ERP migration

Migrate from COINCAP ERP to Epicor Prophet 21

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between COINCAP ERP and Epicor Prophet 21. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Epicor Prophet 21.

COINCAP ERP logo

COINCAP ERP

Source

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Compatibility

83%

10 of 12

objects map 1:1 between COINCAP ERP and Epicor Prophet 21.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

8-12 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Migrating from COINCAP ERP to Epicor ERP is a data-structure migration with two compounding constraints: COINCAP has no public REST API, so every data pull requires vendor-assisted extraction, and its nine-module structure with 11 industry verticals means custom fields are invisible without a live schema audit. We coordinate directly with COINCAP Systems & Services Pvt. Ltd. to define export formats covering the full account hierarchy, party masters with GST registration numbers, item masters with BOM structures, open payables and receivables, and historical transaction vouchers. Epicor Kinetic accepts these through its REST API with rate-limit handling and batch chunking. BOM hierarchies require a dependency-order load because Epicor Part records must exist before PartMtl rows reference them. We configure GST tax codes (CGST, SGST, IGST) in Epicor's tax module before finance data loads, and we preserve COINCAP fiscal-year settings in a reconciliation note for the customer's Epicor admin. Workflows, custom COINCAP module extensions, and document attachments do not migrate; we deliver written inventories for the customer's admin to rebuild and re-upload post-cutover.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

COINCAP ERP logo

COINCAP ERP

What's pushing teams away

  • Companies evaluating modern cloud-first ERPs cite scalability constraints and limited mobile-first access as reasons to move off on-premise or hybrid COINCAP deployments.
  • G2 lists NetSuite, Sage Intacct, and Acumatica as top alternatives, indicating customers are leaving COINCAP for globally-supported platforms with broader ecosystem integrations and API access.
  • On-premise deployment requires internal IT resources for maintenance, backups, and version upgrades—businesses without dedicated IT staff find this ongoing overhead a driver to migrate to managed SaaS alternatives.

Choosing

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-specific design for wholesale distributors, not a general-purpose ERP repurposed for distribution — distributors choose P21 because it matches their replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Strong inventory control with automated replenishment, lot and serial tracking, and multi-warehouse management appeals to distributors with complex stock requirements and tight margin pressure.
  • Responsive customer support cited across G2 and Gartner reviews, with Epicor's 90% retention rate reflecting long-term customer satisfaction in a market where switching costs are high.
  • Cloud deployment on Microsoft Azure provides the flexibility to scale user counts and warehouse locations without on-premise infrastructure investment.
  • The Software Development Kit lets distributors personalize P21 to their specific business processes without modifying the application source code, preserving upgrade paths.

Object mapping

How COINCAP ERP objects map to Epicor Prophet 21

Each row shows how a COINCAP ERP object lands in Epicor Prophet 21, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

COINCAP ERP

Chart of Accounts

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

GLAccount

1:1
Mapping required

COINCAP's financial-account hierarchy maps to Epicor Kinetic GLAccount with account segments preserved. Indian GST tax codes (CGST, SGST, IGST) map to Epicor TaxMaster entries with the appropriate tax type and rate. COINCAP's cost-centre dimension (if used in multi-segment accounts) maps to an Epicor dimension code we configure during the chart-of-accounts load. COINCAP's fiscal-year setup is documented in the reconciliation notes for the customer's Epicor admin to align to the Indian April-March fiscal calendar.

COINCAP ERP

Party Master (Customer + Supplier)

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Customer + Supplier

1:many
Fully supported

COINCAP party master records cover both customers and suppliers in a single entity table. We split by the party's COINCAP type flag: customers map to Epicor Customer with ShipTo and BillTo addresses, GST registration number in Tax Registration ID, and payment terms from COINCAP. Suppliers map to Epicor Supplier with the GST registration number in Vendor Tax Registration and the same payment-term mapping. COINCAP stores addresses across multiple address tables (billing, shipping); we consolidate into Epicor's address structure before load.

