Project Management migration

Migrate from Avaza to monday Work Management

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Avaza and monday Work Management. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in monday Work Management.

Avaza logo

Avaza

Source

monday Work Management

Destination

monday Work Management logo

Compatibility

62%

8 of 13

objects map 1:1 between Avaza and monday Work Management.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Avaza to monday.com is a structural migration from a billing-integrated PSA-style platform to a flexible Work OS. Avaza stores Projects as top-level billing containers carrying cost rates, billable rates, and budget settings; monday.com treats projects as Boards with column configurations that approximate those fields. We resolve the schema translation during scoping, preserving the Avaza project hierarchy (Projects containing Sections containing Tasks) inside monday.com Groups and Items. Timesheet rate values that were frozen at entry time in Avaza transfer as custom columns on Items or as a dedicated Time Tracking board so historical billing accuracy is not lost. Invoice records require reconstruction from Avaza's composite source data and land in monday.com as Items on a Finance Board rather than native invoice objects. Automations, reporting dashboards, and Team Chat do not migrate; we deliver a written automation inventory for your admin to rebuild in monday.com's workflow builder.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Avaza logo

Avaza

What's pushing teams away

  • Advanced task management features are limited compared to dedicated tools, causing teams managing complex project hierarchies to look elsewhere.
  • Reporting requires navigating role-based permissions and is described as difficult to access, create, and use for real-time profit-and-loss visibility.
  • Teams scaling beyond small-business size find the platform lacks the depth needed for multi-project portfolio management and enterprise workflows.
  • Integration capabilities are considered limited, prompting teams with complex toolchains to migrate to platforms with richer marketplace ecosystems.

Choosing

monday Work Management logo

monday Work Management

What's pulling them in

  • Lowest onboarding friction of any mid-market PM tool — drag-and-drop boards and colorful UI mean non-technical team members contribute from day one without training.
  • Highly customizable board structure lets teams model their actual workflow rather than forcing a predefined template onto their process.
  • Generous free forever plan with two seats lets small teams or solo users validate the platform before committing budget or migrating data from elsewhere.
  • Integrations with Slack, Zoom, Google Drive, and CRM tools keep monday.com as a coordination hub rather than requiring teams to switch context constantly.
  • Multiple view modes — Kanban, Calendar, Gantt, Map, Chart — give different team members the visualization they prefer without switching tools.

Object mapping

How Avaza objects map to monday Work Management

Each row shows how a Avaza object lands in monday Work Management, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Avaza

Project

maps to

monday Work Management

Board

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Projects map 1:1 to monday.com Boards. Each Avaza project carries billing method, budget, cost rate, and billable rate settings inherited from the contact or timesheet category level. We translate these into monday.com Board columns: billing method becomes a Status or Dropdown column, budget becomes a Numbers column, and cost/billable rates become Numbers columns or a linked Rate Board. The project name becomes the Board name, and the project description becomes the Board description or a Workdoc. Project status (active, archived) maps to Board folder or archive state in monday.com.

Avaza

Section

maps to

monday Work Management

Group

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Sections are grouping containers inside a Project used to organise Tasks. They have a display order and no independent metadata. We map Sections to monday.com Groups within the target Board, preserving the display order and renaming them to match the source Section name. Groups provide the first level of hierarchy inside a Board, replicating the Project → Section relationship as Board → Group.

Avaza

Task

maps to

monday Work Management

Item

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Tasks sit inside Sections inside Projects. Each task carries assignees, due dates, priorities, flat-rate amounts, and task-level custom fields. We map Tasks to monday.com Items within the corresponding Group. Assignee maps to the People column, Due Date to the Date column, Priority to a Labels or Status column, and flat-rate amounts to a Numbers column. Sub-task relationships in Avaza (if used) map to monday.com Sub-items attached to the parent Item.

Avaza

Timesheet

maps to

monday Work Management

Time Tracking column or Item on Rate Board

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Timesheets are time entries linked to a project, section, task, user, and timesheet category. Billable rates and cost rates are copied into each timesheet record from the project at entry time and retained as frozen historical values. We preserve these frozen rate values by creating a Time Tracking board or adding a Time Tracking column to each project Board, storing the date, duration, user, category, and the preserved billable and cost rates as custom Numbers columns. We do not recompute from the current project rate because Avaza's historical rate snapshot must remain intact for billing accuracy.

