Project Management migration

Migrate from Exepron to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Exepron and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Exepron logo

Exepron

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Exepron and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Exepron to Asana is a methodology simplification as much as a data migration. Exepron uses Critical Chain Project Management with Dynamic Drum scheduling, AI-driven Project Risk Quotient, and a resource-drum hierarchy. Asana is a task-dependency tool that handles Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Sections, and Custom Fields but has no Critical Chain model, no equivalent to ATU or Dynamic Drum, and no runtime analytics like BIDSS. We map Exepron Activities to Asana Tasks, preserve predecessor relationships as dependencies, resolve Resources to Assignee assignments, and carry Custom Fields across using Asana's global custom fields API. We flag BIDSS dashboards, PALS training records, Custom Roles, What-If Analysis Projects, and Earned Value snapshots as non-transferable—each requires a rebuild or alternative approach post-migration. The Critical Chain buffer structure (project buffers, feeding buffers, and resource buffers) cannot be migrated as a scheduling artefact; we document it as a written reference for your PM team to re-implement manually if needed.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Exepron logo

Exepron

What's pushing teams away

  • Manual data-entry overhead persists in several workflows; customers report that too many actions still require hand-management rather than automation.
  • Resource overload identification lacks precision—teams struggle to pinpoint which resource and which time window is causing contention across the portfolio.
  • The pricing jump from Standard ($200/mo) to Pro ($2,000/mo) is steep, and mid-market teams find the feature gate between those tiers difficult to justify.
  • Mobile interface is functional but limited compared to the desktop experience, frustrating field supervisors who need on-site task updates.
  • Customers with simpler, single-project needs find the Critical Chain methodology and associated terminology add unnecessary cognitive load.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Exepron objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Exepron object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Exepron

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Exepron Projects map directly to Asana Projects. We extract project metadata (name, description, start date, finish date, status, priority flags, and Project Risk Quotient score) via GET /projects. The PRQ score is a numeric value between 0-100 with no native Asana equivalent, so we create a custom number field prq_score__c on the Project. Project-level custom fields migrate to Asana project-level custom fields using the Asana Custom Fields API. Exepron's Project Templates are separate objects; the template structure migrates to Asana project templates if the destination is on Asana Business plan or above, or we document the task structure for manual template creation on lower tiers.

Exepron

Activity

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Exepron Activities map to Asana Tasks within a Project. We map Task Name, Duration, Start, Finish, Fixed-Duration flags, and Predecessor links. Predecessor relationships in Exepron (finish-to-start, start-to-start, finish-to-finish, start-to-finish) translate to Asana dependency links using the Asana dependencies API. Custom Activity Statuses and Kanban status groupings migrate as Asana task custom fields of type enum. The Critical Chain buffer concept (project buffer, feeding buffers, resource buffers) cannot be migrated as a scheduling artefact; we document the buffer assignments per project in a written reference sheet for the PM team to implement manually using task milestones or due-date offsets if needed.

Exepron

Resource

maps to

Asana

User (assignee)

1:many
Fully supported

Exepron Resources (people, equipment, facilities) map to Asana Users assigned to Tasks. We export Resource Name, Type, and Consumption units. The assignee resolution uses the Resource email address to match against Asana Users. If a Resource has no email (equipment or facility), we create an Asana custom field resource_type__c on the task to preserve the type information. Resource consumption data (hours allocated vs consumed) migrates to Asana custom number fields consumption_hrs__c and allocated_hrs__c on the task. Multiple Resources on a single Activity produce multiple task assignments in Asana with the same task duplicated per assignee.

Exepron

Resource Type

maps to

Asana

Team

lossy
Fully supported

Exepron Resource Types group Resources for Dynamic Drum scheduling. We export the type hierarchy as a written reference. In Asana, Teams are the nearest structural equivalent—they are used to scope project membership and assignee lists. We map each distinct Resource Type to an Asana Team, provisioning the team before any project migration so that Resources resolved to assignees can be grouped by team membership. This mapping is configuration-only; no data moves.

Exepron

Activity Bundle

maps to

Asana

Section

1:1
Fully supported

Exepron Activity Bundles group related Activities under a parent Work Package. Asana Sections within a project serve a similar grouping function—though Asana sections are flat within a project and do not support nested hierarchies. We map each Activity Bundle to an Asana Section, with the section name carrying the bundle name. Activities within the bundle become tasks under that section. If the bundle hierarchy is two or more levels deep, we flatten it to a single section level and note the original nesting in a custom field original_bundle_path__c on each task.

Exepron

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Exepron Custom Fields are per-account extension properties. We export field definitions (name, type, required flag, picklist options) and all populated values. Asana supports custom fields of type text, number, enum (single-select), multi-enum (multi-select), date, and person. We map Exepron text, number, and picklist fields to their Asana equivalents. Enum multi-select fields map to Asana multi-enum. Any Exepron field type with no direct Asana equivalent (for example, a calculated field or a field referencing a related object) is flagged during scoping and mapped to a text field with the calculated value serialized as a string. Custom field values are attached to the migrated tasks using the Asana Custom Fields API in a post-task-insert pass.

