Project Management migration

Migrate from Twproject to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Twproject and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

Twproject logo

Twproject

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Twproject and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Twproject to Microsoft Project is primarily a Gantt-structure and resource-data migration. Twproject exports project structure to XML format that Microsoft Project can read, but Twproject's own documentation confirms that resource data is stripped to names-only during that export, leaving behind cost rates, allocation percentages, and department metadata. We pull resource data directly from the Twproject API and reconstruct Resource Sheet entries in Microsoft Project with the missing fields restored. Worklogs and costs also fall outside the standard XML export path and require separate API fetches. Task dependencies and constraints migrate through the XML path but require validation post-import because Twproject and Microsoft Project model constraints differently. We do not migrate ToDos, attachments, or workflow automation — these require rebuild or archival in the destination. The migration lands in two to four weeks for portfolios under 50 projects with straightforward hierarchies, and extends to six to ten weeks when cost-tracking data, custom fields, and large resource pools require transformation work.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Twproject logo

Twproject

What's pushing teams away

  • API documentation is sparse — rate limits, versioning policy, and bulk operation details are not publicly published, making integration planning difficult.
  • The built-in project JSON export omits worklogs, costs, ToDos, and attached documents — teams expecting a complete data package are surprised to find these absent.
  • User management is tied to licensing in a non-obvious way; disabled users lose access immediately which can disrupt active assignments if not handled proactively.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How Twproject objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a Twproject object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Twproject

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project (MPP file or Project Online project)

1:1
Fully supported

Twproject Projects map to Microsoft Project .mpp files (desktop) or Project Online project records (cloud). The project-level fields (name, description, start date, finish date, status) transfer via the XML export path. We validate that the destination Project Plan uses the correct Fiscal Year start and Calendar settings before import so that date calculations propagate correctly from Twproject's working-day model to Microsoft Project's base calendar.

Twproject

Task (with WBS hierarchy)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task (with outline structure)

1:1
Fully supported

Twproject Tasks with parent-child hierarchies (WBS) map to Microsoft Project Tasks with outline indent levels. The XML export preserves the hierarchical structure. Task fields migrating include Name, Duration, Start Date, Finish Date, % Complete, Priority, and Notes. Milestones in Twproject (zero-duration tasks) map to Microsoft Project Milestone tasks (Duration = 0). Subtask rollup behavior differs: Twproject calculates parent completion from children; Microsoft Project requires explicit setting of 'Rollup' on the Summary Task.

Twproject

Resource (Users)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource Sheet

1:1
Fully supported

This is the highest-risk mapping in the pair. Twproject's MS Project XML export deliberately omits cost rates, max units, resource type (Material vs Work), and department metadata — the export includes only name and surname. We pull the full resource record from the Twproject API and reconstruct Microsoft Project Resource Sheet entries with the missing fields restored: Max Units, Std Rate, Cost/Use, Accrue At, Resource Type, and Material Label. This requires a separate API extraction phase that the standard XML export path does not perform.

Twproject

Task Assignment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Assignment

1:1
Fully supported

Twproject task assignments (resource-to-task allocations with percentage or hours) map to Microsoft Project Assignments. The assignment fields migrating include Assigned Resources, Units (%), and Work. Duration-driven scheduling in Microsoft Project recalculates Work unless the project is set to Fixed Work; we flag this scheduling-mode difference during scoping so the customer's PM team can decide whether to preserve Twproject's estimated effort or accept Microsoft Project's automatic calculation.

Twproject

Worklogs (Time entries)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Assignment Timephased Data or CSV timesheet

1:1
Mapping required

Twproject Worklogs (hours logged per task per resource per date) are not included in the XML export. We extract worklogs via the Twproject API keyed by task ID and map them to Microsoft Project Assignment timephased data if the destination is Project Online (supports Bulk Update via REST API), or export as a companion CSV timesheet file for the desktop MPP if the destination is Project desktop. We flag that Microsoft Project does not have a native time-tracking UI for worklogs — they require either manual entry or a Power Automate-based timesheet solution.

Twproject

Costs and Budgets

maps to

Microsoft Project

Cost Resources and Budget fields

1:1
Mapping required

Twproject's Costs & Revenues section (budget-vs-actual tracking) is excluded from the XML project export. We pull cost records via the Twproject API and map them to Microsoft Project Cost Resources (assigned to tasks as fixed costs or per-unit costs) or to project-level Budget fields. The mapping depends on how Twproject categorized costs (labor vs material vs fixed expense). We document the cost type breakdown during discovery so the customer can confirm which Microsoft Project cost model applies.

Twproject

Custom Fields (Task level)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Fields

lossy
Mapping required

Twproject custom fields on tasks migrate as Microsoft Project custom fields. The import dialog during .mpp import allows up to 10 custom fields to be mapped per project. We enumerate all Twproject custom field definitions (name, data type) during discovery and map each to the nearest Microsoft Project custom field type: Text, Flag, Number, Cost, Date, or Outline Code. Fields exceeding the 10-field import limit require the customer to select the priority set and document the remainder for post-migration manual entry.