COINCAP ERP

Item Master (Part)

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Part

1:1
Fully supported

COINCAP item masters covering raw materials, semi-finished goods, and finished goods map to Epicor Part records. Item codes map to Part Number, UOM conversions map from COINCAP UOM definitions to Epicor UOMClass and UOM conversions, and pricing tiers map to Epicor PriceLsh groups. Part Class and Commodity codes from COINCAP map to Epicor Part.ClassID for reporting grouping. Indian measurement units (metric tonnes, liters) require UOMClass configuration before Part load.

COINCAP ERP

Bill of Materials (BOM)

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

PartRev + PartMtl + PartOpr

1:1
Fully supported

COINCAP multi-level BOM structures map to Epicor PartRev (revision), PartMtl (materials), and PartOpr (operations) tables. Load order is critical: Part records must exist before PartMtl references them, and PartRev must exist before PartOpr references the revision. COINCAP BOM quantities and scrap percentages map to PartMtl.QtyPer and PartMtl.ScrapFactor. COINCAP routing or operation sequences map to PartOpr with standard rates and labor codes. We resolve BOM levels recursively during the COINCAP export to ensure the correct load sequence.

COINCAP ERP

Open AP Ledger

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

APInvoice + APLedger

1:1
Fully supported

Outstanding payables from COINCAP's finance module map to Epicor APInvoice records with Supplier, invoice number, due date, amount, and GST tax breakdown. Aged trial-balance data from COINCAP must be reconciled against the Epicor AP aging report after load. COINCAP payment terms (e.g., Net 30, Net 45) map to Epicor's Terms table and are linked to the Supplier during import. Open AP records are loaded before AP payment history to maintain the open-document state.

COINCAP ERP

Open AR Ledger

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

ARInvoice + ARLedger

1:1
Fully supported

Outstanding receivables from COINCAP's finance module map to Epicor ARInvoice records with Customer, invoice number, due date, amount, and GST tax breakdown (CGST, SGST split). COINCAP's AR aging data requires reconciliation against Epicor's AR aging report post-load. COINCAP credit limit data maps to Epicor Customer.CreditLimit, and COINCAP invoice-level GST tax breaks are preserved as ARInvoice tax detail lines. Open AR records are loaded before AR payment history.

COINCAP ERP

Transaction Vouchers

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

TranGLC + Epicor Tables

1:1
Fully supported

All posting transactions from COINCAP's finance module—sales invoices, purchase receipts, journal entries, and debit/credit notes—map to Epicor TranGLC (General Ledger Control) and the relevant Epicor transaction tables. Date-range scoping is required during discovery to define the migration window; historical transactions beyond 3-5 years may be archived rather than loaded. Epicor's multi-company structure (if the customer operates multiple COINCAP companies) requires company-code configuration before TranGLC load. GST posting details from COINCAP vouchers map to Epicor's tax-registration breakdown.

COINCAP ERP

User Accounts + Roles

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

User + UserAccount + SecUser

1:1
Fully supported

COINCAP user records with role assignments map to Epicor Kinetic User and SecUser records. Role names from COINCAP map to Epicor Employee and associated labor codes so that production operators can be assigned to jobs post-migration. COINCAP module-level access restrictions map to Epicor menu安全和 access groups. Passwords, session tokens, and MFA settings cannot be migrated; users must re-authenticate in Epicor Kinetic post-cutover. We deliver a user-role matrix for the customer's Epicor admin to reassign access groups.

COINCAP ERP

Documents and Attachments

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

EDMS Document

1:1
Not supported

COINCAP ERP does not expose a documented API endpoint for bulk attachment export. Transaction-linked scanned documents, PDFs, and images cannot be retrieved programmatically. We identify every COINCAP transaction and master record with linked documents during discovery, present options to the customer (manual re-upload post-migration, a separate COINCAP vendor-assisted document workstream, or accepting that attachments will not migrate), and document the affected record IDs for the customer's admin to action. Epicor's EDMS (Electronic Document Management System) is available as the destination repository for re-uploaded files.

