Project Management migration

Migrate from GanttPRO to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between GanttPRO and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

GanttPRO logo

GanttPRO

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

73%

11 of 15

objects map 1:1 between GanttPRO and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

GanttPRO and Asana take different philosophical approaches to project scheduling. GanttPRO is dependency-first: every task has an explicit relationship to its predecessors and successors, visualized as orange arrows on a Gantt chart, and the platform auto-recalculates downstream dates when an upstream date changes. Asana uses Timeline view, which also supports dependency arrows but handles cascading date updates differently and has documented edge cases with complex multi-path dependency chains. We resolve these differences by extracting the full dependency graph from GanttPRO's API, mapping all four dependency types (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Finish) into Asana's dependency format, and validating the resulting Timeline against the original before cutover. GanttPRO's virtual resources (role-based placeholders with cost rates) require manual conversion to Asana Members during scoping, since virtual resources do not correspond to user accounts in Asana's permission model. We do not migrate Templates, Filters, or GanttPRO-specific Working Day Calendars as executable objects; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

GanttPRO logo

GanttPRO

What's pushing teams away

  • G2 reviews cite expensive pricing as a top frustration, with multiple mentions that the cost poses challenges for students and small businesses operating on limited budgets.
  • Users report a steep learning curve that makes navigation difficult for beginners, particularly when moving from simpler tools like spreadsheet-based planning.
  • Limited customization options restrict flexibility, with users noting that advanced features feel constrained compared to competing project management tools.
  • Reviews mention missing project duplication functionality and insufficient reporting modules as gaps that drive users to look for alternatives.
  • The platform lacks a QuickBooks integration, which frustrates teams whose invoicing depends on direct time-tracking connections.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How GanttPRO objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a GanttPRO object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

GanttPRO

Portfolio

maps to

Asana

Portfolio (Business tier)

1:1
Fully supported

GanttPRO Portfolios group multiple projects for high-level monitoring. Asana Portfolios (Business tier and above) provide a similar cross-project view with progress and workload tracking. We migrate portfolio membership and project-level metadata (project name, status, owner) into Asana Portfolio items. If the customer is on Asana Free or Premium (no native Portfolio), we map portfolio groupings to a top-level Project-within-Project structure or a tag-based grouping strategy, agreed during scoping.

GanttPRO

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

GanttPRO Projects map directly to Asana Projects. We preserve the project name, description, start date, and auto-scheduling toggle. GanttPRO's duration step (hours/days/weeks/months) is set per project; Asana Timeline infers duration from start and due dates. Project color coding migrates as a custom field in Asana if the customer uses color for status tracking.

GanttPRO

Summary Task

maps to

Asana

Section or Parent Task

lossy
Fully supported

GanttPRO Summary Tasks are parent rows that group related subtasks and display roll-up progress. We map Summary Tasks to Asana Sections (if the summary task has no dates of its own) or to a parent Task (if the summary task has independent start/end dates and progress). The choice is made per Summary Task based on whether it carries its own date values in GanttPRO. Subtasks under each Summary Task are imported as Asana Subtasks of the corresponding parent.

GanttPRO

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Standard GanttPRO Tasks map to Asana Tasks with all standard fields preserved: title, description, start date, due date, status, priority, assignee, and progress percentage. We set Asana's Start Date and Due Date fields from GanttPRO start_date and end_date properties. Task color coding migrates to a custom field if used for classification rather than status.

GanttPRO

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

GanttPRO Subtasks nested under Summary Tasks map to Asana Subtasks. The parent-child relationship is preserved by setting the Asana parent Task reference at import time. Subtasks carry their own dates and assignments in GanttPRO; these migrate as Asana Subtask start and due dates and assignee assignment.

