ERP migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between COINCAP ERP and Epicor Prophet 21. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Epicor Prophet 21.
COINCAP ERP
Source
Epicor Prophet 21
Destination
Compatibility
10 of 12
objects map 1:1 between COINCAP ERP and Epicor Prophet 21.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
8-12 weeks
Overview
Migrating from COINCAP ERP to Epicor ERP is a data-structure migration with two compounding constraints: COINCAP has no public REST API, so every data pull requires vendor-assisted extraction, and its nine-module structure with 11 industry verticals means custom fields are invisible without a live schema audit. We coordinate directly with COINCAP Systems & Services Pvt. Ltd. to define export formats covering the full account hierarchy, party masters with GST registration numbers, item masters with BOM structures, open payables and receivables, and historical transaction vouchers. Epicor Kinetic accepts these through its REST API with rate-limit handling and batch chunking. BOM hierarchies require a dependency-order load because Epicor Part records must exist before PartMtl rows reference them. We configure GST tax codes (CGST, SGST, IGST) in Epicor's tax module before finance data loads, and we preserve COINCAP fiscal-year settings in a reconciliation note for the customer's Epicor admin. Workflows, custom COINCAP module extensions, and document attachments do not migrate; we deliver written inventories for the customer's admin to rebuild and re-upload post-cutover.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a COINCAP ERP object lands in Epicor Prophet 21, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
COINCAP ERP
Chart of Accounts
Epicor Prophet 21
GLAccount
1:1COINCAP's financial-account hierarchy maps to Epicor Kinetic GLAccount with account segments preserved. Indian GST tax codes (CGST, SGST, IGST) map to Epicor TaxMaster entries with the appropriate tax type and rate. COINCAP's cost-centre dimension (if used in multi-segment accounts) maps to an Epicor dimension code we configure during the chart-of-accounts load. COINCAP's fiscal-year setup is documented in the reconciliation notes for the customer's Epicor admin to align to the Indian April-March fiscal calendar.
COINCAP ERP
Party Master (Customer + Supplier)
Epicor Prophet 21
Customer + Supplier
1:manyCOINCAP party master records cover both customers and suppliers in a single entity table. We split by the party's COINCAP type flag: customers map to Epicor Customer with ShipTo and BillTo addresses, GST registration number in Tax Registration ID, and payment terms from COINCAP. Suppliers map to Epicor Supplier with the GST registration number in Vendor Tax Registration and the same payment-term mapping. COINCAP stores addresses across multiple address tables (billing, shipping); we consolidate into Epicor's address structure before load.
COINCAP ERP
Item Master (Part)
Epicor Prophet 21
Part
1:1COINCAP item masters covering raw materials, semi-finished goods, and finished goods map to Epicor Part records. Item codes map to Part Number, UOM conversions map from COINCAP UOM definitions to Epicor UOMClass and UOM conversions, and pricing tiers map to Epicor PriceLsh groups. Part Class and Commodity codes from COINCAP map to Epicor Part.ClassID for reporting grouping. Indian measurement units (metric tonnes, liters) require UOMClass configuration before Part load.
COINCAP ERP
Bill of Materials (BOM)
Epicor Prophet 21
PartRev + PartMtl + PartOpr
1:1COINCAP multi-level BOM structures map to Epicor PartRev (revision), PartMtl (materials), and PartOpr (operations) tables. Load order is critical: Part records must exist before PartMtl references them, and PartRev must exist before PartOpr references the revision. COINCAP BOM quantities and scrap percentages map to PartMtl.QtyPer and PartMtl.ScrapFactor. COINCAP routing or operation sequences map to PartOpr with standard rates and labor codes. We resolve BOM levels recursively during the COINCAP export to ensure the correct load sequence.
COINCAP ERP
Open AP Ledger
Epicor Prophet 21
APInvoice + APLedger
1:1Outstanding payables from COINCAP's finance module map to Epicor APInvoice records with Supplier, invoice number, due date, amount, and GST tax breakdown. Aged trial-balance data from COINCAP must be reconciled against the Epicor AP aging report after load. COINCAP payment terms (e.g., Net 30, Net 45) map to Epicor's Terms table and are linked to the Supplier during import. Open AP records are loaded before AP payment history to maintain the open-document state.
COINCAP ERP
Open AR Ledger
Epicor Prophet 21
ARInvoice + ARLedger
1:1Outstanding receivables from COINCAP's finance module map to Epicor ARInvoice records with Customer, invoice number, due date, amount, and GST tax breakdown (CGST, SGST split). COINCAP's AR aging data requires reconciliation against Epicor's AR aging report post-load. COINCAP credit limit data maps to Epicor Customer.CreditLimit, and COINCAP invoice-level GST tax breaks are preserved as ARInvoice tax detail lines. Open AR records are loaded before AR payment history.
