Project Management migration

Migrate from Planview Daptiv to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Planview Daptiv and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Planview Daptiv logo

Planview Daptiv

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

77%

10 of 13

objects map 1:1 between Planview Daptiv and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Planview Daptiv to Asana is a shift from a portfolio-first PPM tool to a task-centric work management platform. Daptiv organizes around portfolios and sub-portfolios with dedicated resource management and billing rate tracking; Asana uses workspaces, teams, and projects with tasks as the primary work unit. We resolve this structural difference by mapping Daptiv portfolios to Asana Portfolios (Advanced tier) or nested project groupings (Starter tier), preserving resource allocation percentages and billing rates as custom fields on users and tasks. DeskDocs file attachments are extracted as binary blobs and re-associated via the Asana Attachments API. Time entry histories land as numeric effort fields or as Timesheets add-on entries if Advanced tier is confirmed. Daptiv dashboards, saved reports, and workflow rules do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory with recommended Asana equivalents for the PMO to rebuild post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Planview Daptiv logo

Planview Daptiv

What's pushing teams away

  • Steep learning curve — reviewers consistently note the UI is cumbersome for new users and requires significant training.
  • Building comprehensive reports often requires advanced technical skills or IT support, despite the bundled analytics.
  • Subscription pricing is enterprise-grade and not transparently published — buyers face sales-led contracting.
  • Implementation and module add-ons (resource management, integrations) drive incremental cost beyond per-user license.
  • Customers preferring a lighter-weight PPM may move to Smartsheet, Wrike, or Monday.com; those needing tighter SAP/Oracle integration go to Clarity PPM or Oracle Primavera.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Planview Daptiv objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Planview Daptiv object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Planview Daptiv

Portfolio

maps to

Asana

Portfolio or project groupings

lossy
Fully supported

Daptiv's portfolio hierarchy (parent portfolios with child portfolios, status rollup, and financial fields) maps to Asana Portfolio (Advanced tier) or to nested project groupings within a folder structure (Starter tier). We preserve parent-child relationships and any portfolio-level status fields as custom fields in the destination. If the destination org is on Asana Starter, we map the top-level Daptiv portfolio to a Team and lower-level portfolios to project folders, noting that cross-project rollup views are not available without the Advanced tier.

Planview Daptiv

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Daptiv Projects map directly to Asana Projects. Project-level fields including start date, end date, status, owner, and budget fields transfer 1:1. Daptiv workflow states are translated using the status mapping table generated during scoping so that records land in the correct completion or custom state rather than as null or default.

Planview Daptiv

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Daptiv Tasks map to Asana Tasks with dates, assignments, effort, and cost fields preserved. We map predecessor-successor relationships from Daptiv's Gantt dependency structure to Asana's depends_on and blocking dependency fields, preserving the task chain ordering. Daptiv subtasks map to Asana subtasks within the parent task.

Planview Daptiv

Resource

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

Daptiv Resources (people with billing rates, skill assignments, and allocation percentages) map to Asana Users by email match. We capture every distinct billing rate value and store it as a custom numeric field on the corresponding Asana User record. Allocation percentages store as a custom allocation field on tasks or as a workload percentage if Asana Advanced with Workload Management is confirmed.

Planview Daptiv

Milestone

maps to

Asana

Task (milestone)

1:1
Fully supported

Daptiv Milestones are first-class objects carrying target dates and deliverable descriptions. We map them to Asana Tasks with the milestone flag enabled, preserving the target date and linking to the parent project. Milestone deliverables transfer as the task description in Asana.

Planview Daptiv

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Custom numeric field or Timesheets add-on

lossy
Fully supported

Daptiv time entries linked to tasks and resources migrate as numeric effort fields (hours) on the corresponding Asana tasks. Time entry dates and descriptions preserve. If Asana Advanced with the Timesheets and Budgets add-on is active, we land entries as native timesheet records; without the add-on, time data lands as historical custom fields. The customer's admin confirms add-on status before migration scope is finalized.

Planview Daptiv

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Daptiv custom fields on projects and tasks map to Asana custom fields of the equivalent type (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox). We inventory all custom fields during scoping and generate a field-mapping table before any import. Tenant-specific picklist values migrate as Asana dropdown options within the custom field.

