Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Allegra and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.
Allegra
Source
Microsoft Project
Destination
Compatibility
3 of 10
objects map 1:1 between Allegra and Microsoft Project.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
2-4 weeks
Overview
Moving from Allegra to Microsoft Project is a data-structure translation, not a simple file copy. Allegra organizes work around Items with a distinction between native attributes (which belong to Items) and custom fields (which belong to input forms). Microsoft Project uses Tasks as the core object with Summary Tasks for hierarchy, custom fields for metadata, and predecessor links for dependency chains. We query the Allegra schema endpoint to retrieve all attribute and field definitions, separate them into their respective categories, then map Item attributes to Microsoft Project custom fields (Text1, Text2, Number1, etc.) and custom field definitions to destination custom field structures. Attachments stored on disk under ALLEGRA_HOME migrate as linked files that we re-attach to the correct Tasks in the destination using the original path structure as a reference key. We do not migrate workflows, automations, or server-level installation data; these require manual rebuild or are specific to the Allegra hosting environment.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Allegra object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Allegra
Item
Microsoft Project
Task
1:1Allegra Items map 1:1 to Microsoft Project Tasks. Standard Item attributes (Name, Description, Start Date, Due Date, Status, Priority) map to Task Name, Notes, Start, Finish, and custom flag or text fields. Item-level attributes migrate to Microsoft Project custom fields (Text1-30, Number1-20, Date1-10) based on data type. We query the Allegra schema endpoint to retrieve all attribute definitions before migration so that Item attributes and form fields are classified correctly and never conflated.
Allegra
Item (parent-child)
Microsoft Project
Summary Task + Subtasks
1:manyAllegra Items with parent-child relationships (sub-items) map to Microsoft Project Summary Tasks and their subordinate Tasks. We extract the parent-child hierarchy from Allegra's item structure and construct the Task hierarchy in Microsoft Project, where Summary Tasks roll up dates and durations from their child Tasks. Milestone items map to Tasks with zero duration and the Milestone flag set.
Allegra
Item (dependencies)
Microsoft Project
Task Predecessors
lossyAllegra item relationships that represent dependencies map to Microsoft Project Predecessor links. We parse the relationship type (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, etc.) if available in the Allegra export and construct the corresponding predecessor link type in Microsoft Project. Relationships without a defined type default to Finish-to-Start (FS), which is the most common dependency type in project scheduling.
Allegra
Custom Attribute (Item-native)
Microsoft Project
Custom Field
lossyAllegra attributes that belong to Items (not forms) map to Microsoft Project custom fields. We classify each attribute by data type (text, number, date, dropdown, boolean) and map to the closest Microsoft Project built-in custom field type. Custom attributes that use Allegra custom lists map to Microsoft Project custom fields with lookup tables or drop-down values populated from the custom list entries.
Allegra
Custom Field (Form-native)
Microsoft Project
Custom Field (separate mapping)
lossyAllegra form fields (which belong to input forms, not Items) require a separate mapping from item attributes. We extract the form definitions and field definitions via the Allegra REST API, then map form fields to Microsoft Project custom fields on a per-project basis, noting that form fields may not have values for every Item unless the form was consistently applied. We flag any form fields that have sparse data coverage before migration so the customer can decide whether to include them.
Allegra
Custom List
Microsoft Project
Lookup Table or Drop-Down Custom Field
lossyAllegra custom lists and their entries are retrieved via GET /v2/lists in the REST API. Each custom list becomes a Microsoft Project custom field with a drop-down list of allowed values. If the custom list is referenced by a custom attribute on Items, the drop-down field is applied to the corresponding Task custom field and the values are pre-populated during migration so that re-assignment is possible in the destination.
Allegra
Attachment
Microsoft Project
Linked Attachment
lossyAllegra attachments reside on disk in the ALLEGRA_HOME directory, not in the database. We export the attachments directory alongside the database export, preserving the directory structure that maps Items to their attached files. In the destination Microsoft Project file, we re-attach files using relative paths if the destination is a shared network folder, or we generate a written mapping table (Item ID to file path) if the destination uses SharePoint or OneDrive for attachments. We validate that each file exists at the expected path before marking the attachment as migrated.
Allegra
User
Microsoft Project
Resource
1:1Allegra Users map to Microsoft Project Resources. We export user records from the Allegra database (including name, email, and role) and create corresponding Material Resources or Work Resources in Microsoft Project based on the user's assignment pattern. Resource names map from the Allegra user display name. If a user has an assigned role in Allegra, we store it in the Resource Notes field for reference.
