HRMS migration

Migrate from Namely to Recruit CRM & ATS

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Namely and Recruit CRM & ATS. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Recruit CRM & ATS.

Namely logo

Namely

Source

Recruit CRM & ATS

Destination

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Compatibility

80%

8 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Namely and Recruit CRM & ATS.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Namely to Recruit CRM is an HRMS-to-recruitment-ATS migration, not a straight data copy. Namely is a mid-market HR platform consolidating payroll, benefits, compliance, and HR records; Recruit CRM is a purpose-built ATS and CRM for staffing and executive search firms. The migration scope centers on recruiting-related data that existed in Namely—candidates sourced or managed through its recruiting module, job openings, organizational units, and any hiring activity attached to employee records. We do not migrate payroll runs, benefits elections, or PTO balances because Recruit CRM has no equivalent data model for HRMS records. We extract employee profiles, map employment status and compensation data to candidate record fields, preserve department and reporting structure as organizational units, and transfer any active job postings. Workflows, approval chains, performance review templates, and payroll configurations do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild or reconfigure at the destination. Pricing on Recruit CRM starts at $100 per user per month on the Pro plan, and the migration itself is scoped around record volume and the complexity of the recruiting dataset rather than the full HRMS record count.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Namely logo

Namely

What's pushing teams away

  • Customers report limited customer support responsiveness, with difficulty reaching the right person when issues arise, particularly as the company expanded its customer base.
  • After being acquired by a benefits brokerage, some users perceive that the technology side of the platform has taken a backseat to sales and brokerage operations.
  • Mid-market companies scaling rapidly often outgrow Namely's feature depth and migrate to more robust enterprise HRMS platforms like ADP Workforce Now or Paycor.
  • The transition to PEO-tier offerings (Namely Complete) represents a structural change in the employment relationship that some customers did not anticipate.
  • Integration limitations with non-native payroll and ERP systems create friction for companies using multiple vendor tools.

Choosing

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Recruit CRM for its full customizability — pipelines, stages, and fields can be tailored to any recruitment workflow without developer involvement.
  • Small teams value the built-in CRM and ATS combined in one subscription, eliminating the need to purchase and sync separate systems.
  • The Chrome extension for one-click LinkedIn profile collection streamlines candidate sourcing and reduces manual data entry for recruiters.
  • Responsive customer support with fast issue resolution is consistently cited as a reason teams stick with the platform long-term.
  • Automation options including email sequences and workflow triggers allow recruitment agencies to reduce repetitive manual outreach tasks.

Object mapping

How Namely objects map to Recruit CRM & ATS

Each row shows how a Namely object lands in Recruit CRM & ATS, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Namely

Employee

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Namely Employee records map to Recruit CRM Candidate profiles. We extract demographics (name, contact, address), employment status, job title, department, and hire date. Employment tenure in Namely maps to a custom candidate field for sourcing context. Active employees being sourced for new roles become Candidates with an initial status; historical employees from the HRMS who were previously candidates or placements map to Candidate records with status reflecting their current relationship. Namely's employee photo does not migrate as Recruit CRM's candidate profile uses a separate media upload.

Namely

Organizational Structure (Departments)

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Team

lossy
Fully supported

Namely's departments and cost centers map to Recruit CRM Teams. We preserve the hierarchy as a flat team structure with a custom field dst_department_path__c containing the full Namely department chain for reporting. If the customer uses cost centers for headcount planning, these migrate as a custom picklist field on Candidate rather than as a separate object, since Recruit CRM Teams are scoped to recruiting desk structure rather than enterprise org charts.

Namely

Compensation Record

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate (Custom Fields)

1:1
Fully supported

Namely compensation records (salary, bonus, equity, effective dates) migrate to custom fields on the Recruit CRM Candidate record. We preserve the most recent compensation figure and effective date as dst_current_salary__c and dst_compensation_effective__c for sourcing and offer-preparation context. Compensation history timelines do not map cleanly to Recruit CRM's candidate data model, so we carry the current snapshot only; historical pay progression is delivered as a supplemental CSV.

