Project Management migration

Migrate from CONTACT Project Office to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between CONTACT Project Office and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

CONTACT Project Office logo

CONTACT Project Office

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

60%

6 of 10

objects map 1:1 between CONTACT Project Office and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from CONTACT Project Office to Microsoft Project is a migration that begins with data discovery rather than a defined API. Public documentation on CONTACT Project Office is sparse, which means every engagement starts with a scoping call to inventory what actually exists in the source instance — Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Resources, Assignees, Custom Fields, Attachments, and Comments — before defining what can be extracted and how it maps into Microsoft Project's schema. We work from whatever export format the source instance produces, normalizing the output into a FlitStack AI staging format before load. We migrate task hierarchies (WBS), baseline data where available, resource pools, and Custom Fields mapped to Microsoft Project's typed custom field slots. We do not migrate workflows, automations, or reporting configurations as code; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Microsoft Project after cutover.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

CONTACT Project Office logo

CONTACT Project Office

What's pushing teams away

  • Very thin public review presence — neither G2 nor Capterra currently shows established user ratings for CONTACT Project Office, so prospective buyers struggle to find peer validation outside of CONTACT's own case studies.
  • Tightly tied to the broader CONTACT Elements stack — customers who never adopted CIM Database PLM derive less differentiated value from Project Office vs. mainstream PM tools and tend to drift toward Jira, MS Project, or Smartsheet.
  • Limited third-party integration ecosystem — outside the CONTACT Elements modules and MS Office/CAD viewers, customers report fewer pre-built connectors than ServiceNow SPM, Planview, or Wrike provide.
  • Sparse public documentation outside the customer portal — without a vendor relationship, evaluators have difficulty finding API references, data-model documentation, or pricing transparency in open channels.
  • Concentrated in German-speaking and European industrial sectors — North American and APAC customers may face support, language, and consultant availability gaps compared with global PPM vendors.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How CONTACT Project Office objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a CONTACT Project Office object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

CONTACT Project Office

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Projects map directly to Microsoft Project project files or Project Online project records. We use the source Project Name as the destination project name and the source project start date or creation date as the project StartDate. If the source export includes a project-level description or status field, we map it to the Project Summary Task Name field or a custom Project-level text field. The destination project must be provisioned (or a .mpp template created) before any task hierarchy insert begins.

CONTACT Project Office

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Summary Task and Task

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Tasks map to Microsoft Project Task records. Summary tasks in Microsoft Project (those with child tasks indented beneath them) represent the same hierarchy as the source WBS. We preserve the task Name, Start and Finish dates, Duration, and the predecessor/successor dependency chain if exported as predecessor ID references. Task hierarchy is resolved before insert so that parent task IDs are available for child task assignment during the load sequence.

CONTACT Project Office

Subtask

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task (sub-level)

1:many
Fully supported

Subtasks in CONTACT Project Office map to Microsoft Project Tasks with an outline level greater than 1. We flatten the subtask structure into a single task table with OutlineLevel and WBS code preserving the original hierarchy depth. If the source distinguishes between a subtask and a summary task (a row with children versus a row without), we assign Task.Summary = True for rows that have children in the source. The OutlineNumber is computed from the parent's outline position plus a sequential child index.

CONTACT Project Office

Resource

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Resources map to Microsoft Project Resources. The source resource Name, Email (if available), Max Units, and calendar data map to Resource.Name, Resource.Initials, Resource.MaxUnits, and Resource.BaseCalendar respectively. If the source export includes an hourly cost rate or material label, we set Resource.StandardRate and Resource.Type (0 = Material, 1 = Work). Resource groups from the source map to Resource.Group.

CONTACT Project Office

Assignment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Assignment

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office task assignments map to Microsoft Project Assignments (task-resource rows). We resolve the source task ID and source resource ID to the Microsoft Project TaskUID and ResourceUID generated during the task and resource loads. The source assignment units or effort percentage maps to Assignment.Units, and the source start/finish dates for the assignment map to Assignment.Start and Assignment.Finish. If the source assignment has a percent complete value, we set Assignment.PercentWorkComplete after the assignment row is inserted.

CONTACT Project Office

Custom Field

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office custom field definitions vary by instance. We inventory the custom field names and data types during data discovery and pre-create the corresponding Microsoft Project custom fields (up to 10 per object type, per Microsoft Project limits). Text fields map to TextN custom fields; number fields map to NumberN; date fields map to DateN; flag fields map to FlagN. Custom field values migrate as Lookup table entries if the source field uses a picklist-style enumeration, or as raw values if the source field is free-form text. The customer approves the field-type mapping during schema validation before any data loads.

