ERP migration

Migrate from Infor LN to Epicor Prophet 21

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Infor LN and Epicor Prophet 21. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Epicor Prophet 21.

Infor LN logo

Infor LN

Source

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Compatibility

100%

16 of 16

objects map 1:1 between Infor LN and Epicor Prophet 21.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

8-12 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Infor LN to Epicor ERP is a manufacturing-ERP migration with a dependency chain that must be respected throughout. Infor LN stores financial companies and business partners before warehouses, and items and BOMs before purchase orders, sales orders, and projects. Epicor ERP uses a similar master-transactional hierarchy but resolves part numbers, BOM revisions, and site assignments differently. We sequence the export to capture LN text-table content first (LN stores long-form text in separate LN Tools tables and assigns numeric IDs to transactional tables, so a direct extract produces IDs instead of readable descriptions), reconcile multicompany settlements, and preserve price matrix priority rules as metadata alongside the resulting price records. Workflows, batch jobs, alerts, and production scheduling rules do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of every LN automation requiring rebuild in Epicor Kinetic so the customer's admin team has a concrete checklist post-migration. The migration runs through the LN ION API with its 25-second timeout enforced in our chunking logic and Epicor Kinetic REST API calls with rate-limit handling on the write side.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Infor LN logo

Infor LN

What's pushing teams away

  • Licensing cost and minimum user requirements (20 users) make it economically impractical for smaller manufacturers or organizations with seasonal headcount.
  • Steep learning curve and specialized consultant dependency for day-to-day administration create ongoing operational overhead after go-live.
  • Vendor audit requests and contract enforcement practices cause friction and distrust, with some organizations reporting extended pressure campaigns for access and documentation.
  • Modern, lighter-weight ERPs like NetSuite or Acumatica offer faster time-to-value for manufacturers without the depth of discrete engineering complexity that LN addresses.
  • Support quality is perceived as inconsistent across implementation partners, leading to variable post-go-live experiences.

Choosing

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-specific design for wholesale distributors, not a general-purpose ERP repurposed for distribution — distributors choose P21 because it matches their replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Strong inventory control with automated replenishment, lot and serial tracking, and multi-warehouse management appeals to distributors with complex stock requirements and tight margin pressure.
  • Responsive customer support cited across G2 and Gartner reviews, with Epicor's 90% retention rate reflecting long-term customer satisfaction in a market where switching costs are high.
  • Cloud deployment on Microsoft Azure provides the flexibility to scale user counts and warehouse locations without on-premise infrastructure investment.
  • The Software Development Kit lets distributors personalize P21 to their specific business processes without modifying the application source code, preserving upgrade paths.

Object mapping

How Infor LN objects map to Epicor Prophet 21

Each row shows how a Infor LN object lands in Epicor Prophet 21, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Infor LN

Business Partner

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Customer and Supplier

1:1
Fully supported

Infor LN maintains Business Partners as a single entity with a Role field distinguishing customer from supplier. Address, contact, and financial limit data live as related child records. We map to Epicor Customer and Supplier records, splitting by LN Role at migration time. Customer and Supplier are separate record types in Epicor Kinetic. The LN financial limit data maps to Customer Credit Limit and Supplier Payment Terms fields.

Infor LN

Item

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Part

1:1
Fully supported

LN Items carry rich attribute data including BOM structures, routing steps, costing information, and stocking dimensions. We map to Epicor Kinetic Part with PartClass assignment, Stocking UOM, and Costing information preserved. LN Item Type (make, buy, or phantom) maps to Epicor Type Code. Part Number from LN becomes Part Number in Epicor; the LN Item Revision becomes Epicor Part Revision with revision-specific BOM and routing attachments.

Infor LN

Financial Company

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Company and Fiscal Year

1:1
Fully supported

LN Financial Companies maintain their own chart of accounts, fiscal calendar, and tax configuration. We map each LN Financial Company to an Epicor Kinetic Company record with its own fiscal calendar, accounting period definitions, and tax jurisdiction assignment. Multicompany LN configurations generate multiple Epicor Company records. We preserve the LN currency assignments and any intercompany trading relationships as a separate configuration guide for the customer's Epicor admin.

