Project Management migration

Migrate from ftrack to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between ftrack and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

ftrack logo

ftrack

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

42%

5 of 12

objects map 1:1 between ftrack and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from ftrack to Trello is a structural simplification, not a direct record copy. ftrack is a production tracking platform built around a deep hierarchical data model (Projects containing Sequences containing Shots containing Tasks with linked Asset Versions and Review sessions). Trello is a Kanban board tool that operates at the level of Workspaces, Boards, Lists, and Cards with no native support for Shot hierarchies, asset publish tracking, review sessions, or studio storage Locations. We preserve Tasks as Cards, map Project and Sequence names into Board and List structure, and migrate Notes and Custom Attributes into Card descriptions and Custom Fields. Review sessions, annotation data, Asset Versions, and Locations have no Trello equivalent and are documented as unsupported. ftrack Workflows and the Locations plugin configuration do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of each for the customer's admin to assess for manual rebuild.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

ftrack logo

ftrack

What's pushing teams away

  • Initial setup requires significant API scripting and custom pipeline integration, which strains smaller teams without a dedicated pipeline TD.
  • Regular ftrack updates occasionally break existing integrations and custom scripts, creating maintenance overhead that frustrates users.
  • Project navigation inside third-party integrations is described as poor, making it difficult to browse or update ftrack data from within DCC tools.
  • Notes posted in the webplayer sometimes attach to the wrong task level, requiring producers to manually verify and reassign them.
  • Storage configuration and Location management is complex for studios without a dedicated infrastructure engineer.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How ftrack objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a ftrack object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

ftrack

Project

maps to

Trello

Workspace and Board

1:many
Fully supported

Each ftrack Project becomes a Trello Workspace (or a top-level Board within a Workspace) to serve as the primary container. Project-level custom attributes migrate to Board-level Custom Fields if the customer's Trello plan supports them. The Project name becomes the Board name, and any project-level status settings are documented for manual configuration in Trello.

ftrack

Sequence

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

ftrack Sequences map to individual Trello Boards when the Project-to-Board mapping uses one Board per Sequence. When a single Board represents an entire Project, Sequences are documented as Lists within that Board. The mapping choice is made during scoping based on the customer's board structure preference.

ftrack

Shot

maps to

Trello

Card (milestone or label)

1:1
Fully supported

ftrack Shots are children of Sequences and parents of Tasks, representing a key production deliverable. In Trello, Shots map to milestone Cards (named Cards with a distinct label such as 'Shot') to preserve the production vocabulary. Shot status (WIP, awaiting review, final) maps to Card labels that mirror the shot pipeline stage.

ftrack

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

ftrack Tasks are the core work unit and map directly to Trello Cards. Task name becomes the Card title, Task description maps to Card description, due date maps to Card due date, and assignees map to Card members. Task status maps to the Card's position within the Trello List (To Do, In Progress, Review, Done) rather than a status label. We validate that the parent Shot is represented as a milestone Card in the destination before inserting child Task Cards.

ftrack

Asset

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:many
Fully supported

ftrack Assets represent published files or asset builds linked to a Shot or Sequence context. Each Asset has multiple Asset Versions representing sequential publishes. Trello has no native Asset or version tracking model; we attach the most recent Asset Version's file as a Card attachment on the corresponding Shot Card. Historical version history is documented in a written record for manual reference. Asset context_id linkage is preserved as a Card label or description note.

ftrack

Asset Version

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment (version note)

lossy
Fully supported

Asset Versions represent sequential publishes of a ftrack Asset. Trello has no version tracking. We document the Asset Version chain in a written inventory linked to the parent Card, noting the version number, publish date, and file reference. Version comparison and lineage tracking are not available in Trello and must be handled manually or with a separate DAM tool.

ftrack

Note

maps to

Trello

Card Comment

1:1
Fully supported

ftrack Notes attached to Tasks migrate to Trello Card Comments. We handle the known ftrack webplayer issue where notes occasionally attach to the wrong task level by comparing the note's context_id against the task hierarchy during migration and re-associating misplaced notes with the correct parent Task Card. Note body and author transfer as plain text. Notes with @mention or action-item formatting are migrated as-is and may need manual reformatting in Trello.

