HRMS migration

Migrate from EPAY HCM to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between EPAY HCM and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

EPAY HCM logo

EPAY HCM

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between EPAY HCM and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

6-10 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Migrating from EPAY HCM to Bullhorn is an HCM-to-ATS translation, not a like-for-like replacement, because the two platforms serve fundamentally different functions. EPAY HCM bundles recruiting, onboarding, HR, benefits, time tracking, payroll processing, and tax filing under one roof. Bullhorn is an applicant tracking and recruiting CRM built for staffing agencies and internal talent acquisition teams. We map EPAY employee records and their associated compensation, benefits, and time-and-attendance data to Bullhorn Candidate and Contact profiles, and we flag explicitly that payroll processing history, tax filing records, and garnishment orders do not have native homes in Bullhorn and require either manual re-entry or parallel access to EPAY for lookback purposes. The absence of a public API on EPAY HCM means all source exports require vendor coordination, which we initiate early in the scoping phase. Bullhorn's Custom Objects are available on the Front Office Growth and Enterprise tiers only, so customers on the ATS tier with fewer than two custom objects available may need to upgrade or map their EPAY job-costing and labor-allocation data to standard Bullhorn fields. We do not migrate EPAY workflows, onboarding sequences, or benefits carrier integrations as these are either system-specific or require direct carrier re-enrollment. We deliver a written inventory of any EPAY configurations requiring manual rebuild in Bullhorn or a third-party HRIS integration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

EPAY HCM logo

EPAY HCM

What's pushing teams away

  • Pricing is opaque — there is no public pricing page and prospects must request a quote, which causes delays and uncertainty during vendor evaluation and migration planning.
  • No documented public API means integrations with downstream accounting, ERP, or business intelligence tools require manual data handling or custom development, creating dependency on EPAY's own export tools.
  • Customers report frustration with reporting and analytics limitations — the built-in dashboards are considered functional but not sufficient for deep workforce insight needs without supplementary tools.
  • Switching away from EPAY is complicated because the platform bundles recruiting, onboarding, HR, benefits, payroll, and tax filing — leaving requires a coordinated multi-system migration rather than a simple data export.
  • Customer reviews note a steep learning curve for administrators configuring complex pay rules, union agreements, and multi-state tax setups, which can extend implementation timelines significantly.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How EPAY HCM objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a EPAY HCM object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

EPAY HCM

Employee

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate and Contact

1:1
Fully supported

EPAY Employee records map to Bullhorn Candidate profiles (for recruiting and placement records) and optionally to Bullhorn Contact profiles (for HR and employee-relations records) depending on whether the migration scope includes staffing operations, internal HR records, or both. We preserve employee personal information, hire date, job title, department, and employment status. The mapping direction depends on the customer's Bullhorn usage pattern: staffing agencies use Candidate; internal talent acquisition teams may map employees to Contacts attached to a Company record representing their own organization. We flag this decision during scoping.

EPAY HCM

Compensation Record

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Fields or Custom Object

1:1
Fully supported

EPAY compensation records (pay rates, salary history, pay frequency, effective-dated rate changes, bonuses) have no native Bullhorn equivalent in standard fields. We map pay rate to a Candidate custom field or Custom Object depending on the customer's Bullhorn edition and the number of compensation fields. If the customer is on Bullhorn Front Office Growth or Enterprise, we create a Compensation History custom object with effective-dated entries. If the customer is on ATS or ATS Growth, we use custom fields on the Candidate record. We preserve the full compensation timeline including pay changes and bonuses as supporting data for placement or employment offers.

EPAY HCM

Benefits Enrollment

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object or Document Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

EPAY benefits enrollment records (plan names, coverage tiers, enrollment dates, dependent information) map to a Bullhorn Benefits custom object if the customer's edition supports it. If the Bullhorn edition has no available Custom Object slots, we export the enrollment data as a structured CSV and attach it to the Candidate record. We flag that many insurance carriers require direct re-enrollment in the carrier portal or the new HR platform's carrier integration, so we treat benefits data as supporting documentation rather than a live enrollment migration. The customer budgets for a 2-4 week parallel re-enrollment window with each benefits vendor.

EPAY HCM

Time and Attendance Logs

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object or Candidate Notes

1:1
Mapping required

EPAY time-and-attendance logs (clock-in/clock-out data, overtime, accruals, scheduling rules) have no native Bullhorn equivalent because Bullhorn is not a time-tracking system. We export time-and-attendance data by pay period and map it to a Custom Object if available, or we export it as structured records for the customer's HR team to load into their chosen time-and-attendance platform post-migration. High-volume punch-level data is chunked by pay period to manage file sizes. We flag that customers who rely on EPAY time-and-attendance data for billing (staffing agencies billing clients by hours worked) need a replacement time-tracking platform integrated with Bullhorn.