Avaza

Expense

maps to

monday Work Management

Item on Expense Board

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Expenses are linked to a project and carry amount, currency, category, billable flag, and receipt attachments. We create a dedicated Expense Board in monday.com and map each expense to an Item, with amount as a Numbers column, currency as a Labels or Dropdown column, category as a Labels column, and the billable flag as a Toggle column. Receipt attachments migrate as file attachments on the Item. The billable flag is preserved so that downstream invoice reconstruction can filter uninvoiced versus invoiced expenses.

Avaza

Invoice

maps to

monday Work Management

Item on Finance Board

lossy
Fully supported

Avaza Invoices are composite financial records built from free-form line items, uninvoiced timesheets, uninvoiced expenses, and task fixed amounts, each grouped by project, category, user, section, or task. monday.com has no native invoice object. We create a Finance Board and map each Avaza invoice to an Item, with invoice number, date, customer reference, total amount, currency, and payment status as columns. Line item detail is stored as sub-items on the Item, pulling from the migrated timesheet and expense data already resident in monday.com. The customer reconciles the Finance Board against their accounting system post-migration.

Avaza

Quote and Estimate

maps to

monday Work Management

Item on Sales Board

lossy
Fully supported

Avaza Quotes have approval statuses and client-view links distinct from Projects and Invoices. monday.com has no native quote object. We create a Sales Board and map each Quote to an Item, with quote number, date, customer, total amount, status (Draft, Sent, Approved, Declined), and expiry date as columns. Line item detail is stored as sub-items on the Quote Item. The client-view link does not migrate and must be recreated in monday.com or via a document generation integration.

Avaza

Customer and External Contact

maps to

monday Work Management

People column or Contact Board

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza Customers are contacts billable at the account level; External Contacts include project collaborators and client portal users. Both carry billing and payment-term settings. We map these to a Contact Board in monday.com (Name, Email, Phone, Company, Payment Terms as columns) and link them to Items in project Boards via the People column or as an Item in a Contacts Board with cross-board linking. User contact records are cross-referenced against the Users mapping to avoid duplication.

Avaza

User and Team Member

maps to

monday Work Management

User

1:1
Fully supported

Avaza differentiates between Project Collaborators, Timesheet/Expense Users, Admin/Finance Users, Resource Schedulers, and Chat-access Team Members. We map all active Avaza users with a seat assignment to monday.com Workspace Members, using email as the match key. We flag any Avaza user referenced on timesheet or expense records who does not have a monday.com seat for admin provisioning before migration. Role differences (Admin vs Member) map to monday.com Workspace permission levels.

Avaza

Timesheet Category

maps to

monday Work Management

Labels column on Time Tracking Board

lossy
Fully supported

Avaza Timesheet Categories define the type of work logged (e.g., Development, Design, Consulting) and carry default billable and cost rates that cascade into projects and timesheet entries. We map Categories to monday.com Labels on the Time Tracking Board or as a Labels column on the relevant project Boards. The default billable and cost rates stored at the category level are preserved in the migrated timesheet records as frozen values rather than recomputed, since Avaza copies these rates into each timesheet at entry time.

Avaza

Attachment

maps to

monday Work Management

File attachment on Item

1:1
Fully supported

File attachments on Avaza tasks, expenses, and invoices are stored internally. We migrate file references where the export includes a reachable URL or blob, attaching them to the corresponding monday.com Item using monday.com's file upload API. Files without a reachable URL are flagged in the Statement of Work as a gap for manual re-upload by the customer. Avaza's Team Chat file attachments are excluded because Team Chat itself is not migratable (no export endpoint).

Avaza

Custom Field on Project and Task

maps to

monday Work Management

Column on Board or Item

lossy
Fully supported

Avaza Custom Fields on Projects and Tasks appear in filtered report views and require explicit filter context to surface in exports. We perform a field-by-field review during scoping to identify all named custom fields, their types (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox), and their parent object (Project or Task). We create equivalent monday.com Columns on the target Board or Items, matching the field type to the closest monday.com column type (text to Text, number to Numbers, date to Date, dropdown to Dropdown or Labels, checkbox to Toggle). Custom fields without a clear monday.com equivalent are stored as text Notes columns with the field name as the column header.

