HRMS migration

Migrate from Screenloop to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Screenloop and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Screenloop logo

Screenloop

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

92%

11 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Screenloop and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Screenloop to Bullhorn is an extraction-and-replatforming migration. Screenloop does not publish a documented REST API, so bulk data export relies on CSV extraction coordinated through Screenloop's admin interface, which requires active participation from the customer's Screenloop account. Bullhorn receives the exported data via its REST API with field-level mapping and validation. The primary migration risk is Screenloop's Interview Intelligence layer: audio recordings are not directly portable, and AI-generated transcript text migrates as structured Note records against the Candidate. Scorecard templates, Reference survey results, Background Check summaries, and Training Module completion records all map to Bullhorn Custom Objects or standard Note records depending on the destination Bullhorn edition. Bullhorn's tier-specific Custom Object limits (2 on Bullhorn ATS, 10 on Front Office Growth/Enterprise) constrain how many parallel Custom Objects can hold migrated data; we plan the mapping around those limits during scoping. Workflows, Automations, and Scheduling Rules do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's Bullhorn admin to rebuild.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Screenloop logo

Screenloop

What's pushing teams away

  • Users want granular control over Slack notification routing, reporting that current Slack integration lacks the depth to filter which alerts reach which channels.
  • Smaller teams report occasional difficulty navigating advanced analytics and reporting features that feel more suited to mid-market users.
  • Early-stage platform maturity means some enterprise-grade controls like audit logging, role-based field restrictions, and org-wide data retention policies are limited or undocumented.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How Screenloop objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a Screenloop object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Screenloop

Candidates

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Screenloop Candidate records (name, email, phone, location, application date, source, stage history log) map to Bullhorn Candidate. The stage history log transfers as a structured text field or as a series of Note records with timestamps, depending on the volume. Bullhorn CandidateId becomes the parent reference for all related Interview, Scorecard, Reference, and Background Check records that follow. Deduplication uses email as the primary key; we flag duplicate email addresses in a reconciliation report before final import.

Screenloop

Jobs

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder

1:1
Fully supported

Screenloop Job records (title, department, location, employment type, description, active vs. closed status) map to Bullhorn JobOrder. Job-specific custom fields extract during the audit phase and map to Bullhorn custom fields on JobOrder. Active status preserves as JobOrder status; closed jobs import with their final status for historical pipeline reporting. We flag any job-specific integration settings (e.g., job board distribution) that require manual reconfiguration in Bullhorn.

Screenloop

Pipeline Stages

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder Status + Placement Track

lossy
Fully supported

Screenloop's configurable pipeline stages (e.g., Applied, Screening, Interview, Offer) map to Bullhorn JobOrder Status values and, for placement-driven workflows, to Placement Track Status values. Stage ordering and stage-specific rules export from Screenloop and recreate as Bullhorn Status picklist values ordered to match the original pipeline flow. Stage transition timestamps become Note records or a custom activity log depending on the destination Bullhorn edition's Custom Object headroom.

Screenloop

Scorecards

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object or Note

1:1
Mapping required

Screenloop Scorecards contain structured ratings, free-text feedback, and AI-generated notes from the Interview Intelligence layer. We extract the rating criteria and weights per job and map them to Bullhorn custom fields on a Custom Object (e.g., scorecard_rating_overall__c, scorecard_communication_score__c). If the destination Bullhorn edition is Bullhorn ATS (2 Custom Object limit) and the customer has multiple scorecard templates, we consolidate into a single Custom Object with template-type and section fields, and store the free-text feedback as Notes attached to the Candidate. Bullhorn Support must provision the Custom Object using the Custom Object Setup Sheet before migration begins.

Screenloop

Interview Records

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Note + Task

1:1
Mapping required

Screenloop Interview Records (scheduled date, interviewer assignment, interview type, duration, outcome) map to Bullhorn Note and Task records attached to the Candidate. The Interview Intelligence transcript text migrates as a Note with the body set to the full transcript. Audio recording files cannot be programmatically extracted from Screenloop; we flag this during scoping and advise the customer to request audio files directly from Screenloop support if required for compliance or legal retention purposes. Bullhorn's standard Task record covers interview scheduling and outcome tracking.

Screenloop

References

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object or Note

1:1
Mapping required

Screenloop's Modern Referencing feature collects referee name, relationship to candidate, submission date, and soft-skill feedback. This maps to a Bullhorn Custom Object (e.g., CandidateReference__c) with fields for referee name, relationship, submission date, and feedback summary. If the destination Bullhorn edition does not have Custom Object capacity remaining after scorecard and background check mapping, the feedback migrates as a Note attached to the Candidate with a standardized prefix for identification.

Screenloop

Background Checks

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object or Note

1:1
Mapping required

Screenloop Background Check records include check type, provider, status, and outcome summary. The structured result data maps to a Bullhorn Custom Object (e.g., BackgroundCheck__c). Raw PDF reports from third-party providers cannot be pulled programmatically from Screenloop; we flag this as a document retrieval step and advise the customer to request exports directly from their background check provider. Bullhorn does not natively integrate with all background check vendors; we document the vendor list for manual re-integration post-migration.

