Project Management migration

Migrate from The Daily Project to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between The Daily Project and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

The Daily Project logo

The Daily Project

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

50%

5 of 10

objects map 1:1 between The Daily Project and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from The Daily Project to Microsoft Project is a structural migration from a personal, list-first task manager to an enterprise project scheduling platform. The Daily Project has no bulk export endpoint, so we extract via per-record API reads at a conservative 30-60 requests per minute to avoid undocumented throttling. Recurrence rules stored as natural-language RRULE strings require parsing before they can be re-expressed in Microsoft Project's scheduling format. Tasks with checklist structures become subtasks with outline indentation preserved. Sections map to summary task groupings or task groups. Labels become custom text fields. Attachments migrate as URL references only; actual file content must be independently downloaded and re-uploaded. Comments transfer as task notes. We do not migrate workflows, automations, or any reporting configuration, and we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

The Daily Project logo

The Daily Project

What's pushing teams away

  • No native collaboration features — shared workspaces, user roles, and permissions are absent or minimal
  • Task-level dependency tracking and Gantt-style visualisation are not available in the product
  • Limited integration ecosystem compared to established platforms like Asana or Monday.com
  • No mobile application as of the last documented release, limiting use to desktop browsers
  • The platform has limited public documentation, making self-service troubleshooting difficult

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How The Daily Project objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a The Daily Project object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

The Daily Project

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

The Daily Project tasks map to Microsoft Project tasks. Task title becomes Task Name. Description migrates to the Notes field. Due date maps to either Finish Date (in Fixed Duration scheduling mode) or to a custom Due_Date__c field if the customer uses Fixed Units or Fixed Work. Priority flag (low/medium/high) maps to the Priority field (1-10 scale). Checklist items within a task become subtasks with outline indentation preserved. Task order within a section is preserved by setting the Outline Number and WBS fields during import.

The Daily Project

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Each The Daily Project project maps to a separate Microsoft Project plan (MPP file or Project for the web project). Project name becomes the project title. Project colour label migrates as a custom text field project_colour__c since Microsoft Project does not have a native colour property. Task membership is preserved so all tasks within a section belong to the correct project. Archived projects require an explicit include-archived toggle during extraction; we set this flag in scoping but exclude archived projects from migration unless the customer requests them in writing.

The Daily Project

Section

maps to

Microsoft Project

Summary Task / Task Group

1:many
Fully supported

The Daily Project sections provide horizontal grouping within a project (e.g. Backlog, In Progress, Done). Sections map to Microsoft Project summary tasks that act as grouping headers for their child tasks. The section name becomes the summary task name. Relative task order within each section is preserved by setting the Outline Level and ID fields during import. If the customer uses section colour coding, the colour value migrates to a custom summary task field. Microsoft Project's outline structure supports unlimited nesting; single-level sections from The Daily Project map to top-level summary tasks.

The Daily Project

Recurring Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Recurring Task

lossy
Fully supported

The Daily Project stores recurrence as natural-language RRULE strings (e.g. FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=MO,TU,WE,TH,FR). We parse each RRULE at migration time and re-express it in Microsoft Project's recurrence dialog format: frequency (daily, weekly, monthly, yearly), interval, days of week, day of month, and end condition. Non-standard phrasing (e.g. 'every couple of weeks on Tuesday') cannot be fully parsed algorithmically and require a manual mapping step; we flag these during scoping and confirm the mapping with the customer before recurrence data is committed.

The Daily Project

Comment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Note

1:1
Fully supported

The Daily Project comments attached to tasks migrate as Microsoft Project task notes. Comment body text, author name, and timestamp are included. @username mentions within comment text are preserved as plain-text strings and are not automatically linked to Microsoft Project user accounts since The Daily Project has no native user concept. The customer may choose to manually tag colleagues post-migration if Microsoft Project user accounts exist.

The Daily Project

Attachment (URL reference)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Document / Document Upload

lossy
Fully supported

The Daily Project stores attachment URLs pointing to externally hosted files, not the file content itself. We transfer the URL reference and original filename as a text value in a custom attachments_url__c field on the task. The actual file content must be independently downloaded from the source URL and re-uploaded to the destination SharePoint document library or Microsoft Project attachment layer. If the source URL becomes inaccessible before migration completes, the attachment migrates as a broken link and is flagged in the pre-cutover URL validation report.

The Daily Project

Label

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Text Field

1:1
Fully supported

The Daily Project labels are flat tag strings applied to tasks. We migrate label names and apply them to corresponding Microsoft Project tasks via a custom Text1 through Text10 field (or a named custom field if Project Plan 3 or above is in use). If the customer uses multiple labels per task, we concatenate them with semicolons in a single custom field or distribute across multiple custom fields based on the destination plan's custom field quota. Label colour information is not available from The Daily Project's API and cannot be migrated.