Avaza

Reports and Exports

maps to

monday Work Management

Dashboard

lossy
Fully supported

Avaza exposes 48 named reports across Project Management, Finance, Expenses, and Exports sections, all role-filtered. We do not migrate reports as executable objects because monday.com's reporting model (widgets on Dashboards) is structurally different. Instead, we extract the named report definitions from Avaza's Exports section as structured data, map each report's metrics and filters to monday.com Dashboard widgets, and document the mapping as a rebuild guide for the customer's admin. The dashboard rebuild itself is out of migration scope.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Avaza logo

Avaza gotchas

High

Cost Rates and Billable Rates are role-restricted

Medium

Timesheet rate values are copied at entry time

Medium

Invoice data spans multiple linked entities

Medium

Tier-based limits on active projects and users

Low

Team Chat has no export capability

monday Work Management logo

monday Work Management gotchas

High

Subitems have no bulk export endpoint

High

API complexity budget constrains query depth

Medium

Daily call limits vary sharply across plan tiers

Medium

Automation and integration rules do not export via API

Low

Saved views are not exposed via API

Pair-specific challenges

  • Avaza invoices are composite records with no direct monday.com equivalent

    Avaza invoices are assembled from free-form line items, bulk-added uninvoiced timesheets, uninvoiced expenses, and task fixed amounts, each grouped by project, category, user, section, or task. monday.com has no native invoice object, so invoice data must be reconstructed inside a dedicated Finance Board. We use Avaza's Invoice Detail report to capture the fully assembled invoice state rather than re-aggregating source records post-migration, and map line items to sub-items on invoice Items. The customer must reconcile the Finance Board against their accounting system post-migration, and recurring invoice generation requires a monday.com-native or third-party integration.

  • Cost Rates and Billable Rates are role-restricted in Avaza

    Billable Rates and Cost Rates configured in Avaza are visible only to users with the Project Manager, Finance Manager, or Admin role. During migration, if our access account lacks one of these roles, these fields may not appear in exports even though they exist in the database. We require Admin-level credentials for the migration account and verify that Cost and Billable rates are visible in a test export before running the full job. If they are absent, we reconstruct rate values from the contact or timesheet-category level source records.

  • Timesheet rate values are frozen at entry time in Avaza

    When an Avaza timesheet is created or edited, the Billable Rate and Cost Rate are copied from the project or category configuration into the timesheet record itself. If the project rate is subsequently changed, existing timesheet entries retain the historical rate value that was active when they were logged. We preserve the frozen rate stored in each timesheet rather than recomputing from the current project rate, ensuring historical billing accuracy in monday.com. This requires us to map individual timesheet rate columns rather than relying on a project-level rate lookup.

  • Custom fields require explicit filter context to export from Avaza

    Avaza Custom Fields on Projects and Tasks only appear in filtered report views and are not surfaced in the standard export grid without applying the correct filter context. During scoping, we run test exports with different filter configurations to identify all named custom fields and their types before the full export. Custom field identification is a prerequisite for creating equivalent monday.com columns, and any missed custom fields are added post-scoping as a change order.

  • monday.com API rate limits constrain bulk import throughput

    monday.com's API enforces rate limits on item creation and update operations. For migrations with large timesheet histories (over 10,000 entries) or multiple Boards with thousands of Items, we use batched API calls with exponential backoff and per-request retry logic to avoid 429 responses. We also throttle Board creation and Item import to stay within monday.com's documented limits per plan tier. Migrations exceeding 50,000 Items in a single run may require multi-day scheduling to stay within rate limit windows.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Avaza to monday Work Management data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit the source Avaza account across all tiers, identifying active projects, sections, tasks, timesheet categories, expense records, invoice history, customer and external contact records, user seat assignments, and custom field definitions. We run test exports with Admin credentials to verify that Cost Rates and Billable Rates are visible in exports and to capture all named custom fields via filtered report views. We pair this with a monday.com workspace audit confirming the destination plan tier, existing Boards, and workspace permission structure. The discovery output is a written migration scope, an Avaza-to-monday.com object map, and a custom field inventory with column type recommendations.

  2. Board and column schema design

    We design the monday.com destination schema: one Board per Avaza Project (or consolidated Boards if the customer requests project grouping), Groups per Avaza Section, and Items per Task. We define column types for every mapped field including billable and cost rate columns on the Time Tracking Board, the Finance Board for invoice reconstruction, the Sales Board for quotes, and the Contact Board for customers. Custom fields from Avaza are matched to the closest monday.com column type. The schema is validated in a monday.com test workspace before any production data is loaded.