ftrack

Custom Attribute

maps to

Trello

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

ftrack custom attributes on any entity type (Project, Shot, Task) map to Trello Custom Fields if the customer's Trello plan supports them. Custom Field types in Trello are limited to checkbox, date, dropdown, number, and text. ftrack attributes with hierarchical inheritance (which the API returns as raw values rather than evaluated inherited values) are resolved by querying the parent entity for the effective value before migration. Expression attributes (calculated formulas) are flagged in the scope document because Trello cannot evaluate them; the customer recalculates these post-migration.

ftrack

User and Assignee

maps to

Trello

Card Member

1:1
Fully supported

ftrack Users assigned to Tasks as assignees map to Trello Card members. We match assignees by email against the Trello destination workspace. Any ftrack User without a matching Trello account is placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before the final migration phase. Active and inactive user status is preserved in a Card label for post-migration review.

ftrack

Task Status

maps to

Trello

List

lossy
Fully supported

ftrack Task Statuses are configurable per project and include name, color, and order. The status schema varies between ftrack workspaces. We map ftrack status values to Trello List names (e.g., 'wip' to 'In Progress', 'hrev' to 'Awaiting Review', 'final' to 'Approved'). Any ftrack status without an exact Trello List match is documented during scoping. Lists are created in the destination Board before Card migration begins.

ftrack

Location

maps to

Trello

Unsupported

lossy
Fully supported

ftrack Locations define storage configuration for assets and files, including cloud and on-premises path logic. Trello has no storage configuration capability. Locations are documented as unsupported in the migration scope, and the customer's infrastructure team assesses whether file paths can be managed externally or require a separate asset management tool post-migration.

ftrack

Review and Annotation

maps to

Trello

Unsupported

lossy
Fully supported

ftrack Review sessions and frame annotations are linked to Asset Versions and represent the client and stakeholder approval workflow. Trello has no native review, annotation, or approval workflow system. Review sessions and annotation data are documented as unsupported. We flag the expected file path of reviewed media for manual handoff. If approval tracking is required, the customer needs a separate review tool or Trello Butler automation configured manually post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

ftrack logo

ftrack gotchas

Medium

Notes attach to wrong task level in webplayer

Medium

Hierarchical custom attributes return raw values in API

Low

Expression custom attributes not evaluated by API

High

Import wizard does not delete records

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Trello has no Shot hierarchy or production hierarchy model

    ftrack's core data model is a deep hierarchy: Projects contain Sequences contain Shots contain Tasks contain Asset Versions. Trello operates with a flat structure: Boards contain Lists contain Cards with no nested entity equivalent to Sequences or Shots. We handle this by mapping Projects to Boards, Sequences to Lists or Boards depending on structure preference, and Shots to milestone Cards. However, any downstream reporting or pipeline queries that relied on the Shot-Sequence-Project parent chain will not work in Trello without manual reconstruction of the relationship as Card labels or Board structure.

  • Asset versions and review sessions have no Trello equivalent

    ftrack's Asset and Asset Version objects track published file history with version numbers, components, and metadata. Review sessions and frame annotations track client approval with timestamp, reviewer, and comment. Trello has no Asset model, no version history on attachments, and no frame annotation layer. The most recent Asset Version file can migrate as a Card attachment; all version history, component references, and annotation data are documented as unsupported. Customers requiring asset versioning and review tracking need a separate DAM or review tool.

  • ftrack webplayer notes attach to wrong task level

    A known ftrack behavior is that notes posted via the webplayer occasionally land at the topmost parent object instead of the intended child Task. This creates orphaned or misplaced notes that are difficult to detect without manual review. We detect these mismatched notes during migration by comparing each note's context_id against the task hierarchy and re-associate them with the correct parent Card before writing to Trello. This resolution is included in the migration scope at no additional charge.

  • Hierarchical and expression custom attributes return raw values in ftrack API

    The ftrack API returns the raw value for hierarchical custom attributes rather than the evaluated inherited value. If a custom attribute is set on a Shot and inherited by child Tasks, querying the Task via the API returns null. We handle this by querying the parent entity for the effective value and applying it during migration. Expression attributes (calculated formulas) are evaluated by the ftrack UI but not by the API; the API returns the non-evaluated expression string. We flag all expression attribute fields in the pre-migration scope and advise customers that these values must be recalculated in Trello Custom Fields post-import.

