Helpdesk migration

Migrate from Gmelius to HubSpot Service Hub

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Gmelius and HubSpot Service Hub. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in HubSpot Service Hub.

Gmelius logo

Gmelius

Source

HubSpot Service Hub

Destination

HubSpot Service Hub logo

Compatibility

92%

11 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Gmelius and HubSpot Service Hub.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Gmelius to HubSpot Service Hub is a platform migration from a Gmail extension into a dedicated multi-channel service desk. Gmelius stores Shared Inboxes, email threads, labels, and Kanban boards as layered configurations inside Google Workspace, with no public REST API on lower tiers and Automation Rules stored as extension-local state rather than exportable data. We extract via the Gmail API and Google Contacts API, map conversation-level metadata (assignee, status, tags, SLA flags) to HubSpot Ticket properties and Conversation threads, and preserve label taxonomies as HubSpot ticket labels or custom properties. We do not migrate Automation Rules as code — these are captured during discovery and delivered as a written rebuild inventory for your admin. Shared Drafts become HubSpot canned responses. Kanban board columns map to HubSpot pipeline stages. HubSpot Service Hub tiers (Starter at $15/seat, Professional at $100/seat, Enterprise at $150/seat) determine which features are available after cutover, and we scope feature parity against the source Gmelius plan tier during discovery.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Gmelius logo

Gmelius

What's pushing teams away

  • Slow email loading times (6+ mentions on G2) damage productivity for high-volume support teams who need sub-second response, pushing them toward dedicated helpdesk platforms.
  • Gmail-only constraint eliminates teams using Outlook or mixed email environments, forcing an either/or decision that enterprise IT departments often cannot make.
  • Steep learning curve for Automation Rules and Kanban boards means new team members require guided onboarding before they can operate independently.
  • No public API documentation on lower tiers and limited mobile app functionality frustrates technical teams needing programmatic access or mobile support workflows.
  • Extension conflicts with other Gmail add-ons (documented in Gmelius own help center) cause UI glitches that require disabling competing extensions.

Choosing

HubSpot Service Hub logo

HubSpot Service Hub

What's pulling them in

  • Unified CRM context means every support ticket links directly to the Contact and Company record without a separate integration
  • Free tier provides unlimited support seat access with basic ticketing and a shared inbox for small teams to validate fit before committing
  • Omnichannel routing consolidates email, live chat, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, and Instagram DM into one queue
  • Built-in customer success workspace gives health scores and portfolio views that other standalone helpdesks cannot match
  • AI-powered Breeze agent automates common resolutions and surfaces knowledge base articles without agent intervention

Object mapping

How Gmelius objects map to HubSpot Service Hub

Each row shows how a Gmelius object lands in HubSpot Service Hub, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Gmelius

Shared Inbox

maps to

HubSpot Service Hub

Team Inbox / Ticket Queue

1:1
Fully supported

Gmelius Shared Inboxes map directly to HubSpot Service Hub Team Inboxes. Each Shared Inbox becomes a separate ticket queue in HubSpot, with team members assigned to the queue via the Agents setting. Inbox-level SLA policies are captured during discovery and applied to the corresponding HubSpot ticket pipeline as SLA rules. Note that HubSpot Starter supports one Team Inbox; Professional and Enterprise allow multiple team inboxes for different departments or client groupings.

Gmelius

Email Conversation (thread)

maps to

HubSpot Service Hub

Ticket + Conversation

1:1
Fully supported

Gmelius conversation threads migrate to HubSpot Tickets with associated Conversation records. The full email thread (all messages, headers, CC/BCC, and inline attachments) is preserved as conversation entries on the Ticket. Ticket status (open, pending, resolved, closed) is mapped from Gmelius conversation status, and the original thread timestamp becomes the Ticket's create date. The conversation subject line becomes the Ticket name.

Gmelius

Shared Label

maps to

HubSpot Service Hub

Ticket Label

1:1
Fully supported

Gmelius Shared Labels are exported via the Gmail API and recreated as HubSpot Ticket Labels. We preserve the full label hierarchy (parent labels and sub-labels) as a flat label taxonomy on HubSpot tickets, since HubSpot does not support hierarchical label nesting. Label-to-conversation associations migrate as label assignments on the corresponding HubSpot ticket. Label color coding is noted during discovery but cannot be reproduced in HubSpot's current label system.

Gmelius

Email Template

maps to

HubSpot Service Hub

Canned Response

1:1
Fully supported

Gmelius Email Templates with variable placeholders (merge fields) migrate to HubSpot Canned Responses. We preserve the full template body, variable placeholder syntax (e.g., {{contact.first_name}}), and any conditional logic present in the template. Gmelius template categories map to HubSpot Canned Response folders. If the customer uses HubSpot Sales or Service Hub Professional, Canned Responses are available in the Conversations inbox toolbar for quick insertion during ticket resolution.