Exepron

Project Template

maps to

Asana

Project Template

1:1
Fully supported

Exepron Project Templates contain reusable task networks and Resource assignments. We export the template block structure and task sequence. Template Blocks are exported as a flat task structure that the customer can use to populate a new Asana project template on Business plan or above. We do not auto-create Asana templates because Asana's template API does not support task-level block import; instead, we deliver a structured task tree document showing the source template hierarchy and recommended Asana section/section/task layout for manual template creation.

Exepron

Alert and Reason Code

maps to

Asana

Task Comment or Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Exepron Alerts are threshold-based notifications tied to task slippage and Resource overloads. Reason Codes annotate why a slip occurred. Both are exported as metadata and attached to the affected task as an Asana task comment containing the alert text and reason code. If the customer requires a queryable record, we offer an optional Asana custom field alert_reason_code__c that captures the most recent reason code for the task. This is a mapping not a direct object transfer because Asana does not have an alerts object.

Exepron

BIDSS Configuration

maps to

Asana

N/A

1:1
Fully supported

BIDSS is Exepron's runtime Business Intelligence Decision Support System. Its dashboards, charts, and heatmaps are generated from live project data at query time—there is no persistent BIDSS configuration object in the Exepron database. We explicitly exclude BIDSS from migration scope. Customers who rely on BIDSS insights receive a written inventory of every chart type, filter, and data source reference they should rebuild in a destination BI tool (Power BI, Tableau, or Asana's native reporting on Business plan) using the migrated project data as the source.

Exepron

PALS Training Record

maps to

Asana

N/A

1:1
Fully supported

PALS (Project Advanced Learning System) generates learner progress data independently of live projects. It is not a persistent data object with a schema we can query—it is a simulation and knowledge-transfer environment. We do not migrate PALS records. Customers who use PALS for team onboarding or Critical Chain methodology training should treat the PALS data as a training asset to be recreated post-migration using the migrated project portfolio as the practical reference material.

Exepron

Custom Role

maps to

Asana

N/A

1:1
Fully supported

Exepron Custom Roles govern permission scoping within the platform. Asana does not have a Custom Roles model—it uses Team membership and project-level permissions (full access, can view, can edit). We export role definitions and permission sets as a written reference document for the customer's admin to evaluate against Asana's permission model and implement using a combination of Teams, projects, and Asana Enterprise Grid admin controls if the destination is Enterprise. There is no data migration path for role definitions.

Exepron

What-If Analysis Project

maps to

Asana

Project (separate copy)

1:many
Fully supported

Exepron What-If scenarios are separate project clones with modified durations, Resource loads, or start dates tracked as deltas from the base project. Asana does not have a What-If scenario model. We export the base project and each scenario as a separate Asana project, with the scenario project named using a convention like [Base Project Name] - Scenario [N] and a custom field scenario_base_project__c pointing to the base project gid. The delta changes are documented as task modifications (adjusted durations and dates) for the PM team to evaluate manually rather than as a native scenario-delta tracking artefact.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Exepron logo

Exepron gotchas

Medium

API uses placeholder URLs that must be replaced

Medium

API scopes and token expiry are not publicly documented

Medium

MS Project import requires exact column sequence

High

BIDSS and PALS have no persistent export artefacts

Low

No prorated refunds on cancellation

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • BIDSS and PALS have no persistent export artefacts

    BIDSS dashboards and PALS learning records are not stored as discrete data objects in the Exepron database—they are generated from live project data at runtime. This is not a migration limitation; it is a platform characteristic. We explicitly exclude these from our migration scope and deliver a written inventory of every BIDSS chart, filter, and data source for the customer to rebuild in a destination BI tool or Asana's native reporting. Customers who rely heavily on BIDSS insights for portfolio-level decision-making must plan a rebuild effort separate from the data migration.

  • Predecessor chain depth exceeds Asana dependency limits on lower tiers

    Exepron Critical Chain predecessor chains can be deep and cross-project when Linked Projects are used on Enterprise. Asana's dependency API allows predecessor links between tasks, but cross-project dependencies require Asana Business plan or above. If the Exepron source uses Linked Projects with cross-chain predecessors, we flag these during scoping, document the cross-project dependency map, and recommend migrating those related projects into a shared Asana Portfolio with manual dependency tracking or a third-party integration (e.g., Instagantt) for Gantt visualisation. We do not silently drop predecessor links; every unresolved link appears in the reconciliation report.

  • Custom Roles have no Asana equivalent

    Exepron Custom Roles with permission scoping (defined at Pro and Enterprise) govern what each user can view and act on within the platform. Asana uses Team membership and project-level permissions (full access, can edit, can view) without a custom role concept. We export the role definitions and permission matrix as a written document. The customer's admin must evaluate Asana's Enterprise Grid admin controls for equivalent scoping if they are on Asana Enterprise Grid, or use a combination of Teams and project privacy settings on lower plans. Role mapping is a configuration handoff, not a data migration.

