Project Management

Migrate your Conceptboard data

GDPR-compliant visual collaboration whiteboard built for EU enterprises, government agencies, and regulated industries that need governance, audit trails, and data sovereignty above all else.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
Conceptboard logo

In its favor

Why people choose Conceptboard

The signal that keeps Conceptboard on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

EU data residency and GDPR compliance drive adoption among German public sector, ministries, and enterprises that cannot use US-based whiteboards like Miro or Mural.

Board history, audit logs, and approval workflows satisfy internal governance and procurement requirements that other whiteboards treat as optional features.

Built-in facilitator tools including freeze, voting, and structured meeting modes reduce the need for separate meeting orchestration software.

Custom branding on Advanced+ plans lets consulting firms and agencies deliver client-facing boards that match their corporate identity.

German-language support and IONOS or StackIT on-premises hosting options attract organisations with strict IT procurement policies.

Interface feels dated and unintuitive compared to Miro or Mural; several G2 reviewers specifically cite slow UX and steep learning curve as friction points.

Limited third-party integrations and some integration features that failed during PCMag testing; customers needing ecosystem connectivity look elsewhere.

No public API means automation-heavy teams cannot embed Conceptboard into CI/CD or documentation pipelines, pushing them toward API-first alternatives.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave Conceptboard

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Conceptboard. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where Conceptboard fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

German data centers with GDPR compliance, ISO-certified processes, and EU data sovereignty for regulated industry customers.Built-in facilitator tools including freeze frame, voting, and structured agenda modes reduce external meeting overhead.Board history and approval workflows provide governance and traceability on higher tiers.Custom branding on Advanced+ plans enables white-label client delivery.Guest accounts are free and do not consume paid seats, making external workshops cost-effective.

Weaknesses

No public REST API — all data export relies on manual PDF and PNG output, limiting automation options.Interface and UX perceived as dated compared to Miro, Mural, and FigJam by multiple G2 reviewers.Limited integrations with third-party tools; PCMag testing noted some integrations failed to work.Starter plan caps active boards at 3, restricting functionality for small teams evaluating the tool seriously.

Where it works

German and EU public sector organizations, ministries, and government agencies that require GDPR compliance, EU data residency, and audit trails for procurement compliance.Large enterprises in regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure where data sovereignty and governance workflows are non-negotiable.Consulting firms and agencies that deliver white-label client workshops and need custom branding on Advanced+ plans alongside free guest accounts for external participants.Organizations conducting structured facilitation sessions such as strategy workshops, retrospectives, and training programs where built-in freeze, voting, and agenda tools replace separate meeting software.Teams with strict IT procurement policies that mandate on-premises or German-hosted cloud deployment through IONOS or StackIT options.

Where it struggles

Teams requiring native integrations with productivity tools like Slack, Jira, Confluence, or Teams—PCMag testing found some integrations failed, and the ecosystem is limited.Organizations with automation-centric workflows needing API access to embed Conceptboard into CI/CD pipelines, documentation systems, or developer toolchains.Design, product, and creative teams expecting a modern, intuitive interface comparable to Miro, Mural, or FigJam—G2 reviewers consistently describe Conceptboard as dated and slow.Small teams on the Starter plan who need serious evaluation; the 3 active board and 5 project cap restricts meaningful use before committing to a paid tier.Distributed teams relying on real-time visual collaboration at scale without structured facilitator control, since the platform's performance is optimized for moderated sessions rather than open-ended co-creation.

Pricing tiers

Conceptboard pricing overview

Conceptboard is a per-seat, user-based SaaS with four published tiers ranging from free to €14/user/month. Starter targets individuals and small teams with hard limits on active projects; Advanced adds governance features like board history and approval workflows; Corporate & Government is designed for large regulated organisations requiring SSO, audit logs, and EVB-IT contracts. Annual billing is required for teams of 10+ users on Advanced and 100+ users on Corporate tiers.

Free

Tier 1 of 5

€0

What's included

3 active boards maximum150+ pre-built template libraryPrivate board sharingLive moderation feature250 MB file storage

Need help selecting your Project Management?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Conceptboard's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

Conceptboard object support

Object-by-object support for Conceptboard migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Boards

Fully supported

Boards are the primary workspace in Conceptboard. We extract board content via PDF and PNG export, preserving the visual layout, text elements, and embedded media references. Starter plans limit to 5 active boards; we account for this during scoping to avoid over-importing archived boards.

Projects

Mapping required

Projects are containers that group Boards in Starter (up to 5 active) and unlimited in Advanced+. Project-level metadata such as project name, creation date, and status require mapping to the destination's equivalent project or folder structure.

Sections

Mapping required

Sections subdivide a Board and can be exported individually as PDF or image. We handle section-level export for targeted migration and preserve the section outline hierarchy when the destination supports nested structures.

Attachments

Fully supported

Files uploaded to a Board are accessible via the Attachments dialog. We download each file individually and re-attach them at the equivalent location in the destination platform, preserving filenames and upload timestamps.

Templates

Fully supported

Both personal and team-shared templates exist. Starter has a pre-built template library; Advanced+ adds team templates. We migrate template boards as standard boards in the destination, preserving the template structure.

Users

Mapping required

Licensed users are billed per-seat. Guest users (unregistered collaborators) are free and do not have accounts. We separate these two populations during user mapping so destination platform seat counts are accurate.

Board History

Not in this platform

Board history tracks version snapshots on Advanced+ plans. This is an audit artifact, not content data. We do not migrate version history as most destination platforms do not support equivalent schema. We note the last saved state as the migration baseline.

Approval Workflows

Not in this platform

Approval workflows are a Corporate and Government tier feature. They represent process state rather than content. We flag whether boards had active approvals at migration time but do not migrate workflow state as destinations lack compatible approval engine.

Audit Logs

Not in this platform

Audit logs are a Corporate and Government tier feature recording administrative actions. These are not user content and are not migrated. We note their presence as a data governance indicator.

Tasks and Milestones

Mapping required

Conceptboard supports tasks, milestones, and dependencies within boards for planning use cases. These map to task objects in destination PM tools, but custom fields or dependency graphs may require manual reconfiguration after migration.

Comments

Mapping required

Comments on board elements can be exported via PDF but are not available as structured data. We capture comment content in the board-level PDF export and note the comment count as a quality indicator for destination board reconstruction.

Gotchas

What to watch for in Conceptboard migrations

Issues we've hit on past Conceptboard migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

No public API means migration relies entirely on PDF/PNG export

Medium

One-way import to Miro is PDF-only and non-editable

Medium

Starter plan limits active projects to 5, blocking full workspace migration

Low

Board history and approval workflows are tier-gated and not migratable

How a Conceptboard migration works

Four steps, Conceptboard-specific

Connect

Not publicly documented into Conceptboard. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate Conceptboard-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Conceptboard quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with Conceptboard rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

Conceptboard migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Conceptboard migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Conceptboard migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Conceptboard migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate Conceptboard.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Conceptboard setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported