HRMS migration

Migrate from Harri to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Harri and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Harri logo

Harri

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

58%

7 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Harri and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Harri to Bullhorn is a cross-domain migration: Harri manages frontline hospitality workforce operations (scheduling, shifts, compliance, hourly workers) while Bullhorn is purpose-built for staffing and recruiting agencies (candidates, job orders, placements, client corporations). Harri organizes by Location and Worker; Bullhorn uses ClientCorporation, Candidate, and JobOrder. We resolve the structural gap by mapping Harri Locations to Bullhorn ClientCorporations, Harri Workers to Bullhorn Candidates with employment-type classification, Harri Positions to Bullhorn JobOrders, and Harri Applications to Bullhorn JobSubmission records. Shift data has no native Bullhorn equivalent and migrates as Candidate custom fields or documented configuration for the customer admin to decide. Bullhorn custom objects require Bullhorn Support to provision before migration begins, so we coordinate that ticket during discovery. Payroll, engagement survey data, and Harri Workflows do not migrate; we deliver a written schedule rebuild guide and a Bullhorn Automation inventory for admin reconstruction.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Harri logo

Harri

What's pushing teams away

  • Pricing scales at enterprise tiers with custom quotes, making it difficult for small and mid-sized operators to justify cost versus simpler standalone scheduling or ATS tools.
  • Payroll is integration-led in the U.S. rather than native, requiring operators to maintain a separate payroll provider and sync configuration—adding complexity some teams want to eliminate.
  • Gated API documentation and member-only developer portal make it difficult for technical teams to self-assess data portability before committing to the platform.
  • Onboarding and implementation timelines for the full HCM suite can stretch longer than expected, especially for multi-location deployments with custom configurations.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How Harri objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a Harri object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Harri

Worker

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Harri Workers (employees and applicants) map to Bullhorn Candidate records. We preserve first name, last name, email, phone, employment status, hire date, job title, and department. Employment type (full-time, part-time, seasonal) maps to Bullhorn's EmployeeType custom field or standard classification fields. Active workers import as active Candidates; applicants retain their application status. Harri worker custom properties migrate to Bullhorn Candidate custom fields (customObject1s through customObject10s depending on edition), which Bullhorn Support provisions before migration begins.

Harri

Location

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ClientCorporation

1:1
Fully supported

Harri Locations (restaurant or hotel properties) map to Bullhorn ClientCorporation records. Each Location's address, manager assignment, and associated property metadata become Bullhorn ClientCorporation fields. For hospitality operators transitioning to staffing models, the Location is the client company; for operators maintaining direct employment, the Location maps to an internal ClientCorporation used for reporting and compliance tracking. We chunk export by Location and validate completeness per site before loading into Bullhorn.

Harri

Position

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder

1:1
Fully supported

Harri Positions define job listings within a Location, including title, pay rate, FT/PT/seasonal classification, and department. Bullhorn JobOrder captures the same fields: title, employmentType, salary, and pay rate. We map Position title to JobOrder title, FT/PT classification to JobOrder employmentType, and pay rate to JobOrder salary or a custom pay rate field. Custom Position properties (shift requirements, coverage needs, job description) migrate to JobOrder custom fields.

Harri

Application

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobSubmission

1:1
Fully supported

Harri Applications track candidate submissions for Positions, including application date, source, pipeline stage, and interview scores. Bullhorn JobSubmission (accessible via the Candidate and JobOrder relationship) captures submission date, status, source, and rating. We map Harri application stage names (customer-configured) to Bullhorn JobSubmission status values, preserving interview scores in custom rating fields. Pipeline stage names vary by Harri customer configuration, so we create a customer-specific stage mapping table during scoping.