COINCAP ERP
Transaction Vouchers
Epicor Prophet 21
TranGLC + Epicor Tables
1:1All posting transactions from COINCAP's finance module—sales invoices, purchase receipts, journal entries, and debit/credit notes—map to Epicor TranGLC (General Ledger Control) and the relevant Epicor transaction tables. Date-range scoping is required during discovery to define the migration window; historical transactions beyond 3-5 years may be archived rather than loaded. Epicor's multi-company structure (if the customer operates multiple COINCAP companies) requires company-code configuration before TranGLC load. GST posting details from COINCAP vouchers map to Epicor's tax-registration breakdown.
COINCAP ERP
User Accounts + Roles
Epicor Prophet 21
User + UserAccount + SecUser
1:1COINCAP user records with role assignments map to Epicor Kinetic User and SecUser records. Role names from COINCAP map to Epicor Employee and associated labor codes so that production operators can be assigned to jobs post-migration. COINCAP module-level access restrictions map to Epicor menu安全和 access groups. Passwords, session tokens, and MFA settings cannot be migrated; users must re-authenticate in Epicor Kinetic post-cutover. We deliver a user-role matrix for the customer's Epicor admin to reassign access groups.
COINCAP ERP
Documents and Attachments
Epicor Prophet 21
EDMS Document
1:1COINCAP ERP does not expose a documented API endpoint for bulk attachment export. Transaction-linked scanned documents, PDFs, and images cannot be retrieved programmatically. We identify every COINCAP transaction and master record with linked documents during discovery, present options to the customer (manual re-upload post-migration, a separate COINCAP vendor-assisted document workstream, or accepting that attachments will not migrate), and document the affected record IDs for the customer's admin to action. Epicor's EDMS (Electronic Document Management System) is available as the destination repository for re-uploaded files.
COINCAP ERP
Custom Fields (Per Vertical)
Epicor Prophet 21
UD Fields + Custom Fields
lossyCOINCAP deployments in any of its 11 active industry verticals include module-specific custom fields not present in the base product. These are invisible without a live COINCAP schema audit conducted with COINCAP technical staff. We identify all custom field definitions during the schema audit phase, map each to an equivalent Epicor Kinetic user-defined field (UD01-UD20 on the relevant table) or create a new custom field, and document the mapping in the field-matrix deliverable. Any COINCAP custom fields without a clear Epicor equivalent are flagged for customer review and manual data entry post-migration. BOM custom fields are loaded last due to their dependency on Part and PartRev records.
COINCAP ERP
Production Orders
Epicor Prophet 21
JobMtl + JobOper + Labor
1:1COINCAP production orders and job traveler data map to Epicor Kinetic JobMtl (material requirements), JobOper (operation steps), and Labor transaction records. COINCAP's work-order status, scheduling dates, and labor allocation map to Epicor's job scheduling engine. COINCAP job close dates and actuals map to Labor.PostedFlag and Labor.LaborQty for work-in-progress reconciliation. We scope open jobs for migration; closed jobs from prior periods are not migrated unless the customer specifically requests WIP carry-forward.
COINCAP ERP
Purchase Orders + Sales Orders
Epicor Prophet 21
POHeader + SOHeader + Line Items
1:1Open purchase orders from COINCAP map to Epicor POHeader and POLine records with Supplier, dates, quantities, and pricing. Open sales orders map to Epicor SOHeader and SOLine records with Customer, order number, ship dates, and pricing. COINCAP order-line GST tax codes map to Epicor line-level tax details. Closed orders from prior periods are not migrated; only open or partially-shipped orders are in scope for migration. COINCAP's multi-address delivery model (if used) maps to Epicor ShipTo records linked to the Customer.