Infor LN

Warehouse and Site

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Site and Warehouse

1:1
Fully supported

LN Sites represent physical or logical locations with inventory policies, location definitions, and receiving rules. We map to Epicor Kinetic Site (or Plant) and Warehouse records with location structure preserved. The multisite control data governing cross-site stock transfers maps to Epicor Transfer Order and inter-site warehouse assignment rules.

Infor LN

Bill of Materials

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Part BOM (Part Revision)

1:1
Fully supported

LN BOMs support multiple nesting levels, phantom assemblies, option classes, and lead-time offsets. Engineering Change Orders attach to BOMs as revision-controlled overlays. We preserve BOM level structure, quantity-per, operation steps, and scrap percentages in Epicor Part Revision BOM. Phantom assemblies map to Epicor Phantom BOM type. ECO-linked BOM revisions migrate as Epicor ECO and Part Revision records with effective dates.

Infor LN

Purchase Order

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

POHeader and POLine

1:1
Fully supported

LN separates purchase order headers from lines and schedule dates. Purchase contracts (blanket orders) link to release schedules that decrement funded quantities. We map header, line, and schedule as three related Epicor records: POHeader, POLine, and PORel (release schedule). The LN purchase contract funded quantity becomes Epicor PO Header with linked release lines. Open and closed status preserves from LN Document State.

Infor LN

Purchase Contract

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

POHeader with Blanket Release lines

1:1
Fully supported

LN blanket purchase orders (contracts) hold funded quantity and delivery terms. We map to Epicor POHeader with a Blanket PO type, where release schedules correspond to individual POLine release records. Funded quantity and remaining authorized amount map from LN to Epicor POHeader Total Promise and remaining commitment fields. We flag any contract with releases that span multiple LN Financial Companies for separate intercompany reconciliation.

Infor LN

Sales Order

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

SOHeader and SOLine

1:1
Fully supported

LN sales orders can resolve pricing through price books and matrix definitions. Multicompany invoicing combines lines from Sales, Project, and Service logistic packages onto a single invoice. We map to Epicor Kinetic Sales Order with SOLine and release schedule preserved. LN pricing resolution through matrix definitions migrates as Epicor Price Code assignments and Part Price records (see price matrix mapping). Multicompany sales order lines are split at migration time by LN Financial Company and mapped to corresponding Epicor Company records.

Infor LN

Project

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Job and Project

1:1
Fully supported

LN Projects support ETO and MTO lifecycles with phase structures, work breakdown hierarchies, and billing milestones. We map to Epicor Kinetic Project with phase hierarchy, WBS levels, revenue recognition milestones, and project-level accounting rules preserved. Project cost categories map from LN to Epicor Project Plant Cost Codes. Revenue recognition methods (percentage of completion, completed contract, or as-incurred) migrate as Project Billing Rules.

Infor LN

Service Contract

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Service Contract

1:1
Fully supported

LN service contracts track entitlement, coverage periods, and SLA terms. Field service records include technician assignments, mobile dispatch data, and parts consumed. We map to Epicor Kinetic Service Contract with coverage terms, contract lines, and SLA response-time definitions. Contract entitlement rules migrate from LN coverage matrix to Epicor Service Agreement coverage rules.

Infor LN

Field Service Record

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Service Call and Job

1:1
Fully supported

LN field service records track technician assignments, work orders, parts consumed, and dispatch data. We map to Epicor Kinetic Service Call with linked Job for any billable labor, and Parts and Labor records for material and time consumed. Technician assignments migrate as Service Call assigned-resource records with skill certifications checked against Epicor Resource Group qualifications.

Infor LN

User and Employee Assignment

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Customer Contact and Supplier Contact

1:1
Fully supported

LN maps users to Business Partner contacts and to organizational roles for approval routing. Owner assignments on transactional records (orders, projects) reference the LN user table. We map user IDs to Epicor Customer and Supplier contact records, with organizational role assignments preserved in the contact's Role field and in the Epicor Security Groups configuration guide we deliver for the customer's admin team.

