Project Management migration

Migrate from ProjectManager to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between ProjectManager and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

ProjectManager logo

ProjectManager

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

54%

7 of 13

objects map 1:1 between ProjectManager and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-8 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from ProjectManager to Asana is a schema simplification, not a lateral move. ProjectManager organizes work into Workspaces containing Projects, Tasks, Resources, ResourceTeams, and Risks with a dynamic scheduling engine that cascades date changes through dependency chains. Asana uses Teams > Projects > Tasks with a simpler dependency model that supports Waiting On and Blocked By links but does not auto-recalculate downstream dates when upstream dates shift. We resolve that gap by documenting every dependency chain during discovery and attaching it as task notes for the customer's PM to rebuild as Milestone tasks or timeline dependencies in Asana Premium. Multi-assignee tasks are a structural mismatch: ProjectManager allows multiple TaskAssignees per task while Asana allows one assignee per task — we convert additional assignees to subtasks with the assignee moved to the parent. Custom fields require a two-step migration in ProjectManager (field definition then value write) and map to either global or project-local custom fields in Asana depending on reuse requirements scoped during discovery. We do not migrate ProjectManager's automated workflows, timesheet billing rates, or dynamic resource workload heat maps as code; these require manual configuration in Asana or a third-party resource management add-on post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

ProjectManager logo

ProjectManager

What's pushing teams away

  • The mobile app is described as a lite version of the desktop interface, frustrating field teams who need full Gantt and task functionality on-site.
  • New users report a steep learning curve with no guided onboarding flow, leading to low adoption in organizations that skip formal training.
  • Report customizations and forecasting capabilities are limited compared to purpose-built BI tools, limiting insight depth for data-driven PMOs.
  • The interface is described as cluttered with an outdated aesthetic, particularly compared to newer visually-driven alternatives like monday.com or Asana.
  • Integration with external CRMs, ERPs, or time-tracking tools often requires expensive add-ons not included in base licensing.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How ProjectManager objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a ProjectManager object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

ProjectManager

Workspace

maps to

Asana

Team

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectManager Workspaces map to Asana Teams. The Workspace name and description carry over as the Team name and team bio. Workspace-level permissions in ProjectManager map to Asana team membership with the closest matching permission level (Member, Admin, Guest). We extract all distinct Workspace memberships from the source and provision matching Asana team memberships during migration.

ProjectManager

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectManager Projects map directly to Asana Projects. The project name, description, start date, end date, and status carry over. ProjectManager's dynamic scheduling flag (whether the project uses auto-scheduling) does not have an Asana equivalent; we note this per project and advise the customer to review the project timeline in Asana after migration. ProjectManager custom ProjectFields migrate as Asana project-level custom fields.

ProjectManager

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectManager Tasks map to Asana Tasks with parent-child hierarchy preserved as subtasks. TaskStatus values (Not Started, In Progress, Completed, On Hold) map to Asana TaskStatus equivalents. The task name, description, start date, due date, and completion status carry over 1:1. Dependencies in ProjectManager (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish) map to Asana Dependencies (Waiting On, Blocked By) as task-level links. Because Asana does not auto-cascade dates through dependency chains, we document every dependency chain during discovery and attach the chain as a formatted note on the lead task of each chain for the customer's PM to rebuild manually in Asana.

ProjectManager

ProjectField

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (project-local or global)

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectManager ProjectFields are custom properties scoped to the Workspace. We discover existing ProjectField definitions via GET /api/data/projects/fields, then create matching Asana custom fields via POST. Field types (string, number, date, choice) map directly to Asana custom field types. Whether the migrated field is global (org-wide) or project-local depends on the reuse scope defined during discovery. Choice fields with options migrate as picklist custom fields with all options preserved.

ProjectManager

TaskField

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (project-local or global)

lossy
Fully supported

TaskFields in ProjectManager follow the same two-step API process as ProjectFields (schema definition then value write). We run this pipeline for each task field, respecting the per-project field attachment in Asana. Not all ProjectManager field types have native Asana equivalents; formula fields and calculation fields require manual rebuild as Asana custom formula fields (available in Asana Advanced+). Fields with no equivalent are flagged for the customer to configure post-migration.

ProjectManager

TaskAssignee

maps to

Asana

Task (assignee) + Subtask (secondary assignees)

1:many
Fully supported

ProjectManager allows multiple TaskAssignees per task, driving the workload view. Asana permits one assignee per task. We assign the primary TaskAssignee to the Asana Task directly and convert additional assignees to subtasks named '[Assignee Name] — supporting task', with the additional assignee assigned to the subtask. This preserves every assignment while satisfying Asana's one-assignee constraint. The full assignee list is also written to a multi-select custom field assignee_list__c for reference.

