Project Management migration

Migrate from Avaza to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Avaza and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

Avaza logo

Avaza

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Avaza and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Avaza to Microsoft Project is a scheduling-focused migration, not a full platform transfer. Avaza bundles project management with time tracking, expense management, and invoicing; Microsoft Project is primarily a scheduling engine built around Tasks, Resources, and Assignments. We migrate the task and resource layers 1:1 and document the financial layer (Invoices, Expenses, Billable Rates) as out-of-scope for the native Microsoft Project file because those objects have no standard destination. We handle Avaza's role-restricted rate fields by reconstructing values from the frozen timesheet record, preserve the task hierarchy through WBS-level mapping, and handle the export via XML where the API endpoint is available or via structured CSV where it is not. Team Chat history is not migratable under any export method and is explicitly scoped out of the Statement of Work.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Avaza logo

Avaza

What's pushing teams away

  • Advanced task management features are limited compared to dedicated tools, causing teams managing complex project hierarchies to look elsewhere.
  • Reporting requires navigating role-based permissions and is described as difficult to access, create, and use for real-time profit-and-loss visibility.
  • Teams scaling beyond small-business size find the platform lacks the depth needed for multi-project portfolio management and enterprise workflows.
  • Integration capabilities are considered limited, prompting teams with complex toolchains to migrate to platforms with richer marketplace ecosystems.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How Avaza objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a Avaza object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Avaza

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project File (MPP) or Project Online Project

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Projects map 1:1 to Microsoft Project files or Project Online project records. Each Avaza Project carries billing method, budget, cost rate, and billable rate inherited from the contact or timesheet category level. We migrate Project Name, start date, end date, status, and description. Budget and billing rate values transfer to custom fields in Microsoft Project because no native equivalent exists on the standard Project table. If the destination is Microsoft Project Online (Plan 3 or Plan 5 required for PWA), we provision the project via the REST API with enterprise project type and enterprise custom fields populated from Avaza project metadata.

Avaza

Section

maps to

Microsoft Project

Summary Task (WBS parent row)

1:many
Fully supported

Avaza Sections are grouping containers inside a Project used to organize Tasks. They carry display order but no independent metadata. We map each Section to a Microsoft Project Summary Task (a parent row at WBS level 1) with the section name as the task name and no duration. Child Tasks inherit the Summary Task as their parent. This preserves the grouping structure that Avaza users rely on for organizing work by phase or workstream.

Avaza

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task (with WBS levels)

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Tasks map directly to Microsoft Project Tasks. We preserve task name, assignees, due dates, priorities, and flat-rate amounts (mapped to custom Cost fields in Microsoft Project). Milestone tasks in Avaza (tasks with zero duration) become Microsoft Project milestone tasks. Task dependencies in Avaza map to Predecessor links in Microsoft Project using FS, SS, SF, and FF dependency types determined by the task relationship context. If Avaza task-level custom fields are present, we map them to Project Online enterprise custom fields or MPP custom fields depending on the destination version.

Avaza

User / Team Member

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza users (Project Collaborators, Timesheet Users, Admin/Finance Users, Resource Schedulers) map to Microsoft Project Resources. We map display name to Resource Name, email to Resource Initials or email field, and default billable rate from the contact-level rate configuration. Microsoft Project distinguishes between Material Resources (consumables) and Work Resources (people), and supports Generic Resources for unassigned capacity. We default all Avaza users to Work Resources and set Max Units based on the user's Avaza timesheet category allocation where available.

Avaza

Timesheet Category

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource Rate Table

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Timesheet Categories define work types and carry default billable and cost rates that cascade into projects and timesheet entries. We map each category to a Microsoft Project Resource Cost Rate Table entry (Cost Rate A) so that when assignments are made in the destination, the correct rate applies. Multi-tier cost rates (A through E) in Microsoft Project map from Avaza's category-level rate tiers where they exist.

Avaza

Timesheet Entry

maps to

Microsoft Project

Assignment Actual Work

lossy
Fully supported

Avaza timesheet entries are linked to a project, section, task, user, and timesheet category, and carry the Billable Rate and Cost Rate frozen at entry time. We map each timesheet entry to a Microsoft Project Assignment on the matching task-resource pair with Actual Work set to the hours logged and Actual Cost calculated from the frozen rate. This preserves historical billing data inside the project schedule. Note: Microsoft Project desktop has no native timesheet UI; the Actual Work values are stored in the file and visible in the Task Usage and Resource Usage views.

Avaza

Expense

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Field / No native equivalent

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Expenses carry amount, currency, category, billable flag, and receipt attachments linked to a project. Microsoft Project has no native expense module. We document the full expense inventory in a structured CSV delivered alongside the MPP file or Project Online migration, with project name, expense category, amount, currency, and billable flag. The customer assigns expenses to project cost baselines in Microsoft Project manually or via a separate expense tracking process. Receipt attachments migrate as file links where a reachable URL is present in the Avaza export.

Avaza

Invoice

maps to

Microsoft Project

No native equivalent

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Invoices can include free-form line items, uninvoiced timesheet blocks, uninvoiced expenses, and task fixed amounts, each referencing the customer. Microsoft Project has no invoice or billing module. We export invoice data as a structured document with project reference, line item breakdown, totals, currency, and payment status, delivered as a supplementary record set. The customer's finance team reconciles this against their accounting system post-migration. We use the Avaza Invoice Detail report to capture fully assembled invoice state rather than re-aggregating source records post-migration.

Avaza

Customer / External Contact

maps to

Microsoft Project

SharePoint Contact List or Dynamics 365 (if integrated)

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Customers (billing contacts) and External Contacts (collaborators and client portal users) carry billing and payment-term settings. Microsoft Project has no native contact management layer. If the destination is Microsoft Project Online with SharePoint, we export contacts to the associated SharePoint site contact list. If the organization uses Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales or Customer Service, we map Avaza contacts to the corresponding Dynamics records via the customer-provided integration. Standalone MPP file destinations receive a contact CSV as a supplementary deliverable.

Avaza

Quote / Estimate

maps to

Microsoft Project

No native equivalent

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Quotes are distinct from invoices with approval statuses and client-view links. Avaza can convert a quote to a project in one click, but the quote itself is not a sub-object of the project. We reconstruct quote line items as a structured CSV with project reference, client name, approval status, and total value. The quote-to-project conversion history is documented in the migration inventory for the customer's project manager to reference during project initiation in Microsoft Project.

Avaza

Custom Field (Project-level)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Enterprise Custom Field (Project Online) or Custom Field (MPP)

lossy
Fully supported

Avaza custom fields on projects appear only in filtered report views and require the correct filter context to export. We map named custom fields to Microsoft Project Enterprise Custom Fields (for Project Online destinations) or text/number/date custom fields on the Project Summary Task (for MPP file destinations). Each field requires field-by-field review during scoping because Avaza surfaces project-level custom fields inconsistently across export views.

Avaza

Custom Field (Task-level)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Custom Field (Project Online) or Custom Field (MPP)

lossy
Fully supported

Avaza task-level custom fields migrate to Microsoft Project Task Custom Fields. We map text fields to Text fields, number fields to Number fields, and date fields to Date fields. Flag fields map to Flag custom fields. Task custom fields appear in the Task Details view in Project Online and in the Custom Fields column in desktop MPP.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Avaza logo

Avaza gotchas

High

Cost Rates and Billable Rates are role-restricted

Medium

Timesheet rate values are copied at entry time

Medium

Invoice data spans multiple linked entities

Medium

Tier-based limits on active projects and users

Low

Team Chat has no export capability

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Microsoft Project desktop has no API for automated import

    Microsoft Project desktop (MPP files) exposes no documented REST or bulk API. Data must move through XML export from Avaza and XML import into Microsoft Project, or through structured CSV with a validation step. If the destination is Microsoft Project desktop rather than Project Online, we use the MPX/XML format which preserves task hierarchy, WBS levels, and predecessor links. XML import errors (malformed dependencies, invalid date formats, missing resource references) can silently drop or misplace tasks; we run a post-import validation pass comparing task count and dependency count between source Avaza export and the imported MPP file before declaring the migration complete.

  • Billable Rates and Cost Rates are role-restricted in Avaza

    Avaza Cost Rates and Billable Rates are visible only to users with the Project Manager, Finance Manager, or Admin role. If our migration account lacks one of these roles, rate fields may not appear in exports even though they exist in the database. We require Admin-level credentials for the Avaza migration account and verify rate visibility in a test export before running the full job. If rates remain absent, we reconstruct them from the contact or timesheet-category level source records that are accessible without elevated permissions.

  • Timesheet rate values are frozen at entry time

    When an Avaza timesheet is created or edited, the Billable Rate and Cost Rate are copied from the project or category configuration into the timesheet record. If the project rate is subsequently changed, existing timesheet entries retain the historical rate value that was active when they were logged. We preserve the frozen rate stored in each timesheet rather than recomputing from the current project rate. This is intentional and correct for billing accuracy. When migrating to Microsoft Project, we use the frozen rate to populate the Assignment Actual Cost field on the relevant task-resource assignment.

  • Expenses and Invoices have no Microsoft Project destination

    Microsoft Project has no native expense tracking or invoicing module. Expenses and Invoices migrated from Avaza cannot be imported as native objects. We deliver these as structured CSV exports alongside the project migration, and the customer's project manager or finance team reconciles them into the appropriate downstream system (accounting software, SharePoint, or a manual cost-tracking process). We explicitly scope these records in the Statement of Work to prevent expectations of native integration that does not exist.