CONTACT Project Office

Comment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Note

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Comments attached to tasks map to Microsoft Project Notes on the corresponding Task record. If the source comment has an author name and timestamp, we prepend that metadata to the note body. Notes are inserted after all task records exist so that the TaskUID is available for the Note.TaskUID foreign key. If the source stores comments as a separate entity with a many-to-one relationship to tasks, we join them to the task during normalization before the Notes phase.

CONTACT Project Office

Attachment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Document (SharePoint/PWA)

lossy
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office file attachments do not have a documented export path in the available source evidence. We flag attachments during data discovery as a separate migration scope. If the destination is Project Online or Project for the web, we document the SharePoint document library path and provide a file-level copy script using the source export location and the destination SharePoint URL. For Project desktop destinations, attachments are migrated to a parallel file directory and documented as a manual relinking step for the customer admin.

CONTACT Project Office

Milestone

maps to

Microsoft Project

Milestone

1:1
Fully supported

If the source CONTACT Project Office data includes task records flagged as milestones (zero duration, milestone indicator), we map those to Microsoft Project Milestone tasks (Task.IgnoreProjectCalendar = Yes and Task.Type = 1 for Fixed Duration, or Task.Milestone = True). The milestone Name and Finish date transfer directly. The milestone's position in the WBS is preserved via OutlineNumber.

CONTACT Project Office

Baseline

maps to

Microsoft Project

Baseline

lossy
Fully supported

Baseline data migration is conditional on what the source export contains. If the source CONTACT Project Office export includes baseline dates or planned values, we set Microsoft Project Task.BaselineStart, Task.BaselineFinish, Task.BaselineWork, and Task.BaselineCost for each task. We validate that the destination project has a Baseline number selected (Baseline0 through Baseline10) before inserting. If the source does not include baseline data, we set the Microsoft Project baseline on the first post-migration snapshot as the customer's admin task.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

CONTACT Project Office logo

CONTACT Project Office gotchas

High

Public documentation is limited; API surface is gated to customers

Medium

Project structure is template-driven and may include CIM Database links

Medium

Hybrid agile + classical tasks coexist in the same project

Low

Ratings and peer feedback are sparse — discovery has to be customer-led

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • CONTACT Project Office has no documented public API

    Public documentation on CONTACT Project Office's API, schema, and data model is sparse. There is no confirmed REST or Graph API endpoint documented for automated extraction. We begin every engagement with a data discovery call to inventory what export formats the source instance can produce — whether CSV, XML, a proprietary format, or a manual screen export — before defining the migration scope. If the source instance has no export capability, we guide the customer through a manual extraction workflow and normalize the result into a FlitStack AI staging format. This step adds one to two weeks to the timeline compared to a source with a documented API.

  • Microsoft Project web has feature limitations versus desktop

    Project for the web (the web client included with Project Plan 3) does not support all desktop features. Baselines are not imported; certain constraints (As Late As Possible, As Soon As Possible) are not supported; and cross-project resource pooling is limited in the web experience compared to Project Online or the desktop client. If the customer's CONTACT Project Office data includes baseline schedules or cross-project resource assignments, we document what does and does not migrate to the web target and recommend a Project Plan 3 desktop client destination if full feature parity is required.

  • Custom field type mapping must be decided before destination schema creation

    Microsoft Project limits custom fields to 10 per object type (task, resource, project). CONTACT Project Office custom fields have no documented schema, so the data type (text, number, date, picklist) must be inferred from the source data during discovery. We pre-create Microsoft Project custom fields (Text1-10, Number1-10, Date1-10, Flag1-10, OutlineCode1-10, Currency1-10) based on the inferred type before any data import. If the source field contains mixed types (text that sometimes looks like a number), we flag it for the customer to resolve before schema creation proceeds.

  • Task hierarchy must be resolved before import to avoid orphaning subtasks

    Microsoft Project enforces referential integrity for task OutlineLevel and parent-child task relationships during MPP or Project Online import. If the source export produces flat task rows without parent ID references, we must reconstruct the WBS hierarchy during the normalization phase before insert. We compute parent links from indentation levels or WBS path prefixes in the source file. Failure to resolve this step before insert results in subtasks appearing at the top level in the destination project, requiring manual restructure by the customer's admin.

