff inventory so the customer's AP team can re-enter approval records if required for audit. Closed POs migrate as historical records without line-item detail reactivation.

Certinia ERP Cloud

Supply Chain Management Products

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Part or Inventory Item

lossy
Mapping required

Certinia SCM Product Mapping records from the SCM Accounting Connector require remapping to Epicor Part (or Product) records. The line type renaming from Certinia's internal migration (Freight and Handling to Freight, Customer Deposit to Deposit) is handled during this mapping phase. We capture the exact line type values at export time and apply the new names at import. Part numbers, descriptions, and unit of measure migrate to Epicor Part Master records.

Certinia ERP Cloud

Users / Resources

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Epicor User (Basic)

1:1
Mapping required

Certinia Salesforce Users with PSA Resource Management attributes (skills, utilization targets, cost rates) map to Epicor User records. We map the user email, name, and active status. PSA-specific attributes (skills, utilization targets) have no Epicor native equivalent; we preserve these in a supplemental data file (CSV export) for the customer's team to reference when configuring Epicor resource groups and labor rates. Resource cost rates from Certinia migrate to Epicor Labor Rate codes.

Certinia ERP Cloud

Custom Objects

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Custom Table or UD Table

1:1
Mapping required

Certinia custom objects built within the FinancialForce managed package are accessible via Salesforce API. We export custom object definitions and data together and map them to Epicor UD (User-Defined) tables or custom Erp.Tables as appropriate for the destination version. Lookup relationships between custom objects map to Epicor foreign key references using the same relationship structure. We note that Epicor UD table schema requires manual setup in Epicor Administration before data import; we provide the schema definition in the handoff package.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Certinia ERP Cloud logo

Certinia ERP Cloud gotchas

High

Salesforce Workflow deprecation requires managed workflow migration

Medium

SCM Accounting Connector migration renames line types

Medium

External IDs must be unique across all bank format mapping records

Medium

Managed package objects restrict customer-level field customization

High

Multi-entity structure must be replicated before ledger entries are posted

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21 gotchas

High

Third-party bolt-on integrations complicate migration scope

High

Dirty data without standardized processes compounds migration risk

Medium

SDK customizations and BPMs may not survive platform upgrades

Medium

Report-based export only for non-technical users

Low

Per-user pricing model requires accurate user count before migration planning

Pair-specific challenges

  • Certinia managed Workflows cannot migrate to Epicor

    Certinia's managed Workflows are Salesforce Flow equivalents within the Certinia managed package, and Salesforce deprecated Workflows as of December 2025. Certinia plans a Winter 2026 managed package migration for its own Workflows, but there is no customer-accessible edit capability for managed package Workflows and no equivalent in Epicor ERP. We do not migrate Workflows as automation code. We deliver a written inventory of every active Certinia managed Workflow with its trigger, conditions, and actions, plus a written assessment of whether each workflow has an Epicor equivalent (approval rules, automated alerts, field updates). The customer's admin team or an Epicor consultant rebuilds these post-migration.

  • Epicor has no native Salesforce CRM integration

    Certinia shares the same customer record with Salesforce CRM because it is a Salesforce managed package. Epicor ERP operates as a standalone system with its own CRM module (Epicor CRM) as an optional add-on, not as a native integration. Any organization that has been using Salesforce CRM alongside Certinia must choose a separate CRM for Epicor or license Epicor CRM. We do not migrate Salesforce CRM records (Opportunities, Leads, Contacts as CRM objects) because Epicor's data model does not align with Salesforce's CRM object structure. We document the CRM separation scope in the discovery phase so the customer can make a CRM selection decision before migration begins.

