Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Fluid and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
Fluid
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
11 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Fluid and Asana.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
2-4 weeks
Overview
Moving from Fluid to Asana is a structural migration that requires resolving two platform-level differences before records move. Fluid encodes Programs as top-level groupings with a direct parent-child relationship to Projects; Asana has no native Program object, so we map Programs to Asana Teams or tag Projects with a Program_Group custom field during import. Fluid's live effort metrics and hours-consumed data map to numeric custom fields in Asana, but Asana does not include native time-tracking from Starter through Advanced tiers. We do not migrate Flex Statistics scenario-modelling data or workload distribution visualisations because Fluid stores both in formats with no documented export endpoint. Workflow and automation inventory is delivered as a written document for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana Rules and Timeline.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Fluid object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Fluid
Program
Asana
Team or custom Program_Group field
lossyFluid Programs are top-level groupings of related Projects. Asana has no native Program object. We map Programs to Asana Teams (where the Team name matches the Program name and the team scope controls project visibility) or to a custom multi-select or text field Program_Group__c on Projects. The customer chooses the strategy during scoping based on whether Program-to-Program reporting is required. If Program-level reporting is needed, we recommend using a dedicated Asana Portfolio with a custom field for Program attribution.
Fluid
Project
Asana
Project
1:1Fluid Projects map directly to Asana Projects. Project name, description, status (active, on-hold, complete), start date, end date, and owner assignment migrate to Asana Project fields. The Project's parent Program relationship is resolved via the Team mapping or the Program_Group__c custom field. Projects are created before Tasks so that parent references are satisfied at insert time.
Fluid
Task
Asana
Task
1:1Fluid Tasks carry name, status, start/end dates, assignees, priority, and notes. We map these to Asana Task fields with a direct 1:1 transform for standard fields. The subtask nesting structure in Fluid is preserved as a flattened set of Task records with a parent_id reference field so Asana's native subtask hierarchy can be reconstructed in the destination. Task-level start dates in Asana require a Premium plan or above (Starter does not include start dates); we flag this tier constraint during scoping if the customer's Fluid plan supports start dates.
Fluid
Subtask
Asana
Subtask
1:1Fluid Subtasks inherit fields from their parent Task. Asana natively supports subtasks. We map each Fluid Subtask to an Asana Subtask linked to the parent Task via the parent-task relationship. Subtask-level custom fields migrate as-is if the destination project includes those field definitions. If a Fluid Subtask carries fields not present on the parent Task, we add those field definitions to the destination project before import.
Fluid
Custom Fields
Asana
Custom Fields
1:1Fluid Custom Fields are supported but require a pre-migration schema review to determine field type (text, number, date, picklist, boolean, multi-select). We generate corresponding Asana Custom Fields in the destination project, mapping type for type. Multi-select fields in Fluid map to Asana multi-select. Boolean flags in Fluid map to Asana checkbox or single-select with two options. If a Fluid custom field uses a data type not natively supported in Asana (for example, a Fluid-specific formatted number), we flag this during scoping and either create a text-equivalent custom field or discuss a type-conversion approach with the customer.
Fluid
Assignees
Asana
Assignee
1:1Fluid assigns Tasks to named users. We extract the user identity (display name and email) from Fluid's assignee data and map it to the Asana Task assignee field. Asana assigns one user per Task (Fluid supports single assignee per Task as well). We resolve assignees by email match against the Asana workspace User list. Any assignee with no matching Asana User goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before the import phase continues.
Fluid
Effort Metrics
Asana
Custom Fields (numeric)
1:1Fluid stores hours-consumed and planned-effort per Task as numeric fields. Asana does not include a native effort-tracking object on Starter or Advanced tiers. We map Fluid effort fields to Asana numeric Custom Fields (Effort_Planned__c, Effort_Actual__c, Hours_Logged__c) created on the destination projects. Asana's native Timeline view then displays these as custom columns. If the customer requires a native time-tracking interface (start/stop timer, timesheet approval), we flag that this requires Asana's Enterprise+ time-tracking add-on or a third-party integration and note it in the migration scope as a post-migration recommendation.
Fluid
Gantt Chart / Schedule Data
Asana
Timeline view
1:1Fluid stores Task start and end dates that drive its Gantt visualisation. We extract these as standard date fields (start_date, due_date) and map them to Asana Task Start Date and Due Date. Asana's Timeline view reconstructs a Gantt-style display from these fields. The Gantt layout itself is a UI construct in Fluid and does not migrate; the underlying schedule data transfers completely.
Fluid
Workload Distribution
Asana
Not migrated
1:1Fluid computes workload distribution charts at runtime by aggregating Task assignments and effort metrics. These visualisations are not stored as discrete exportable records. We do not attempt to migrate workload distribution data. We flag this gap in the migration scope and note that Asana's Workload view (available on Business tier at $24.99/user/mo) requires manual reconfiguration of resource allocation rules.
Fluid
Flex Statistics / Scenario Models
Asana
Not migrated
1:1Flex Statistics mode in Fluid stores scenario-modelling and what-if planning data in a proprietary analytical format with no documented export endpoint. We do not migrate Flex Statistics data. We document this gap explicitly in the migration scope before work begins and advise the customer to export any scenario outputs as PDF or screenshot for manual reference.
Fluid
Time Entries
Asana
Custom Fields or third-party integration
1:1If Fluid stores discrete time-entry records (timestamped log entries, not just effort fields), we map these to a custom time-entry structure in Asana. Asana's native data model does not include a time-entry object, so we create a dedicated Time_Entry__c custom object in Asana with fields for Task_Lookup__c, User__c, Hours__c, Date__c, and Notes__c. If the customer uses Fluid's effort metrics as a simpler timesheet, the numeric effort fields covered in the Effort Metrics mapping may suffice without a separate entry record.
Fluid
Attachments
Asana
Attachments
1:1Task attachments (documents, images, links) stored in Fluid migrate as Asana task attachments. Asana's API accepts file attachments with a 100MB per-file limit. We flag any Fluid attachments exceeding this size during the pre-migration audit and skip them with a documented exception report for the customer's admin to handle manually.
| Fluid | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Program | Team or custom Program_Group fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Subtask | Subtask1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Fields | Custom Fields1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Assignees | Assignee1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Effort Metrics | Custom Fields (numeric)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Gantt Chart / Schedule Data | Timeline view1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Workload Distribution | Not migrated1:1 | Not supported | |
| Flex Statistics / Scenario Models | Not migrated1:1 | Not supported | |
| Time Entries | Custom Fields or third-party integration1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Attachments | Attachments1:1 | Mapping required |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Fluid gotchas
Workload visualisation data is not exportable
Flex Statistics scenario models have no export endpoint
Limited API documentation public availability
Meeting functionality gap requires separate tooling
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Scoping and export method confirmation
We audit the Fluid workspace across Programs, Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Custom Fields, effort metrics, and attachments. We confirm whether a Fluid API is available for the customer's account. If no API exists, we plan a per-project CSV export, document the field structure for each CSV, and generate a custom field-mapping spreadsheet. We also identify Flex Statistics usage and workload distribution usage so these gaps appear in the written migration scope before work begins. The scoping output is a migration plan, a field-mapping spreadsheet, and a timeline estimate.
Asana workspace setup and schema creation
We create the Asana workspace, Teams (mapped from Fluid Programs), and Projects in the destination. Custom Fields are pre-created in each project based on the Fluid custom field schema review. We configure Timeline view availability per project (Starter tier or above required for start dates) and verify that the destination Asana plan supports the required feature set. All schema is deployed into a Sandbox workspace first for validation.
CSV export and field mapping
If no API access is confirmed, we guide the customer through per-project CSV export from Fluid and map each CSV column to the corresponding Asana field. We handle multi-select values (comma-separated in Fluid CSVs) by splitting them into Asana-compatible multi-select options. Date fields are normalised to ISO 8601 format. Custom field data types are validated against the pre-created Asana schema. Subtask data is extracted from nested rows and flattened with parent-reference fields for reconstruction in Asana.
Sandbox import and reconciliation
We run a full import into the Asana Sandbox workspace using production-equivalent data volume. The customer's PMO lead reconciles record counts (Programs in vs Teams, Projects in, Tasks in, Subtasks in, effort field values present), spot-checks 20-30 random tasks for field-level accuracy against the source Fluid export, and signs off the schema and mapping before production migration begins. Any field mapping corrections happen in Sandbox.
Owner and assignee reconciliation
We extract every distinct assignee from the Fluid export and match by email against the Asana workspace User list. Assignees without a matching Asana User go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before the production import. This step is a prerequisite for Task import because Asana requires a valid User reference on the assignee field.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Teams (from Fluid Programs), Projects, Tasks (with start dates, due dates, priority, and notes), Subtasks, Custom Field values, Effort Metrics (as numeric custom fields), Attachments (up to 100MB per file). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. CSV-based migrations use Asana's bulk import endpoint with batch chunking; API-based migrations use the Asana REST API with rate-limit handling and exponential backoff.
Cutover, validation, and automation handoff
We freeze Fluid access during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of any Fluid automations (workflow triggers, if present in the account) and the Flex Statistics gap document to the customer's admin team. We support a three-day hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Fluid automations in Asana Rules as part of the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.
Platform deep dives
Fluid
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Fluid and Asana.
Object compatibility
3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Fluid: Not publicly documented — confirm with Fluid support during scoping..
Data volume sensitivity
Fluid exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Fluid to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Fluid to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Fluid
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.