Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between RoboHead and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.
RoboHead
Source
Microsoft Project
Destination
Compatibility
8 of 11
objects map 1:1 between RoboHead and Microsoft Project.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from RoboHead to Microsoft Project is a domain shift from creative project intake to enterprise scheduling. RoboHead centers on custom request briefs, approval workflows, and creative asset review; Microsoft Project centers on Gantt scheduling, critical path analysis, and resource leveling. We do not migrate Workflow Automations because RoboHead's automation rules are not exposed via its public API, and because Microsoft Project's scheduling engine operates on different trigger logic. We preserve custom creative briefs as structured task notes attached to migrated Projects, transform RoboHead role rates and user rates into Microsoft Project resource cost tables, and map Campaigns to a portfolio grouping convention that the customer's PMO defines at scoping. File attachments and DesignDrop annotation references are documented separately for manual reattachment or a post-migration file-link reconciliation sprint. The migration covers data only; PMO-standard template rebuilds, baseline setting, and resource pool configuration are scoped as a separate configuration engagement after cutover.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a RoboHead object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
RoboHead
Project
Microsoft Project
Project
1:1RoboHead Projects map to Microsoft Project as the primary record. Project name, start date, due date, status, description, and custom fields migrate directly. We detect whether a RoboHead Project was created from a Template (stale team references are common) and flag any orphaned user assignments for manual resolution before the Project lands in Microsoft Project. Archived projects migrate as inactive projects to preserve historical record without cluttering active portfolios.
RoboHead
Campaign
Microsoft Project
Enterprise Portfolio or Project Summary Task
lossyRoboHead Campaigns are organizational groupings above Projects, often used to bundle related creative work. Microsoft Project does not have a native Campaign object. During scoping, we define a grouping convention: either a SharePoint list that Projects reference, a naming convention prefix that Teams use to filter, or a Summary Task at the top of each Project file that holds the Campaign name. The customer chooses the convention before migration so we can map Projects to the correct grouping structure.
RoboHead
Request
Microsoft Project
Project Notes or Task Notes (structured)
1:manyRoboHead Requests are project intake forms submitted before a Project is created. Each Request contains custom brief fields (ListColumns) that capture creative requirements. Microsoft Project does not have a request or brief object. We split Requests from their parent Project and preserve them as structured Notes attached to the migrated Project: a summary note with the request type, requester name, submission date, and a formatted block of the custom brief field values. We flag any Requests without a parent Project for the customer's review before migration.
RoboHead
Task
Microsoft Project
Task
1:1RoboHead Tasks map directly to Microsoft Project tasks with task name, start date, finish date, percent complete, assignee, and task status preserved. Task dependencies in Microsoft Project are not present in RoboHead by default; if the customer has used sequential task ordering in RoboHead, we create Finish-to-Start dependencies in Microsoft Project during migration. Task roles (Designer, Writer, QA) migrate as text assignments on the task; full resource assignments require the resource pool to be populated first.
RoboHead
Team Member
Microsoft Project
Resource
1:1RoboHead Team Members (Users) map to Microsoft Project resources. We resolve each Team Member by email match against the destination resource pool. RoboHead user-level billing rates map to the resource's Cost Rate Table in Microsoft Project (Standard Rate field). Role-level rates in RoboHead map to separate resource entries with role names and cost rates, or to the resource's material label if the customer's PMO uses a generic resource pool. Inactive or orphaned users in RoboHead are flagged for manual resource pool cleanup before migration.
RoboHead
Task Role
Microsoft Project
Resource (generic or named)
1:manyRoboHead Task Roles (Designer, Writer, QA, etc.) with role-level billing rates map to Microsoft Project resource entries. If the customer has both named users and role-based assignments in RoboHead, we create two resource strategies during scoping: named resources for individuals and generic resources (e.g., 'Designer - Creative') for role-based assignments without a named user. Role rates become the generic resource's standard rate in the cost table.
RoboHead
Custom Field
Microsoft Project
Custom Field
1:1RoboHead custom fields on Projects, Campaigns, and Requests are discovered during scoping via the GetAllFields API. List-type fields return optionIds that we resolve to display values during transform. We create equivalent custom fields in Microsoft Project (via Project Web App for Project Online or the enterprise custom fields interface in Project Desktop) and populate them during import. Field type mapping: RoboHead text and number map to Project Text and Number fields; date fields map to Date fields; list-type fields map to Flag or Text depending on single or multi-select behavior.
RoboHead
Attachment
Microsoft Project
SharePoint Document Library (documented)
1:1RoboHead file attachments on Tasks and Projects are stored in the RoboHead document layer. Microsoft Project stores files in SharePoint or local project files. We document the original file URL and attachment context during migration and provide a reattachment guide that maps each file to the corresponding Project's SharePoint document library. DesignDrop annotation links on creative assets do not migrate; these are flagged for manual reannotation post-migration since the annotation history is not exportable via RoboHead's API.