  • Multi-entity structure must be established before GL entries post

    Certinia's multi-entity architecture assigns each subsidiary or business unit as a separate entity with its own ledger, AR/AP, and billing configuration. Epicor's multi-company capability requires manual setup of each entity as a separate Epicor Company with its own fiscal year, currency, and chart of accounts before any transactional data can be posted. We stage all entity records (Ledger, AR/AP configuration) to migrate after Epicor Company setup is complete and before any GL entries, invoices, or PO records are imported. Failure to sequence this correctly results in posting errors from undefined entity references and orphaned ledger balances.

  • PSA records require manual project translation not captured by API

    Certinia PSA (Projects, Budgets, Assignments, Milestones, Billing Events) has no native Epicor equivalent. Epicor's Project module is job-costing focused, not a full PSA. We migrate the data records (project headers, budget lines, assignment percentages, milestone dates) but Epicor's project billing rules, utilization targets, resource skill matching, and billing event-to-invoice automation require separate Epicor configuration. We document the PSA-to-Epicor-Project translation rules in the handoff package and flag which Certinia billing rule types have no Epicor equivalent for the customer's project manager and finance team to resolve.

  • SCM line type renaming from Certinia internal migration must be preserved

    Certinia's own internal data migration feature (when migrating from SCM Accounting Connector to Supply Chain Management) renames Freight and Handling to Freight and Customer Deposit to Deposit. We capture the exact line type values at the time of our export and remap them to the Epicor Part or Product mapping records at import time. If the customer has already run Certinia's internal migration, the renamed values appear in the export and we map them accordingly. If the internal migration has not been run, we export the pre-rename values and apply a transformation at import. We validate line type distribution in the reconciliation report to catch any orphaned assignments.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Certinia ERP Cloud to Epicor Prophet 21 data migration

  1. Discovery and architecture decision

    We audit the Certinia ERP Cloud org across all installed modules (Professional Services Cloud, Financial Management Cloud, Customer Success Cloud), custom objects, multi-entity configuration, multi-currency setup, PSA record volumes (projects, budgets, assignments, milestones, billing events), GL account structure, and active managed Workflows. We simultaneously assess the Epicor target: Kinetic cloud versus on-premise deployment, Epicor Prophet 21 version, selected Epicor modules (Manufacturing, Distribution, Financials, Project), and whether the customer has selected or will select a separate CRM. The discovery output is a written migration scope, a CRM decision checklist if applicable, and an Epicor module selection recommendation.

  2. Epicor schema setup and entity configuration

    We guide the customer through Epicor Company and entity setup (multi-company configuration if applicable) before any transactional data migrates. This includes chart of accounts mapping from Certinia GL accounts to Epicor GL accounts, fiscal year and period configuration, multi-currency setup (currency codes and exchange rate tables), and tax code mapping. We then export Certinia entity and ledger configuration records and stage them for import into the newly created Epicor entities. GL account remapping is the most critical step here; we generate a written remapping table for the customer's finance team to validate before posting.

  3. Sandbox validation and record reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a non-production Epicor environment using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager and finance lead reconcile record counts (Customers, Persons, Projects, GL entries, Invoices, Fixed Assets, PO/AP records) against the Certinia source system and spot-check 25-50 records in each category. Any mapping corrections (account code remapping, entity assignment errors, currency code mismatches) happen in this phase. The customer signs off on the schema, mapping, and entity configuration before production migration begins.

  4. PSA record translation and project setup

    We translate Certinia PSA records (Projects, Budgets, Assignments, Milestones, Billing Events) into Epicor Project (Estimate or Job) records using the translation rules defined during discovery. Assignments translate to Epicor Project Labor with resource allocation percentages converted to hours-based booking entries. Milestone dependencies become Epicor Task predecessors with predecessor type and lag days preserved. We flag any billing events tied to custom billing rules that require manual Epicor configuration post-migration. PSA records migrate after Epicor Project templates are established to ensure phase structures are in place.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in dependency order: Epicor Company and entity setup (validated from sandbox), then Customers and Persons, then Fixed Assets, then GL entries (with dimensional analysis), then open AP/PO records, then AR Invoices, then Project records with Estimates and Job data, then Assignment and Billing Event history, then SCM Product mappings, then Custom Objects last (because they may reference standard objects). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We use Epicor's REST and bulk data APIs with rate-limit handling and batch chunking for large record sets.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze Certinia writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then mark Epicor as the system of record. We deliver the Workflow and PSA automation inventory document to the customer's team, specifying which Certinia managed Workflows have Epicor equivalents (approval rules, alerts) and which require manual rebuild. We do not rebuild Certinia Workflows or PSA automations inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement. We offer a one-week hypercare window to resolve reconciliation issues raised by the customer's team during the first week of Epicor live operations.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Certinia ERP Cloud logo

