Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between ProjectManager and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
ProjectManager
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
7 of 13
objects map 1:1 between ProjectManager and Asana.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
4-8 weeks
Overview
Moving from ProjectManager to Asana is a schema simplification, not a lateral move. ProjectManager organizes work into Workspaces containing Projects, Tasks, Resources, ResourceTeams, and Risks with a dynamic scheduling engine that cascades date changes through dependency chains. Asana uses Teams > Projects > Tasks with a simpler dependency model that supports Waiting On and Blocked By links but does not auto-recalculate downstream dates when upstream dates shift. We resolve that gap by documenting every dependency chain during discovery and attaching it as task notes for the customer's PM to rebuild as Milestone tasks or timeline dependencies in Asana Premium. Multi-assignee tasks are a structural mismatch: ProjectManager allows multiple TaskAssignees per task while Asana allows one assignee per task — we convert additional assignees to subtasks with the assignee moved to the parent. Custom fields require a two-step migration in ProjectManager (field definition then value write) and map to either global or project-local custom fields in Asana depending on reuse requirements scoped during discovery. We do not migrate ProjectManager's automated workflows, timesheet billing rates, or dynamic resource workload heat maps as code; these require manual configuration in Asana or a third-party resource management add-on post-migration.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a ProjectManager object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
ProjectManager
Workspace
Asana
Team
1:1ProjectManager Workspaces map to Asana Teams. The Workspace name and description carry over as the Team name and team bio. Workspace-level permissions in ProjectManager map to Asana team membership with the closest matching permission level (Member, Admin, Guest). We extract all distinct Workspace memberships from the source and provision matching Asana team memberships during migration.
ProjectManager
Project
Asana
Project
1:1ProjectManager Projects map directly to Asana Projects. The project name, description, start date, end date, and status carry over. ProjectManager's dynamic scheduling flag (whether the project uses auto-scheduling) does not have an Asana equivalent; we note this per project and advise the customer to review the project timeline in Asana after migration. ProjectManager custom ProjectFields migrate as Asana project-level custom fields.
ProjectManager
Task
Asana
Task
1:1ProjectManager Tasks map to Asana Tasks with parent-child hierarchy preserved as subtasks. TaskStatus values (Not Started, In Progress, Completed, On Hold) map to Asana TaskStatus equivalents. The task name, description, start date, due date, and completion status carry over 1:1. Dependencies in ProjectManager (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish) map to Asana Dependencies (Waiting On, Blocked By) as task-level links. Because Asana does not auto-cascade dates through dependency chains, we document every dependency chain during discovery and attach the chain as a formatted note on the lead task of each chain for the customer's PM to rebuild manually in Asana.
ProjectManager
ProjectField
Asana
Custom Field (project-local or global)
lossyProjectManager ProjectFields are custom properties scoped to the Workspace. We discover existing ProjectField definitions via GET /api/data/projects/fields, then create matching Asana custom fields via POST. Field types (string, number, date, choice) map directly to Asana custom field types. Whether the migrated field is global (org-wide) or project-local depends on the reuse scope defined during discovery. Choice fields with options migrate as picklist custom fields with all options preserved.
ProjectManager
TaskField
Asana
Custom Field (project-local or global)
lossyTaskFields in ProjectManager follow the same two-step API process as ProjectFields (schema definition then value write). We run this pipeline for each task field, respecting the per-project field attachment in Asana. Not all ProjectManager field types have native Asana equivalents; formula fields and calculation fields require manual rebuild as Asana custom formula fields (available in Asana Advanced+). Fields with no equivalent are flagged for the customer to configure post-migration.
ProjectManager
TaskAssignee
Asana
Task (assignee) + Subtask (secondary assignees)
1:manyProjectManager allows multiple TaskAssignees per task, driving the workload view. Asana permits one assignee per task. We assign the primary TaskAssignee to the Asana Task directly and convert additional assignees to subtasks named '[Assignee Name] — supporting task', with the additional assignee assigned to the subtask. This preserves every assignment while satisfying Asana's one-assignee constraint. The full assignee list is also written to a multi-select custom field assignee_list__c for reference.
ProjectManager
Resource
Asana
User (Team member)
1:1ProjectManager Resources (team members or equipment) map to Asana Users. We match Resources to Asana Users by email address during owner reconciliation. Resource availability windows and cost rates do not have native Asana equivalents; if the customer requires this data post-migration, we create custom fields resource_availability__c and resource_hourly_rate__c on the User profile and recommend a resource management add-on for ongoing workload heat-map functionality.
ProjectManager
ResourceTeam
Asana
Team
1:1ProjectManager ResourceTeams group Resources for scheduling and workload reporting. These map to Asana Teams independently from the Workspace-to-Team mapping. We preserve ResourceTeam memberships and cross-reference with TaskAssignees during migration to ensure the assignee relationship is accurate in Asana. If ResourceTeams overlap with Workspace groupings, we use the ResourceTeam as the source of truth for team membership and consolidate if the customer confirms overlap during discovery.
ProjectManager
Risk
Asana
Custom Fields + Task (Risk log)
lossyProjectManager Risks are standalone objects linked to Projects with severity, status, and RiskFiles. Asana has no native Risks object. We create a risk_severity__c and risk_status__c custom field on the project for each open Risk, and migrate the Risk description as a dedicated task named '[Risk] Risk: [title]' with the severity, status, and linked ProjectId in custom fields. Closed risks are migrated as completed tasks in a Risk Review section. RiskFiles attach to the risk task as Asana attachments subject to the 100MB per-file limit.