Screenloop

Training Modules

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object or Note

1:1
Mapping required

Screenloop's Interviewer Training library tracks module completion per user and assessment scores. This data maps to a Bullhorn Custom Object (e.g., InterviewerTraining__c) attached to the User record, with fields for module name, completion date, and score. The actual training content (video, slides, assessments) does not transfer; Bullhorn does not host training content natively. We provide a mapping of module names to Bullhorn's own training resources and recommend the customer rebuild training materials in Bullhorn's learning management or link to external hosting.

Screenloop

Users

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

User

1:1
Fully supported

Screenloop User accounts (name, email, role — Admin, Hiring Manager, Recruiter, Interviewer, team assignment) map to Bullhorn User. Owner-to-candidate associations preserve so interview attribution remains intact after migration. We match by email as the dedupe key. Any Screenloop user without a matching Bullhorn User record goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's Bullhorn admin to provision before record import begins. Inactive Screenloop users migrate as inactive Bullhorn Users to preserve historical assignment data.

Screenloop

Custom Fields

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

Screenloop custom fields on Candidates, Jobs, and Interviews (text, number, date, single-select, multi-select) export with their data types and current values. We apply a field-level mapping step during the audit phase, converting Screenloop field types to the closest Bullhorn equivalent: single-select maps to Bullhorn picklist, multi-select maps to Bullhorn multi-select picklist or a Custom Object with a related list, number maps to Bullhorn number or currency depending on context. Bullhorn field name length limits (40 characters) may require truncation of longer Screenloop custom field names.

Screenloop

Activity/Stage History

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Note records or Custom Activity log

1:1
Fully supported

Screenloop accumulates stage changes, interview outcomes, and note additions as candidate pipeline events. There is no documented bulk-export endpoint for historical transaction logs, so we reconstruct stage history by exporting individual candidate records where accessible. Large accounts (10,000+ candidates) may experience incomplete event timelines; we flag gaps in the audit report and advise requesting historical export assistance from Screenloop support before migration begins. The reconstructed history migrates as a series of dated Note records on each Candidate in Bullhorn.

Screenloop

Attachments

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ContentDocumentLink

1:1
Fully supported

Screenloop attachments on Candidates and Jobs (resumes, cover letters, portfolio files) are exported as files from the admin CSV export. Bullhorn stores these as ContentDocument records linked via ContentDocumentLink to the Candidate or JobOrder. We map the file name, type, and binary content, and set the ContentDocumentLink visibility to AllUsers or InternalUsers depending on the file's intended audience. Orphaned attachments (files with no parent record) are flagged in a separate report for manual disposition.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Screenloop logo

Screenloop gotchas

High

No documented public API complicates automated migration

High

Interview Intelligence recordings and AI notes require special handling

Medium

Scorecard templates are Screenloop-native and need remapping at destination

Medium

No documented bulk export endpoint for historical transactions

Low

Platform maturity and audit trail gaps for compliance migrations

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • Screenloop's undocumented API forces CSV-based extraction

    Screenloop does not publish a REST API, OAuth endpoints, or developer documentation. Bulk data export must be coordinated through Screenloop's admin interface, generating CSV files that are then mapped to Bullhorn's REST API for import. This adds coordination steps, requires active Screenloop account access during the migration window, and limits the speed of extraction. Accounts with large candidate volumes (10,000+) face extended timelines because CSV generation is a UI-bounded operation. We coordinate directly with the customer's Screenloop admin to schedule and validate each export batch.

  • Interview Intelligence audio recordings are not programmatically portable

    Screenloop's Interview Intelligence layer stores audio recordings on Screenloop's infrastructure without a documented download URL or export endpoint. The AI-generated transcript text migrates as structured Note records in Bullhorn, but the raw audio files cannot be pulled through any documented API or admin export. We flag this at scoping, export the transcript text, and advise the customer to contact Screenloop support directly for audio file retrieval if legal or compliance retention is required. The absence of audio does not block candidate record migration but creates a data gap for any team relying on recorded interview playback.

  • Bullhorn Custom Object limits constrain scorecard, reference, and background check storage

    Bullhorn ATS edition permits only 2 Custom Objects with 55 fields each. Bullhorn Front Office Growth and Enterprise support 10. Screenloop carries four data types that typically map to Custom Objects (Scorecards, References, Background Checks, Training Modules). On Bullhorn ATS, these four types compete for 2 Custom Object slots. We consolidate by combining related fields into a single Custom Object with type discriminators and using Note records for overflow data. The consolidation strategy is defined during scoping and validated against the customer's actual field counts before any import begins.

  • Scorecard templates are Screenloop-native and require manual remapping

    Screenloop scorecard structures (rating criteria, weighting per criterion, free-text sections) are configured per job or per team within Screenloop and do not export as reusable templates. When migrating to Bullhorn, these templates must be recreated as Bullhorn custom fields and picklist values, then mapped to the destination evaluation form fields. We extract the full scorecard schema for each job during the audit phase and provide a mapping spreadsheet so the customer can align criteria before final import. Any weighting logic must be re-implemented as a Bullhorn formula field or rebuilt manually post-migration.