COINCAP ERP

Custom Fields (Per Vertical)

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

UD Fields + Custom Fields

lossy
Fully supported

COINCAP deployments in any of its 11 active industry verticals include module-specific custom fields not present in the base product. These are invisible without a live COINCAP schema audit conducted with COINCAP technical staff. We identify all custom field definitions during the schema audit phase, map each to an equivalent Epicor Kinetic user-defined field (UD01-UD20 on the relevant table) or create a new custom field, and document the mapping in the field-matrix deliverable. Any COINCAP custom fields without a clear Epicor equivalent are flagged for customer review and manual data entry post-migration. BOM custom fields are loaded last due to their dependency on Part and PartRev records.

COINCAP ERP

Production Orders

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

JobMtl + JobOper + Labor

1:1
Fully supported

COINCAP production orders and job traveler data map to Epicor Kinetic JobMtl (material requirements), JobOper (operation steps), and Labor transaction records. COINCAP's work-order status, scheduling dates, and labor allocation map to Epicor's job scheduling engine. COINCAP job close dates and actuals map to Labor.PostedFlag and Labor.LaborQty for work-in-progress reconciliation. We scope open jobs for migration; closed jobs from prior periods are not migrated unless the customer specifically requests WIP carry-forward.

COINCAP ERP

Purchase Orders + Sales Orders

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

POHeader + SOHeader + Line Items

1:1
Fully supported

Open purchase orders from COINCAP map to Epicor POHeader and POLine records with Supplier, dates, quantities, and pricing. Open sales orders map to Epicor SOHeader and SOLine records with Customer, order number, ship dates, and pricing. COINCAP order-line GST tax codes map to Epicor line-level tax details. Closed orders from prior periods are not migrated; only open or partially-shipped orders are in scope for migration. COINCAP's multi-address delivery model (if used) maps to Epicor ShipTo records linked to the Customer.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

COINCAP ERP logo

COINCAP ERP gotchas

High

No public REST API for self-service data export

High

Vendor-assisted export required due to opaque schema

Medium

On-premise deployments require infrastructure readiness at destination

Medium

No bulk attachment or document export capability

Low

Custom fields per vertical require scoping per deployment

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21 gotchas

High

Third-party bolt-on integrations complicate migration scope

High

Dirty data without standardized processes compounds migration risk

Medium

SDK customizations and BPMs may not survive platform upgrades

Medium

Report-based export only for non-technical users

Low

Per-user pricing model requires accurate user count before migration planning

Pair-specific challenges

  • COINCAP vendor-assisted export required before ingestion begins

    COINCAP ERP does not expose a documented public REST API for bulk data extraction. Every data pull requires active coordination with COINCAP Systems & Services Pvt. Ltd. to define export formats, run database queries or custom export routines, and deliver files in a format we can ingest. This step adds two to four weeks of lead time before the migration pipeline opens and requires the customer's active relationship with COINCAP support. If the customer has a lapsed support contract or no named account manager, export coordination becomes a blocker. We include vendor-engagement support as part of discovery to unblock this step.

  • BOM load order is strict and must resolve dependencies before insert

    Epicor Kinetic enforces referential integrity on PartRev, PartMtl, and PartOpr tables: Part must exist before PartMtl can reference it, and PartRev must exist before PartOpr can reference it. COINCAP's BOM export does not sequence records with dependency order, so we must resolve the full BOM tree during transformation, identify top-level assemblies and sub-assemblies recursively, and generate a sequenced load plan. Migrations that load BOM records out of order will fail Epicor's foreign-key constraints mid-load, requiring a partial rollback and restart.

  • COINCAP custom fields per vertical require live schema audit

    COINCAP ERP serves 11 industry verticals and stores custom fields in the live database that are not visible without direct vendor engagement. We cannot build a field-mapping matrix without examining the specific customer's production instance. The discovery call must include a COINCAP technical walkthrough of all active modules to surface vertical-specific custom fields, module-specific extensions, and any industry-specific COINCAP add-ons. Any unmapped columns are flagged for manual review before the migration window opens. This audit step adds one to two weeks to discovery.