Gmelius

Shared Draft

maps to

HubSpot Service Hub

Canned Response (or Note)

1:1
Fully supported

Gmelius Shared Drafts are collaborative drafts in a shared queue. HubSpot does not have a shared-draft concept for conversations. We export Shared Drafts as Canned Responses (if the draft is intended for reuse) or as internal Notes on the associated ticket (if the draft is in-progress and not yet sent). The customer chooses the strategy during scoping based on how the team uses Shared Drafts.

Gmelius

Kanban Board

maps to

HubSpot Service Hub

Ticket Pipeline + Stage

lossy
Fully supported

Gmelius Kanban boards with status columns map to HubSpot Ticket Pipelines and stages. Each Kanban board becomes a HubSpot Ticket Pipeline, and each board column becomes a Ticket Stage within that pipeline. Card-to-conversation associations preserve which ticket belongs to which board, and card order within a column is noted as a custom property (board_position__c) if the customer requires the original ordering restored. HubSpot Starter supports one ticket pipeline; Professional and Enterprise support multiple pipelines.

Gmelius

Contact (Gmail Contact layer)

maps to

HubSpot Service Hub

Contact + Company

1:1
Fully supported

Gmelius does not maintain a separate contact database — contacts live in the Gmail contact layer via Google Contacts. We export contacts via the Google Contacts API and create HubSpot Contacts. If a contact has an associated company domain in Gmelius, we also create a HubSpot Company and associate it via the contact-to-company relationship. Any Gmelius-specific contact properties (e.g., contact tags, conversation associations) migrate as HubSpot Contact properties.

Gmelius

Tag (conversation tag)

maps to

HubSpot Service Hub

Ticket Label

1:1
Fully supported

Gmelius conversation tags migrate as HubSpot Ticket Labels. We export the complete tag taxonomy and recreate each tag as a HubSpot label. Tag-to-conversation associations preserve which tags were applied to which tickets. If the team uses both Shared Labels and conversation Tags in Gmelius, we consolidate them into HubSpot labels with a naming convention (e.g., prefix 'LBL-' for labels, 'TAG-' for conversation tags) to distinguish the two taxonomies during migration.

Gmelius

SLA Configuration

maps to

HubSpot Service Hub

Ticket Property (SLA metadata)

1:1
Fully supported

Gmelius SLA rules are tier-gated (Growth and Pro) and stored as Gmelius configuration. We export SLA configurations as custom properties on HubSpot tickets (e.g., first_response_sla__c, resolution_sla__c, sla_breached__c) rather than as native HubSpot SLA policies (which require Service Hub Professional or Enterprise). Native HubSpot SLA policies require separate configuration post-migration; we document the equivalent SLA policy settings during the handoff. Historical SLA compliance data migrates as ticket property values.

Gmelius

Automation Rule

maps to

HubSpot Service Hub

Workflow (documented inventory)

1:1
Fully supported

Gmelius Automation Rules define conditional email routing, auto-assignment, and follow-up sequences stored as extension-local state with no export mechanism. We capture the rule configuration during the discovery walkthrough (screen recording and structured questionnaire), then deliver a written inventory of every Automation Rule with its trigger conditions, actions, and a recommended HubSpot Workflow equivalent. We do not rebuild them as HubSpot Workflows within the migration scope. Complex AI dispatching rules on the Pro tier require the most detailed documentation because HubSpot's AI routing (available on Enterprise) has a different model.

Gmelius

User / Team Member

maps to

HubSpot Service Hub

Agent / User

1:1
Fully supported

Gmelius users correspond to Google Workspace accounts. We export the user list and map them to HubSpot Service Hub Agents. Assignment history on conversations (which agent was assigned, reassigned, and when) migrates as a custom multi-line property or as internal ticket notes, since HubSpot's native assignment history is tracked via the activity timeline rather than as a standalone field. Enterprise multi-domain Gmelius configurations require domain-by-domain user reconciliation during migration.