Twproject

Custom Fields (Project level)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project Summary Task custom fields

lossy
Fully supported

Twproject project-level custom fields map to Microsoft Project Summary Task custom fields. These display in the Project Information dialog and can be included in reports. We apply the same type-mapping logic (Text, Flag, Number, Cost, Date) and flag any fields that would require custom fields outside the supported import dialog.

Twproject

Dependency (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, etc.)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Dependency

1:1
Fully supported

Twproject task dependencies transfer through the XML export as Microsoft Project Predecessor/Successor links. We preserve dependency type (FS, SS, FF, SF) and Lead/Lag time. Post-import validation checks for dependency chains that produce negative slack (indicating an impossible schedule) and for circular dependencies (which Microsoft Project flags as an error). Constraint behavior differs: Twproject and Microsoft Project both support Must Start On, Must Finish On, As Late As Possible, but the scheduling engine response to constraints can produce different results when the project uses resource leveling.

Twproject

Calendar / Working Time

maps to

Microsoft Project

Base Calendar

1:1
Fully supported

Twproject working-time configurations (default working days, holidays, exception days) map to Microsoft Project Base Calendars. We export calendar definitions from Twproject and apply them as the project's base calendar in Microsoft Project. Resource-specific calendars (if a resource has different working hours than the project default) map to Microsoft Project Resource Calendars with the same exception-day logic. We flag any resource calendars with non-standard shifts that may not survive the import intact.

Twproject

Tags and Labels

maps to

Microsoft Project

Text Custom Field (or Outline Code)

lossy
Mapping required

Twproject tags on tasks migrate to a Microsoft Project Text custom field. If tags represent categories that would benefit from hierarchical grouping (e.g., Work Package type, Phase), we map them to an Outline Code custom field. We normalize tag values that contain characters not supported in Microsoft Project field names (special characters, spaces over 50 characters) during the transformation phase.

Twproject

ToDos

maps to

Microsoft Project

Not migrated

1:1
Not supported

Twproject ToDos are a lightweight checklist feature within tasks and are explicitly excluded from the XML project export. We flag ToDos during scoping and recommend the customer treat them as non-migratable: active ToDos become a manual checklist entry in the task Notes field, and completed ToDos are archived as part of the migration inventory document delivered alongside the imported .mpp file.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Twproject logo

Twproject gotchas

High

Project JSON export excludes worklogs, costs, and attachments

Medium

API authentication tied to individual user credentials

Medium

On-premise deployments use customer-specific server URLs

Low

License count is based on enabled users, not active assignments

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Resource data is stripped to names-only during XML export

    Twproject's own MS Project export documentation states that resource data is reduced to name and surname when exporting to XML format, with cost rates, max units, resource type, and department metadata omitted. Microsoft Project's Resource Sheet is nearly empty after import. We address this by pulling full resource records from the Twproject API in a separate extraction phase and reconstructing the Resource Sheet with Max Units, Std Rate, Cost/Use, and Resource Type restored. If this step is skipped, resource cost tracking and capacity planning in Microsoft Project must be rebuilt manually for every resource.

  • Worklogs and costs are not included in the XML export

    Twproject's project JSON export and MS Project XML export both explicitly omit worklogs, costs, and ToDos. Organizations expecting their full time-tracking and budget history to appear in Microsoft Project after migration will find these absent. We pull worklogs and cost records via separate API calls keyed to task and project IDs, then map them to Assignment timephased data (Project Online) or a companion CSV timesheet file (desktop). If cost-tracking is a core reporting requirement in the destination, this additional extraction and transformation work must be scoped before migration begins.

  • Task constraint behavior differs between platforms

    Twproject and Microsoft Project both support task constraints (Must Start On, As Late As Possible, etc.), but their scheduling engines resolve constraint conflicts differently. Tasks with multiple constraints or dependencies combined with resource leveling can produce different start/finish dates in each platform. We validate constraint fidelity post-import by comparing the Twproject task start/finish dates against the imported Microsoft Project values and flag discrepancies exceeding one working day for the customer's PM lead to review.

  • Custom field import limited to 10 fields per project in .mpp import

    Microsoft Project's import dialog for .mpp files allows mapping up to 10 custom fields per project. Twproject projects with more than 10 custom fields (across task-level and project-level definitions) exceed this limit. We enumerate all custom field definitions during discovery, rank them by usage frequency, and map the top 10. The remainder are documented in the migration inventory for manual post-migration entry or for the customer to implement a custom field management add-in.

