Project Management migration

Migrate from RoboHead to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between RoboHead and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

RoboHead logo

RoboHead

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

73%

8 of 11

objects map 1:1 between RoboHead and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from RoboHead to Microsoft Project is a domain shift from creative project intake to enterprise scheduling. RoboHead centers on custom request briefs, approval workflows, and creative asset review; Microsoft Project centers on Gantt scheduling, critical path analysis, and resource leveling. We do not migrate Workflow Automations because RoboHead's automation rules are not exposed via its public API, and because Microsoft Project's scheduling engine operates on different trigger logic. We preserve custom creative briefs as structured task notes attached to migrated Projects, transform RoboHead role rates and user rates into Microsoft Project resource cost tables, and map Campaigns to a portfolio grouping convention that the customer's PMO defines at scoping. File attachments and DesignDrop annotation references are documented separately for manual reattachment or a post-migration file-link reconciliation sprint. The migration covers data only; PMO-standard template rebuilds, baseline setting, and resource pool configuration are scoped as a separate configuration engagement after cutover.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

RoboHead logo

RoboHead

What's pushing teams away

  • Manual tagging for notifications forces users to remember who to include, creating miscommunication when team composition changes mid-project.
  • Contact users external to the organization cannot reliably view or interact with their assigned projects, blocking collaboration with agency partners or clients.
  • The task list lacks an outbox-style status indicator, making it difficult to identify which tasks have been submitted without drilling into each one individually.
  • Limited mobile app functionality reduces project visibility and task management for team members working outside the office.
  • Some fundamental features behave unexpectedly, requiring workarounds that slow down established team processes.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How RoboHead objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a RoboHead object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

RoboHead

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead Projects map to Microsoft Project as the primary record. Project name, start date, due date, status, description, and custom fields migrate directly. We detect whether a RoboHead Project was created from a Template (stale team references are common) and flag any orphaned user assignments for manual resolution before the Project lands in Microsoft Project. Archived projects migrate as inactive projects to preserve historical record without cluttering active portfolios.

RoboHead

Campaign

maps to

Microsoft Project

Enterprise Portfolio or Project Summary Task

lossy
Fully supported

RoboHead Campaigns are organizational groupings above Projects, often used to bundle related creative work. Microsoft Project does not have a native Campaign object. During scoping, we define a grouping convention: either a SharePoint list that Projects reference, a naming convention prefix that Teams use to filter, or a Summary Task at the top of each Project file that holds the Campaign name. The customer chooses the convention before migration so we can map Projects to the correct grouping structure.

RoboHead

Request

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project Notes or Task Notes (structured)

1:many
Fully supported

RoboHead Requests are project intake forms submitted before a Project is created. Each Request contains custom brief fields (ListColumns) that capture creative requirements. Microsoft Project does not have a request or brief object. We split Requests from their parent Project and preserve them as structured Notes attached to the migrated Project: a summary note with the request type, requester name, submission date, and a formatted block of the custom brief field values. We flag any Requests without a parent Project for the customer's review before migration.

RoboHead

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead Tasks map directly to Microsoft Project tasks with task name, start date, finish date, percent complete, assignee, and task status preserved. Task dependencies in Microsoft Project are not present in RoboHead by default; if the customer has used sequential task ordering in RoboHead, we create Finish-to-Start dependencies in Microsoft Project during migration. Task roles (Designer, Writer, QA) migrate as text assignments on the task; full resource assignments require the resource pool to be populated first.

RoboHead

Team Member

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead Team Members (Users) map to Microsoft Project resources. We resolve each Team Member by email match against the destination resource pool. RoboHead user-level billing rates map to the resource's Cost Rate Table in Microsoft Project (Standard Rate field). Role-level rates in RoboHead map to separate resource entries with role names and cost rates, or to the resource's material label if the customer's PMO uses a generic resource pool. Inactive or orphaned users in RoboHead are flagged for manual resource pool cleanup before migration.

RoboHead

Task Role

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource (generic or named)

1:many
Fully supported

RoboHead Task Roles (Designer, Writer, QA, etc.) with role-level billing rates map to Microsoft Project resource entries. If the customer has both named users and role-based assignments in RoboHead, we create two resource strategies during scoping: named resources for individuals and generic resources (e.g., 'Designer - Creative') for role-based assignments without a named user. Role rates become the generic resource's standard rate in the cost table.