Infor LN

Custom Fields

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

User-Defined Fields and Extended Fields

1:1
Mapping required

LN custom fields are defined in the Extensions package with a Domain property specifying data type; values are stored in dedicated extension tables that join to base object tables. We read the Domain definition before mapping, validate type compatibility with Epicor UDF or Extended Field data types, and reject any column where the domain type cannot be coerced. UDFs in Epicor Kinetic are defined per-table in System Management before data import begins. LN extension table join IDs require two-pass extraction (text table then transactional tables) before staging.

Infor LN

Item Surcharges and Price Matrices

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Part Price and Customer Price Break

1:1
Mapping required

LN price matrices use priority-based search rules across purchase, sales, and transfer price types with matrix attributes as dimensions. Item surcharges function as cost adders in valuation price setups. We export the full LN Matrix Definition (tdpcg0610m000) metadata alongside each price book to preserve the priority chain. The resulting price records migrate as Epicor Part Price entries with Price Code assignments, and Customer Price Breaks migrate with break quantity and price per tier. The priority order is delivered as a written configuration guide for the Epicor admin to reconstruct in Epicor Price Code priority rules.

Infor LN

Attachment and Document Management

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Document Management Reference

1:1
Fully supported

LN stores document references (pointers to file storage) rather than binary content in most transactional tables. We extract document metadata and URL paths and map them to Epicor Kinetic Document Management records linked to the parent Part, BOM Revision, or Order. The customer's IT team configures the document storage endpoint in Epicor Kinetic (Epicor Data Library, SharePoint, or other) before migration so that the reference links resolve post-go-live.

Infor LN

Multicompany Settlement Record

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Intercompany Transaction Reconciliation (flagged)

1:1
Fully supported

LN multicompany invoicing generates internal financial settlements between entities using self-billing, creating intercompany journal entries that must be reconciled across all financial companies. Epicor Kinetic does not have a native equivalent multicompany settlement engine at the same depth as LN. We extract all settlement records and their linked journal entries, flag any settlement that lacks a matched debit or credit in the same export scope, and deliver a written reconciliation spreadsheet for the customer's financial team to post manually or through an intercompany transaction process in Epicor after go-live.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Infor LN logo

Infor LN gotchas

High

ION API REST handler timeout is 25 seconds

High

Text data stored in separate LN Tools table requires join reconstruction

High

Multicompany invoicing creates intercompany settlements that can orphan during migration

Medium

Custom fields require Domain property validation before schema mapping

Medium

Price matrix priority rules must be exported as metadata, not just price data

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21 gotchas

High

Third-party bolt-on integrations complicate migration scope

High

Dirty data without standardized processes compounds migration risk

Medium

SDK customizations and BPMs may not survive platform upgrades

Medium

Report-based export only for non-technical users

Low

Per-user pricing model requires accurate user count before migration planning

Pair-specific challenges

  • LN ION API REST handler enforces a 25-second timeout

    LN ION API REST handlers impose a hard 25-second timeout on individual request/response cycles. Epicor Kinetic REST API calls have their own per-tenant throttling and rate limits that require batch chunking and exponential backoff. We chunk LN exports into page sizes that return within the 25-second window and implement retry logic for the queued response handlers that have a 10-minute buffer. Without this chunking, LN extraction jobs stall and the ION Gateway marks the service as unavailable, blocking migration progress entirely.

  • LN text data stored in separate LN Tools tables requires two-pass extraction

    LN stores long-form text content (part descriptions, order notes, contract terms) in dedicated LN Tools tables and assigns numeric text IDs to each text field in transactional 'pd' tables. Direct table extraction produces numeric IDs rather than readable text unless we explicitly join to the text tables. Epicor Kinetic stores text fields directly on the parent record, so there is no equivalent join on the destination side. We execute a two-pass extract: first the text table contents keyed by ID, then the transactional tables, and we reconstruct full records in our staging layer before writing clean text to Epicor.