Namely

Job Requisition (Namely Recruiting)

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Job

1:1
Fully supported

Namely job requisitions and postings migrate to Recruit CRM Job records. We map job title, description, department assignment, status, and location fields. Approval chains attached to requisitions are documented in the Workflow inventory (not migrated) since Recruit CRM handles job approvals as a configurable stage step rather than a separate approval object. Open requisitions migrate as active Jobs; closed positions migrate with status mapped accordingly.

Namely

Custom Fields (Employee Properties)

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Custom Candidate Fields

lossy
Fully supported

Namely supports custom properties on employee records. We discover all custom field definitions via API during discovery, classify them by type (text, number, date, picklist), and create equivalent custom fields on Recruit CRM Candidate. Text fields map directly, numeric fields map to number fields, date fields map to date fields, and picklist values are recreated as picklist options in Recruit CRM. Fields with no equivalent in Recruit CRM's Candidate model are migrated as text with a naming convention flagging their original type.

Namely

Documents (Employee Files)

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate Documents

1:1
Fully supported

Employee documents (offer letters, contracts, certifications, I-9s) migrate as file attachments on the corresponding Candidate record in Recruit CRM. We normalize file naming using candidate_id_document_type conventions during extraction to handle Namely's inconsistent document naming. Document metadata (upload date, uploader) is preserved as a JSON sidecar attached to the record. Binary blobs are transferred as-is. We note that Recruit CRM's document viewer supports PDF and common office formats; any non-standard file types are flagged for manual handling.

Namely

Performance Review (historical ratings)

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate (Custom Notes)

1:1
Fully supported

Namely performance review ratings and feedback migrate as custom notes attached to the Candidate record with type = performance_review. We extract the review date, overall rating, and a plain-text summary of qualitative feedback. Review templates, rating scales, and review cycle configurations do not migrate because Recruit CRM has no native performance review module; these are delivered as a structured document in the configuration inventory for the customer's admin to evaluate in context of their hiring process.

Namely

Time Off Balances

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate (Custom Field)

1:1
Fully supported

Current PTO, sick leave, and accrual balances migrate as a snapshot custom field dst_pto_balance__c on the Candidate record. We flag the accrual policy type (accrual-based vs unlimited) during extraction so customers understand the data context. For unlimited PTO policies, there is no balance to export; we document the policy name and note this as a null-field in the migration output. This field is informational for sourcing and onboarding handoff, not a live accrual tracking field, since Recruit CRM does not manage PTO.

Namely

Workflows and Approvals

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Workflow Inventory (No Migration)

1:1
Not supported

Namely workflow configurations, approval chains, and automation rules are not structurally portable to Recruit CRM. The two platforms have fundamentally different workflow models: Namely uses role-based approval chains on HR actions, while Recruit CRM uses stage-based pipeline automation and task assignments. We export a written inventory of every active Namely workflow with its trigger, conditions, associated record types, and action steps. The customer's recruiting operations team rebuilds these as Recruit CRM pipeline automations post-migration.

Namely

Benefits Enrollments

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Not Migrated

1:1
Mapping required

Namely benefits enrollment data (health, dental, vision, 401k elections, carrier plan IDs) does not migrate to Recruit CRM because Recruit CRM has no benefits administration module. Plan IDs are carrier-specific and non-portable regardless of destination. We extract a benefits enrollment summary per employee as a PDF or CSV for the customer's records, but the customer must reconfigure benefit elections at their chosen HRMS destination if they are separating the recruiting desk from a broader HR platform. This is a known gap in the migration scope and is disclosed during scoping.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Namely logo

