HRMS

Migrate your Screenloop data

AI-native Talent Operations Platform combining ATS, Interview Intelligence, and automated scheduling for startups and scaling teams.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
Screenloop logo

In its favor

Why people choose Screenloop

The signal that keeps Screenloop on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Users consistently rate Screenloop 5.0 on G2, praising its UX and calling it the most user-friendly ATS they've used over other platforms like Greenhouse and Workable.

The AI Notetaker auto-fills interview scorecards, saving hiring managers and TA teams hours per week — no competing ATS bundles this natively at any tier.

The platform consolidates ATS, Interview Intelligence, Background Checks, Referencing, and Training into a single subscription, replacing 8+ standalone hiring tools.

Automated scheduling with calendar integration and candidate reminders reduces back-and-forth, cutting interview coordination time significantly across case study clients.

Customers report measurable ROI: Indeed Flex achieved 50% faster hiring, AssemblyAI scaled hiring by 255%, and Housr slashed time-to-hire by 74%.

Users want granular control over Slack notification routing, reporting that current Slack integration lacks the depth to filter which alerts reach which channels.

Smaller teams report occasional difficulty navigating advanced analytics and reporting features that feel more suited to mid-market users.

Early-stage platform maturity means some enterprise-grade controls like audit logging, role-based field restrictions, and org-wide data retention policies are limited or undocumented.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave Screenloop

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Screenloop. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where Screenloop fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

AI Notetaker auto-populates interview scorecards from recorded sessions, eliminating manual note-taking for hiring teams.All-in-one Talent Operations Platform replaces multiple standalone tools with a single subscription and unified data model.Automated interview scheduling with calendar sync and candidate reminders reduces coordination overhead across hiring teams.Interview Intelligence records, transcribes, and analyzes interviews to surface soft-skill insights and candidate fit signals.Strong customer-reported outcomes: 50% faster hiring, 74% time-to-hire reduction, 26% improvement in candidate NPS.

Weaknesses

No publicly documented API — bulk data export and programmatic migration require custom integration work or CSV-based extraction.Platform originated as a hiring-intelligence tool and has expanded into a full ATS, meaning some enterprise-grade controls are still maturing.Interview recordings and AI-generated transcripts are stored in Screenloop's proprietary Interview Intelligence layer and may not be directly portable.Slack integration lacks granular notification routing controls, frustrating users who want fine-grained alert filtering.Small review sample size on G2 (41 reviews) makes it difficult to assess consistency of experience across different team sizes.

Where it works

Early-stage startups to mid-market companies (11–1000 employees) seeking to consolidate multiple hiring tools into a single platform without managing enterprise-scale complexity.Teams where hiring managers actively participate in interviews and need automated scheduling, calendar sync, and candidate reminders to reduce coordination overhead.Technology and SaaS companies in scaling phase that rely on structured interview scorecards and data-driven hiring metrics to evaluate candidate quality.Recruitment teams at UK and European companies (Screenloop is London-based) that value localized support and a platform designed for non-US hiring workflows.Growing businesses that have outgrown spreadsheet-based hiring and need a unified ATS with Interview Intelligence bundled at no additional cost.

Where it struggles

Large enterprises with 1000+ employees, complex org hierarchies, and high-volume hiring requiring granular role-based permissions, audit logging, and compliance controls.Organizations that depend on a well-documented public API for custom integrations, bulk data exports, or automated workflows — Screenloop has no documented public API.Companies with highly specific or non-standard hiring workflows that require deep customization of pipeline stages, scorecard templates, and custom fields.Recruitment teams operating across multiple countries with strict data residency requirements, as interview recordings and AI transcripts live in Screenloop's proprietary layer.Organizations with regulated hiring processes (finance, healthcare, government) that require detailed audit trails, field-level access restrictions, and data retention policies.

Pricing tiers

Screenloop pricing overview

Screenloop pricing starts at $500/year as a flat rate for the Starter tier, which is significantly above the video interviewing software category average of $67/month. Growth and Enterprise tiers are quotation-based and scale with user count, feature modules, and integration depth.

Starter

Tier 1 of 3

$500/year flat rate

What's included

Core ATS with job posting, candidate tracking, and pipeline managementInterview scheduling automation with calendar integrationAI Notetaker for auto-populated interview scorecardsInterview Intelligence recording and transcriptionStandard reporting dashboardsEmail and in-app support

Need help selecting your HRMS?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Screenloop's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

Screenloop object support

Object-by-object support for Screenloop migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Candidates

Fully supported

Candidates are the central record in Screenloop's ATS. We migrate standard fields (name, email, phone, location, application date, source) and preserve stage history as a timestamped pipeline log. Custom candidate properties are migrated as key-value pairs and mapped to the destination's equivalent custom fields.

Jobs

Fully supported

Job postings and requisitions transfer with title, department, location, employment type, and description. Active vs. closed status is preserved. We flag any job-specific custom fields and ensure their values map correctly to the destination schema.

Pipeline Stages

Fully supported

Screenloop's configurable pipeline stages (e.g., Applied, Screening, Interview, Offer) are exported with their ordering and stage-specific rules. Stage-to-stage transition timestamps are preserved as activity history on the candidate record.

Scorecards

Mapping required

Scorecards in Screenloop include structured ratings, free-text feedback, and AI-generated notes from the Interview Intelligence layer. We map the rating criteria to the destination's evaluation form fields. AI-generated notes are exported as a text blob and can be attached to the interview record at the destination.

Interview Records

Mapping required

Interview records include scheduled date, interviewer assignment, interview type, duration, and outcome. Screenloop's Interview Intelligence layer generates a transcript and auto-populated scorecard for each recorded session. We export the transcript as structured text and flag that the audio recording itself lives in Screenloop's proprietary storage and may not be portable.

References

Mapping required

Screenloop's Modern Referencing feature sends automated surveys to nominated referees and collects soft-skill feedback. Reference records include referee name, relationship to candidate, submission date, and survey responses. We map responses to the destination's reference collection format and preserve any rating scores.

Background Checks

Mapping required

Background check records include check type, provider, status, and outcome summary. We export the structured result data and flag that raw supporting documents (e.g., PDF reports from third-party providers) may require separate retrieval from the screening vendor.

Training Modules

Mapping required

Screenloop's Interviewer Training library contains module completion records per user. We export which modules each user has completed and their assessment scores. The actual training content (video, slides) is platform-hosted and does not transfer as files.

Users

Fully supported

User accounts transfer with name, email, role (Admin, Hiring Manager, Recruiter, Interviewer), and team assignment. We preserve the owner-to-candidate association so interview attribution remains intact at the destination.

Custom Fields

Mapping required

Custom fields on Candidates, Jobs, and Interviews are exported with their data types (text, number, date, single-select, multi-select) and current values. We apply a field-level mapping step to align with the destination's custom field definitions, which may use different naming conventions or data types.

Gotchas

What to watch for in Screenloop migrations

Issues we've hit on past Screenloop migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

No documented public API complicates automated migration

High

Interview Intelligence recordings and AI notes require special handling

Medium

Scorecard templates are Screenloop-native and need remapping at destination

Medium

No documented bulk export endpoint for historical transactions

Low

Platform maturity and audit trail gaps for compliance migrations

How a Screenloop migration works

Four steps, Screenloop-specific

Connect

Not publicly documented into Screenloop. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate Screenloop-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Screenloop quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with Screenloop rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

Screenloop migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Screenloop migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Screenloop migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Screenloop migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate Screenloop.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Screenloop setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported