Project Management migration

Migrate from Orangescrum to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Orangescrum and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Orangescrum logo

Orangescrum

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

50%

6 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Orangescrum and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Orangescrum to Asana is a structural migration, not a record copy. Orangescrum uses a hybrid project model with separate sprint objects, backlog management, and built-in invoicing tied to time logs; Asana uses a workspace-team hierarchy with Timeline for scheduling, no native sprint object, and no built-in billing. We map Orangescrum sprint assignments to Asana Timeline date ranges and preserve sprint names as custom fields so teams retain planning context. Time log hours migrate as structured task duration data using Asana's time-tracking integration where enabled, or as custom fields where not. Invoices carry metadata (client, line items, amounts, status, date) but not rendered PDFs; we flag this during scoping and recommend a pre-cutover PDF export from Orangescrum. Custom fields and wiki pages require explicit mapping work during discovery because field types and content structures differ between platforms. Workflows, automations, and invoicing templates do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Orangescrum logo

Orangescrum

What's pushing teams away

  • Users report the platform crashes or becomes unstable during heavy usage periods, disrupting active projects and causing data-entry loss.
  • The interface and feature set feel dated compared to newer tools like ClickUp and monday.com, leading teams to seek a more modern experience.
  • Setup and initial configuration require manual effort that many reviewers describe as time-consuming compared to competitors with faster onboarding.
  • The open-source edition omits critical features — agile boards, backlogs, time tracking, and role management — forcing teams toward paid tiers for basic functionality.
  • Performance on the SaaS version has been inconsistent, with multiple reviewers noting service interruptions during business hours.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Orangescrum objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Orangescrum object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Orangescrum

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum Projects map directly to Asana Projects with name, description, start/end dates, and owner preserved. Milestone relationships map to Asana Milestones where the target workspace has Milestones enabled, or to parent tasks with a Milestone tag where not. Project-level budget fields from Orangescrum migrate to Asana Custom Fields as number or currency fields and are recreated during scoping.

Orangescrum

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum Tasks map 1:1 to Asana Tasks with title, description, priority, status, assignee, due date, and custom field values preserved. Orangescrum task status values map to Asana section membership or custom status fields depending on the target workspace configuration. Subtask nesting depth is preserved up to two levels per the source platform's constraint.

Orangescrum

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum Subtasks inherit parent project and task context. We map them as Asana Subtasks (the subtask field on a parent task) with title, status, and assignee preserved. Parent project and task context is maintained through the Asana task hierarchy. Nesting beyond two levels flattens to the second level; we document this constraint during discovery so the customer can decide on a flattening strategy.

Orangescrum

Sprint

maps to

Asana

Timeline + Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Orangescrum Sprint records (available on Agile-enabled projects) have start/end dates, goal text, and linked tasks. Asana has no formal sprint object; we map sprint name to a Sprint custom field on tasks, assign the sprint's start and end dates as task Start Date and Due Date in Asana Timeline view, and link all tasks to the same timeline range. The sprint goal migrates as a task note on the first task in the sprint or as a project-level description tag. We document sprint assignments during discovery so the customer can choose whether to use Asana's Timeline view or My Tasks for sprint planning.

Orangescrum

Backlog

maps to

Asana

Backlog Project (Tasks)

lossy
Fully supported

Orangescrum Backlog holds stories not yet assigned to a sprint. Asana has no native backlog concept. We create a dedicated Backlog project in Asana and migrate backlog stories as tasks within it, preserving ordering by task position or a custom sort field. Backlog priority and story points migrate as custom fields. The customer decides whether to keep a separate backlog project or distribute stories across sprint projects post-migration.

Orangescrum

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Orangescrum Custom Fields (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox) on tasks, projects, and tickets do not export their schema definition in a transferable format. We map field names and types explicitly during scoping, recreate the destination field schema in Asana using Asana's Custom Field types (text, enum, number, date, people), and migrate values field-by-field during data load. This is explicit mapping work rather than an automated schema transfer.

Orangescrum

Time Log

maps to

Asana

Task + Time Tracking Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum Time Log entries link to a task, a user, and include hours, date, and optional billing notes. Asana has no native time log object; we migrate hours as structured task data. If the customer's Asana workspace has the Asana Time Tracking integration enabled, time logs map to that integration's logged hours. Otherwise, we store hours in a Time Logged custom field (number type) and the billing note as a task comment or note. Billable hours attached to invoice line items migrate alongside invoice metadata.

Orangescrum

User

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum Users (name, email, role, active/inactive status) map to Asana Users resolved by email match. Role-based permissions from Orangescrum do not have a direct Asana equivalent; we map Orangescrum roles to Asana Teams and document the mapping for the customer's admin to configure team-level permissions post-migration. Inactive Orangescrum users migrate as inactive Asana guests or members at the customer's discretion.

Orangescrum

Client

maps to

Asana

Project Member or Contact

1:many
Fully supported

Orangescrum distinguishes internal Team Members from external Client contacts. Client records include company name, contact info, and billing details. We migrate Clients as Asana Project members (for project collaboration) and optionally as Contacts in a CRM system where the customer maintains one. The split depends on how the customer uses Clients in Orangescrum; we confirm during discovery whether Clients are project stakeholders or billing contacts.

Orangescrum

Invoice

maps to

Asana

Invoice Log Project or Task Custom Fields

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum invoices generate from time logs and billable entries with line items, totals, status, and client reference. Asana has no native billing module. We migrate invoice metadata — client, line items, amounts, status, and date — as structured task data in a dedicated Invoice Log Asana project, or as custom fields on tasks linked to the relevant project. Orangescrum renders invoices as PDFs that are not exportable in a transferable format; we flag this and recommend a pre-cutover PDF export from Orangescrum for accounting purposes.

Orangescrum

Epic and Feature Board

maps to

Asana

Portfolio or Project grouping

lossy
Fully supported

Orangescrum Epics and Features (Premium and Enterprise tiers) are hierarchical containers above Tasks. Asana has no Epic object; we map Epics to Asana Portfolios (Enterprise) or to parent tasks with an Epic tag, and Features to sub-tasks or custom field groupings. If the target workspace is on an Asana tier without Portfolios, we use project groupings and custom fields to preserve the hierarchy. We confirm the Asana edition during discovery.

Orangescrum

Wiki

maps to

Asana

Task + Project Description

lossy
Mapping required

Orangescrum Wiki pages have Categories, Sub-Categories, rich text content, and project links. Asana has no wiki module. We migrate wiki pages as Asana tasks with [Wiki] prefixed to the title, rich text preserved in the task description, and category hierarchy mapped to a custom field or naming convention. Project-linked wiki pages become tasks within the relevant project. Content volume is scoped during discovery; large wiki volumes add to migration time because of content review and formatting reconciliation.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Orangescrum logo

Orangescrum gotchas

High

Open-source edition omits key paid features

High

SaaS stability issues documented in 2024

Medium

Enterprise API requires explicit access approval

Medium

Invoices do not preserve rendered PDF files

Low

Self-hosted and SaaS editions have divergent feature sets

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Orangescrum sprints have no direct Asana equivalent

    Orangescrum uses a dedicated Sprint object with start/end dates, goal, and linked tasks. Asana has no sprint object — sprints are managed through Timeline view and task date ranges. We preserve sprint context by mapping sprint names to a Sprint custom field on each task, and assign sprint start and end dates as task Start Date and Due Date so tasks appear on the correct Timeline span. However, sprint velocity tracking, burndown charts, and sprint goal progress must be rebuilt in Asana using dashboards or a third-party reporting tool. Teams relying on Orangescrum's sprint reporting should plan for a reporting gap post-migration.

  • Enterprise API access requires explicit approval

    Orangescrum's Enterprise API is request-based and not self-serve on standard SaaS tiers. During discovery we confirm whether the customer's plan includes API access. If API is unavailable, we use the CSV and spreadsheet export path instead, which limits the migration to records that can be expressed in Orangescrum's CSV schema. Projects, tasks, subtasks, and users export cleanly via CSV; time logs, custom fields, and sprint associations require additional transformation work that is scoped separately. API unavailability can add one to two weeks to the timeline because of manual export-and-map work.

  • SaaS stability means single-session migration is recommended

    Multiple Capterra reviews from 2018 through 2024 document Orangescrum's SaaS platform crashing during active use, with service interruptions during business hours. Although a September 2024 blog post confirmed two critical bugs were resolved, the documented instability pattern means we recommend completing the migration in a single session rather than running a prolonged parallel-run period. We freeze writes on Orangescrum at cutover, migrate all pending data, and validate in Asana before decommissioning the source. This reduces the window of exposure to potential instability during transition.

  • Invoice PDFs cannot be migrated

    Orangescrum's invoice export generates rendered PDFs within the platform that are not accessible via API or CSV export. We migrate invoice metadata — client reference, line items, amounts, status, and date — as structured task data in Asana or as custom fields. However, the rendered PDF files are not transferable. Customers who need invoice copies for accounting or audit purposes must export PDFs manually from Orangescrum before cutover or reconstruct them in a dedicated accounting tool post-migration.