  • Trello Custom Fields are limited to five types

    Trello Custom Fields support five types: checkbox, date, dropdown, number, and text. ftrack custom attributes can have broader type support depending on workspace configuration. We map each ftrack attribute to the closest Trello Custom Field type during scoping. Attributes that cannot map cleanly (e.g., multi-select lists or user-reference fields) are documented in the scope for the customer to handle as Card labels, Card descriptions, or manual Custom Field option entries post-migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful ftrack to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and hierarchy assessment

    We audit the source ftrack workspace across tier (Review, Studio, Enterprise), record counts per entity type (Projects, Sequences, Shots, Tasks, Assets, Asset Versions), note attachment counts, custom attribute definitions and types, and active Locations configuration. We assess the depth of the hierarchy and the customer's Trello workspace structure to determine whether Projects map to Boards or Workspaces, and whether Sequences map to Boards or Lists. The discovery output is a written migration scope with the recommended flattening strategy and a custom attribute mapping table.

  2. Trello destination setup

    We set up the Trello destination workspace structure: creating Boards (one per Project or Sequence per the agreed mapping strategy), configuring Lists to match ftrack task statuses, and creating Custom Fields for each ftrack custom attribute that maps to a supported Trello type. We coordinate with the customer's Trello admin to ensure the appropriate plan (Standard for Custom Fields, Premium for additional integrations) is in place before migration begins. If Butler automations are desired for status-based triggers, we document the desired automation patterns for the customer's admin to implement post-migration.

  3. Note hierarchy reconciliation

    We extract all ftrack Notes with their context_id and task parent, then detect misplaced notes (those whose context_id points to a parent object rather than the intended child task). We re-associate these with the correct parent Task before writing to Trello. This reconciliation step is unique to the ftrack source and is included in the standard migration scope. The note body and author are preserved as Card Comments.

  4. Record migration in dependency order

    We run migration in dependency order: Project-to-Board mapping first, then Shot-to-milestone-Card creation (with Shot Cards created before child Task Cards), then Task-to-Card migration with assignee resolution, then Asset Version attachment (most recent version per Asset), then Notes as Card Comments, then Custom Attribute values as Custom Fields. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. Any ftrack entity without a Trello mapping (Locations, Review sessions, annotation data) is documented in the unsupported inventory delivered alongside the migration.

  5. Owner and assignee reconciliation

    We extract every distinct ftrack User referenced as a Task assignee or Note author and match by email against the Trello destination workspace. Any ftrack User without a matching Trello account is held in a reconciliation queue. The customer's Trello admin provisions any missing members and assigns them to the relevant Boards before Card member assignment proceeds. Active and inactive status from ftrack is preserved as Card labels for post-migration review.

  6. Cutover, validation, and handoff

    We freeze ftrack writes during cutover and run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window. We deliver a Trello board walkthrough with record counts, a written inventory of unsupported objects (Locations, Review sessions, Asset Versions, Annotation data) with file path references, a custom attribute mapping table with Trello Custom Field IDs, and a note on any expression attribute fields requiring recalculation. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not configure Butler automations or rebuild ftrack Workflows inside the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

ftrack logo

ftrack

Source

Strengths

  • End-to-end production tracking from planning through review and final delivery in a single platform.
  • Interactive browser-based media review with annotation tools that clients and stakeholders can access without a full ftrack seat.
  • Python API with JSON-schema-based dynamic schemas that adapt to each workspace's custom entity types and attributes.
  • Locations feature for managing multi-site storage and automated file transfer across studio infrastructure.
  • Custom attribute system allowing studios to extend any entity type with project-specific fields.

Weaknesses

  • API performance degrades with deeply linked queries and large unfocused data fetches, requiring careful query optimization.
  • Hierarchical and expression custom attributes are not fully supported in the API, returning raw rather than evaluated values.
  • Initial deployment and ongoing maintenance require dedicated pipeline TD resources or significant scripting investment.
  • Webplayer note posting can attach comments to the wrong hierarchical level, creating data integrity issues.
  • Enterprise tier pricing is opaque and requires a sales contact, making it hard to budget for large studio deployments.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across ftrack and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    ftrack: Not publicly documented; ftrack advises optimizing queries to avoid server-side resource strain.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    ftrack doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your ftrack to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about ftrack to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ftrack to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your ftrack to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 10,000 Tasks with straightforward Project-to-Board mapping complete in two to four weeks. Migrations with complex multi-level hierarchies (Projects with nested Sequences and Shots requiring Board splitting), high note attachment counts, or extensive Custom Attribute sets requiring Custom Field creation take four to eight weeks. The timeline includes discovery, destination setup, note reconciliation, and a one-week post-migration hypercare window.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from ftrack.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day