ProjectManager
Timesheet
Asana
Custom Fields (time logging)
1:1Timesheets record actual hours logged by Resources against Tasks. ProjectManager embeds billing rates in some historical Timesheet records, which do not map directly to Asana's data model (Asana does not have a native timesheet object at base tiers). We migrate the hours logged as a custom field timesheet_hours__c on the linked Task for each Timesheet record. Billing rates are flagged during discovery; customers choose to migrate hours only or attempt rate reconciliation with the understanding that rates may require manual cleanup post-migration.
ProjectManager
Tag
Asana
Label
1:1ProjectManager Tags and TaskTags are lightweight labeling objects used for categorization. These map to Asana Labels with the tag name preserved. Label color assignment in Asana is not deterministic from ProjectManager's tag colors; we assign default colors and the customer can reorganize post-migration. Tag counts exceeding Asana's label-per-organization limits (500 labels) are flagged during discovery.
ProjectManager
UserRole
Asana
Team permission role
lossyProjectManager UserRoles define permissions within a Workspace. Asana's team permission model is simpler (Admin, Member, Guest). We map source permission profiles to the closest Asana built-in role and flag any custom roles that have no direct equivalent. Customers requiring fine-grained role-based access control in Asana should plan for a permission audit post-migration; Asana Enterprise offers advanced permission controls beyond team roles.
ProjectManager
Dependency
Asana
Dependency (Asana native) + Task Note (chain documentation)
lossyProjectManager dependency types (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish) map to Asana 'Waiting On' (Finish-to-Start) and 'Blocked By' relationships. We import dependency links via the Asana Dependencies API. However, because Asana does not auto-recalculate downstream dates when upstream task dates change, we also generate a dependency chain document during discovery that lists every chain of three or more tasks connected by dependencies. This document is delivered as a task note on the lead task of each chain so the customer's PM can manually verify and reconstruct the schedule logic in Asana.
| ProjectManager | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workspace | Team1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| ProjectField | Custom Field (project-local or global)lossy | Fully supported | |
| TaskField | Custom Field (project-local or global)lossy | Fully supported | |
| TaskAssignee | Task (assignee) + Subtask (secondary assignees)1:many | Fully supported | |
| Resource | User (Team member)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| ResourceTeam | Team1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Risk | Custom Fields + Task (Risk log)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Timesheet | Custom Fields (time logging)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Tag | Label1:1 | Fully supported | |
| UserRole | Team permission rolelossy | Fully supported | |
| Dependency | Dependency (Asana native) + Task Note (chain documentation)lossy | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
ProjectManager gotchas
Custom field migration requires two-step API process
Dynamic scheduling recalculates dates during import
Historical timesheet billing rates vary by source
ResourceTeam vs Teams object distinction
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and scope definition
We audit the source ProjectManager account across Workspaces, Projects, Tasks with hierarchy depth, TaskFields and ProjectFields with their type definitions, Resources, ResourceTeams, Risks (open and closed), Timesheets, Tags, and UserRoles. We identify multi-assignee task counts, oversized file attachments, dependency chain depth, and any custom field types lacking Asana equivalents. The discovery output is a written migration scope with record counts per object, a list of gotcha items requiring customer decisions, and an Asana tier recommendation based on migration volume and API rate-limit requirements.
Schema design and Asana configuration planning
We design the Asana target schema based on discovery output. This includes provisioning Teams (mapped from Workspaces and ResourceTeams), Projects, custom fields (global vs. project-local scope per field), dependency relationships, and subtask structure for multi-assignee tasks. We create an Asana workspace configuration document that the customer can review and approve before any data moves. This step resolves the global-vs-local custom field scope decision, the subtask-split policy, and the risk-log task structure.
Sandbox migration and dependency chain documentation
We run a full migration into an Asana Sandbox environment using a representative subset of Projects covering at least one complex dependency chain, five multi-assignee tasks, and all custom field types. The customer reviews the result, validates the subtask-split output, confirms the dependency chain documentation, and approves before production migration begins. Corrections to custom field types, team structure, and risk-log design happen here, not in production.
Owner and resource reconciliation
We extract every distinct Resource and User from ProjectManager, match by email against the Asana destination organization's User table, and identify gaps. Any Resource without a matching Asana User is placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before production migration resumes. Migration cannot proceed past this step because task assignee and team membership references require valid User records.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Teams and project structure first, then Tasks using topological sort to respect dependency chains, then custom field definitions and values per project, then subtask creation for multi-assignee splits, then risk-log tasks, then timesheet hours as custom fields, then Tags as Labels, then attachments (with 100MB ceiling enforced and oversized files flagged for manual handling). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.
Cutover, validation, and workflow rebuild handoff
We freeze ProjectManager writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of records modified during migration, then hand off Asana as the system of record. We deliver the dependency chain documentation, the subtask-split record map, the custom field inventory with unmatched-field list, and the oversized-file report. We do not migrate ProjectManager's automated workflows or dynamic scheduling logic; the workflow inventory is delivered as a written document for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana Rules or a third-party automation tool. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised during the first user acceptance cycle.
Platform deep dives
ProjectManager
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across ProjectManager and Asana.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
ProjectManager: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
ProjectManager doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ProjectManager to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your ProjectManager to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave ProjectManager
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.