  • Resource calendars and availability may not export from source

    CONTACT Project Office resource calendar data (vacation, working hours, exceptions) is not confirmed in the evidence as exportable. Microsoft Project resources with a BaseCalendar assigned depend on calendar data being present in the source. If the source export does not include resource calendar entries, we set the destination resource calendar to Standard (the default Project calendar) and flag the calendar gap in the migration inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Microsoft Project after cutover.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful CONTACT Project Office to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Data discovery and export format identification

    We schedule a data discovery call with the customer's CONTACT Project Office administrator to inventory the source instance: active projects, task counts, resource records, custom field definitions, attachment locations, comment volume, and any baseline or historical data. We identify the available export mechanism — whether a built-in export function, a database query, a screen-level CSV dump, or a manual data pull. If no documented API exists, we define a manual extraction workflow and normalize the result into a FlitStack AI staging format. The discovery output is a written scope document with source record counts and a confirmed export format.

  2. Microsoft Project destination provisioning

    We confirm the target Microsoft Project product: Project Plan 3 web (Project for the web), Project Online PWA, or the desktop client with a provisioned Project Online tenant. We pre-create the destination project in the target environment and pre-create all custom fields (up to 10 per object type) using the types decided during data discovery. If the destination is Project Online, we validate the tenant's SharePoint document library configuration for attachment targets. The customer approves the destination schema before any data loads begin.

  3. Source data normalization and hierarchy reconstruction

    We transform the source export into FlitStack AI staging records: one Project record, task records with computed OutlineLevel and WBS path, resource records with BaseCalendar assignments, and assignment rows with resolved task-resource IDs. If the source produces flat task rows without parent references, we reconstruct the hierarchy from indentation levels or path prefixes. Custom field values are normalized to the type-mapped destination custom fields. This phase emits a normalized staging CSV for each object type, validated for required field presence and foreign key completeness.

  4. Sandbox or pilot migration and reconciliation

    We run a full load into a non-production Microsoft Project environment (Project Online Sandbox or a desktop .mpp opened in the desktop client) using the normalized staging data. The customer's project manager or PMO lead reconciles record counts: projects in, tasks in (with outline levels verified), resources in, assignments in, custom field values spot-checked against the source. Any missing parent links, unresolvable resource references, or custom field type mismatches are corrected in the normalization layer before a second pilot run validates the fix.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run the production migration in record-dependency sequence: Projects first (to establish the project context), Resources next (to satisfy resource lookups on assignments), Tasks with WBS hierarchy resolved (parent rows inserted before children), Custom Fields on tasks and resources (after the base records exist), Assignments (with resolved TaskUID and ResourceUID), Notes (after tasks exist), and Baseline data (last, if available). Each phase produces a row-count reconciliation report. We use the Microsoft Project desktop client import function or Project Online REST API depending on the destination product.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation inventory handoff

    We freeze writes to the source CONTACT Project Office instance during cutover and run a final delta migration of any records modified during the final window. We validate the destination Microsoft Project plan: task count, hierarchy depth, resource assignments, custom field coverage, and note presence. We deliver a written inventory of any CONTACT Project Office workflows, automations, or reporting configurations that were not migrated (per FlitStack AI scope) so that the customer's admin can rebuild them in Microsoft Project. We provide a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised during the first week of active use in Microsoft Project.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

CONTACT Project Office logo

CONTACT Project Office

Source

Strengths

  • Hybrid planning combining Gantt/WBS with agile task boards inside a single project.
  • Native interoperability with CIM Database PLM for engineering-program data continuity.
  • ISO 26262 tool qualification supports safety-relevant automotive and industrial development.
  • Document management with version control and metadata is part of the same Elements stack.
  • Available as on-premise install or CONTACT Cloud SaaS in EU-hosted environments.

Weaknesses

  • Very limited public review and pricing data — Capterra lists 0 reviews and only a single €35/month figure with no tier breakdown.
  • Strength is conditional on adopting the broader CONTACT Elements stack; standalone value is harder to justify.
  • Smaller pre-built integration ecosystem than mainstream PPM tools.
  • Public API and data-model documentation is gated behind the customer portal.
  • Vendor and consultant footprint is concentrated in European industrial sectors.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate Project Management migration. 7 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across CONTACT Project Office and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    D

    7 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    CONTACT Project Office: Not publicly documented — confirmed with CONTACT support per tenant during scoping..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    CONTACT Project Office doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your CONTACT Project Office to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about CONTACT Project Office to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during CONTACT Project Office to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your CONTACT Project Office to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for instances with up to 20 active Projects and 5,000 combined tasks, where a workable export format is identified during discovery. Migrations with no available export function (requiring manual extraction workflow build) or complex multi-level WBS hierarchies exceeding 10,000 tasks move to six to ten weeks because of data normalization scope, hierarchy reconstruction, and destination schema validation. The data discovery phase is the critical path item for this pair because the source platform's limited documentation means export format identification cannot be pre-assumed.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from CONTACT Project Office.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day