  • Epicor Kinetic UD fields require BPM for automated population

    Epicor Kinetic user-defined fields (UD01-UD20) on Part, Customer, Supplier, and other tables are database-level fields that do not auto-populate on insert. When migrating COINCAP custom field values into Epicor UD fields, the values insert as NULL unless a BPM (Business Process Management) method directive is configured to populate them from the import payload or a related record. We configure post-insert BPMs for UD field population as part of the Epicor configuration phase, but the customer must validate that the populated values match the COINCAP source data.

  • Indian GST tax codes must be pre-configured in Epicor before finance load

    COINCAP ERP has Indian GST compliance built into its finance module with CGST, SGST, and IGST tax codes and GST rates pre-configured. Epicor Kinetic is a global product; the Indian GST tax structure is not pre-configured in a fresh Epicor installation. We configure CGST, SGST, IGST tax types and rates in Epicor's TaxMaster before any finance data (AP, AR, GL, or transaction vouchers) loads. If GST codes are not pre-configured, transaction vouchers will load with unassigned tax and fail reconciliation during the finance audit.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful COINCAP ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 data migration

  1. Discovery and vendor engagement with COINCAP Systems

    We conduct a written discovery questionnaire covering all nine COINCAP modules in use, total record counts per object (accounts, parties, parts, BOM levels, open AP/AR records, transaction voucher date range), active industry verticals and any custom fields in use, COINCAP support contract status and named account manager, and desired migration scope (open transactions only vs. full historical). We simultaneously initiate vendor engagement with COINCAP Systems & Services Pvt. Ltd. to define the data-pull format (SQL export, CSV, or custom routine) and agree on a delivery timeline for the export files. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with record counts, a COINCAP export request confirmation, and an Epicor edition recommendation.

  2. Schema audit and field-mapping matrix

    In collaboration with COINCAP technical staff, we conduct a schema audit of the customer's live COINCAP instance to identify all table names, column names, and data types. We map discovered columns to standard COINCAP object categories (finance, inventory, trading, production) and flag any that are custom fields, industry vertical extensions, or unmapped legacy columns. We build the field-mapping matrix covering Chart of Accounts, Customers, Suppliers, Parts, BOMs, open AP/AR, and transaction vouchers. Any COINCAP custom fields without a clear Epicor equivalent are flagged for customer review. The matrix is validated against the Epicor Kinetic data dictionary before transformation logic is written.

  3. Epicor Kinetic configuration

    We configure the Epicor Kinetic tenant before any data loads. This includes: Chart of Accounts with COINCAP account segments mapped to GLAccount codes and dimension codes; TaxMaster entries for CGST, SGST, IGST at the customer's applicable rates; UOMClass with Indian metric units (metric tonnes, kilograms, liters, meters); Part Class and Commodity codes from COINCAP; Customer and Supplier records with GST registration numbers in Tax Registration ID fields; Epicor UD fields pre-created to match the COINCAP custom field mapping matrix; BOM revision and operation codes in PartRev and PartOpr; and BPMs for UD field auto-population from incoming migration payloads. All configuration is validated in Epicor before migration scripts are written.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into an Epicor Kinetic sandbox using production-like data volumes extracted by the COINCAP team. We validate record counts per object (GL accounts in vs. GL accounts out, Customers in vs. Customers in Epicor, Parts in vs. Parts in Epicor, BOM levels resolved, open AP/AR invoices loaded, transaction vouchers posted), reconcile GL trial balance from COINCAP against Epicor GL balance post-load, spot-check 25-50 random records against the COINCAP source data, and verify BOM structure integrity by exploding a sample multi-level BOM in Epicor against the COINCAP source. The customer's finance lead and Epicor admin sign off on the sandbox migration before production cutover is scheduled.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We execute production migration in strict record-dependency order: GL Accounts first (no dependencies), then Customers and Suppliers (no dependencies), then Parts (no dependencies), then PartRev (depends on Part), then PartMtl (depends on Part and PartRev), then PartOpr (depends on Part and PartRev), then open AP/AR ledgers, then open Purchase Orders and Sales Orders, then BOM load for production orders, then TranGLC transaction vouchers, then UD field population via BPM, then user accounts and roles. Each phase emits a reconciliation report (record counts, GL balance check, AP/AR aging comparison) before the next phase begins. COINCAP writes are frozen during the production migration window.