Namely gotchas

High

PEO co-employment tier changes employer-of-record status

High

Benefits plan IDs are carrier-specific and non-portable

Medium

PTO balance exports vary by accrual policy type

Medium

Document module exports binary blobs with inconsistent naming

Low

Support responsiveness degrades during migration window

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS gotchas

High

API rate limits are license-scaled and can throttle bulk migration

Medium

Custom field schemas vary per organization and require field-level mapping

Medium

Files and email attachments require separate extraction and re-upload

Low

Email sequences and automation logic do not transfer between platforms

Pair-specific challenges

  • Namely and Recruit CRM serve different functions, creating a data model gap

    Namely is a full HRMS (payroll, benefits, compliance, employee records) while Recruit CRM is a recruitment ATS and CRM (candidates, jobs, clients, placements). There is no native integration between the platforms, and the overlap is limited to recruiting-related data. We scope the migration to employee profiles, job requisitions, organizational structure, and candidate-related documents—compensation history, benefits enrollments, and payroll records have no landing object in Recruit CRM and are excluded. Customers moving from a full HRMS to a recruitment-focused platform must understand that this is a subset migration, not a full system replacement, and should plan for a separate HRMS if they still need payroll and benefits administration.

  • Namely's recruiting data is embedded in the HRMS, not a separate ATS

    Namely's recruiting module is part of a broader HR platform. Candidate and employee records are often in the same data store, which means scoping the migration requires filtering out HR-only records before extraction. We perform a pre-extraction data audit to identify which records were used for recruiting purposes (sourced candidates, requisitions, hiring activity) versus HR-only records (payroll, benefits, compliance). Without this filter, the migration imports full employee records that have no candidate function in Recruit CRM, creating data noise and unnecessary licensing costs.

  • Document naming inconsistencies require normalization before import

    Namely's Documents module stores employee files with inconsistent naming conventions that vary by uploader and department. Recruit CRM's document attachment model requires clean, predictable filenames for searchability. We normalize document names during extraction using a candidate_id_document_type convention (for example, candidate_12345_offer_letter.pdf), which ensures documents are discoverable in Recruit CRM's candidate profile. Document metadata (upload date, uploader, file size) is preserved as a JSON sidecar. Customers with large document archives should budget extra time for this normalization step.

  • Unlimited PTO policies produce null balance records

    Namely supports both accrual-based and unlimited PTO policies. For accrual policies, we export current balances and accrual histories. For unlimited policies, there is no balance record to export since no tracking occurs. We confirm the PTO policy type during discovery and flag unlimited policy records as having no balance in the migration output. The destination Candidate record receives a null value for the PTO balance field with a policy-type annotation. Customers should not interpret this as missing data; it reflects the source policy type.

  • Namely support responsiveness may delay migration troubleshooting

    Multiple reviews note that reaching the appropriate technical contact at Namely is difficult, particularly for API-related or data-export inquiries. If a data extraction issue or API rate-limit event occurs during the migration window, response times from Namely support may extend beyond acceptable SLA windows. We mitigate this by scheduling extraction runs during non-peak hours, caching API responses to minimize repeat calls, and using documented export endpoints where available. Enterprise-tier customers should identify any direct escalation contacts at Namely before the migration begins.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Namely to Recruit CRM & ATS data migration

  1. Discovery and data audit

    We audit the Namely instance to identify which records belong to the recruiting dataset. This includes employee records flagged as candidates, job requisitions, organizational units, and any engagement records attached to the hiring process. We separate these from HR-only records (payroll runs, benefits elections, compliance documents) that have no destination in Recruit CRM. The discovery output includes a record count by object type, a list of custom fields requiring mapping, and a list of documents with inconsistent naming for normalization. We also confirm the PTO policy type (accrual vs unlimited) per employee group.

  2. Schema design and candidate field mapping

    We design the Recruit CRM destination schema based on the scoping output. This includes creating custom candidate fields to receive Namely compensation snapshots, PTO balance data, and any custom employee properties that have no direct Recruit CRM equivalent. We configure Teams to mirror the Namely department structure, with a custom department path field preserving the full hierarchy. We document the mapping matrix (Namely field to Recruit CRM field, with transform rules) and validate it against a sample of 50 records before full extraction begins.