| COINCAP ERP | Epicor Prophet 21 | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chart of Accounts | GLAccount1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Party Master (Customer + Supplier) | Customer + Supplier1:many | Fully supported | |
| Item Master (Part) | Part1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Bill of Materials (BOM) | PartRev + PartMtl + PartOpr1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Open AP Ledger | APInvoice + APLedger1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Open AR Ledger | ARInvoice + ARLedger1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Transaction Vouchers | TranGLC + Epicor Tables1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User Accounts + Roles | User + UserAccount + SecUser1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Documents and Attachments | EDMS Document1:1 | Not supported | |
| Custom Fields (Per Vertical) | UD Fields + Custom Fieldslossy | Fully supported | |
| Production Orders | JobMtl + JobOper + Labor1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Purchase Orders + Sales Orders | POHeader + SOHeader + Line Items1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
COINCAP ERP gotchas
No public REST API for self-service data export
Vendor-assisted export required due to opaque schema
On-premise deployments require infrastructure readiness at destination
No bulk attachment or document export capability
Custom fields per vertical require scoping per deployment
Epicor Prophet 21 gotchas
Third-party bolt-on integrations complicate migration scope
Dirty data without standardized processes compounds migration risk
SDK customizations and BPMs may not survive platform upgrades
Report-based export only for non-technical users
Per-user pricing model requires accurate user count before migration planning
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and vendor engagement with COINCAP Systems
We conduct a written discovery questionnaire covering all nine COINCAP modules in use, total record counts per object (accounts, parties, parts, BOM levels, open AP/AR records, transaction voucher date range), active industry verticals and any custom fields in use, COINCAP support contract status and named account manager, and desired migration scope (open transactions only vs. full historical). We simultaneously initiate vendor engagement with COINCAP Systems & Services Pvt. Ltd. to define the data-pull format (SQL export, CSV, or custom routine) and agree on a delivery timeline for the export files. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with record counts, a COINCAP export request confirmation, and an Epicor edition recommendation.
Schema audit and field-mapping matrix
In collaboration with COINCAP technical staff, we conduct a schema audit of the customer's live COINCAP instance to identify all table names, column names, and data types. We map discovered columns to standard COINCAP object categories (finance, inventory, trading, production) and flag any that are custom fields, industry vertical extensions, or unmapped legacy columns. We build the field-mapping matrix covering Chart of Accounts, Customers, Suppliers, Parts, BOMs, open AP/AR, and transaction vouchers. Any COINCAP custom fields without a clear Epicor equivalent are flagged for customer review. The matrix is validated against the Epicor Kinetic data dictionary before transformation logic is written.
Epicor Kinetic configuration
We configure the Epicor Kinetic tenant before any data loads. This includes: Chart of Accounts with COINCAP account segments mapped to GLAccount codes and dimension codes; TaxMaster entries for CGST, SGST, IGST at the customer's applicable rates; UOMClass with Indian metric units (metric tonnes, kilograms, liters, meters); Part Class and Commodity codes from COINCAP; Customer and Supplier records with GST registration numbers in Tax Registration ID fields; Epicor UD fields pre-created to match the COINCAP custom field mapping matrix; BOM revision and operation codes in PartRev and PartOpr; and BPMs for UD field auto-population from incoming migration payloads. All configuration is validated in Epicor before migration scripts are written.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into an Epicor Kinetic sandbox using production-like data volumes extracted by the COINCAP team. We validate record counts per object (GL accounts in vs. GL accounts out, Customers in vs. Customers in Epicor, Parts in vs. Parts in Epicor, BOM levels resolved, open AP/AR invoices loaded, transaction vouchers posted), reconcile GL trial balance from COINCAP against Epicor GL balance post-load, spot-check 25-50 random records against the COINCAP source data, and verify BOM structure integrity by exploding a sample multi-level BOM in Epicor against the COINCAP source. The customer's finance lead and Epicor admin sign off on the sandbox migration before production cutover is scheduled.
Production migration in dependency order
We execute production migration in strict record-dependency order: GL Accounts first (no dependencies), then Customers and Suppliers (no dependencies), then Parts (no dependencies), then PartRev (depends on Part), then PartMtl (depends on Part and PartRev), then PartOpr (depends on Part and PartRev), then open AP/AR ledgers, then open Purchase Orders and Sales Orders, then BOM load for production orders, then TranGLC transaction vouchers, then UD field population via BPM, then user accounts and roles. Each phase emits a reconciliation report (record counts, GL balance check, AP/AR aging comparison) before the next phase begins. COINCAP writes are frozen during the production migration window.
Cutover, validation, and non-migratable handoff
We perform a final delta migration of any COINCAP records modified during the cutover window, then hand Epicor Kinetic to the customer as the system of record. We deliver three written inventories: a Workflow and Automation Inventory documenting any COINCAP module-specific business rules that require rebuild in Epicor (for the customer's admin or an Epicor implementation partner), a Document Migration Register listing every COINCAP record ID with linked attachments and instructions for manual re-upload to Epicor EDMS post-cutover, and a COINCAP Custom Field Inventory mapping every discovered COINCAP custom field to its Epicor UD field equivalent or flagging it as requiring manual entry. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues.
Platform deep dives
COINCAP ERP
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Epicor Prophet 21
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard ERP migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across COINCAP ERP and Epicor Prophet 21.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
COINCAP ERP: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
COINCAP ERP doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during COINCAP ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your COINCAP ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave COINCAP ERP
Other ways to arrive at Epicor Prophet 21
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.