HRMS migration

Migrate from ChartHop to BambooHR

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between ChartHop and BambooHR. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in BambooHR.

ChartHop logo

ChartHop

Source

BambooHR

Destination

BambooHR logo

Compatibility

100%

12 of 12

objects map 1:1 between ChartHop and BambooHR.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from ChartHop to BambooHR is a consolidation from a visual analytics and org-planning layer into a transactional HRIS with built-in ATS, onboarding, and payroll integration. ChartHop's headcount planning scenarios are sandbox planning objects that BambooHR does not support at any tier, so we flag these as reference-only artifacts requiring manual rebuild. Matrix team structures and multi-manager reporting relationships are ChartHop-specific and do not map to BambooHR's standard org model. We migrate employee profiles, compensation fields, job titles, departments, manager relationships, time-off balances, and custom fields in dependency order, and we preserve the full department hierarchy as a parent-child tree. BambooHR's built-in ATS and onboarding workflows do not sync with ChartHop's Jobvite connector; any active requisition records require manual re-entry. We do not migrate headcount planning scenarios, engagement survey result aggregates, performance review templates, or Goals hierarchies as code.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

ChartHop logo

ChartHop

What's pushing teams away

  • Integration depth with payroll and ATS systems is inconsistent; some teams report that data syncs require manual reconciliation or additional middleware.
  • Limited customization compared to enterprise HR suites; organizations with complex workflows or unique data models find ChartHop too opinionated.
  • Technical stability concerns include occasional data staleness, crashes, and site instability reported in user reviews.
  • Steep learning curve for advanced features like custom scenario types and approval workflows; initial admin configuration is required before teams can use the platform fully.
  • Custom field proliferation without governance leads to cluttered data sheets and confusing reporting views over time.

Choosing

BambooHR logo

BambooHR

What's pulling them in

  • Lowest friction entry point for SMBs moving off spreadsheets — intuitive interface means most teams are functional within days, not weeks.
  • Consolidation value: BambooHR merges ATS, onboarding, HR records, time-off, and payroll into a single pane of glass that employees never need to leave.
  • Volume discounts applied automatically by headcount, so pricing scales predictably as the company grows without renewal negotiations.
  • BambooHR reports most customers go live in four to six weeks, making it a realistic commitment for under-resourced HR teams.
  • Award-winning Support Heroes cited frequently in reviews — responsive human support after implementation is a differentiator.

Object mapping

How ChartHop objects map to BambooHR

Each row shows how a ChartHop object lands in BambooHR, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

ChartHop

People (Employees)

maps to

BambooHR

Employee

1:1
Fully supported

ChartHop People records map directly to BambooHR Employee records. Standard fields including name, email, phone, address, date of hire, employment status, and work location migrate 1:1. Custom fields on the ChartHop profile migrate as BambooHR custom fields, which support text, number, date, and picklist types. ChartHop's 16-field-type flexibility (calculated fields, multiple choice, yes/no) may require type reduction; calculated fields that reference live ChartHop data cannot reproduce in BambooHR and are documented as read-only reference values.

ChartHop

Jobs (Positions)

maps to

BambooHR

Employment History + Job Info

1:1
Fully supported

ChartHop Job records (title, department, level, compensation band) map to BambooHR Employment History entries and custom fields. BambooHR stores job title as a single text field on the Employee record; the full job history is reconstructed via the Employment History table. Compensation band information from ChartHop Jobs migrates to custom fields on the Employee record. Job status (active, closed, on-hold) does not map to a BambooHR native field and is stored as a custom field.

ChartHop

Departments

maps to

BambooHR

Departments

1:1
Fully supported

ChartHop department hierarchy maps to BambooHR Departments with the parent-child relationship preserved. BambooHR Department records have name, location, and parent department fields. We reconstruct the full department tree as a flat list of Department records with Parent Department set per the ChartHop hierarchy. Matrix team affiliations stored at the department level in ChartHop are flagged as non-migratable because BambooHR does not model cross-functional team structures.