ProjectManager

Resource

maps to

Asana

User (Team member)

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectManager Resources (team members or equipment) map to Asana Users. We match Resources to Asana Users by email address during owner reconciliation. Resource availability windows and cost rates do not have native Asana equivalents; if the customer requires this data post-migration, we create custom fields resource_availability__c and resource_hourly_rate__c on the User profile and recommend a resource management add-on for ongoing workload heat-map functionality.

ProjectManager

ResourceTeam

maps to

Asana

Team

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectManager ResourceTeams group Resources for scheduling and workload reporting. These map to Asana Teams independently from the Workspace-to-Team mapping. We preserve ResourceTeam memberships and cross-reference with TaskAssignees during migration to ensure the assignee relationship is accurate in Asana. If ResourceTeams overlap with Workspace groupings, we use the ResourceTeam as the source of truth for team membership and consolidate if the customer confirms overlap during discovery.

ProjectManager

Risk

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields + Task (Risk log)

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectManager Risks are standalone objects linked to Projects with severity, status, and RiskFiles. Asana has no native Risks object. We create a risk_severity__c and risk_status__c custom field on the project for each open Risk, and migrate the Risk description as a dedicated task named '[Risk] Risk: [title]' with the severity, status, and linked ProjectId in custom fields. Closed risks are migrated as completed tasks in a Risk Review section. RiskFiles attach to the risk task as Asana attachments subject to the 100MB per-file limit.

ProjectManager

Timesheet

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields (time logging)

1:1
Fully supported

Timesheets record actual hours logged by Resources against Tasks. ProjectManager embeds billing rates in some historical Timesheet records, which do not map directly to Asana's data model (Asana does not have a native timesheet object at base tiers). We migrate the hours logged as a custom field timesheet_hours__c on the linked Task for each Timesheet record. Billing rates are flagged during discovery; customers choose to migrate hours only or attempt rate reconciliation with the understanding that rates may require manual cleanup post-migration.

ProjectManager

Tag

maps to

Asana

Label

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectManager Tags and TaskTags are lightweight labeling objects used for categorization. These map to Asana Labels with the tag name preserved. Label color assignment in Asana is not deterministic from ProjectManager's tag colors; we assign default colors and the customer can reorganize post-migration. Tag counts exceeding Asana's label-per-organization limits (500 labels) are flagged during discovery.

ProjectManager

UserRole

maps to

Asana

Team permission role

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectManager UserRoles define permissions within a Workspace. Asana's team permission model is simpler (Admin, Member, Guest). We map source permission profiles to the closest Asana built-in role and flag any custom roles that have no direct equivalent. Customers requiring fine-grained role-based access control in Asana should plan for a permission audit post-migration; Asana Enterprise offers advanced permission controls beyond team roles.

ProjectManager

Dependency

maps to

Asana

Dependency (Asana native) + Task Note (chain documentation)

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectManager dependency types (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish) map to Asana 'Waiting On' (Finish-to-Start) and 'Blocked By' relationships. We import dependency links via the Asana Dependencies API. However, because Asana does not auto-recalculate downstream dates when upstream task dates change, we also generate a dependency chain document during discovery that lists every chain of three or more tasks connected by dependencies. This document is delivered as a task note on the lead task of each chain so the customer's PM can manually verify and reconstruct the schedule logic in Asana.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

ProjectManager logo

ProjectManager gotchas

Medium

Custom field migration requires two-step API process

Medium

Dynamic scheduling recalculates dates during import

Low

Historical timesheet billing rates vary by source

Low

ResourceTeam vs Teams object distinction

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Asana attachment size ceiling of 100MB per file

    Asana's API silently skips any file attachment exceeding 100MB during import. ProjectManager projects with large file attachments (design files, CAD drawings, video deliverables) will experience silent data loss without proactive detection. We scan all ProjectManager file attachments during discovery, flag every file exceeding 100MB, and give the customer the choice to exclude oversized files from migration, download them to a shared drive, and link from the Asana task description instead.

  • Multi-assignee tasks require subtask split

    ProjectManager allows multiple TaskAssignees per task, which drives the workload allocation view. Asana permits exactly one assignee per task. We implement a split: primary assignee moves to the task, additional assignees become named subtasks. This preserves all assignment records but changes the task-count surface area in Asana and affects workload view accuracy for the customer. We surface the subtask-split count during discovery so the customer can validate the impact on their reporting expectations before migration.

  • Dependency date cascades do not carry over

    ProjectManager's scheduling engine auto-recalculates downstream task dates when an upstream task shifts. Asana supports dependency links (Waiting On, Blocked By) but does not auto-recalculate downstream dates. Teams relying on ProjectManager's cascade behavior will find that schedules appear correct at migration time but become stale if any upstream date changes in Asana. We document every dependency chain of three or more tasks and deliver the chain as task notes for manual rebuild in Asana, but we do not implement a date-cascade automation as part of standard migration scope.