Harri

Shift

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Fields or Placement

lossy
Fully supported

Bullhorn does not have a native shift scheduling object. Harri shift data (assigned shifts with start/end times, shift type, and coverage requirements) cannot map to a standard Bullhorn entity. We migrate shift data as Candidate custom fields (e.g., preferredShiftStart__c, preferredShiftEnd__c, shiftType__c, availabilityNotes__c) or document it as a configuration recommendation for Bullhorn Onboarding (formerly Able) if the customer licenses that module. The customer decides the target structure during scoping.

Harri

Onboarding Task

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Fields or Task

lossy
Fully supported

Harri onboarding task checklists migrate as Bullhorn Task records linked to the Candidate, or as Candidate custom fields if the tasks are status flags rather than dated actions. We map task name, completion status, due date, and responsible manager. Custom onboarding task fields map to Candidate custom fields. Bullhorn Onboarding (formerly Able) handles structured onboarding workflows natively; we document whether the customer licenses this module and flag it as a rebuild target.

Harri

Compliance Record

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Fields

1:many
Fully supported

Harri compliance records (certification expiry, mandatory training completion, regulatory acknowledgements) are compliance record types that vary by jurisdiction and customer setup. Bullhorn has no native compliance tracking module for hospitality-specific regulations. We flatten Harri compliance records into Candidate custom fields (e.g., certificationExpiryDate__c, tipCreditStatus__c, mandatoryTrainingCompleted__c) and preserve the original compliance record type as a custom picklist value. The customer admin rebuilds any active compliance reminder workflows in Bullhorn Automation (formerly Herefish) post-migration.

Harri

Document

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Attachments (ContentDocument)

1:1
Fully supported

Harri stores employee documents (contracts, ID scans, policies) as file attachments on Worker records. We migrate these as Bullhorn ContentDocument records attached to the corresponding Candidate via ContentDocumentLink. Filenames and original upload timestamps are preserved. Document type (contract, ID, policy) is stored in a custom field on the ContentDocument or as a Candidate custom field to aid searchability. Bullhorn supports PDF, DOC, and image formats natively.

Harri

Pay Rate (from Position)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Placement payRate or JobOrder salary

1:1
Fully supported

Harri pay rates are stored on the Position object. Bullhorn captures pay rate on the Placement record (for placed candidates) and on the JobOrder (for the job opening). We map Harri Position pay rate to Bullhorn JobOrder salary or to Placement payRate depending on whether the worker has been placed. Payroll data itself (earnings, deductions, pay stubs) lives in Harri's integrated third-party payroll provider and does not migrate; we instruct customers to export historical payroll from their payroll provider separately.

Harri

Engagement Survey Data

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Excluded

lossy
Fully supported

Harri employee engagement and pulse survey responses are tied to the Harri engagement module and have no documented export mechanism. Bullhorn has no engagement survey module natively. We exclude engagement survey data from migration scope and flag it upfront. Customers who need historical engagement data export it manually from Harri's UI before termination. We note Bullhorn's integration with third-party engagement tools (Culture Amp, Lattice) as a post-migration replacement path.

Harri

Payroll Data

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Excluded

lossy
Mapping required

Harri handles payroll via integration with third-party providers rather than natively. Historical earnings, deductions, pay stubs, and tax withholdings are stored in the integrated payroll system, not in Harri. We do not migrate payroll data. The customer exports historical payroll from their payroll provider and maps it into Bullhorn Back Office (if licensed) or a separate payroll system post-migration.

Harri

Custom Worker Properties

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Objects

1:1
Fully supported

Harri custom properties on Workers (beyond standard fields) map to Bullhorn Candidate custom objects. Bullhorn Support must provision custom objects before migration; the Custom Object Setup Spreadsheet is submitted as a ticket. Growth and Enterprise editions support up to 10 custom objects with 55 fields each; Bullhorn ATS supports 2. We map each Harri custom property to a typed Bullhorn custom field (text, date, drop-down, checkbox) and configure the field mapping in Bullhorn Admin > Field Mappings before migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Harri logo

Harri gotchas

High

Gated API and export templates require direct engagement with Harri

Medium

Payroll data lives in integrated third-party providers

Medium

Engagement survey data is not independently portable

Medium

Multi-location configurations create export complexity

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • Bullhorn custom objects require Bullhorn Support ticket before migration

    Bullhorn custom objects are not self-service. Bullhorn Support must provision each custom object using a Custom Object Setup Spreadsheet submitted as a support ticket. Growth and Enterprise editions allow 10 custom objects with 55 fields each; Bullhorn ATS allows 2; ATS Growth has none. Bullhorn Support ticket response times can add one to three weeks to the migration timeline if not initiated during discovery. We submit the provisioning ticket on the customer's behalf during scoping and hold schema deployment until custom objects are confirmed active. If the customer is mid-termination from Harri, this timeline pressure is amplified because Harri access may be revoked before Bullhorn provisioning completes.

  • Harri export access requires direct engagement with Harri data team

    Harri's developer portal and export templates are gated to active members. There is no publicly documented REST API or bulk export endpoint. Before migration scoping, we engage Harri's customer data team to request a full data export. If the customer is mid-termination from Harri, access may be revoked before we retrieve complete records. We flag this as a timeline risk and recommend initiating the data export request immediately upon deciding to migrate. Multi-location exports (50+ locations with nested Workers, Positions, and Shifts) require chunked export by Location, which Harri's data team must coordinate manually.

  • Shift scheduling data has no native Bullhorn equivalent

    Harri's shift scheduling module (recurring shifts, start/end times, coverage requirements, open shift management) has no direct Bullhorn object. Bullhorn Onboarding (formerly Able) handles scheduling for placed temporary workers but is a separate module and not part of the core ATS/CRM. We migrate shift data as Candidate custom fields (preferred shift times, shift type, availability notes) but we flag that any active shift-swap workflows, overtime alerts, or time-clock integrations in Harri do not migrate to Bullhorn and must be rebuilt or replaced with Bullhorn Onboarding or a third-party scheduling integration.

  • Harri payroll data lives in integrated third-party providers

    Harri does not process payroll natively for most U.S. customers. Pay rates migrate from Harri Positions, but historical earnings, deductions, pay stubs, and tax withholdings remain in the integrated payroll provider (e.g., ADP, Paychex, Gusto). Bullhorn Back Office handles contractor payroll but does not connect to Harri's payroll integrations. We exclude payroll data from migration scope and instruct customers to export historical payroll from their payroll provider separately. Bullhorn Back Office setup is outside standard migration scope and requires a separate Bullhorn implementation engagement.

  • Saved searches and Bullhorn New Candidate List compatibility

    Bullhorn has migrated many customers to its New Candidate List, which uses updated field logic for saved searches. Some legacy saved search criteria may behave differently or not migrate automatically if the customer's Bullhorn instance is on the New Candidate List. Harri has no saved search equivalent, but any Bullhorn-specific configurations the customer built before migration may be affected. We test saved search behavior in the Bullhorn Sandbox before production cutover and flag any that require manual reconfiguration. Bullhorn Support can trigger a saved search migration if any are missed.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Harri to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and edition selection

    We audit Harri across all active modules: Worker records (active, inactive, applicant), Locations (by property count), Position catalogs (titles, pay rates, classifications), Shifts (volume and pattern complexity), Application pipeline stages, Compliance record types, and Document attachments. We pair this with a Bullhorn edition assessment: Bullhorn Team ($99/user) covers basic ATS/CRM with limited custom fields; Bullhorn Corporate ($199/user) adds API access and custom fields; Bullhorn Enterprise (custom) is required if the customer needs 10 custom objects, advanced reporting, or Bullhorn Onboarding scheduling. Bullhorn Support custom object provisioning must begin in this step to account for ticket latency before schema deployment.

