Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Conceptboard and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
Conceptboard
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
11 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Conceptboard and Asana.
Complexity
CModerate
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Conceptboard is a GDPR-compliant visual collaboration whiteboard designed for EU enterprises and government agencies; Asana is a structured project and task management platform used by operations and product teams globally. The two platforms share no common API standard, no automated export path, and fundamentally different data models: Conceptboard organises work as freeform canvases with sticky notes and embedded files, while Asana organises work as hierarchical Projects containing Tasks and Sections. We handle this mismatch by performing guided board export sessions with the customer, downloading each board as PDF and PNG, extracting text and attachment references from the export, then reconstructing the board structure as Projects and Tasks in Asana with sections representing board regions and sticky-note clusters represented as individual tasks. Board history, approval workflows, and audit logs are platform-specific governance artifacts with no destination equivalent; we document their presence and flag what is lost. We do not migrate facilitator tools, voting sessions, or structured meeting modes as these are process artefacts rather than data records. Asana automations, Forms, and custom fields require manual rebuild post-migration.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Conceptboard object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Conceptboard
Project
Asana
Workspace or Team
1:1Each Conceptboard Project becomes an Asana Team (if multi-team governance is needed) or a top-level Project within an existing Asana Team. We extract project name, creation date, and member list during scoping. Starter-tier customers are limited to 5 active projects; archived projects must be accessed separately in Conceptboard's UI. We query the full project list during discovery including archived projects to ensure no boards are missed before migration begins.
Conceptboard
Board
Asana
Project
1:1Each Conceptboard Board maps to an Asana Project. We export the board via PDF and PNG, extract the board title and any section labels visible in the export, and create an Asana Project with the same name. The PDF and PNG exports are stored as file attachments on the Asana Project description or as pinned attachments for reference. Sections within the board map to Asana Sections in the corresponding project.
Conceptboard
Section
Asana
Section
1:1Conceptboard Sections subdivide a board and can be exported individually. We create corresponding Asana Sections within the target Project, preserving the section outline hierarchy when visible in the export. Section-level per-export captures are stored as section-level PDF attachments in the corresponding Asana Section.
Conceptboard
Board Element (sticky note, shape, text, connector)
Asana
Task
1:manyCanvas elements do not have a structured export path. We parse the PDF export for text content and approximate layout positions, then create individual Asana Tasks representing each sticky note or text block cluster. The task name carries the extracted text. Sticky notes that were spatially grouped are sometimes represented as subtasks under a parent task representing the group. This is lossy by necessity: connectors, arrows, and spatial relationships are not structurally preserved.
Conceptboard
Task
Asana
Task
1:1Conceptboard Tasks (milestones, deadlines, and assignees within boards) map to Asana Tasks. We extract task name, due date, assignee (by email lookup), and any subtask structure from the board export and create matching Asana Tasks with the same due date and assignee. Custom fields on Conceptboard tasks require manual field mapping during scoping.
Conceptboard
Attachment
Asana
Attachment
1:1Conceptboard file attachments are downloaded individually from the Attachments dialog and re-attached to the equivalent Asana Project or Task. We preserve original filenames and upload them via the Asana API with the appropriate workspace and target gid. Asana API enforces a 100 MB per-file attachment limit; files exceeding this threshold are flagged for manual handling.
Conceptboard
User (licensed)
Asana
User
1:1Conceptboard licensed users are mapped to Asana Users by email address. We separate licensed users (per-seat billing) from guest accounts (free in Conceptboard). Guest users without Conceptboard accounts are invited to the Asana workspace as Guests or Members depending on their intended role. User mapping is validated before record migration to avoid orphaned assignments.
Conceptboard
Template
Asana
Project Template
1:1Conceptboard personal and team templates are exported as boards and migrated as Asana Projects. Template organisation (personal vs team-shared) is preserved in Asana as private vs team projects. If the customer uses Advanced tier template features, we note template groupings for the customer to rebuild as Asana project templates manually.
Conceptboard
Board History
Asana
None
1:1Board history (Advanced+ feature) tracks version snapshots of board changes over time. This is an audit artifact with no structurally equivalent schema in Asana's activity log. We do not migrate version history. We document whether boards had active history so the customer understands what governance capability is not preserved.