Gmelius

Email Note / @Mention

maps to

HubSpot Service Hub

Internal Note (Activity Log)

1:1
Fully supported

Gmelius email notes and @mentions within conversation threads export as HubSpot internal Notes on the associated Ticket. Note authorship (the Google Workspace user who wrote the note) maps to the HubSpot agent, and the original timestamp is preserved as the Note create date. If the note contains an @mention of another team member, we add the mentioned agent as a Ticket subscriber in HubSpot so they receive notifications.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Gmelius logo

Gmelius gotchas

High

Gmail-only lock-in is irreversible for mixed email environments

High

No formal public API on lower tiers limits programmatic data export

Medium

Automation Rules are extension-local state with no export mechanism

Medium

All team members must share the same plan tier

Low

Extension conflicts with other Gmail add-ons cause UI instability

HubSpot Service Hub logo

HubSpot Service Hub gotchas

High

Rate limits throttle large migration API calls

High

Side conversations and Zendesk macros have no HubSpot equivalent

High

HubSpot stores ticket history as fragmented engagement objects

Medium

Custom Objects require Enterprise tier in HubSpot

Medium

Ticket pipeline stage probability values do not export cleanly

Pair-specific challenges

  • No Gmelius public API requires Google Workspace API extraction

    Gmelius does not expose a documented REST API on the Meli or Growth tiers — API access appears on Growth but without public endpoint documentation. We extract all Gmelius data via the Gmail API (message threads, labels, attachments) and Google Contacts API (contact records). This imposes Gmail API rate limits (1,000 requests per second per user for reads, with daily quotas on bulk exports) that govern migration pacing. Any programmatic integration the customer planned around Gmelius's API will not carry forward and must be redesigned for HubSpot's API surface after cutover.

  • Automation Rules cannot be exported and must be rebuilt manually

    Gmelius Automation Rules are stored as extension-local configuration, not as data in any exportable system. There is no documented export mechanism. We capture rule configurations during the discovery walkthrough and deliver a written inventory with trigger conditions, actions, and recommended HubSpot Workflow equivalents, but the rebuild itself is an admin task. Complex Pro-tier AI dispatching rules are the highest-risk items because they involve conditional routing logic that requires manual reconstruction in HubSpot's automation builder.

  • Gmail-only environment may conflict with HubSpot's multi-channel routing

    Gmelius teams are entirely on Gmail by definition. HubSpot Service Hub routes conversations across email, live chat, and a customer portal. If the team plans to route support requests from a live chat widget or portal into HubSpot alongside existing email channels, the team inbox configuration and routing rules require planning to avoid duplicate tickets. We scope multi-channel routing during discovery and configure channel routing settings during migration setup to prevent email threads from creating separate tickets from the same customer conversation.

  • SLA configurations migrate as metadata, not native policy objects

    Gmelius SLA rules (first response, resolution time) are tier-gated on Growth and Pro. HubSpot's native SLA policies require Service Hub Professional or Enterprise. We export SLA rules as custom ticket properties and deliver a configuration guide for the customer's admin to implement native HubSpot SLA policies post-migration if they upgrade. Teams staying on HubSpot Starter will not have access to native SLA automation and must manage SLA compliance via the migrated metadata and manual processes.

  • Shared Drafts have no direct HubSpot equivalent and require a usage decision

    Gmelius Shared Drafts allow team members to collaboratively draft replies in a shared queue before sending. HubSpot does not have a shared-draft object — drafts are individual to the agent's session. We present two options during scoping: convert Shared Drafts to Canned Responses (for reusable templates) or to internal Notes (for work-in-progress drafts). The choice depends on how the team uses the feature, and both strategies have implications for agent workflow after cutover. We flag this decision point early so it does not block migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Gmelius to HubSpot Service Hub data migration

  1. Discovery and data audit

    We audit the source Gmelius environment across Shared Inbox count, conversation volume, label taxonomy, Kanban board columns, template library, and any Automation Rules in use. We extract a representative sample via the Gmail API to assess data quality, thread depth, attachment prevalence, and tag taxonomy size. We also capture plan tier (Meli/Growth/Pro), team member count, and any SLA configurations in use. The discovery output is a written migration scope, a Gmelius-to-HubSpot object mapping document, and a HubSpot edition recommendation (Starter at $15/seat for basic tickets, Professional at $100/seat for SLA management and workflows, Enterprise at $150/seat for custom ticket properties and AI routing).

  2. HubSpot portal configuration and schema setup

    We configure the destination HubSpot Service Hub portal before any data moves. This includes provisioning Team Inboxes (one per Gmelius Shared Inbox), ticket pipelines and stages (mapped from Gmelius Kanban boards and conversation statuses), ticket properties for SLA metadata and board associations, canned response folders and templates (mapped from Gmelius email templates), and agent accounts mapped from Gmelius Google Workspace users. We also configure the email forwarding address for each Team Inbox so that emails routed to the Gmelius inbox can be redirected to HubSpot post-cutover.