  2. Harri data export coordination

    We engage Harri's customer data team directly to request a full data export. Because Harri's API and export templates are member-gated, we coordinate the export request before any platform termination. For multi-location deployments, we request exports chunked by Location to manage file size and enable per-site validation. The export includes Workers, Positions, Locations, Shifts, Applications, Compliance records, and Documents. Payroll data and engagement survey data are excluded; we instruct the customer to export payroll from their payroll provider and engagement data from Harri's UI manually. We validate export completeness against our discovery audit before proceeding to transformation.

  3. Schema design and Bullhorn field mapping

    We design the Bullhorn destination schema based on the export structure. This includes Bullhorn Support provisioning custom objects for extended Worker properties, standard field mapping (Harri Worker fields to Bullhorn Candidate fields), Location mapping to ClientCorporation, Position mapping to JobOrder, Application mapping to JobSubmission, and shift data mapping to Candidate custom fields or Bullhorn Onboarding configuration notes. Field edit types, required flags, and picklist values are configured in Bullhorn Admin > Field Mappings. Schema is deployed into a Bullhorn Sandbox first for validation before production migration begins.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Bullhorn Sandbox using production-like data volume from the Harri export. The customer's HR and operations leads reconcile record counts (Workers in, Candidates in, Locations in, ClientCorporations in, Positions in, JobOrders in, Shifts in), spot-check 25-50 random records against the Harri source, and verify document attachments are linked to the correct Candidate. Compliance record mapping is validated for accuracy across jurisdictions. The customer signs off on schema and mapping before production migration begins. Any mapping corrections happen in the Sandbox, not in production.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: ClientCorporations (from Harri Locations) first, then Candidates (with employment type and custom fields), JobOrders (with Position pay rates and classifications), JobSubmissions (with application status mapping), Placement records (if applicable), Task records (for onboarding task status), Compliance data (as Candidate custom fields), and Documents (as ContentDocument linked to Candidates). Shift data is the final batch, mapped to Candidate custom fields per the customer's chosen configuration. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We use Bullhorn REST API with rate-limit handling and exponential backoff for all insert and update operations.

  6. Cutover, validation, and rebuild handoff

    We freeze Harri writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Bullhorn as the system of record. We deliver a written schedule rebuild guide for Bullhorn Onboarding (if licensed) and a Bullhorn Automation inventory documenting any migration-scope automation recommendations. We do not rebuild Harri Workflows or shift scheduling as Bullhorn automations inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any record-reconciliation issues raised by the customer's team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Harri logo

Harri

Source

Strengths

  • Covers the full hospitality HCM lifecycle from talent attraction through engagement in one platform.
  • Serves major hospitality brands including Raising Cane's, Subway, and McDonald's at scale.
  • Mobile-first architecture designed for hourly frontline workers rather than desk employees.
  • Compliance analytics module built for hospitality-specific regulatory requirements.
  • May 2024 release added 70+ new features across the platform, showing active development investment.

Weaknesses

  • Pricing model is opaque and requires sales consultation rather than self-serve, limiting comparison shopping.
  • API is not publicly documented—developer portal is gated to members, complicating migration planning.
  • U.S. payroll is integration-dependent rather than native, adding a third-party dependency for complete HR data.
  • G2 ratings of 4.3 with 99 reviews indicate limited market penetration relative to mainstream HRMS platforms.
  • No free tier or self-service plan—enterprise focus means smaller operators are not the primary audience.
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Harri and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Harri and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    A

    All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Harri and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Harri: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Harri doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Harri to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Harri to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Harri to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Harri to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and six weeks for operators under 5,000 Workers, 50 Locations, and no custom object dependencies. Migrations with 50+ locations, complex shift patterns, compliance record mapping across jurisdictions, or custom object provisioning with Bullhorn Support move to eight to twelve weeks because of Harri export coordination, Bullhorn Support ticket latency, and shift-data transformation work. Bullhorn's own onboarding guidance suggests two weeks for small staffing firms and two to six weeks for larger agencies; adding Harri migration scope extends that estimate.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Harri.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day