Conceptboard
Approval Workflow
Asana
None
1:1Approval workflows (Corporate and Government tier) represent process state rather than content data. There is no Asana equivalent for board-level approval workflows. We flag whether any boards had active approval states at migration time and document the review cycle for the customer's admin to re-implement manually in Asana if required.
Conceptboard
Audit Log
Asana
None
1:1Audit logs are a Corporate and Government tier feature recording administrative actions. These are not user content and are not migratable. We note their presence as a data governance indicator and recommend the customer exports audit logs from Conceptboard before decommissioning.
Conceptboard
Comment
Asana
Task Comment
1:1Conceptboard comments on board elements are captured in the board-level PDF export but are not available as structured data. We note the comment count per board as a quality indicator and, where comments were exported as visible text in the PDF, add them as Asana Task comments on the corresponding reconstructed task. This is lossy: author attribution and thread context are not preserved.
| Conceptboard | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Workspace or Team1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Board | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Section | Section1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Board Element (sticky note, shape, text, connector) | Task1:many | Fully supported | |
| Task | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User (licensed) | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Template | Project Template1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Board History | None1:1 | Not supported | |
| Approval Workflow | None1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Audit Log | None1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comment | Task Comment1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Conceptboard gotchas
No public API means migration relies entirely on PDF/PNG export
One-way import to Miro is PDF-only and non-editable
Starter plan limits active projects to 5, blocking full workspace migration
Board history and approval workflows are tier-gated and not migratable
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and export scoping
We audit the Conceptboard account for project count (active and archived), board count, section count, attachment volume, and user population. Starter-tier accounts are checked for the 5-active-project limit. We identify which boards used Advanced+ features (board history, team templates, facilitator tools) and flag these during discovery. We confirm the destination Asana account type (workspace or organisation) and verify it is not a Personal Projects space. The discovery output is a written migration scope including board inventory, export checklist, and attachment count.
Guided export sessions
Conceptboard requires manual UI interaction to trigger PDF and PNG exports. We schedule guided export sessions with the customer to export boards in batches, covering all active and archived projects. Each board export produces a PDF (full board capture) and per-section PNG exports where selected. Attachment files are downloaded from the Attachments dialog simultaneously. We provide an export checklist so that no boards are missed and archived projects are accessed before session completion.
Board parsing and Asana workspace structuring
We parse the exported PDFs and PNGs to extract text content, approximate spatial groupings, and section labels. Sticky notes and text blocks are mapped to Asana Tasks within the corresponding Project. Groups of related sticky notes are represented as subtasks under a parent task. Section labels become Asana Section headers. Attachment files are associated with the correct Project or Task via the Asana API upload endpoint, with files over 100 MB flagged for manual post-migration handling.
Asana workspace and project setup
Before data migration, we configure the Asana workspace: Teams (mapped from Conceptboard Projects), Projects (mapped from Conceptboard Boards), Sections (mapped from Conceptboard Sections), and custom fields (where Conceptboard task custom fields require mapping). User accounts are provisioned or invited so that OwnerId references are satisfied at migration time. We validate the workspace structure in an Asana sandbox or test project before moving to production migration.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in order: Asana workspace configuration first, then Projects from Conceptboard Boards, then Tasks parsed from board exports, then Section headers, then Attachments. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. Any board exports that were not completed during guided sessions are flagged and scheduled for follow-up export before the migration window closes. We do not migrate facilitator tool state, approval workflow state, or board history as these are platform-specific artefacts with no Asana equivalent.
Cutover, validation, and rebuild handoff
We freeze Conceptboard write access during cutover and run a final delta check for any boards modified after the guided export sessions. We deliver a written inventory of Asana automations, Forms, and custom fields requiring rebuild, along with documentation of any Conceptboard features (facilitator tools, approval workflows, board history) that were not migratable. We support a one-week post-migration window to resolve reconciliation issues raised by the customer's team. We do not rebuild Asana automations or Forms as part of the standard migration scope; that is a separate engagement or internal admin task.
Platform deep dives
Conceptboard
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Moderate Project Management migration. 4 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Moderate migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Conceptboard and Asana.
Object compatibility
4 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Conceptboard: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Conceptboard doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Conceptboard to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Conceptboard to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Conceptboard
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.