Certinia ERP Cloud

Source

Strengths

  • Native Salesforce architecture shares the same customer record, user interface, and analytics across ERP and CRM layers.
  • Modular product suite lets organizations deploy Professional Services Cloud, Financial Management Cloud, or Customer Success Cloud independently.
  • Multi-entity and multi-currency support with flexible general ledger handles global services organizations with complex reporting hierarchies.
  • Veda AI agents integrated into workflows automate scope generation, skill matching, and administrative tasks like time capture and status updates.
  • Real-time project financials connect delivery data to billing, enabling live margin forecasting without spreadsheet consolidation.

Weaknesses

  • Tightly coupled to Salesforce platform means customers inherit Salesforce release cycles, API throttling behavior, and managed package upgrade dependencies.
  • Pricing is per-user subscription; organizations with high biller-to-revenue ratios may find costs escalate without proportional value delivery.
  • Implementation complexity is high for organizations with complex multi-subsidiary, joint venture, or multi-currency structures requiring extended configuration cycles.
  • Managed workflows from Certinia packages cannot be edited by customers; all customization requires Certinia product team involvement or waiting for official release migrations.
Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for wholesale distribution with industry-specific replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Multi-warehouse management with bin locations, cross-docking, and real-time inventory visibility across all warehouse locations.
  • Automated replenishment engine with demand-based and min-max planning reduces stockouts and overstock carrying costs.
  • AI-infused reporting via Epicor Prism provides Gen AI-driven insights into ERP data without requiring a BI team.
  • Strong customer retention at 90% and a 50-year track record in the distribution vertical provides long-term vendor stability.

Weaknesses

  • High total cost of ownership — per-user pricing of $150-200/month plus $10K-$500K implementation creates significant budget commitment for small and mid-market distributors.
  • Customization via SDK requires technical expertise and introduces upgrade risk when custom code conflicts with new P21 releases.
  • Report generation performance is a known pain point — multiple users report system freezes during large or complex report exports.
  • Third-party bolt-on reliance for functionality that competitors include natively increases integration complexity and total solution cost.
  • Limited public API documentation — developers building custom integrations report difficulty finding P21 API authentication methods and endpoint specifications.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard ERP migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Certinia ERP Cloud and Epicor Prophet 21.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Certinia ERP Cloud: Governed by Salesforce platform limits; per-org daily API call limits vary by Salesforce edition and add-on licenses.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Certinia ERP Cloud exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Certinia ERP Cloud to Epicor Prophet 21 migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Certinia ERP Cloud to Epicor Prophet 21 data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Certinia ERP Cloud to Epicor Prophet 21 migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Certinia ERP Cloud to Epicor Prophet 21 migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between six and ten weeks for single-entity deployments under 10,000 customer records and no PSA project hierarchies. Migrations with multi-entity structures, complex GL hierarchies (multi-currency, multi-dimensional analysis), large billing event histories, or multiple PSA project hierarchies move to twelve to twenty weeks because of Epicor Company and entity setup sequencing, GL account code remapping validation, and PSA-to-project translation work. Epicor Kinetic implementations alone typically take five to ten months; adding Certinia migration complexity extends this estimate.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Certinia ERP Cloud.
Land in Epicor Prophet 21, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day