Planview Daptiv

Attachment (DeskDocs)

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

DeskDocs files are extracted as binary blobs and re-associated to the correct Asana task or project via the Asana Attachments API. We use file naming conventions or DeskDocs metadata to match each file to its parent record. This step requires the task and project records to be present in Asana first so that GIDs are available for attachment linkage; it runs in parallel with or after record migration.

Planview Daptiv

Resource Allocation

maps to

Asana

Workload percentage or custom allocation field

lossy
Fully supported

Daptiv allocation percentages and demand-vs-availability data map to Asana Workload Management (Advanced tier) or to a custom numeric allocation percentage field on tasks. We flag any rounding differences in percentage precision. Asana's workload view shows allocation against task assignments but does not compute against billing rates without a custom integration.

Planview Daptiv

Budget and Cost Data

maps to

Asana

Custom numeric cost field

1:1
Mapping required

Daptiv's planned cost (derived from assigned billing rates and resource effort) migrates to a custom numeric field on the project in Asana. Asana's native project budgeting is available via the Timesheets and Budgets add-on on Advanced tier; we document the activation and configuration steps for the customer's admin. Without the add-on, cost figures land as read-only historical custom fields.

Planview Daptiv

Status and Workflow State

maps to

Asana

Section or custom status field

1:1
Fully supported

Daptiv's configurable workflow statuses vary by tenant. We collect the complete status vocabulary during discovery, build a translation table, and translate statuses to Asana Sections within a project or to a custom status field. Records land in the correct state rather than as null or default, preventing tasks from appearing in an unintended completion state after migration.

Planview Daptiv

Dashboard and Report

maps to

Asana

None (documented for rebuild)

1:1
Fully supported

Daptiv dashboards and saved report definitions are tightly coupled to its data model and reporting engine. We do not migrate dashboard configurations. We deliver a written inventory of each dashboard's key metrics, data sources, refresh cadence, and recommended Asana equivalents (Portfolio views, custom fields, connected BI tools) for the PMO to rebuild post-migration.

Planview Daptiv

Owner

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

Daptiv project owners and task assignees map to Asana Users by email match. Any Daptiv owner without a matching Asana User is held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes. Owner mapping must complete before task migration begins because OwnerId is a required reference on many standard objects.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Planview Daptiv logo

Planview Daptiv gotchas

Medium

Billing rate configuration affects downstream cost calculations

Medium

DeskDocs attachment storage requires file-level extraction

Low

Tenant-specific workflow statuses require a mapping table

Low

Post-acquisition product lineage creates documentation gaps

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Resource load charts and billing rates have no native Asana equivalent

    Daptiv's Resource Management module provides load charts, demand-vs-availability views, and billing rate tracking per resource as native features. Asana does not have a native resource management module; the Workload Management add-on (Advanced tier) shows allocation percentage only, with no billing rate or cost rollup capability. We migrate allocation percentages to a custom numeric field and document billing rates as a separate custom field on User records. If the customer's PMO requires true cost-loaded resource planning, they need a third-party integration such as Harvest for time tracking plus a custom cost calculation layer, or a Planview Hub synchronization as a separate implementation step.

  • Time tracking requires Asana Advanced tier and the Timesheets add-on

    Daptiv's time tracking with billing rate integration is a core PMO feature. Asana's time tracking is not included in Starter or base Advanced plans; it requires the Timesheets and Budgets add-on on the Advanced tier. We migrate time entry hours as numeric fields on tasks during the standard migration scope. Customers who need native active timesheet tracking in Asana must confirm their Advanced-tier subscription and add-on activation before migration. Without the add-on, time data lands as historical custom fields rather than live timesheet entries, limiting ongoing time tracking workflows.

  • DeskDocs attachments require file-level extraction and re-association

    Daptiv stores attachments in DeskDocs, a document management layer that is separate from task and project records. Files are not accessible via a standard row export and must be extracted as binary blobs. We extract DeskDocs files, map them to the correct Asana task or project using file naming conventions or metadata, and re-associate them via the Asana Attachments API. This step requires the parent record GIDs to exist in Asana first, adding processing time proportional to total attachment volume.

  • Asana Portfolios require Advanced tier; Starter maps to project groupings

    Cross-project rollup views in Asana are only available on the Advanced tier ($30.49/user/month). Starter-tier Asana organizations cannot create Portfolios and lose the multi-portfolio rollup that Daptiv provides natively. For Starter-tier destinations, we map Daptiv's portfolio hierarchy to project groupings or Folders, but portfolio-level status rollup and financial aggregation are not available without upgrading. The customer's Asana tier must be confirmed before migration scope is finalized; upgrading to Advanced post-migration requires reprocessing the portfolio structure.