  • Custom field type equivalents are not always available

    ProjectManager's field types (formula, calculation, rollup) do not have direct Asana equivalents at all tiers. Asana custom formula fields are available only at Advanced tier and above. Fields with no equivalent are flagged during discovery and left as empty custom fields in Asana for the customer to configure post-migration. We document each unmatched field with its original definition and recommended Asana replacement.

  • Asana API rate limits vary by plan tier

    Asana's API enforces 150 requests per minute on Starter and 1500 requests per minute on Advanced and Enterprise. Migrations with large task volumes (over 10,000 records) hitting Starter-tier rate limits can extend migration timelines significantly. We recommend Asana Advanced as the destination tier during discovery for any migration exceeding 5,000 records to ensure adequate API throughput.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful ProjectManager to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and scope definition

    We audit the source ProjectManager account across Workspaces, Projects, Tasks with hierarchy depth, TaskFields and ProjectFields with their type definitions, Resources, ResourceTeams, Risks (open and closed), Timesheets, Tags, and UserRoles. We identify multi-assignee task counts, oversized file attachments, dependency chain depth, and any custom field types lacking Asana equivalents. The discovery output is a written migration scope with record counts per object, a list of gotcha items requiring customer decisions, and an Asana tier recommendation based on migration volume and API rate-limit requirements.

  2. Schema design and Asana configuration planning

    We design the Asana target schema based on discovery output. This includes provisioning Teams (mapped from Workspaces and ResourceTeams), Projects, custom fields (global vs. project-local scope per field), dependency relationships, and subtask structure for multi-assignee tasks. We create an Asana workspace configuration document that the customer can review and approve before any data moves. This step resolves the global-vs-local custom field scope decision, the subtask-split policy, and the risk-log task structure.

  3. Sandbox migration and dependency chain documentation

    We run a full migration into an Asana Sandbox environment using a representative subset of Projects covering at least one complex dependency chain, five multi-assignee tasks, and all custom field types. The customer reviews the result, validates the subtask-split output, confirms the dependency chain documentation, and approves before production migration begins. Corrections to custom field types, team structure, and risk-log design happen here, not in production.

  4. Owner and resource reconciliation

    We extract every distinct Resource and User from ProjectManager, match by email against the Asana destination organization's User table, and identify gaps. Any Resource without a matching Asana User is placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before production migration resumes. Migration cannot proceed past this step because task assignee and team membership references require valid User records.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Teams and project structure first, then Tasks using topological sort to respect dependency chains, then custom field definitions and values per project, then subtask creation for multi-assignee splits, then risk-log tasks, then timesheet hours as custom fields, then Tags as Labels, then attachments (with 100MB ceiling enforced and oversized files flagged for manual handling). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow rebuild handoff

    We freeze ProjectManager writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of records modified during migration, then hand off Asana as the system of record. We deliver the dependency chain documentation, the subtask-split record map, the custom field inventory with unmatched-field list, and the oversized-file report. We do not migrate ProjectManager's automated workflows or dynamic scheduling logic; the workflow inventory is delivered as a written document for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana Rules or a third-party automation tool. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised during the first user acceptance cycle.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

ProjectManager logo

ProjectManager

Source

Strengths

  • Real-time portfolio dashboard aggregating time, cost, and workload across all projects simultaneously.
  • Dynamic scheduling engine that cascades date changes through task dependencies automatically.
  • Automated time and cost tracking features built directly into the platform without requiring add-ons.
  • Color-coded resource workload views that highlight overloaded assignees across the portfolio.
  • Enterprise security with SAML SSO and MFA, suitable for regulated industry deployments.

Weaknesses

  • Mobile app is a significantly reduced feature set compared to the full desktop interface.
  • Steep learning curve for new users with no built-in guided onboarding or walkthroughs.
  • Report customizations and forecasting capabilities are limited, requiring external BI tools for deeper analysis.
  • Interface is described as cluttered with an outdated visual design compared to newer competitors.
  • Integration add-ons for CRM, ERP, and external time-tracking are priced separately from base licensing.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across ProjectManager and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    ProjectManager: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    ProjectManager doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your ProjectManager to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about ProjectManager to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ProjectManager to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your ProjectManager to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and eight weeks. Straightforward moves with under 2,000 tasks, fewer than 15 custom fields, no risk records, and no timesheet data complete in four to six weeks. Migrations with multiple Workspaces, complex dependency chains, extensive custom field schemas, risk-log records, or large timesheet histories requiring reconciliation extend to eight to twelve weeks because of subtask-split logic, dependency chain documentation, and sandbox validation cycles.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from ProjectManager.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day