  3. User provisioning and contact reconciliation

    We extract every distinct Avaza user referenced on timesheet, expense, and task records and cross-reference them against the monday.com Workspace Member list. Users present in Avaza but missing from monday.com go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before migration. We also reconcile Avaza Customers and External Contacts against the monday.com Contact Board to avoid duplicate person records, using email as the primary dedupe key.

  4. Test migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a monday.com test workspace using production-like data volume. The customer reconciles record counts (Projects in, Boards in, Tasks in, Items in, Timesheets in, Expenses in, Invoices in), spot-checks 25-50 random records against Avaza source, and verifies that frozen timesheet rates, expense billable flags, and invoice line items are correctly translated. Schema corrections, column type adjustments, and any missed custom fields are addressed in the test workspace before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Contact Board (customers and external contacts), then project Boards (structure and tasks), then Time Tracking data (timesheets with frozen rates), then Expense Board (expenses with billable flags), then Finance Board (invoices from composite source), then Sales Board (quotes), then custom field columns on items. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We use batched monday.com API calls with rate-limit handling and exponential backoff to stay within per-plan API limits.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation handoff

    We freeze Avaza writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable monday.com as the system of record. We deliver the automation inventory document listing every Avaza workflow and notification with its trigger, conditions, and a recommended monday.com automation equivalent for the customer's admin to rebuild. We do not rebuild Avaza automations as monday.com recipes inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task. We support a one-week post-cutover window to resolve reconciliation issues raised by the team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Avaza logo

Avaza

Source

Strengths

  • Unified platform covering projects, time tracking, expenses, and invoicing under one login.
  • Free tier with unlimited contacts and project collaborators for small teams to evaluate fit.
  • Time logged against tasks can flow directly into invoices without re-entry.
  • Cost rate and billable rate configuration at contact or category level cascades through to timesheet entries.
  • Resource scheduling calendar shows team allocation across projects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting is role-restricted and difficult to navigate, particularly for real-time profit-and-loss visibility.
  • Task management lacks depth for complex project hierarchies — suitable primarily for small to mid-sized projects.
  • Custom fields only appear in filtered report views and require explicit configuration to export.
  • Integration ecosystem is smaller than major PSA competitors, limiting connectivity for complex toolchains.
  • Team Chat history is not exportable through any documented API endpoint.
monday Work Management logo

monday Work Management

Destination

Strengths

  • Drag-and-drop board UI with near-zero learning curve for non-technical users entering project data for the first time.
  • 20+ column types and unlimited custom columns let teams model arbitrarily complex data structures without developer help.
  • Multi-view support — Kanban, Gantt, Calendar, Timeline, Chart, Map — satisfies different team members without forcing a single layout.
  • Automations cover common trigger-action patterns for teams without dedicated developers to write custom scripts.
  • Free plan for 2 seats and a 14-day trial on all paid tiers make evaluation risk-free before committing to migration scope.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing with no enterprise flat-rate option means costs scale linearly with headcount, making it expensive at 50+ seats.
  • Subitems lack bulk API access, making them problematic for CRM-style use cases where contact records live as subitems under a company board.
  • Automations and advanced views are gated behind Pro and Enterprise tiers, creating feature deserts on entry-level plans.
  • Dependency column is visually limited — no critical path, no auto-rescheduling, and cross-board dependencies require manual link management.
  • No native document management; docs, wikis, and knowledge bases require a separate integration or third-party workaround.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 4 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Avaza and monday Work Management.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    4 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Avaza: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Avaza exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Avaza to monday Work Management migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Avaza to monday Work Management data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Avaza to monday Work Management migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Avaza to monday Work Management migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations with under 50 active Avaza projects, 5,000 timesheet entries, and a straightforward project-to-board mapping land between three and five weeks. Migrations with over 100 projects, large timesheet histories (over 20,000 entries), composite invoice reconstruction from multiple source objects, or complex custom field configurations on both projects and tasks extend to eight to twelve weeks because of schema design time, batched API throughput, and reconciliation testing cycles.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Avaza.
Land in monday Work Management, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day