GanttPRO

Dependency

maps to

Asana

Dependency

1:1
Fully supported

All four GanttPRO dependency types (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Finish) are extracted from the GanttPRO API. Asana's native Timeline supports Finish-to-Start dependencies directly. Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, and Start-to-Finish dependencies are imported using Asana's dependency attachment API (dependency_type field) and validated after import. We flag any circular dependency chains detected in the GanttPRO data before import to prevent broken Timeline arrows in Asana.

GanttPRO

Project Member (real user)

maps to

Asana

Member

1:1
Fully supported

GanttPRO project members who correspond to real user accounts map to Asana project Members. We match by email address across the two systems. Member-level permissions (Admin, Member, Viewer) are approximated from GanttPRO's role assignments, with the customer's admin confirming the final permission structure in Asana since the role models differ.

GanttPRO

Virtual Resource

maps to

Asana

Member (manual conversion required)

lossy
Fully supported

GanttPRO virtual resources are role-based placeholders with assigned cost rates and no corresponding user account. They do not migrate automatically to Asana because Asana has no virtual resource concept. We extract virtual resource assignments as a task-level note on each affected task and provide a written conversion map during scoping: each virtual resource must be assigned to a real Asana user or team before the migration runs. If the virtual resource carried a cost rate used in GanttPRO budget tracking, we map it to a custom numeric field on the task or project for the customer's budget tracking to continue in Asana.

GanttPRO

Custom Field (Advanced tier)

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (Premium tier)

lossy
Fully supported

GanttPRO custom fields (text, number, dropdown, date, checkbox, user) on the Advanced tier and above are extracted per project. We pre-create matching custom fields in the Asana workspace before any task data is imported, using the same field label and type where possible. GanttPRO dropdown options map to Asana enum options; GanttPRO user-picker fields map to Asana members custom fields. If a GanttPRO field type has no direct Asana equivalent, we choose the closest Asana type and document the mapping in the field inventory.

GanttPRO

Time Log

maps to

Asana

Time Tracking (Asana Business/Enterprise)

1:1
Fully supported

GanttPRO time logs (date, user, hours, optional comment per task) map to Asana time entries on Business and Enterprise plans. We export time logs via GanttPRO's XLSX export (the only available format) during scoping, then convert to Asana time tracking entries by matching the task name and date range. Time log export in GanttPRO defaults to the current month; we explicitly request the full project date range during scoping to avoid silent data loss.

GanttPRO

Workload Data

maps to

Asana

Workload View (Asana Business)

1:1
Fully supported

GanttPRO workload snapshots display resource allocation in hours, percentages, or task-count mode. We extract workload data per resource and project. Asana's Workload view (Business tier) requires a user-level assignment; we map GanttPRO resource workload to Asana project Member workload by matching real user assignments. Virtual resource workload is included in the virtual resource conversion map.

GanttPRO

Budget Data

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields (numeric)

1:1
Mapping required

GanttPRO budget calculations derive from resource cost rates and estimated hours. We extract both the calculated budget values and the underlying resource-rate assumptions. Since Asana has no native budget object, we create numeric custom fields (Budget Estimate, Actual Cost, Estimated Hours) at the project level and populate them from the GanttPRO export. The customer's finance team uses these fields in Asana reporting or exports them to a spreadsheet tool for detailed budget tracking.

GanttPRO

Project Calendar (working days, holidays)

maps to

Asana

Working Days Configuration

1:1
Fully supported

GanttPRO project calendars define working days, holidays, and exceptions per project. We export these as working-day configurations and map them to Asana's working-day settings at the workspace level. Asana does not support per-project working-day calendars; a single workspace-level working-day configuration applies to all projects. We flag this limitation during scoping and recommend the customer choose the most commonly used calendar or configure a project-specific note field.

GanttPRO

Template (Advanced tier)

maps to

Asana

Template (manual rebuild)

lossy
Fully supported

GanttPRO custom project templates (task hierarchy, dependencies, custom field configurations) are documented as a structural inventory during migration scoping. Asana does not have a native template import feature beyond duplicate-project. We deliver a written template map describing the original GanttPRO template structure so the customer's admin can recreate it in Asana by duplicating a migrated project or using Asana's template library.