ChartHop

Org Chart

maps to

BambooHR

Org Chart (BambooHR generated)

1:1
Mapping required

ChartHop's org chart is a rendered view of People and Jobs with reporting lines. We export the underlying data (people, jobs, managers) and reconstruct the reporting hierarchy in BambooHR. BambooHR generates a read-only org chart from the manager relationships on Employee records. Matrix reporting relationships (employees with multiple managers) cannot be represented in BambooHR's org chart; we document these as reference records in the migration deliverable.

ChartHop

Compensation Data

maps to

BambooHR

Pay

1:1
Mapping required

ChartHop's compensation fields (base compensation, cash compensation, variable pay, equity, total compensation) organized into built-in categories map to BambooHR Pay entries. Each BambooHR Pay entry captures pay rate, pay frequency, and effective date. Multiple compensation components (base, bonus, equity) require separate Pay entries or custom fields. Historical compensation changes from ChartHop migrate as individual Pay history entries with correct effective dates.

ChartHop

Custom Fields

maps to

BambooHR

Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

ChartHop custom fields organized into user-defined categories migrate to BambooHR custom fields. We audit for duplicate or near-duplicate field names (e.g., 'Comp Band' vs 'Compensation Band') and surface them for customer review before mapping. BambooHR supports fewer data types than ChartHop; calculated fields and formula-based fields cannot reproduce and are migrated as static read-only values. Field-level access controls from ChartHop do not map to BambooHR's permission model and are documented separately.

ChartHop

Time Off and PTO Balances

maps to

BambooHR

Time Off

1:1
Mapping required

ChartHop PTO balances, accrual policies, and time-off requests map to BambooHR Time Off entries. Current balances migrate as of the migration snapshot date. Historical accrual logs migrate as separate time-off entries with zero balance and a note referencing the historical record. BambooHR's unlimited custom time-off policies map directly from ChartHop's time-off policy configuration.

ChartHop

Performance Reviews

maps to

BambooHR

Performance Reviews

1:1
Mapping required

ChartHop review cycles, review forms, and submitted responses migrate to BambooHR Performance Reviews. Review templates with custom question types, branching logic, or weighted scoring may require simplification. We export review records and responses; review status (draft, submitted, acknowledged) maps to BambooHR review status. Review metadata including template structure is documented for manual rebuild if the destination template diverges significantly.

ChartHop

Goals

maps to

BambooHR

Goals (BambooHR Pro and above)

1:1
Mapping required

ChartHop Goals (company, team, and individual objectives with progress tracking) map to BambooHR Goals on Pro and above tiers. Goal hierarchies and parent-child linkages migrate as parent goal references. Cascading goal dependencies that rely on ChartHop's live-connection to people data may require manual re-linkage. Goals on BambooHR Core tier are not available and are documented as requiring manual rebuild or a tier upgrade.

ChartHop

Documents and Files

maps to

BambooHR

Documents

1:1
Mapping required

ChartHop file uploads per employee profile migrate to BambooHR Employee Documents. We export files via ChartHop's file export mechanism and re-upload to BambooHR under the corresponding Employee record. All files must be under 100MB per ChartHop's limit and under BambooHR's file size constraints. File categorization (miscellaneous or field-linked) is preserved in the BambooHR document type field.

ChartHop

Headcount Planning Scenarios

maps to

BambooHR

Not supported

1:1
Not supported

ChartHop headcount planning scenarios (create, update, terminate/backfill, promotion, budget, custom types) are sandbox planning objects exposed exclusively inside ChartHop's planning workflow engine and are not accessible via public API. BambooHR does not have a headcount planning or scenario modeling module at any tier. We flag all active scenarios during migration scoping, export them as reference documents, and deliver them to the customer for manual re-creation in their preferred planning tool or spreadsheet.