EPAY HCM

Job Costing and Labor Allocation

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object or Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

EPAY job-costing and labor-allocation data (cost center assignments, project codes, department allocations) maps to a Bullhorn Custom Object if the customer has available slots on their Bullhorn edition. Front Office Growth and Enterprise editions support up to 10 Custom Objects with 55 fields each, which accommodates cost center, project code, and department fields. ATS Growth and ATS editions are limited to 2 Custom Objects, which may require the customer to prioritize which job-costing fields migrate and which are exported as a lookup table for manual reference. We validate the Custom Object availability during scoping.

EPAY HCM

Payroll Processing History

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Not Migrated (External Storage)

lossy
Mapping required

EPAY payroll processing history (pay runs, earnings, deductions, taxes, net pay by pay period) cannot migrate into Bullhorn because Bullhorn does not have a payroll module and no standard Bullhorn object stores payroll data. We export the payroll history as a structured archive file that the customer stores externally (document management system, HRIS of record, or a payroll lookup tool). For companies still processing payroll in EPAY during the transition, we recommend retaining read-only EPAY access for a minimum of 90 days post-migration for garnishment lookback and payroll dispute resolution. Tax filing records similarly require external storage or a dedicated payroll platform.

EPAY HCM

Garnishments and Deductions

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object with Legal Hold Flag

1:1
Mapping required

EPAY garnishment orders, wage deductions, and voluntary deduction codes map to a Bullhorn Custom Object with fields for deduction type, court or agency, current balance, and deduction amount per pay period. Active garnishment orders require manual verification by the customer's payroll administrator before the first payroll run in the new system because Bullhorn does not process payroll and cannot enforce deduction calculations. We flag every active deduction during scoping with a verification checklist that the customer completes before cutover. Deduction history without active orders is exported as supporting documentation.

EPAY HCM

Performance Review Records

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object or Candidate Notes

1:1
Mapping required

EPAY performance review records (review cycles, 360-degree feedback, journaling entries, review status, scores) map to a Bullhorn Custom Object if available. If no Custom Object is available on the customer's edition, we export the review history as structured records attached to the Candidate. Bullhorn's review-cycle structure differs from EPAY's performance management module, so we preserve the historical review data as documentation rather than a live performance module migration. The customer's HR team rebuilds active review cycles in their chosen performance management platform post-migration.

EPAY HCM

Learning and Training Records

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object or Candidate Skills

1:1
Mapping required

EPAY learning and training records (course completions, custom certificates, training status) map to Bullhorn Candidate Skills (for skill-based matching and searchable records) and a Custom Object for detailed completion history if available. We export completion status, certificate metadata, and course names. Custom course structures and learning paths from EPAY LMS require manual rebuild in the customer's chosen training platform because Bullhorn does not have a native LMS. Certificate metadata migrates to a Custom Object or Candidate file attachment for compliance documentation.

EPAY HCM

ACA Compliance Data

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Not Migrated (External Storage)

lossy
Mapping required

EPAY ACA eligibility tracking, coverage offers, and enrollment status for Affordable Care Act compliance do not map to Bullhorn because Bullhorn does not have a compliance module for ACA measurement or reporting. We export ACA measurement data as a structured file for the customer's HR compliance team to load into their chosen compliance tool or retain for IRS reporting. Customers who use EPAY specifically for ACA tracking and reporting should select a dedicated ACA compliance platform as part of their post-migration HRIS stack.

EPAY HCM

Recruiting (EPAY module)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate and JobOrder

1:1
Fully supported

For customers using EPAY's recruiting and applicant tracking module, job postings and applicant records map to Bullhorn JobOrder and Candidate records respectively. EPAY job postings become Bullhorn JobOrder entries with job title, description, requirements, and status. EPAY applicants become Bullhorn Candidates with application status and submission history. We resolve the EPAY applicant pipeline stages to Bullhorn lead-status values during transformation. This module migration only applies if the customer actively uses EPAY for external hiring rather than purely for internal workforce management.