The Daily Project

Checklist Item

maps to

Microsoft Project

Subtask

1:many
Fully supported

The Daily Project checklist items within a task map to subtasks in Microsoft Project with outline indentation one level below the parent task. The checklist item text becomes the subtask name. Checklist completion status (checked/unchecked) maps to the Percent Complete field: completed items set to 100%, incomplete items set to 0%. Task order among checklist items is preserved by the subtask ID sequence. Checklist items that reference external URLs may have those URLs preserved as task notes on the subtask.

The Daily Project

Due Date

maps to

Microsoft Project

Finish Date

lossy
Fully supported

The Daily Project due date maps to Microsoft Project Finish Date. Before migration, we confirm the scheduling mode in use: Fixed Duration (default for most imported plans) means the due date maps directly; Fixed Work or Fixed Units scheduling modes require a start date calculation based on the due date and estimated effort. We configure the scheduling mode in the destination project before import and document any due-date-only tasks that cannot be fully scheduled without start date information.

The Daily Project

Priority Flag

maps to

Microsoft Project

Priority Field

1:1
Fully supported

The Daily Project priority flag (low, medium, high) maps to Microsoft Project's Priority field on a 0-10 scale: low maps to 250, medium maps to 500, high maps to 1000. Tasks without a priority flag default to 500 (medium). The priority value affects task sorting in Project for the web views and is used by some reporting filters. We preserve the priority value but note that Microsoft Project does not have a native task importance or urgency flag beyond this numeric scale.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

The Daily Project logo

The Daily Project gotchas

High

No public bulk export API

Medium

Recurrence stored as opaque strings

Medium

Attachment URLs only — no file migration

Low

No native user or workspace role concept

Low

Archive state not exposed in export

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • No bulk export API forces conservative per-record extraction

    The Daily Project does not publish a bulk export or REST bulk endpoint. Migration relies on per-record API reads, which means we paginate through tasks, projects, sections, comments, and attachments individually. Without a documented rate limit, we pace requests conservatively at 30-60 requests per minute to avoid triggering any undocumented throttle that could suspend the account during extraction. Workspaces with more than 500 tasks will see extended extraction timelines. We scope the extraction phase explicitly during discovery and flag any accounts approaching the 500-task threshold for timeline adjustment before extraction begins.

  • Recurrence rules require manual parsing for non-standard phrasing

    Recurrence rules are stored as natural-language or RFC 5545 RRULE strings in a single field. We parse standard RRULE syntax (FREQ, INTERVAL, BYDAY, BYMONTHDAY) algorithmically and re-express in Microsoft Project's recurrence dialog format. Rules that use non-standard phrasing (e.g. 'every couple of weeks on Tuesday', 'every weekday', 'twice a month on the 1st and 15th') cannot be fully parsed without manual mapping. We flag these during the extraction audit and confirm the recurrence interpretation with the customer before committing the schedule data. A flat task (non-recurring) fallback is always available if the recurrence cannot be reliably mapped.

  • Attachment URLs only — actual files must be re-uploaded

    The Daily Project stores only a URL reference for attachments, not the file content. During migration we preserve the URL reference and filename in a custom field. The actual file content must be independently downloaded from the source URL and re-uploaded to the destination SharePoint document library or Microsoft Project attachment layer. If the source URL becomes inaccessible before migration completes (e.g. due to account cancellation), the attachment migrates as a broken link. We run a URL accessibility check during scoping and again before the cutover window opens, flagging any inaccessible URLs for the customer to resolve before cutover.

  • Single-workspace model maps all tasks under one system-owned project

    The Daily Project has no native user or workspace role concept. Any team or shared-workspace structure is a client-side workaround, not a first-class object. When migrating to Microsoft Project, which has a full user and permission model, we create a single destination project or workspace to receive all tasks. Assignee fields that existed as plain-text task owner names in The Daily Project are not automatically linked to Microsoft Project user accounts. We document every task owner reference for the customer's admin to re-assign post-migration. If the customer wants task assignments in Microsoft Project, they must provision user accounts and provide the mapping before the assignment phase.