  • Wiki content requires manual review during conversion

    Orangescrum Wiki pages store rich text content in a structured module with category hierarchies. Asana has no wiki or knowledge-base module; wiki content migrates as task descriptions. Pages with heavy formatting, embedded images, or links to other wiki pages require manual review to ensure content renders correctly in Asana's task description format. Large wiki volumes (over 100 pages) add scoping time and should be flagged during discovery.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Orangescrum to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and export path selection

    We audit the Orangescrum workspace across tier (Basic, Pro, Premium, Enterprise), project count, task and subtask volume, active sprint count, custom field definitions, time log entry count, and wiki page volume. We confirm whether the customer's plan includes API access; if not, we plan for the CSV export path with explicit field mapping for each exportable object. The discovery output is a written migration scope, a destination schema design, and a recommendation on whether to use Asana's Basic, Premium, or Enterprise tier based on portfolio and custom field requirements.

  2. Sprint and backlog mapping design

    We design the sprint and backlog mapping for the destination Asana workspace. This includes creating a Sprint custom field on tasks, deciding whether to use Asana Timeline view or My Tasks for sprint planning, and creating a dedicated Backlog project. For each active Orangescrum sprint, we map the sprint start/end dates to task date ranges, assign the sprint name as a custom field value, and document the full task-sprint assignment matrix. Backlog items receive a sort order preserved as a custom field or task position. This design is reviewed with the customer before any data moves.

  3. Schema creation and custom field recreation

    We create the destination schema in Asana: projects, sections, custom fields (with correct types: text, enum, number, date, people), and any required portfolios or project groupings. Orangescrum custom fields are recreated explicitly because field schemas do not export in a transferable format — we build each field by name and type from the discovery audit. The Asana workspace admin validates the schema before migration begins. Any time log migration setup (Asana Time Tracking integration activation or custom field creation) is completed in this step.

  4. Export, transform, and sandbox migration

    We export data from Orangescrum via API (if available) or CSV. Data undergoes transformation: sprint assignments become custom field values and task dates; backlog ordering becomes task position; client records are split into project members and contacts; invoice metadata is extracted from billable time entries. We run a sandbox migration into a test Asana workspace to validate record counts, custom field population, and task hierarchy. The customer reviews 25-50 sample records and signs off before production migration.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record dependency order: Projects first (as containers), then Users, then Tasks with subtask nesting and sprint custom fields, then Backlog tasks, then Time Log data, then Invoice metadata, then Wiki content as tasks. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. We freeze Orangescrum writes at the start of production migration to prevent delta drift. Any records modified in Orangescrum during migration are captured as a final delta pass before cutover.

  6. Cutover, validation, and rebuild handoff

    We enable Asana as the system of record, deliver the workflow and automation rebuild inventory (Asana Rules equivalents for Orangescrum automations), and provide a sprint configuration guide for the customer's team to finalize sprint planning in Timeline. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Orangescrum workflows as Asana Rules or configure Asana Portfolios inside the migration scope; those are separate configuration tasks for the customer's admin.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Orangescrum logo

Orangescrum

Source

Strengths

  • Per-user pricing capped at $349/month for Premium Unlimited with unlimited users and projects.
  • Includes Gantt charts, Kanban, sprint boards, time tracking, and invoicing in a single subscription.
  • Self-hosted open-source option under GPL v3 for teams requiring on-premises data residency.
  • API access on Premium and Enterprise tiers enables integrations with ERP, CRM, and payroll systems.
  • Supports both waterfall and agile methodologies simultaneously within the same workspace.

Weaknesses

  • Stability concerns documented across multiple reviews, with users reporting crashes and service interruptions on the SaaS version.
  • Open-source edition lacks agile boards, backlogs, time tracking, and role management — core features are paywalled.
  • UI and feature set are perceived as outdated compared to newer project management platforms like ClickUp and monday.com.
  • Manual setup required for integrations and workflows; limited out-of-the-box automation relative to competitors.
  • Enterprise API requires explicit access approval, adding friction for technical teams evaluating the platform.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Orangescrum and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Orangescrum: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Orangescrum doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Orangescrum to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Orangescrum to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Orangescrum to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Orangescrum to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 5,000 tasks with no complex custom field schemas, active sprints across fewer than ten projects, and no large wiki content. Migrations with multiple active sprints, complex custom field definitions, large time log histories (over 50,000 entries), wiki content requiring formatting review, or a self-hosted Orangescrum source requiring database export move to seven to ten weeks because of sprint-to-timeline mapping, field type reconciliation, and wiki content restructuring.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Orangescrum.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day