EPAY HCM

Onboarding (EPAY module)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Task Workflow

lossy
Fully supported

EPAY onboarding records (new hire tasks, document collection, I-9 verification, onboarding checklist status) map to Bullhorn Candidate tasks and a documented onboarding task list. Bullhorn Onboarding (formerly Able) is a separate product that some customers license independently. We export the onboarding task structure as a written checklist for the customer's HR team to rebuild in Bullhorn, Bullhorn Onboarding, or a third-party onboarding platform. Active document uploads from EPAY onboarding migrate as file attachments to the Candidate record. We do not migrate onboarding automations as code.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

EPAY HCM logo

EPAY HCM gotchas

High

No public API means migration extraction is vendor-assisted

High

Historical payroll and tax filing data require special handling

Medium

Benefits carrier re-enrollment is often required at destination

Medium

Employee count directly affects billing — imports increase costs

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • EPAY HCM has no public API — exports are vendor-assisted

    EPAY HCM does not publish a documented REST or bulk API for customer data extraction, so all migration exports require coordination with EPAY's internal export tools or direct database access facilitated by their team. This is a source-platform gotcha, not a pair gotcha, but it directly affects the migration timeline because the export is gated on EPAY's availability, export format, and record-access procedures. We initiate the export request early in the scoping phase, validate record counts before beginning transformation work, and build the transformation pipeline to accept the format EPAY delivers rather than a standardized schema. Timeline risk is highest for customers with large historical payroll volumes because EPAY exports are delivered in batches.

  • Bullhorn ATS and ATS Growth have limited Custom Object access

    Bullhorn editions below Front Office Growth limit Custom Objects to two with 55 fields each, while Front Office Growth and Enterprise support ten. EPAY HCM customers with job-costing data, labor-allocation records, or multi-field benefits enrollments may exceed these limits. We validate the customer's Bullhorn edition during scoping and either recommend upgrading to Front Office Growth or work with the customer to prioritize which fields migrate into the available Custom Object slots and which export as a structured lookup file. Skipping this check before migration causes records to be dropped or truncated during import.

  • Payroll processing history does not exist in Bullhorn

    Bullhorn is an ATS and recruiting CRM and does not process payroll, store pay stubs, or handle tax filing. EPAY customers migrating away must arrange for payroll processing to continue in either a new payroll platform (ADP, Paychex, Rippling) or by retaining EPAY read-only access for lookback. Historical pay stubs, tax filing records, and garnishment order history export from EPAY as structured files but cannot load into Bullhorn as live records. We flag this gap during scoping and recommend a dedicated payroll platform be selected and configured before cutover, with at least one parallel payroll run completed before the migration date.

  • Benefits carrier re-enrollment is required at the destination

    Although we export EPAY benefit enrollment records with plan names, coverage tiers, and dependent information, most insurance carriers require employees to re-enroll directly in the carrier's portal or the new HR platform's carrier integration. We map the enrollment data to Bullhorn Candidate records or a Custom Object as supporting documentation, but live enrollment status must be re-established with each carrier post-migration. We advise customers to budget for a 2-4 week parallel re-enrollment window and to notify benefits carriers before migration cutover so that coverage is not interrupted. Active deductions for benefits that are EPAY-processed must be set up as new deduction entries in the new payroll platform.

  • Bullhorn's per-user pricing means headcount changes affect the bill

    Bullhorn prices on a per-recruiter-seat basis (Starter $99/user/mo, Core $165/user/mo, Pro custom) rather than EPAY's per-employee basis. Organizations with large internal workforces but small recruiting teams may find Bullhorn pricing significantly lower than EPAY's fixed per-employee model, but organizations with large staffing operations (high headcount managed per recruiter) should validate that Bullhorn's seat model aligns with their team structure. We flag the seat count versus EPAY employee count comparison during pricing scoping so the customer understands the ongoing cost dynamics of the new platform.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful EPAY HCM to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and edition selection

    We audit the EPAY HCM environment across all active modules in scope: Employee records, Compensation history, Benefits enrollments, Time and Attendance logs, Job Costing data, Payroll history, Garnishments and Deductions, Performance Reviews, Learning Records, and any active recruiting or onboarding modules. We pair this with a Bullhorn edition assessment to determine available Custom Object slots, identify any upgrade requirements, and confirm whether the customer is on Bullhorn Platform or Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud (Salesforce-based) because the API and migration tools differ. The discovery output is a written migration scope listing every object, record count, and edition gap that must be resolved before migration begins.

  2. Vendor-assisted export coordination with EPAY

    We initiate the export request with EPAY HCM's customer success or data team, providing a detailed schema of the records and fields required. Because EPAY has no self-service export portal, we coordinate the export format (CSV, XML, or database extract), delivery timeline, and record counts. We validate the export against our discovery record counts as soon as it arrives and escalate any gaps before beginning transformation work. If the customer has a large historical payroll volume, we request that EPAY batch the export by pay period to avoid single-file size issues.