  • Custom fields not available on The Daily Project free or lower tiers

    The Daily Project does not expose a custom fields object in its documented API at any tier. Any customer-specific field definitions discovered in the UI (e.g. fields visible only on Business tier) are treated as plain-text task properties and migrated as such. In Microsoft Project for the web, custom fields are available from Project Plan 3 ($30/user/month) and above. Customers on Project Plan 1 ($10/user/month) have a fixed field set and cannot receive label or custom data into dedicated custom fields; we store these in the Notes field instead.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful The Daily Project to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Discovery and API audit

    We audit the The Daily Project account via per-record API reads across all tasks, projects, sections, comments, attachments, labels, and recurring task records. We record the task count per project, section nesting depth, recurrence rule patterns (standard vs non-standard), attachment URL health, and label taxonomy. We confirm whether archived tasks should be included via the include-archived API flag. We identify any UI-only custom fields and classify them as text properties for migration. We assess API response latency to calibrate conservative request pacing and produce a discovery report with record counts, estimated extraction time, and any non-standard recurrence items requiring manual mapping.

  2. Microsoft Project destination setup

    We create the destination project plan structure in Microsoft Project. For Project for the web, we create a project per The Daily Project project, configure the SharePoint document library connection, and set the scheduling mode (Fixed Duration recommended for date-only imports). For Project Desktop, we create MPP files with appropriate calendar settings. We provision custom fields (Text1-10 or named fields) for labels and attachment URLs if Project Plan 3 or above is in use. We document the task owner reference list for the customer to provision Microsoft 365 user accounts before the assignment phase begins.

  3. Recurrence parsing and mapping confirmation

    We parse every unique recurrence rule pattern encountered during extraction. Standard RRULE patterns (FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=MO,TU,WE,TH,FR, etc.) are automatically mapped to Microsoft Project recurrence dialog equivalents. Non-standard phrasing is flagged in a recurrence mapping document sent to the customer for written confirmation. We do not commit recurring task data until all non-standard patterns have a confirmed mapping. For each confirmed recurring task, we create the recurrence series in the destination project with the correct frequency, interval, days, and end condition.

  4. Attachment URL validation

    We run an HTTP reachability check against every attachment URL extracted from The Daily Project. URLs that return 200 OK are flagged as valid and queued for the customer's file download step. URLs that return 404, 403, or timeout are flagged as broken links and reported to the customer with the task name and attachment filename. The customer independently downloads valid files to a staging location for re-upload to SharePoint. We do not download file content ourselves; we only preserve the URL reference. We re-run URL validation before the cutover window opens to catch any links that expired during the migration window.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: projects first (as container), then sections as summary tasks, then tasks with outline structure, then checklist items as subtasks, then comments as task notes, then recurring task series, then labels as custom fields, then attachment URL references. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. For large workspaces (over 1,000 tasks), we chunk the migration into batches of 200 tasks with checkpoint validation between batches to prevent data loss from a mid-migration API interruption.

  6. Cutover, validation, and owner assignment handoff

    We freeze The Daily Project writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during migration, then close out the migration. We deliver a summary report with record counts, any remaining broken attachment links, any recurrence rules that were mapped manually, and the task owner reference list for manual assignment. We do not assign tasks to Microsoft Project users; that requires the customer's admin to map The Daily Project owner names to provisioned Microsoft 365 accounts. We provide a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the customer's team. Workflows, automations, and reporting configurations do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of any automation patterns observed for the admin to rebuild in Microsoft Project.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

The Daily Project logo

The Daily Project

Source

Strengths

  • Cross-platform desktop application for Windows, macOS, and Linux — works offline without a browser dependency.
  • Built-in time tracking via precise stopwatches against individual tasks, removing the need for a separate timer app.
  • Dual organisation model — tasks tracked simultaneously by Project and by Category — gives a flexible view for freelancers juggling multiple workstreams.
  • Project Pillars structure supports managing many concurrent projects without the platform becoming cluttered.
  • Lightweight footprint with keyboard shortcuts and progress bars aimed at solo users and small teams who find tools like Asana or Jira overkill.

Weaknesses

  • No native team collaboration features — no shared workspaces, roles, or permission levels
  • No mobile application limits access to desktop browsers
  • No built-in time-tracking or time-entry recording
  • Limited third-party integration options beyond calendar sync
  • Scarce public documentation and no community forum for self-service support
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across The Daily Project and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    The Daily Project: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    The Daily Project doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your The Daily Project to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about The Daily Project to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during The Daily Project to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your The Daily Project to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 2,000 tasks and 50 projects with standard recurrence patterns. Migrations with over 5,000 tasks, multi-level section hierarchies, non-standard recurrence phrasing requiring manual mapping, or multiple projects requiring individual plan creation move to eight to twelve weeks. The per-record API extraction is the primary timeline driver for large workspaces; bulk export is not available and we pace conservatively at 30-60 requests per minute to avoid undocumented throttling.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from The Daily Project.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day