GanttPRO

Filter (Advanced tier)

maps to

Asana

Saved View (Premium tier)

1:1
Fully supported

GanttPRO saved filters (by task name, type, assignee, status, priority, date range, color, custom fields) are extracted per project. Asana's saved views serve a similar function. We document each GanttPRO filter configuration and its Asana equivalent (filter by field, sort order, grouping) in the migration handoff. Asana's saved views are project-scoped and must be recreated manually in each destination project.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

GanttPRO logo

GanttPRO gotchas

High

API is in Public Beta with no guaranteed SLA

High

5 req/sec rate limit throttles bulk migration speed

Medium

API access gated to Business and Enterprise tiers

Medium

Virtual resources require manual assignee mapping

Low

Time log export limited to XLSX format only

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • GanttPRO API is in Public Beta with no SLA and 5 req/sec rate limit

    The GanttPRO REST API remains in Public Beta with no documented SLA, no production readiness guarantee, and support via general email only. Additionally, the API enforces a 5 requests per second limit on insert, update, and delete operations. For a project with 500 tasks, this alone means over 100 seconds of API wait time before network latency. We handle this by using GanttPRO's XLSX/CSV export as the primary data extraction path during scoping and validation, using API calls only for targeted record verification. We implement retry logic with exponential backoff on all API operations and flag the migration as requiring a manual fallback path if API stability degrades during the migration window.

  • Asana native Timeline does not support all four dependency types natively

    GanttPRO supports all four dependency types (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Finish). Asana's native Timeline view only displays Finish-to-Start dependencies as arrows. Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, and Start-to-Finish dependencies are stored via Asana's dependency attachment API but do not render visually in Timeline without a third-party add-on like Instagantt. We import all dependency types and validate the graph in a sandbox. For visual dependency display, we recommend using Instagantt ($5/user/month) or documenting that Start-to-Start and Finish-to-Finish dependencies will not display as arrows in the native Asana Timeline view.

  • Asana has known dependency re-calculation bugs in complex Timeline views

    Asana's community forums document a confirmed bug where dependent tasks do not move to the correct date when a predecessor date changes, particularly with complex multi-path dependency chains and tasks that are blocked by multiple predecessors. The issue produces red dependency arrows and random date errors that are difficult to reproduce consistently. We validate the dependency graph after import and before cutover, and we recommend that teams using complex multi-path dependencies in GanttPRO test the dependency re-calculation behavior in Asana during the sandbox phase. If the bug affects critical project paths, we document a manual revalidation procedure.

  • Virtual resources require manual assignee conversion before migration

    GanttPRO distinguishes between project members (real users) and virtual resources (role-based placeholders with cost rates used in budget calculations). Virtual resources do not correspond to user accounts in Asana. We extract virtual resource assignments as task-level notes and provide a conversion map during scoping, but the customer must either assign each virtual resource to a real Asana user or accept that those tasks will have no assignee in the destination. If the virtual resource carried a cost rate used in GanttPRO budget tracking, the customer should confirm whether that rate should be preserved as a custom field in Asana or recalculated against the new assignee's cost.

  • GanttPRO API access requires Business or Enterprise tier

    The GanttPRO REST API is only available on Business and Enterprise plans. Teams currently on GanttPRO Core or Advanced cannot generate API keys and therefore cannot use fully automated API-based migrations. We identify the customer's current GanttPRO plan during scoping. If the customer is on Core or Advanced, we recommend upgrading to Business before migration or use the XLSX/CSV export path as the primary data extraction method. Upgrading to Business also unlocks time tracking and budget tracking, which are needed for those object migrations.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful GanttPRO to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and plan assessment

    We audit the source GanttPRO account across tier (Core/Advanced/Business/Enterprise), project count, task volume, portfolio membership, dependency graph complexity, and virtual resource usage. We identify custom field definitions per project, active templates, saved filters, and the full time log date range. We also confirm the GanttPRO plan tier and whether API access is available. The discovery output is a written migration scope document listing all objects to migrate, the dependency type inventory, and any virtual resource conversion tasks that require manual action before migration begins.