  • Multicompany settlements and intercompany journal entries require explicit reconciliation

    LN multicompany invoicing automatically generates internal financial settlements between entities when goods and invoices cross entity boundaries. The resulting intercompany journal entries must be reconciled across all financial companies. If we extract invoice headers without also extracting linked settlement records and counterpart journal entries, Epicor will have unbalanced intercompany positions with no native settlement mechanism to correct them. We sequence the export to capture all Financial Company and Business Partner data before any invoice or settlement records, and we deliver a reconciliation report listing every settlement with its matched debit or credit status.

  • Price matrix priority rules must export as metadata alongside price records

    LN resolves item prices through matrix priority search rules where multiple price books and matrix definitions compete and the highest priority wins. Epicor Kinetic Part Price and Customer Price Break records do not carry priority metadata natively; priority is resolved via Price Code assignment order. If we export only the resulting price records without the LN matrix definition and priority order, Epicor will resolve prices differently and customers will see pricing discrepancies on open orders at go-live. We export the full Matrix Definition (tdpcg0610m000) metadata alongside each price book and deliver it as a written configuration guide for Epicor Price Code priority reconstruction.

  • LN custom field Domain properties require validation before Epicor UDF mapping

    LN custom fields are defined with a Domain property that sets the data type. Two custom fields with the same logical name can have incompatible domains (alphanumeric vs. numeric) depending on how they were created in the LN Extensions package. We read the Domain definition before mapping any custom field column to the Epicor schema, rejecting any column where the domain type cannot be coerced to the target UDF data type. Epicor Kinetic UDFs are defined per-table in System Management before data import begins, so schema provisioning must complete before any custom field data is written.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Infor LN to Epicor Prophet 21 data migration

  1. Discovery and LN environment audit

    We audit the source Infor LN environment across all installed packages, financial companies, sites, item volumes, open PO and SO backlog, active project count, BOM complexity, custom field extensions, and price matrix definitions. We extract LN text table schema alongside transactional table schema. We assess multicompany structure, intercompany trading relationships, and any outstanding engineering change orders linked to BOM revisions. The discovery output is a written migration scope with record counts per object, dependency graph for the extraction order, and a flag for any LN object without an Epicor equivalent that requires a manual-rebuild or approximation strategy.

  2. Epicor Kinetic environment provisioning and schema design

    We provision or configure the Epicor Kinetic environment with Company, Site, Warehouse, Fiscal Year, and Chart of Accounts aligned to LN Financial Company data. We create all required User-Defined Fields based on validated LN custom field Domain properties. We configure Part classes, BOM types, and routing definitions before any data import begins. We define Price Codes aligned to LN price matrix priority chains and prepare Customer and Supplier price break templates. The Epicor schema is validated in a test company before production migration begins.

  3. Dependency-ordered extraction from Infor LN

    We extract LN data in the dependency chain: Financial Companies and Business Partners first (no dependencies), then Warehouses and Sites, then Items and Bills of Material (depend on Warehouses), then price matrices and surcharges (depend on Items), then purchase contracts and purchase orders (depend on Business Partners and Financial Companies), then sales orders (depend on Business Partners, Financial Companies, and Items), then Projects (depend on Financial Companies, Items, and BOMs), then Service Contracts and Field Service records (depend on Business Partners). Each extraction phase uses LN ION API with 25-second timeout enforced in chunking logic, and we execute two-pass extraction for any object with text-table join dependencies.

  4. Transformation, reconciliation, and Epicor write-back

    We transform staged LN data to Epicor Kinetic API format, resolving Epicor Part Number and revision assignments from LN Item and BOM revision data. Price matrix priority chains are encoded in the written configuration guide; Epicor Part Price records are written with Price Code assignments. Multicompany settlement records are flagged and held for reconciliation rather than written directly. We write to Epicor Kinetic via REST API with batch chunking, rate-limit handling, and exponential backoff. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report comparing LN source counts to Epicor written counts, with a discrepancy threshold of 0.5 percent before proceeding to the next phase.