Allegra
Item Assignment (User to Item)
Microsoft Project
Task Assignment (Resource to Task)
1:1Allegra item assignments map to Microsoft Project task assignments. We extract the assignment records linking Users to Items, resolve the User-to-Resource mapping, and create Task Assignments in Microsoft Project with the assigned Resource and units percentage. If Allegra tracks assignment hours or effort, we map those to the Assignment Work field in Microsoft Project.
Allegra
Project-level Metadata
Microsoft Project
Project Summary Task or Custom Fields
lossyAllegra project-level properties (project name, description, manager, start date, target date) map to the Microsoft Project Summary Task fields and project-level custom fields. The Summary Task Name becomes the project name; project start and finish dates map to the Project Start and Project Finish fields. Any project-level custom attributes migrate to project-level custom fields applied in the General Microsoft Project Information dialog.
| Allegra | Microsoft Project | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Item (parent-child) | Summary Task + Subtasks1:many | Fully supported | |
| Item (dependencies) | Task Predecessorslossy | Fully supported | |
| Custom Attribute (Item-native) | Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field (Form-native) | Custom Field (separate mapping)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Custom List | Lookup Table or Drop-Down Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Linked Attachmentlossy | Fully supported | |
| User | Resource1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Item Assignment (User to Item) | Task Assignment (Resource to Task)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Project-level Metadata | Project Summary Task or Custom Fieldslossy | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Allegra gotchas
Attachments reside in ALLEGRA_HOME filesystem, not the database
Attributes vs. fields distinction causes field mapping errors
Server migration requires full installation shutdown
Database system change during migration risks field-length data loss
Microsoft Project gotchas
Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner
Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling
Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client
Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365
Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Schema discovery and attribute classification
We query the Allegra REST API and inspect the database schema to retrieve all item attribute definitions, form field definitions, and custom list structures. We classify each metadata field as item-native attribute or form-native field, note which forms each field belongs to, and identify the data type for each. We produce a written schema inventory document that the customer reviews and approves before extraction begins. This step resolves the attributes-versus-fields distinction before any data is touched.
Maintenance window and filesystem preparation
We coordinate with the customer's IT team to schedule a maintenance window during which the Allegra server is stopped. During the window, we extract the Allegra database and the ALLEGRA_HOME attachments directory simultaneously. We validate the database backup integrity, verify that the attachment directory is complete (no files open or in-transit), and produce a row count report for Items, attachments, custom lists, and users. The customer approves the extraction output before we proceed to transformation.
Data transformation and custom field mapping
We transform the Allegra export into Microsoft Project-compatible format. Items become Tasks with Start and Finish dates mapped from Allegra's due dates and start dates. Parent-child item relationships become Summary Tasks and subtasks. Item dependencies become predecessor links. We apply the custom attribute mapping (item-native attributes to Microsoft Project custom fields by type) and the form field mapping (form-native fields to separate custom fields on a per-project basis, with a coverage report flagging fields that are not populated on all Items). Custom lists become lookup tables or drop-down custom field value lists.
Attachment re-linking and file path validation
We re-attach files to the corresponding Tasks in the Microsoft Project file using the ALLEGRA_HOME attachment directory structure as the reference key. If the destination is a local or network file share, we maintain the relative path structure. If the destination uses SharePoint or OneDrive, we generate a written file mapping table (Item ID, original file path, recommended destination path) that the customer's admin uses to upload and link the files post-migration. We validate that each file exists before marking it as successfully re-linked.
MPP file generation and reconciliation
We generate one or more Microsoft Project MPP files (one per Allegra project or one consolidated file depending on the customer's structure preference). We run a reconciliation report comparing Item counts, attachment counts, custom field coverage, and user-to-resource mapping against the Allegra source. The customer reviews the reconciliation report and spot-checks 15-25 randomly selected tasks for data accuracy. Any mapping corrections are applied and a corrected MPP file is generated before cutover.
Cutover and handoff
We deliver the final MPP file(s), the attachment directory (or file mapping table if SharePoint/OneDrive integration is used), and the written schema inventory and reconciliation report. We do not migrate Allegra workflows, automations, or server-level installation data; these are documented as requiring manual rebuild or being specific to the Allegra hosting environment. We support a brief reconciliation period (up to three business days) where the customer can report any data discrepancies for resolution. Post-cutover admin tasks (SharePoint attachment linking, resource calendar configuration, baseline setting) are the customer's responsibility.
Platform deep dives
Allegra
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Microsoft Project
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Allegra and Microsoft Project.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Allegra: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Allegra doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Allegra to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Allegra to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Allegra
Other ways to arrive at Microsoft Project
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.