  • No bulk export for historical pipeline transaction logs

    Screenloop's ATS accumulates stage transitions, interview outcomes, and note additions as candidate pipeline events, but there is no documented bulk-export endpoint for historical transaction logs. We reconstruct stage history by exporting individual candidate records where accessible, but very large accounts (10,000+ candidates) may have incomplete event timelines due to the absence of a programmatic audit log export. We flag gaps in the audit report, document what is missing, and advise the customer to request historical export assistance from Screenloop's support team before the migration window opens.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Screenloop to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and extraction planning

    We audit the Screenloop account across all active objects — Candidates, Jobs, Pipeline Stages, Scorecards, Interview Records, References, Background Checks, Training Modules, Users, and Custom Fields — and identify which objects will map to Bullhorn standard records versus Custom Objects. We coordinate with the customer's Screenloop admin to schedule the CSV export batches, validate field coverage, and identify any records that cannot be extracted through the admin interface (e.g., Interview Intelligence audio files, raw background check PDFs). The discovery output is a written migration scope, an export sequence plan, and a Bullhorn edition recommendation based on Custom Object requirements.

  2. Bullhorn schema design and Custom Object provisioning

    We design the destination Bullhorn schema based on the Screenloop audit. This includes provisioning Bullhorn Custom Objects (using the Bullhorn Support Custom Object Setup Sheet), defining custom fields on Candidate, JobOrder, User, and related entities, configuring JobOrder Status picklist values to match Screenloop pipeline stages, and setting up Record Types if the destination uses placement-driven workflows. Bullhorn Support must approve Custom Object requests before provisioning; we manage this ticket workflow on the customer's behalf. Schema deploys to a Bullhorn Sandbox first for validation.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into Bullhorn Sandbox using production-equivalent data volume from the Screenloop CSV exports. The customer's Bullhorn admin reconciles record counts (Candidates in, JobOrders in, Users in), spot-checks 25-50 random records against the Screenloop source, and validates Custom Object data integrity. Any field mapping corrections, Custom Object schema adjustments, or stage-configuration changes happen in the Sandbox before production migration begins.

  4. Scorecard template mapping and AI note extraction

    We extract the full scorecard schema for each Screenloop job during the audit phase. Each rating criterion maps to a Bullhorn custom field on the designated Custom Object. AI-generated interview notes extract as structured text and load into Note records attached to the Candidate. We produce a scorecard mapping spreadsheet that the customer reviews and approves, confirming that rating categories align with the destination evaluation criteria before final import.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users (validated against Bullhorn User table by email), JobOrders (with custom fields and status configured), Candidates (with Bullhorn CandidateId established as parent reference), Scorecards and Interview Notes (attached to Candidate by ID), References and Background Checks (Custom Object records linked to Candidate), Training Module completion (Custom Object records linked to User), and Attachments (ContentDocument uploaded and linked via ContentDocumentLink). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze Screenloop write access during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the window, then enable Bullhorn as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of Screenloop workflows, scheduling rules, and scorecard templates that require rebuild in Bullhorn Automation or Bullhorn Plus. Audio file retrieval from Screenloop is outside our scope; we provide the customer with a request template for Screenloop support. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues. Workflow and automation rebuilds are a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Screenloop logo

Screenloop

Source

Strengths

  • AI Notetaker auto-populates interview scorecards from recorded sessions, eliminating manual note-taking for hiring teams.
  • All-in-one Talent Operations Platform replaces multiple standalone tools with a single subscription and unified data model.
  • Automated interview scheduling with calendar sync and candidate reminders reduces coordination overhead across hiring teams.
  • Interview Intelligence records, transcribes, and analyzes interviews to surface soft-skill insights and candidate fit signals.
  • Strong customer-reported outcomes: 50% faster hiring, 74% time-to-hire reduction, 26% improvement in candidate NPS.

Weaknesses

  • No publicly documented API — bulk data export and programmatic migration require custom integration work or CSV-based extraction.
  • Platform originated as a hiring-intelligence tool and has expanded into a full ATS, meaning some enterprise-grade controls are still maturing.
  • Interview recordings and AI-generated transcripts are stored in Screenloop's proprietary Interview Intelligence layer and may not be directly portable.
  • Slack integration lacks granular notification routing controls, frustrating users who want fine-grained alert filtering.
  • Small review sample size on G2 (41 reviews) makes it difficult to assess consistency of experience across different team sizes.
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Screenloop and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Screenloop: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Screenloop doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Screenloop to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Screenloop to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Screenloop to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Screenloop to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 10,000 Candidates and 500 Jobs with no large-scale Interview Intelligence extraction. Migrations with large Interview Record volumes (over 5,000 transcribed sessions), multiple scorecard templates requiring field remapping, or reference and background check data spanning several Custom Object types move to eight to twelve weeks because of CSV extraction coordination, multi-pass field mapping, and Bullhorn Custom Object provisioning via Bullhorn Support.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Screenloop.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day