  5. Multicompany settlement reconciliation and financial validation

    We run a settlement reconciliation pass on all LN multicompany invoice and settlement records. For each settlement, we verify that a matched debit and credit exist within the same export scope. Settlements without matches are written to a reconciliation spreadsheet for the customer's financial team to post manually in Epicor after go-live. We also validate that Epicor GL entries balance by Financial Company by comparing total debits to total credits per Company against the LN trial balance totals from the pre-migration extraction.

  6. Cutover, delta migration, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze LN to read-only status during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, and enable Epicor Kinetic as the system of record. We deliver the LN workflow and automation inventory document listing every LN workflow, batch job, alert, and production scheduling rule that requires rebuild in Epicor Kinetic. The customer's admin team uses this as a concrete checklist; we do not rebuild LN workflows as Epicor Kinetic BPM or Data Directive inside the migration scope. We support a two-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the customer's operations and finance teams.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Infor LN logo

Infor LN

Source

Strengths

  • Handles multi-level BOMs, phantom assemblies, and engineering change orders without requiring application-layer workarounds.
  • Multicompany architecture natively supports organizations with multiple financial entities and intercompany trading.
  • MRO and field service modules provide depot-level and shop-floor tracking capabilities purpose-built for A&D environments.
  • Cloud deployment on AWS delivers elastic scaling and automated availability-zone failover at a lower TCO than statically-sized on-premises.
  • Comprehensive discrete manufacturing coverage across ETO, MTO, and standard BOM-driven production modes.

Weaknesses

  • Minimum 20-user licensing requirement and $200/user/month floor exclude smaller manufacturers from cost-effective adoption.
  • Specialized consultant dependency for administration creates ongoing operational overhead beyond typical ERP platforms.
  • Steep learning curve and dated UI conventions compared to modern SaaS ERP alternatives.
  • Unicode and VRC-based update management requires careful planning and downtime windows for on-premises deployments.
Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for wholesale distribution with industry-specific replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Multi-warehouse management with bin locations, cross-docking, and real-time inventory visibility across all warehouse locations.
  • Automated replenishment engine with demand-based and min-max planning reduces stockouts and overstock carrying costs.
  • AI-infused reporting via Epicor Prism provides Gen AI-driven insights into ERP data without requiring a BI team.
  • Strong customer retention at 90% and a 50-year track record in the distribution vertical provides long-term vendor stability.

Weaknesses

  • High total cost of ownership — per-user pricing of $150-200/month plus $10K-$500K implementation creates significant budget commitment for small and mid-market distributors.
  • Customization via SDK requires technical expertise and introduces upgrade risk when custom code conflicts with new P21 releases.
  • Report generation performance is a known pain point — multiple users report system freezes during large or complex report exports.
  • Third-party bolt-on reliance for functionality that competitors include natively increases integration complexity and total solution cost.
  • Limited public API documentation — developers building custom integrations report difficulty finding P21 API authentication methods and endpoint specifications.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard ERP migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Infor LN and Epicor Prophet 21.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Infor LN: PRD tenant: max 250 concurrent REST executions; other tenant suffixes: max 125. REST handler timeout: 25 seconds..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Infor LN doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Infor LN to Epicor Prophet 21 migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Infor LN to Epicor Prophet 21 data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Infor LN to Epicor Prophet 21 migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Infor LN to Epicor Prophet 21 migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 50,000 parts, 5 BOM levels, and 10,000 open purchase and sales orders with a single financial company typically land between 8 and 12 weeks. Migrations with multi-level BOMs, phantom assemblies, 3 or more financial companies, large open PO and SO backlogs, extensive price matrix definitions, or ECO revision overlays move to 14-24 weeks because of BOM reconstruction time, price matrix metadata mapping, and multicompany settlement reconciliation. Epicor's on-premise sunset timelines give customers until at least 2029 for active support, providing a managed window for the transition rather than a forced one.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Infor LN.
Land in Epicor Prophet 21, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day