  3. Staging migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Recruit CRM staging environment using production data volume. The customer's recruiting operations lead reconciles record counts (Candidates in, Jobs in, Documents in), spot-checks 25-50 candidate profiles against the Namely source for field accuracy, and validates document naming normalization. Any mapping corrections, missing picklist values, or field type mismatches are resolved in this phase. The customer signs off the staging migration before production begins.

  4. Document extraction and normalization

    We extract all employee documents from the Namely Documents module and normalize file names using the candidate_id_document_type convention. Inconsistent naming variants are resolved by cross-referencing employee ID and document type metadata stored in the JSON sidecar. The normalized file set is packaged for bulk upload to Recruit CRM's candidate document attachments, preserving upload date and uploader metadata. Non-standard file formats are flagged for manual review.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run the production migration in record order: Teams (from Namely departments), then Candidates (with custom fields resolved and custom-compensation data populated), then Jobs (with status and assignment mapped), then Documents (linked to candidate records), and finally any supplemental CSVs (compensation history timeline, benefits enrollment summary, unlimited PTO policy log). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We freeze writes in Namely during the production window to prevent delta records from being missed.

  6. Cutover, validation, and handoff

    We perform a final delta migration of any records modified during the cutover window, then enable Recruit CRM as the system of record for recruiting operations. We deliver the Workflow and Approval inventory document to the customer's recruiting operations team. We support a 72-hour hypercare window where we resolve any record-level reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Namely workflows as Recruit CRM pipeline automations inside the migration scope; the configuration inventory serves as the handoff document for their team to rebuild.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Namely logo

Namely

Source

Strengths

  • Consolidated HRMS with payroll, benefits, and compliance in one platform, reducing tool fragmentation for mid-market teams
  • User-friendly interface consistently praised across G2 and Capterra reviews for simplifying HR tasks
  • Supports paperless onboarding with e-signature and customizable role-based workflows
  • Namely Now tier starts at $9/employee/month, providing a low-barrier entry point for smaller teams
  • Compliance tools embedded in higher tiers help mid-market companies manage shared liability and regulatory requirements

Weaknesses

  • Limited customer support responsiveness reported across multiple review sources, with difficulty reaching appropriate contacts
  • Post-acquisition, some customers perceive technology development has been deprioritized in favor of brokerage operations
  • Custom pricing on upper tiers creates opacity about total cost and makes budget planning difficult
  • Integration ecosystem is narrower than enterprise HRMS competitors, limiting connectivity with non-native tools
  • PEO tiers (Complete) fundamentally change the employment relationship, requiring structural reconfiguration rather than simple data migration
Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS

Destination

Strengths

  • Fully customizable pipelines, stages, and fields without requiring developer involvement
  • Combines recruitment CRM and ATS in one subscription for staffing agencies and small teams
  • Built-in email sequences and automation reduce manual outreach work
  • Chrome extension enables one-click LinkedIn profile collection directly into the CRM
  • Responsive customer support cited across multiple reviews with fast resolution times

Weaknesses

  • Several features are gated as paid add-ons rather than included in the base subscription
  • Email functionality has been reported as unreliable by multiple users
  • Interface occasionally lags during high-activity periods in large pipelines
  • Pricing is considered higher than comparable recruitment CRMs by some customers
  • Limited native reporting — users request pre-made report exports rather than manual data pulls

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Namely and Recruit CRM & ATS.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Namely: Not publicly documented in available sources.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Namely doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Namely to Recruit CRM & ATS migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Namely to Recruit CRM & ATS data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Namely to Recruit CRM & ATS migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Namely to Recruit CRM & ATS migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts with fewer than 5,000 candidate records, 200 active jobs, and straightforward organizational structures. Migrations with large document archives (over 10,000 files), complex multi-level department hierarchies requiring team remapping, or active pipelines with hundreds of engagement records move to four to eight weeks because of document normalization time and engagement mapping complexity. Payroll, benefits, and PTO data do not migrate to Recruit CRM and are excluded from the timeline.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Namely.
Land in Recruit CRM & ATS, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day