  • Large projects can exceed Microsoft Project task-per-project limits

    Microsoft Project has a published boundary of approximately 1,500 tasks per project file. Twproject's unlimited-project structure means some customers have individual projects with thousands of tasks that originated as Twproject portfolios or programs. We assess task count per project during discovery. Projects exceeding 1,200 tasks are flagged for the customer to either split into sub-projects (linked via the Master Project feature in Microsoft Project) or accept that the import will require manual adjustment of the over-limit project.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Twproject to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Discovery and export-path validation

    We audit the Twproject tenant across project count, task hierarchy depth per project, resource pool size, active custom field definitions, cost records, and worklog volume. We validate API access using a dedicated admin account and confirm that the MS Project XML export path is functional for the customer's deployment type (cloud or on-premise). If on-premise, we collect the customer-hosted server URL. We also confirm whether the destination is Microsoft Project desktop (.mpp) or Project Online, which determines the import API path we use for final delivery.

  2. Custom field enumeration and type mapping

    We enumerate every Twproject custom field definition at the task and project level, recording field name, data type, and usage count across the portfolio. We map each to the nearest Microsoft Project custom field type and identify any fields exceeding the 10-field import limit. For Project Online destinations, we use the Project Online REST API to create custom field definitions before import. For desktop destinations, we document the field-priority ranking for dialog-based mapping.

  3. Resource data extraction and Resource Sheet reconstruction

    We extract full resource records from the Twproject API (cost rates, allocation percentages, resource type, department, email) in parallel with the standard project XML export. We then reconstruct the Microsoft Project Resource Sheet with the missing fields restored. This is the step most often skipped by manual migrations, leading to empty resource sheets in the destination. We validate resource count in Twproject against resource count in the destination Resource Sheet as a required reconciliation checkpoint.

  4. XML export and import with dependency validation

    We run the Twproject XML export for each project and import into Microsoft Project (desktop via .mpp or Project Online via REST API). Post-import, we run a dependency validation pass: checking for circular dependencies, negative slack, and constraint conflicts. Any task with a constraint in Twproject that produces a different start/finish date in Microsoft Project (exceeding one working day variance) is flagged in a discrepancy report for the customer's PM lead. We also validate that the outline hierarchy (WBS levels) imported correctly and that milestones converted to zero-duration tasks.

  5. Worklog and cost data migration

    We extract worklogs via the Twproject API grouped by task ID and map them to Assignment timephased data. For Project Online, we push worklogs via the Project Online Bulk Update API. For desktop MPP destinations, we export a companion CSV timesheet file that the customer's admin can import via a Power Automate flow or manually enter. We extract cost records and map them to Microsoft Project Cost Resources or Budget fields based on the cost type classification documented during discovery. Both worklog and cost phases include a row-count reconciliation against the Twproject source before proceeding to validation.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze writes in Twproject during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any tasks modified since the initial extraction, then deliver the completed .mpp files or confirm Project Online project records are live. We deliver a migration inventory document listing every Twproject object that was migrated (with record counts), every object that was excluded (ToDos, attachments, workflow configurations), and every manual action required post-migration (custom field entry beyond the 10-field limit, timesheet entry for historical worklogs, Resource Sheet completion where API data was incomplete). We do not migrate Twproject workflow configurations or Kanban board settings; these are documented as requiring rebuild in Microsoft Project or Power Automate.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Twproject logo

Twproject

Source

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects across all plans removes the most common scaling pain point found in per-project pricing models.
  • Per-user, enabled-only licensing means teams only pay for people who actually need access, not total registered accounts.
  • On-premise or cloud deployment options with optional source code access make Twproject viable for regulated industries and enterprises with strict data-residency requirements.
  • Integrated cost tracking with budget-vs-forecast dashboards covers financial project management without requiring a separate tool.
  • Multi-methodology views (Gantt, Kanban, weekly planner) in a single tool reduce the need to onboard teams onto different interfaces as project types change.

Weaknesses

  • API documentation is minimal — no public rate limit spec, no structured changelog, and no public bulk endpoint reference make programmatic migration planning difficult.
  • Project JSON export deliberately omits worklogs, costs, ToDos, and attachments — customers expecting a complete data bundle face surprise gaps post-export.
  • Italian-headquartered software house with a relatively small team (11–50 employees) may raise concerns for enterprise customers requiring large-scale or multi-region support coverage.
  • No publicly documented roadmap or API versioning policy means customers cannot predict how future platform changes might affect integrations.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Twproject and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Twproject: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Twproject doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Twproject to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Twproject to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Twproject to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Twproject to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Straightforward migrations under 50 projects with clean task hierarchies and no cost-tracking data land in two to four weeks. Migrations with large resource pools (over 100 resources), cost-tracking transformation, more than 20 custom fields, or projects exceeding 1,200 tasks per file extend to six to ten weeks because of the additional resource reconstruction phase, cost-data API extraction, and custom-field prioritization work. The destination format (desktop .mpp vs Project Online) does not significantly affect timeline but determines which API we use for the final import step.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Twproject.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day