RoboHead

Custom Field

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead custom fields on Projects, Campaigns, and Requests are discovered during scoping via the GetAllFields API. List-type fields return optionIds that we resolve to display values during transform. We create equivalent custom fields in Microsoft Project (via Project Web App for Project Online or the enterprise custom fields interface in Project Desktop) and populate them during import. Field type mapping: RoboHead text and number map to Project Text and Number fields; date fields map to Date fields; list-type fields map to Flag or Text depending on single or multi-select behavior.

RoboHead

Attachment

maps to

Microsoft Project

SharePoint Document Library (documented)

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead file attachments on Tasks and Projects are stored in the RoboHead document layer. Microsoft Project stores files in SharePoint or local project files. We document the original file URL and attachment context during migration and provide a reattachment guide that maps each file to the corresponding Project's SharePoint document library. DesignDrop annotation links on creative assets do not migrate; these are flagged for manual reannotation post-migration since the annotation history is not exportable via RoboHead's API.

RoboHead

Note

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Notes or Project Summary

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead Notes on Projects and Tasks with @mentions migrate as Microsoft Project task notes or project notes. @mention user references are converted to plain text (e.g., '@John Smith' becomes 'John Smith') since Microsoft Project notes do not support @-mention linking. Notes are mapped to the corresponding task or project record by ID. If a Note references a deleted or orphaned user, the note text is preserved without the broken mention link.

RoboHead

Project Template

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project Template (.mpt)

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead Project Templates (Projects saved as templates with tasks, files, budget, and team structure) migrate as Project plan outlines rather than executable .mpt template files. We extract the template's task structure, default assignees, and duration estimates and preserve them as a Project plan in Microsoft Project. If the customer requires .mpt template files for repeated use, the PMO rebuilds them from the migrated plan; we provide a template extraction guide as part of the handoff documentation.

RoboHead

Workflow Automation

maps to

Microsoft Project

Not Migrated

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead workflow automation rules—including approval chains, status-change triggers, and conditional notifications—are not exposed via the public API and cannot be exported programmatically. This is a platform-level constraint, not a pair-specific gap. We document every active automation during the discovery call (trigger, conditions, actions, affected records) and provide a configuration guide for rebuilding equivalent rules in Power Automate or SharePoint approval workflows post-migration. Customers should plan two to three days of post-migration workflow reconfiguration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

RoboHead logo

RoboHead gotchas

High

Workflow automations are not exposed via the public API

Medium

Reporting accuracy depends on diligent data hygiene in RoboHead

Medium

Custom field IDs must be collected before adding or updating records

Low

Project Templates may carry stale team references

Low

Contact users face limited access to project data

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Custom creative briefs have no native destination in Microsoft Project

    RoboHead Requests and their custom brief fields (ListColumns) are a core data type that has no direct Microsoft Project equivalent. We split Requests from their parent Projects and preserve them as structured task or project notes, but the rich form structure is flattened. If the customer's creative brief data is mission-critical for downstream reporting or billing, we recommend a pre-migration data sprint to consolidate critical brief fields into RoboHead's Project-level custom fields, which map more cleanly to Microsoft Project custom fields. Brief fields that live only on Requests and not on Projects will require manual re-entry or a supplemental SharePoint form after cutover.

  • RoboHead workflow automations do not migrate

    RoboHead's approval chains, status-change triggers, and conditional notification rules are not exposed via the REST API and cannot be exported or reconstructed programmatically. Microsoft Project does not have an equivalent automation engine for project-level approvals without Power Automate or SharePoint workflow configuration. We document every active RoboHead automation during scoping and deliver a Power Automate rebuild guide. Approval and escalation logic must be rebuilt post-migration by the customer's admin team or a Power Platform consultant.

  • Role-rate and user-rate billing requires cost table design

    RoboHead separates role-rate billing (e.g., $75/hour for Designer) from user-rate billing (e.g., $90/hour for John Smith as Designer). Microsoft Project resource cost tables support a Standard Rate and an Accrue At setting per resource but do not natively distinguish role-based versus user-based rates without custom resource pool design. We transform role rates into generic resources and user rates into named resources, but the PMO must validate the resulting cost table against their billing expectations. Budget rollup reports in Microsoft Project will reflect the cost table values; incorrect rate assignment produces inaccurate project cost forecasts.

  • Project Online retirement does not affect Microsoft Project Desktop or Project Server

    Microsoft Project Online is retiring September 30, 2026 per Microsoft's official announcement, but this only affects Project Online (the cloud PWA). Microsoft Project Desktop (Project Standard and Project Professional) and Project Server Subscription Edition continue as supported products. If the destination is Project Online, the customer's IT team must confirm their tenant's Project Online license is still active and migration is within scope; otherwise Project Desktop or Project Server are the viable Microsoft Project destinations. We clarify the destination variant during scoping.