  2. Asana workspace and project structure setup

    We set up the Asana destination workspace including project creation for each GanttPRO project, pre-creation of all Custom Fields (matching GanttPRO field types and dropdown options), and configuration of Asana's working-day calendar. If the customer uses Asana Business or Enterprise, we set up Portfolios corresponding to GanttPRO portfolio groupings. We do not create automation rules (Rules, Forms, or Templates) during this step; these are documented separately for the customer's admin to rebuild.

  3. Data extraction from GanttPRO

    We extract data from GanttPRO using XLSX/CSV export as the primary path (to avoid beta API reliability risk and the 5 req/sec rate limit) and supplement with targeted API calls for dependency graph verification. We explicitly request the full time log date range (not the default current month) during extraction. We extract virtual resource assignments as a separate structured output for the conversion map. We run a preliminary validation pass to confirm record counts match between the export and the GanttPRO UI.

  4. Sandbox validation and dependency graph testing

    We run a full migration into the customer's Asana sandbox using the extracted data. We validate the dependency graph by checking that all four dependency types are present in Asana's data model, that the Timeline renders without red arrows on standard dependency paths, and that complex multi-path dependency chains produce expected date cascades. We also validate custom field values, time log entries, and virtual resource conversion. The customer's project manager spot-checks 20-30 random tasks and signs off the sandbox migration before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record order: Asana Projects first, then Sections and Summary Task parents, then Tasks, then Subtasks, then dependencies (using Asana's dependency API), then time logs, then custom field values, then workload snapshots. Dependencies are imported last because they reference tasks that must exist first. We use Asana's bulk API endpoints with rate-limit handling and batch chunking. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. Any virtual resource assignments that the customer has not resolved are preserved as task notes rather than blocking the migration.

  6. Cutover, validation, and template/filter handoff

    We freeze GanttPRO writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We validate the dependency graph in production and confirm the Timeline renders correctly for key project paths. We deliver a written inventory of GanttPRO templates, saved filters, and working-day calendars for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana. We do not rebuild these as executable objects. We support a one-week post-cutover window for reconciliation issues. Workflow automation rebuild, Rules configuration, and any third-party Gantt chart add-on setup (Instagantt, Bridge24) are outside standard migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

GanttPRO logo

GanttPRO

Source

Strengths

  • Visual Gantt chart interface with clear timeline, dependency arrows, and critical path highlighting
  • Portfolio-level view for monitoring multiple projects simultaneously across an organization
  • Resource workload visualization with allocation tracking per resource or project
  • Template library covering construction, IT, marketing, and professional services industries
  • Auto-scheduling that recalculates dependent task dates when upstream changes occur

Weaknesses

  • API remains in Public Beta with no formal SLA, creating reliability risk for automated migrations
  • Strict 5 req/sec rate limit on insert/update/delete calls significantly extends bulk migration timelines
  • Business tier or higher required for API access, adding cost for teams currently on lower plans
  • Monthly subscriptions only available for teams of 5+ users, limiting adoption for smaller groups
  • Export permissions restricted to Account Owner, Admins, and Enterprise users with custom roles
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across GanttPRO and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    GanttPRO: 5 req/sec for insert, update, and delete operations.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    GanttPRO doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your GanttPRO to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about GanttPRO to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during GanttPRO to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your GanttPRO to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts with fewer than 3,000 tasks, clean assignee mapping, and no virtual resource conversions. Migrations with multi-portfolio structures, all four GanttPRO dependency types, Advanced-tier custom fields, and virtual resource conversions requiring manual mapping move to six to ten weeks because of dependency graph validation, Asana custom field schema creation, and virtual resource reconciliation scope.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from GanttPRO.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day