  3. Sample migration and reconciliation

    We run a sample migration of up to 100 representative conversations (including threads with attachments, notes, labels, and varied statuses) into a HubSpot Sandbox or staging portal. The customer's team lead reviews the migrated tickets, checks label accuracy, verifies SLA metadata, and confirms that conversation threading is intact. Mapping corrections happen in this phase. We do not proceed to full production migration until the sample is signed off.

  4. Full production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in this order: (1) Contacts and Companies via Google Contacts API mapped to HubSpot Contact and Company objects, (2) Team Inbox and pipeline configuration validated against the HubSpot destination, (3) Tickets with conversation threads migrated via Gmail API batch export with rate-limit handling, (4) Labels and Tags mapped to HubSpot ticket labels, (5) Canned Responses from Gmelius templates and Shared Drafts, (6) SLA metadata applied as custom ticket properties, (7) Agent assignment history reconstructed as internal notes or custom properties. Gmail API quotas govern batch pacing throughout.

  5. Cutover and email routing redirect

    We freeze Gmelius writes during cutover. Any new conversations created during the migration window are migrated as a delta pass. We then configure email routing to point the Gmelius-associated inbox addresses to HubSpot Team Inboxes. We validate that incoming emails land in the correct HubSpot ticket rather than creating duplicates. We deliver the Automation Rules inventory document to the customer's admin team with HubSpot Workflow equivalents documented for each rule. Post-cutover, Gmelius can be uninstalled from the Google Workspace admin panel.

  6. Validation, handoff, and post-migration support

    We run a row-count reconciliation comparing migrated ticket count, contact count, and label count against the Gmelius source export. The customer's team lead spot-checks 25-50 tickets for data accuracy. We deliver the final migration report, the Automation Rules rebuild guide, and a contact list of any Gmelius team members without HubSpot agent accounts (for the admin to provision). We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. Workflow rebuild, SLA policy configuration, and portal setup beyond what is scoped are separate engagements.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Gmelius logo

Gmelius

Source

Strengths

  • Gmail-native shared inbox means no new application to launch — team members stay in their existing email workflow.
  • AI assistant Meli handles reply drafting, email sorting, and meeting scheduling directly inside Gmail without additional tools.
  • SOC 2 Type II certified with Swiss privacy-by-design, meeting enterprise security procurement requirements.
  • Per-user pricing model with no per-conversation or per-channel fees makes cost predictable as teams grow.
  • Collaboration features including shared labels, Kanban boards, and real-time email notes reduce inbox clutter for support and sales teams.

Weaknesses

  • Gmail-only platform — no Outlook support eliminates teams in mixed or Microsoft-first email environments entirely.
  • Extension-delivered model means performance depends on browser extension loading times, with documented slow email loading on G2.
  • No permanent free plan and no free tier creates a billing commitment before teams can validate fit for their workflow.
  • Limited mobile app functionality means mobile support teams operate with reduced feature parity versus desktop.
  • Automation Rules and complex workflow configuration requires a learning investment that slows initial team adoption.
HubSpot Service Hub logo

HubSpot Service Hub

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified CRM object model means support context is always linked to sales and marketing data
  • Generous free tier with unlimited tickets and a shared inbox for small teams
  • Omnichannel inbox consolidates email, live chat, and major messaging platforms natively
  • Customer Success Workspace provides portfolio-level health scores without a separate tool
  • AI agent (Breeze) handles Tier-1 resolutions and knowledge base deflection automatically

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing with mandatory onboarding fees inflates year-one cost significantly
  • Ticket history stored as fragmented engagement objects across APIs complicates export and migration
  • Custom Objects locked behind Enterprise tier limits portability for mid-market teams
  • Help desk depth—routing rules, SLA management, advanced reporting—trails dedicated tools like Zendesk
  • Setup and configuration requires real time investment; out-of-box defaults rarely fit existing workflows

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Helpdesk migration. 2 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Gmelius and HubSpot Service Hub.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Gmelius: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Gmelius doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Gmelius to HubSpot Service Hub migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Gmelius to HubSpot Service Hub data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Gmelius to HubSpot Service Hub migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Gmelius to HubSpot Service Hub migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for teams with fewer than 10,000 conversations, a single Shared Inbox, and no multi-pipeline Kanban boards. Migrations with multiple Shared Inboxes, multi-column Kanban boards that require HubSpot multi-pipeline configuration, large email thread histories (over 100,000 individual messages), or Pro-tier AI dispatching rules that require detailed documentation move to six to nine weeks. The discovery and sample migration phase alone typically takes one to two weeks before any production data moves.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Gmelius.
Land in HubSpot Service Hub, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day