  3. Bullhorn schema provisioning and custom object setup

    We design and deploy the destination schema in Bullhorn before any data import. This includes creating Custom Objects (if available on the customer's edition) with fields mapped from EPAY compensation, benefits, time-and-attendance, job-costing, and garnishment records; adding custom Candidate fields for data that exceeds Custom Object capacity; configuring Candidate field mappings through Bullhorn Admin; and setting up JobOrder and placement records if the customer uses Bullhorn for staffing operations. Schema is deployed into a Bullhorn sandbox or staging environment first for validation. Bullhorn editions with zero available Custom Objects require the customer to either upgrade or approve a reduced field set.

  4. Data transformation and record deduplication

    We transform EPAY records into Bullhorn Candidate and Contact format. Employee records become Candidates (and optionally Contacts) with personal information, employment dates, job titles, and department assignments. Compensation records are transformed into custom object entries with effective dates. Benefits enrollments are structured as enrollment records with plan details and dependent information. We deduplicate on Social Security Number or employee ID where available, and flag any records with missing required Bullhorn fields for the customer's HR admin to complete before import. Time-and-attendance data is exported separately for the customer's chosen time-tracking platform, not into Bullhorn.

  5. Payroll and deduction verification handoff

    We deliver a structured export of payroll history, garnishment orders, and active deduction codes as a written handoff to the customer's payroll administrator. We provide a verification checklist for every active garnishment order and deduction code that the administrator must confirm is set up correctly in the new payroll platform before processing the first payroll run. We do not set up payroll deductions in Bullhorn because Bullhorn does not process payroll. The customer selects and configures a dedicated payroll platform (ADP, Paychex, Rippling, or EPAY read-only access) before cutover.

  6. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration into Bullhorn in record-dependency order: Custom Objects and custom fields are deployed first, then Candidate records are imported with all custom field data resolved. If the scope includes Bullhorn Contact records for internal employees, those import after Candidate records with a Contact-to-Candidate reference. JobOrder records import next if the customer uses Bullhorn for staffing. Benefits enrollment documentation and performance review records attach to the relevant Candidate or Contact. We run row-count reconciliation after each phase before proceeding to the next. We do not migrate workflows, onboarding sequences, or automation rules as these are EPAY-specific and have no Bullhorn equivalent.

  7. Cutover, validation, and benefits re-enrollment support

    We freeze EPAY access for write operations during cutover and run a final delta migration of any records modified during the window. We deliver the migration reconciliation report to the customer's HR and recruiting leads for sign-off. We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve record-level issues surfaced during initial Bullhorn usage. We provide a written handoff for benefits carrier re-enrollment, including a template communication to send to employees with their EPAY enrollment summary and instructions for re-enrolling with each carrier. We do not manage carrier re-enrollment directly or provide ongoing payroll administration post-migration.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

EPAY HCM logo

EPAY HCM

Source

Strengths

  • All-in-one bundling of recruiting, onboarding, HR, benefits, time tracking, and payroll under a single vendor relationship reduces multi-vendor coordination overhead.
  • Fixed per-employee pricing model provides predictable monthly costs with no surprise transaction fees, unlimited admin seats, and included tax filing across all jurisdictions.
  • FedRAMP Ready certification for time and labor management meets federal cloud security standards required by government contractors and public-sector employers.
  • Complex workforce handling for multi-state, multi-union, and split-shift environments is a documented differentiator, with customers in construction, staffing, and manufacturing specifically citing flexibility.
  • 24/7 customer support included at no extra charge with a dedicated Client Relationship Manager assigned at onboarding.

Weaknesses

  • No public pricing page or tier documentation — prospects must request a quote, making budget planning and vendor comparison difficult before committing.
  • No documented public API for programmatic data export — integrations and migrations rely on vendor-assisted exports or manual data extraction, limiting automation options.
  • Reporting and analytics capabilities are described as functional but not deep, with customers noting they supplement EPAY analytics with external BI tools for workforce insights.
  • Switching away requires coordinating a full-suite migration since the platform bundles multiple HCM functions — there is no modular exit path for individual modules.
  • Steep administrative configuration curve for complex pay rules, union agreements, and multi-state tax setups extends implementation timelines beyond initial estimates.
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. All 7 core objects map 1:1 between EPAY HCM and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across EPAY HCM and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    A

    All 7 core objects map 1:1 between EPAY HCM and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    EPAY HCM: Not publicly documented..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    EPAY HCM doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your EPAY HCM to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about EPAY HCM to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during EPAY HCM to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your EPAY HCM to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between six and ten weeks for organizations under 500 active employees with no complex garnishment orders or multi-benefit-plan configurations. Migrations with large historical payroll volumes, active court-ordered garnishments, multiple benefits plans requiring carrier re-enrollment, or EPAY job-costing data that requires Bullhorn Custom Object configuration move to twelve to eighteen weeks because of vendor-assisted export coordination, deduction verification, and Bullhorn edition selection for custom object access.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from EPAY HCM.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day