  6. Cutover, validation, and non-migratable handoff

    We perform a final delta migration of any COINCAP records modified during the cutover window, then hand Epicor Kinetic to the customer as the system of record. We deliver three written inventories: a Workflow and Automation Inventory documenting any COINCAP module-specific business rules that require rebuild in Epicor (for the customer's admin or an Epicor implementation partner), a Document Migration Register listing every COINCAP record ID with linked attachments and instructions for manual re-upload to Epicor EDMS post-cutover, and a COINCAP Custom Field Inventory mapping every discovered COINCAP custom field to its Epicor UD field equivalent or flagging it as requiring manual entry. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

COINCAP ERP logo

COINCAP ERP

Source

Strengths

  • Nine-module integrated suite covering finance, inventory, purchase, sales, and production within one database.
  • 100% guaranteed implementation commitment marketed as the primary customer assurance differentiator.
  • Domestic Indian vendor with Mumbai-based support and GST-compliant finance modules for Indian regulatory requirements.
  • COINCAP-III version signals active development and periodic product upgrades for existing customers.
  • Long customer retention—references spanning 25+ years suggest stable product-market fit for mid-market industrial companies.

Weaknesses

  • No publicly documented REST API or bulk export interface, making automated migration reliant on vendor-assisted data pulls.
  • On-premise deployment model requires customer-managed infrastructure, backups, and upgrade scheduling.
  • Limited visibility into COINCAP's internal schema outside of direct vendor engagement, complicating pre-migration audit.
  • Pricing and licensing terms are not published publicly, requiring direct sales contact for every evaluation.
Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for wholesale distribution with industry-specific replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Multi-warehouse management with bin locations, cross-docking, and real-time inventory visibility across all warehouse locations.
  • Automated replenishment engine with demand-based and min-max planning reduces stockouts and overstock carrying costs.
  • AI-infused reporting via Epicor Prism provides Gen AI-driven insights into ERP data without requiring a BI team.
  • Strong customer retention at 90% and a 50-year track record in the distribution vertical provides long-term vendor stability.

Weaknesses

  • High total cost of ownership — per-user pricing of $150-200/month plus $10K-$500K implementation creates significant budget commitment for small and mid-market distributors.
  • Customization via SDK requires technical expertise and introduces upgrade risk when custom code conflicts with new P21 releases.
  • Report generation performance is a known pain point — multiple users report system freezes during large or complex report exports.
  • Third-party bolt-on reliance for functionality that competitors include natively increases integration complexity and total solution cost.
  • Limited public API documentation — developers building custom integrations report difficulty finding P21 API authentication methods and endpoint specifications.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard ERP migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across COINCAP ERP and Epicor Prophet 21.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    COINCAP ERP: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    COINCAP ERP doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your COINCAP ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about COINCAP ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during COINCAP ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your COINCAP ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Standard migrations covering finance, inventory, and trading modules with under 50,000 Part records, no multi-level BOM hierarchies, and clean open ledger balances land between eight and twelve weeks. Complex migrations with multi-level BOM structures, custom fields across multiple COINCAP verticals, aged AP/AR ledgers requiring trial-balance reconciliation, large transaction histories (over 200,000 vouchers), or multi-company Epicor configurations move to sixteen to twenty-four weeks because of the COINCAP vendor-assisted export lead time, schema audit scope, and BOM dependency resolution. COINCAP's lack of a public API means every data pull adds two to four weeks of vendor coordination before ingestion begins.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from COINCAP ERP.
Land in Epicor Prophet 21, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day