  • Tenant-specific workflow statuses require a mapping table before import

    Daptiv allows organizations to define custom workflow states beyond the default set, and these status names vary by tenant. Without an explicit translation table, records imported from Daptiv may land in an unintended completion state in Asana. During scoping we collect the complete status vocabulary from the source tenant and build a mapping so each Daptiv status translates to the correct Asana Section or custom field value before any record is imported.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Planview Daptiv to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and scope confirmation

    We audit the Daptiv tenant across record types in active use: portfolio count and hierarchy depth, project count, task volume, resource count with billing rate values, time entry volume and date range, custom field inventory across projects and tasks, DeskDocs file count and total size, and the complete workflow status vocabulary. We pair this with a confirmation of the destination Asana tier (Starter, Advanced, or Enterprise) and whether the Timesheets and Budgets add-on is or will be active. The discovery output is a written migration scope with object-level record counts, a preliminary field-mapping table, and a migration sequence.

  2. Schema design and workflow status mapping

    We design the destination schema in Asana. This includes creating the workspace and team structure, configuring custom fields (resource billing rate fields, cost fields, allocation percentage fields, workflow status dropdowns), and building the portfolio hierarchy if Advanced tier is confirmed. We deploy the complete status mapping table so that Daptiv workflow states land as the correct Asana Section name or custom status value. Schema is validated in a staging Asana workspace before production migration begins.

  3. User and resource reconciliation

    We extract every distinct Daptiv Resource and map by email to the corresponding Asana User. Billing rate values are captured and stored as a custom numeric field on the Asana User record. Any resource without a matching Asana User goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes. Owner mapping must complete before task migration begins because OwnerId is a required reference on most standard objects.

  4. Portfolio, project, and task migration in dependency order

    We run migration in record-dependency order: Portfolio hierarchy or project groupings (Starter tier), Projects with project-level fields and budget data, Tasks with dependency chains and assignments, Milestones, Resource allocations, then Time entries. Custom fields are mapped using the table generated during discovery. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  5. DeskDocs file extraction and attachment re-association

    We export DeskDocs files as binary blobs, apply naming conventions derived from Daptiv metadata to identify parent records, and re-associate them to the correct Asana tasks or projects via the Asana Attachments API. This step runs after the task and project records are present in Asana so that GIDs are available for attachment linkage. Processing time scales with total attachment volume and is tracked separately from record migration timelines.

  6. Cutover, validation, and dashboard rebuild handoff

    We freeze Daptiv writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then confirm Asana as the system of record. We deliver a written dashboard and report inventory with recommended Asana equivalents for the PMO team to rebuild. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve reconciliation issues raised by the customer's project teams. We do not rebuild Daptiv dashboards as Asana Portfolios or custom reports inside the migration scope; that work is handled by the customer's admin or a separate Asana implementation engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Planview Daptiv logo

Planview Daptiv

Source

Strengths

  • Resource load charts and Gantt views give visual clarity across multi-project workloads
  • Configurable dashboards let organizations tailor views to their reporting cadence
  • Time tracking with billing rate integration enables accurate project cost accounting
  • Cloud-based delivery removes on-premises infrastructure overhead and enables multi-region access
  • Security controls include access controls and data encryption meeting enterprise compliance requirements

Weaknesses

  • API documentation for Daptiv-specific endpoints is not publicly published, complicating automated extraction
  • Custom fields and workflow states vary by tenant, requiring per-customer schema mapping work
  • The product sits within a crowded Planview product family whose roadmap direction is unclear post-acquisition
  • Reported performance slowdowns when querying large datasets or viewing extensive portfolios
  • Implementation complexity demands a technically literate administrator with executive buy-in
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Planview Daptiv and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Planview Daptiv: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Planview Daptiv doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Planview Daptiv to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Planview Daptiv to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Planview Daptiv to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Planview Daptiv to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and six weeks for organizations with fewer than 50 active projects, fewer than 200 resources, and manageable DeskDocs attachment volume. Migrations with large portfolios (50+ projects), high task volumes, substantial time entry histories (thousands of entries), or complex DeskDocs structures move to ten to sixteen weeks because of file extraction time, custom field configuration, and multi-phase validation cycles.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Planview Daptiv.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day