ChartHop

Matrix Teams

maps to

BambooHR

Not supported

1:1
Mapping required

ChartHop Matrix Teams model cross-functional collaboration where employees report to multiple leaders. BambooHR does not support multi-manager relationships or cross-functional team assignments natively. We export the matrix assignment data as a reference CSV alongside the migration so the customer has an audit record. Matrix team filtering and reporting must be handled via BambooHR custom fields or an external tool post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

ChartHop logo

ChartHop gotchas

High

Headcount planning scenarios are not accessible via API

Medium

Spreadsheet imports require XLSX format and strict formatting rules

Medium

ATS integration with Jobvite requires exact email matching

Medium

Internal transfers are not supported in ATS sync

Low

Custom fields proliferate without governance by default

BambooHR logo

BambooHR gotchas

High

Undocumented API rate limits can trigger 503 errors

High

Per-employee pricing model requires active record count verification

Medium

API credentials must be sent on every request to avoid extra round trips

Medium

Custom field schema varies per account and requires manual inventory

Low

Document and attachment exports are not covered by standard report exports

Pair-specific challenges

  • Headcount planning scenarios are not API-accessible and do not migrate

    ChartHop does not expose headcount planning scenarios through its public API. All scenario data — including proposed hires, budget impacts, approval statuses, and scenario types (create, update, terminate/backfill, promotion, budget, custom) — lives inside ChartHop's planning workflow engine and cannot be retrieved programmatically. BambooHR does not have a headcount planning module. We flag active scenarios during scoping so the customer can export them as reference documents before cutover and re-create them manually at the destination or in a third-party planning tool.

  • BambooHR does not support matrix team structures or multi-manager reporting

    ChartHop's Matrix Teams feature models cross-functional collaboration where employees report to multiple leaders simultaneously. This structure is non-standard in BambooHR, which uses a single-manager hierarchy per employee. We cannot represent dual-reporting relationships in BambooHR's org model. We export matrix assignment data as a reference CSV for the customer to maintain outside BambooHR or to encode as custom fields if a workaround is required.

  • ChartHop requires XLSX for bulk imports; CSV data may be silently rejected

    ChartHop explicitly rejects CSV files for bulk imports and may corrupt data if CSV is used instead of XLSX. During migration scoping, we validate any customer-provided spreadsheet exports, reformat them to the required XLSX structure, and confirm that country codes are present in all international phone numbers and that job titles are complete. We apply the same validation to any supplemental data the customer provides during migration.

  • BambooHR custom fields have fewer data types than ChartHop

    ChartHop supports 16 custom field types including calculated fields with live formulas, multiple choice, yes/no, and rich text. BambooHR supports text, number, date, and picklist custom fields. Calculated fields and formula-based fields that derive values from live ChartHop data cannot reproduce in BambooHR and are migrated as static read-only values. We surface all non-mappable field types during scoping and document them as reference data requiring manual maintenance.

  • ChartHop-to-Jobvite ATS sync records do not map to BambooHR

    If the customer uses ChartHop's Jobvite integration for ATS requisitions, those sync records (job requisitions, candidate associations, hiring status) do not have a migration path to BambooHR's built-in ATS because BambooHR's ATS uses a different data model and API. Internal transfer records explicitly excluded from ChartHop's ATS sync are also not available for migration. We flag all active requisitions and candidate records during scoping so they can be re-entered in BambooHR's ATS or maintained in Jobvite with a new sync configuration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful ChartHop to BambooHR data migration

  1. Discovery and module inventory

    We audit the source ChartHop portal across all activated modules (Core, HRIS, Compensation, Performance, Headcount Planning, Engagement, Goals). We count People records, Jobs, Departments, custom field definitions with data types, active headcount planning scenarios, performance review cycles with template structures, Goals hierarchies, and file attachments. We pair this with a BambooHR edition check (Core vs Pro vs Elite) to confirm which destination features are available. The discovery output is a written migration scope with record counts per object and a list of non-migratable objects requiring manual handling.

  2. Custom field audit and deduplication

    We extract all ChartHop custom field definitions with their data types, categories, and access controls. We identify duplicate or near-duplicate field names (e.g., 'Comp Band' vs 'Compensation Band'), fields using data types that BambooHR does not support (calculated fields, formula fields), and fields with no current values. We present the deduplicated field list to the customer for review before mapping to BambooHR's custom field schema. Any calculated fields are flagged as static read-only values.