  • Team Chat and project comments have no export path

    Avaza's Team Chat feature stores messages in an internal messaging layer with no documented API endpoint. Chat channels, direct messages, file attachments shared in chat, and project-level comments are not included in any data export. Microsoft Project desktop has no equivalent collaboration layer, and Project Online uses SharePoint comments which are a separate system. We scope chat and comments out of the migration and document this gap in the Statement of Work.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Avaza to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Scoping and source audit

    We audit the Avaza source account across Projects, Sections, Tasks, Timesheets, Expenses, Invoices, Users, and Timesheet Categories. We confirm the migration account has Admin-level credentials to ensure Cost and Billable Rates are visible in export. We identify any active project template usage, cross-project task dependencies, and the volume of timesheet entries and expenses per project. We also confirm the destination: Microsoft Project desktop (MPP), Project Online with PWA, or Project for the Web.

  2. Destination provisioning and schema design

    For Microsoft Project Online destinations, we provision the project in PWA or Project for the Web via the REST API, configure enterprise custom fields to match the named Avaza custom fields, and set up the resource pool mapping Avaza users to Project Resources with rate tables populated from Timesheet Categories. For desktop MPP destinations, we design the custom field schema on the Project Summary Task and task-level custom fields that will carry Avaza financial metadata. We document the out-of-scope objects (Invoices, Expenses, Quotes) and define the supplementary CSV export structure for each.

  3. Rate reconstruction and timesheet aggregation

    We extract all timesheet entries and reconstruct the frozen Billable Rate and Cost Rate for each entry by matching against the contact or category-level source record where direct rate export was unavailable. We aggregate timesheet hours by task-resource pair to populate Assignment Actual Work and Actual Cost in Microsoft Project. We produce a timesheet summary report alongside the migration for the customer's project manager to validate against source records.

  4. Task hierarchy and dependency mapping

    We build the WBS structure in Microsoft Project by mapping Avaza Sections to Summary Tasks and Avaza Tasks to child rows. We map Avaza task dependencies (extracted from the Avaza task relationship model) to Microsoft Project predecessor links with the appropriate dependency type (Finish-to-Start by default). We validate the imported task count, section count, and dependency count against the Avaza source export before declaring the hierarchy migration complete.

  5. Resource pool and rate table population

    We migrate Avaza users to Microsoft Project Resources, mapping display name, email, and max units. We populate the Cost Rate Table from Avaza Timesheet Categories. For users with different rates across project types (from category-level configuration), we create multiple rate table rows (A through E) in Microsoft Project and document which row applies to which project context. Resource Sheet validation confirms that all tasks with assignees have a corresponding resource before the final MPP file is saved.

  6. Financial layer export and handoff

    We export Avaza Expenses as a structured CSV with project reference, category, amount, currency, billable flag, and receipt URL where available. We export Invoices using the Invoice Detail report to capture fully assembled invoice state, delivered as a supplementary document. We deliver both alongside the migrated project file or Project Online migration with a reconciliation guide explaining how to incorporate the data into Microsoft Project cost baselines or external financial systems.

  7. Cutover, validation, and handoff documentation

    We freeze Avaza writes during the cutover window and run a final delta migration capturing any records modified since the initial export. We deliver the final MPP file or confirm Project Online project records are published, along with the financial CSV exports and a migration inventory document listing all objects migrated, out-of-scope objects, and any manual steps required. We do not rebuild Avaza automations or templates in Microsoft Project; those are documented as an admin-rebuild scope outside the migration engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Avaza logo

Avaza

Source

Strengths

  • Unified platform covering projects, time tracking, expenses, and invoicing under one login.
  • Free tier with unlimited contacts and project collaborators for small teams to evaluate fit.
  • Time logged against tasks can flow directly into invoices without re-entry.
  • Cost rate and billable rate configuration at contact or category level cascades through to timesheet entries.
  • Resource scheduling calendar shows team allocation across projects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting is role-restricted and difficult to navigate, particularly for real-time profit-and-loss visibility.
  • Task management lacks depth for complex project hierarchies — suitable primarily for small to mid-sized projects.
  • Custom fields only appear in filtered report views and require explicit configuration to export.
  • Integration ecosystem is smaller than major PSA competitors, limiting connectivity for complex toolchains.
  • Team Chat history is not exportable through any documented API endpoint.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Avaza and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Avaza: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Avaza exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Avaza to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Avaza to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Avaza to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Avaza to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts with fewer than 500 tasks and 50 resources across up to 20 projects, with no complex cross-project dependencies. Migrations with large resource pools (over 100 users), cross-project task hierarchies, rate reconstruction from timesheet records, or Microsoft Project Online provisioning with PWA move to five to nine weeks because of the SharePoint/PWA setup steps, resource type mapping, and validation passes required on the MPP or PWA destination.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Avaza.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day