  • DesignDrop annotation links do not export

    RoboHead's DesignDrop provides external stakeholder annotation on creative assets. The annotation links and review comments stored in DesignDrop are not accessible via the RoboHead API and cannot be migrated to Microsoft Project or SharePoint. We document each DesignDrop attachment context (Project, Task, file name) so the customer's admin can re-share the original files in SharePoint or Teams for reannotation. The annotation history is lost; stakeholders must re-add feedback in the new collaboration environment.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful RoboHead to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Discovery and destination variant clarification

    We audit RoboHead across active Projects, Campaigns, Requests, Tasks, Team Members, Task Roles, custom fields (via GetAllFields and GetFieldOptions APIs), attachments, and Notes. We also document every active Workflow Automation (name, trigger, conditions, actions, affected records) for the automation inventory handoff. In parallel, we confirm the Microsoft Project destination variant: Project Desktop (Standard or Professional), Project Online (PWA), or Project Server Subscription Edition. The destination variant determines how we connect (MPP file import, Project Online REST API, or Project Server CSOM) and what custom field configuration options are available.

  2. Campaign grouping convention and cost table design

    We define the grouping strategy for RoboHead Campaigns during a scoping workshop with the customer's PMO lead. Options include SharePoint list referencing, naming convention prefix, or Project Summary Task inclusion. We also design the resource cost table structure: which RoboHead role rates map to generic resources, which user rates map to named resources, and what the Standard Rate values are. This design is validated against a sample of ten Projects and twenty Tasks before full migration begins. Custom brief fields that cannot map cleanly to Project custom fields are flagged for the pre-migration data sprint.

  3. Pre-migration data cleanup sprint

    We run a data quality report against the RoboHead export, flagging stale task statuses, orphaned user references from template-derived Projects, inactive users with open assignments, and Requests without parent Projects. The customer's team resolves these issues in RoboHead before we begin the export. This step prevents orphaned records and stale assignments from landing in Microsoft Project and inflating the resource pool with inactive users.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a test environment (a SharePoint document library for file output, or a Project Online sandbox site) using production-like data volume. The customer's PM lead reconciles record counts (Projects in, Campaigns grouped, Tasks in, Resources in, Notes attached), spot-checks twenty to thirty random Projects against the RoboHead source, and validates the cost table values. Any field mapping corrections, grouping convention adjustments, or cost rate corrections happen here before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Resources first (Team Members and Task Roles mapped to the resource pool with cost rates), then Projects (with custom fields normalized and Campaign grouping applied), then Tasks (with assignees resolved to the resource pool and dependencies created where sequential ordering is detected), then Notes (mapped to the parent Project or Task). Attachments are documented with original URLs and reattachment context rather than transferred directly. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow handoff

    We freeze RoboHead writes during cutover, run a final delta pass for any records modified during the migration window, then deliver the production migration output. We provide the Workflow Automation inventory document with Power Automate rebuild guides, the DesignDrop reannotation checklist, the Campaign grouping reference sheet, and the cost table summary. We support a three-day hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the PMO. We do not rebuild Workflow Automations as Power Automate flows inside the migration scope; that is a separate Power Platform engagement or internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

RoboHead logo

RoboHead

Source

Strengths

  • Custom creative request briefs and intake forms reduce project kickoff back-and-forth for marketing teams.
  • Role-rate and user-rate billing tracking enables accurate creative workforce cost accounting.
  • DesignDrop provides a zero-friction file annotation and feedback layer for external stakeholders.
  • No-code workflow automation with approval chains and triggers configurable by project managers.
  • Differentiated focus on the marketing and creative project lifecycle rather than generic project tracking.

Weaknesses

  • Notification system requires explicit manual tagging; automations do not fire for all team members by default.
  • Contact users (external collaborators) face restricted project visibility and interaction capabilities.
  • API documentation is minimal and rate limits are not publicly published, complicating programmatic migrations.
  • Mobile app functionality is limited compared to the desktop experience.
  • The task list view does not clearly distinguish sent versus pending tasks without manual status inspection.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across RoboHead and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    RoboHead: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    RoboHead exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your RoboHead to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about RoboHead to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during RoboHead to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your RoboHead to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 500 Projects and 5,000 Tasks with no extensive custom brief structures. Migrations with extensive custom fields on both Projects and Requests, role-rate billing requiring cost table mapping, large attachment sets, or multiple Campaigns requiring a custom grouping convention move to eight to twelve weeks because of field normalization, cost table design validation, and PMO stakeholder review cycles.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from RoboHead.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day