  3. Schema design and department tree reconstruction

    We design the BambooHR destination schema including Department records with parent-child hierarchy, Employee custom fields, Pay entry structure for compensation components, Time Off policy configuration, and Employment History setup. We deploy configuration to a BambooHR sandbox or staging environment for validation. The department tree is reconstructed from ChartHop's hierarchy export; matrix team affiliations are documented separately since BambooHR does not model them natively.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into the BambooHR staging environment using production-equivalent data volume. The customer's HR lead reconciles record counts across all objects, spot-checks 25-50 employee profiles against the ChartHop source, and verifies that manager relationships and compensation data landed correctly. Any field mapping corrections, missing data, or schema gaps are resolved here before the production migration window opens.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Departments (with parent references resolved), Employees (with manager lookup resolved from the department tree), Employment History entries, Pay records (with effective dates), Time Off balances (as of snapshot date), custom field values, Documents (file re-upload to each Employee record), Performance Review records, and Goals (on Pro and above). Headcount planning scenarios and matrix team assignments are exported as reference CSVs and handed off. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow handoff

    We freeze ChartHop write access during cutover and run a final delta migration for any records modified during the migration window. BambooHR becomes the system of record once the delta pass completes. We deliver the headcount planning scenario export, matrix team reference CSV, performance review template comparison document, and Goals handoff notes to the customer's HR admin. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation questions. We do not rebuild ChartHop workflows, approval chains, or engagement survey distributions as BambooHR workflows; those require separate configuration by the customer's admin or a BambooHR partner.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

ChartHop logo

ChartHop

Source

Strengths

  • Visual, live org chart that updates as employee data changes, eliminating manual spreadsheet maintenance
  • Modular per-employee pricing lets customers buy only the modules they need (Core, Headcount Planning, HRIS, Compensation, Performance, Engagement)
  • Headcount planning supports six scenario types (create, update, terminate/backfill, promotion, budget, custom) with live budget impact
  • Sits on top of existing payroll providers (ADP, Gusto, etc.) rather than requiring a payroll switch, lowering adoption risk
  • Built-in connectors for ATS (Jobvite, Greenhouse, Lever), HRIS (BambooHR, Namely, Rippling) and equity tools for end-to-end people-data sync

Weaknesses

  • Payroll and ATS integration depth varies significantly across connectors; sync frequency and field mapping differ by system.
  • Advanced features like custom scenario types and approval workflows require significant initial admin configuration before teams can use them productively.
  • No public API documentation for headcount planning scenarios; sandbox planning data is inaccessible for programmatic migration.
  • Matrix team structures and multi-manager reporting relationships are ChartHop-specific and do not map cleanly to standard HRMS schemas.
  • Limited offline or bulk-export options for large employee rosters; file uploads capped at 100MB per document.
BambooHR logo

BambooHR

Destination

Strengths

  • Single platform consolidating ATS, onboarding, HR records, payroll, and time-off reduces system sprawl for SMBs.
  • Fast implementation — BambooHR reports four to six weeks from kickoff to go-live for most customers.
  • Per-employee pricing with automatic volume discounts makes cost predictable as headcount grows.
  • Strong customer support reputation (Support Heroes) cited consistently across G2, Capterra, and direct testimonials.
  • Well-documented API with UTF-8 encoding, clear field types, and HTTPS-only access.

Weaknesses

  • Mobile application is significantly limited compared to the desktop experience, frustrating remote and field workers.
  • Companies above 150–200 employees frequently outgrow the platform's feature depth and customization surface.
  • Limited advanced reporting and analytics compared to enterprise HR platforms — custom report building is the ceiling.
  • PTO and profile customization are pain points — non-standard accrual policies and complex org structures require workarounds.
  • Document management and attachment handling lack the granularity of dedicated document-centric HR systems.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across ChartHop and BambooHR.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    ChartHop: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    ChartHop doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your ChartHop to BambooHR migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about ChartHop to BambooHR data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ChartHop to BambooHR migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your ChartHop to BambooHR migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 500 employees with standard profiles, one department hierarchy, and no active Headcount Planning or Engagement modules land between four and six weeks. Migrations with active compensation cycles, time-off accrual policies across multiple jurisdictions, performance review history, or goals hierarchies move to eight to twelve weeks because each module requires a separate export pass and BambooHR configuration pass. BambooHR's own implementation guidance suggests a four to six-week go-live for standard rollouts, and our migration timeline is additive to that baseline for customers who already have BambooHR provisioned.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from ChartHop.
Land in BambooHR, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day