RoboHead
Note
Microsoft Project
Task Notes or Project Summary
1:1RoboHead Notes on Projects and Tasks with @mentions migrate as Microsoft Project task notes or project notes. @mention user references are converted to plain text (e.g., '@John Smith' becomes 'John Smith') since Microsoft Project notes do not support @-mention linking. Notes are mapped to the corresponding task or project record by ID. If a Note references a deleted or orphaned user, the note text is preserved without the broken mention link.
RoboHead
Project Template
Microsoft Project
Project Template (.mpt)
1:1RoboHead Project Templates (Projects saved as templates with tasks, files, budget, and team structure) migrate as Project plan outlines rather than executable .mpt template files. We extract the template's task structure, default assignees, and duration estimates and preserve them as a Project plan in Microsoft Project. If the customer requires .mpt template files for repeated use, the PMO rebuilds them from the migrated plan; we provide a template extraction guide as part of the handoff documentation.
RoboHead
Workflow Automation
Microsoft Project
Not Migrated
1:1RoboHead workflow automation rules—including approval chains, status-change triggers, and conditional notifications—are not exposed via the public API and cannot be exported programmatically. This is a platform-level constraint, not a pair-specific gap. We document every active automation during the discovery call (trigger, conditions, actions, affected records) and provide a configuration guide for rebuilding equivalent rules in Power Automate or SharePoint approval workflows post-migration. Customers should plan two to three days of post-migration workflow reconfiguration.
| RoboHead | Microsoft Project | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Campaign | Enterprise Portfolio or Project Summary Tasklossy | Fully supported | |
| Request | Project Notes or Task Notes (structured)1:many | Fully supported | |
| Task | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Team Member | Resource1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task Role | Resource (generic or named)1:many | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Field1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | SharePoint Document Library (documented)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Note | Task Notes or Project Summary1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Project Template | Project Template (.mpt)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Workflow Automation | Not Migrated1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
RoboHead gotchas
Workflow automations are not exposed via the public API
Reporting accuracy depends on diligent data hygiene in RoboHead
Custom field IDs must be collected before adding or updating records
Project Templates may carry stale team references
Contact users face limited access to project data
Microsoft Project gotchas
Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner
Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling
Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client
Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365
Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and destination variant clarification
We audit RoboHead across active Projects, Campaigns, Requests, Tasks, Team Members, Task Roles, custom fields (via GetAllFields and GetFieldOptions APIs), attachments, and Notes. We also document every active Workflow Automation (name, trigger, conditions, actions, affected records) for the automation inventory handoff. In parallel, we confirm the Microsoft Project destination variant: Project Desktop (Standard or Professional), Project Online (PWA), or Project Server Subscription Edition. The destination variant determines how we connect (MPP file import, Project Online REST API, or Project Server CSOM) and what custom field configuration options are available.
Campaign grouping convention and cost table design
We define the grouping strategy for RoboHead Campaigns during a scoping workshop with the customer's PMO lead. Options include SharePoint list referencing, naming convention prefix, or Project Summary Task inclusion. We also design the resource cost table structure: which RoboHead role rates map to generic resources, which user rates map to named resources, and what the Standard Rate values are. This design is validated against a sample of ten Projects and twenty Tasks before full migration begins. Custom brief fields that cannot map cleanly to Project custom fields are flagged for the pre-migration data sprint.
Pre-migration data cleanup sprint
We run a data quality report against the RoboHead export, flagging stale task statuses, orphaned user references from template-derived Projects, inactive users with open assignments, and Requests without parent Projects. The customer's team resolves these issues in RoboHead before we begin the export. This step prevents orphaned records and stale assignments from landing in Microsoft Project and inflating the resource pool with inactive users.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a test environment (a SharePoint document library for file output, or a Project Online sandbox site) using production-like data volume. The customer's PM lead reconciles record counts (Projects in, Campaigns grouped, Tasks in, Resources in, Notes attached), spot-checks twenty to thirty random Projects against the RoboHead source, and validates the cost table values. Any field mapping corrections, grouping convention adjustments, or cost rate corrections happen here before production migration begins.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Resources first (Team Members and Task Roles mapped to the resource pool with cost rates), then Projects (with custom fields normalized and Campaign grouping applied), then Tasks (with assignees resolved to the resource pool and dependencies created where sequential ordering is detected), then Notes (mapped to the parent Project or Task). Attachments are documented with original URLs and reattachment context rather than transferred directly. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.
Cutover, validation, and workflow handoff
We freeze RoboHead writes during cutover, run a final delta pass for any records modified during the migration window, then deliver the production migration output. We provide the Workflow Automation inventory document with Power Automate rebuild guides, the DesignDrop reannotation checklist, the Campaign grouping reference sheet, and the cost table summary. We support a three-day hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the PMO. We do not rebuild Workflow Automations as Power Automate flows inside the migration scope; that is a separate Power Platform engagement or internal admin task.
Platform deep dives
RoboHead
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Microsoft Project
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across RoboHead and Microsoft Project.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
RoboHead: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
RoboHead exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during RoboHead to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your RoboHead to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave RoboHead
Other ways to arrive at Microsoft Project
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.