  • Activity Bundle hierarchies are flattened

    Exepron Activity Bundles support nested grouping (Work Package > Bundle > Activity). Asana Sections are a single-level flat list within a project. We map each Activity Bundle to a Section, but any nesting beyond one level is flattened and preserved in a custom field original_bundle_path__c. Customers who rely on deep bundle hierarchies for work breakdown structure visibility should review whether Asana Sections meet their needs or whether an alternative like nested subtasks or a separate WBS custom field is preferable. We raise this as a scoping decision point before migration begins.

  • Earned Value snapshot is point-in-time only

    Exepron's Earned Value Module tracks Planned Value, Earned Value, and Actual Cost per Activity and is available on Pro and Enterprise. Because EV is calculated at migration time from the current project state, the snapshot reflects the portfolio's EV standing at the moment of export—not a historical series. We flag this as a point-in-time export and note that Asana has no native Earned Value module. Customers who need ongoing EV tracking should evaluate Asana add-ons (such as the FlitStack Earned Value reporting layer) or a third-party integration. The EV data migrates as custom number fields on each task and is available for historical reference even if not continuously updated post-migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Exepron to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit the source Exepron account across plan tier (Free/Standard/Pro/Enterprise), active project count, Activity volume, Resource count, Resource Type hierarchy, Custom Field definitions, Activity Bundle depth, and any use of Linked Projects or What-If Analysis. We identify API endpoint availability for the customer's plan tier and confirm whether extended scopes (exepron.restapi:extended) are required. We also confirm the actual Identity Server and API Server URLs replacing the placeholder domains in Exepron's documentation. The discovery output is a written scope document listing all migratable objects, all non-migratable objects with rebuild recommendations, and a data volume estimate for migration pacing.

  2. Schema design and Asana destination setup

    We design the Asana destination schema before any data moves. This includes creating Asana Teams (mapped from Exepron Resource Types), Projects, and custom fields using the Asana Custom Fields API. We match Exepron Custom Field types to Asana equivalents (text, number, enum, multi-enum, date). We create custom fields for PRQ score (prq_score__c), Resource consumption hours (consumption_hrs__c, allocated_hrs__c), original bundle path (original_bundle_path__c), scenario base project (scenario_base_project__c), and alert reason codes (alert_reason_code__c) as needed based on scoping. We configure any cross-project dependency groups using Asana Portfolios on Business plan and above.

  3. API authentication and rate-limit characterisation

    We configure OAuth 2.0 token acquisition for the Exepron API, including automatic token refresh (tokens expire after 1 hour) and requesting both exepron.restapi and exepron.restapi:extended scopes. Because Exepron does not publish API rate limits publicly, we characterise the actual rate limit during a pre-migration test pass by measuring 429 response frequency at increasing request volumes. We configure exponential backoff with jitter in our connector to handle throttling gracefully. We also validate that the customer's Identity Server and API Server URLs are reachable and that OAuth credentials have not expired before the migration window opens.

  4. Sandbox validation migration

    We run a full migration into a staging Asana environment using a representative sample of the production data volume. We validate task count reconciliation (Activities in Exepron vs tasks in Asana), dependency integrity (predecessor links correctly formed), assignee resolution rate (Resources matched to Asana Users), custom field population rate, and section naming from Activity Bundles. The customer reviews the staging output, spot-checks ten to fifteen tasks against the Exepron source, and signs off before production migration begins. Any mapping corrections happen in staging, not in production.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Teams (from Resource Types), Projects, Custom Fields definitions, Tasks with predecessor dependencies, Assignee assignments (Resources resolved to Users), Custom Field values attached to tasks, Sections (from Activity Bundles), Comments (from Alerts and Reason Codes), and What-If Analysis Projects as separate copies. We use the Asana REST API with batch chunking for large task sets. We flag any Resource that could not be resolved to a User (equipment or facility Resources) and confirm with the customer whether to use a placeholder assignee or the custom field approach. We disable Asana notifications during the migration window to prevent team notifications from firing on imported records.

  6. Cutover, reconciliation, and rebuild handoff

    We freeze Exepron writes during the cutover window, run a delta migration of any records modified during migration, then deliver the final reconciliation report (record counts by object, unmatched assignees, unresolved dependencies, custom field population rate). We deliver the written BIDSS rebuild inventory, PALS rebuild note, Custom Roles mapping document, and What-If Analysis scenario map as separate artefacts. We enable Asana notifications after validation sign-off. We support a one-week hypercare window for data reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Exepron automations, Custom Roles, or What-If scenarios as Asana features; those are documented for the customer's admin to implement as a separate post-migration engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Exepron logo

Exepron

Source

Strengths

  • Critical Chain scheduling natively resolves multi-project resource contention—something generic Gantt tools cannot do automatically.
  • AI-powered Dynamic Drum gives a concrete, date-driven recommended start for each pipeline project without manual balancing.
  • Lifetime free tier exists, and paid plans have no per-seat fees—cost scales by portfolio size, not headcount.
  • Enterprise tier includes a mature REST API with OAuth 2.0, OData queries, and Postman collection for integration work.
  • Security posture is strong: Azure-hosted, ISO 27001-aligned, GDPR-compliant, and HIPAA certified.

Weaknesses

  • API rate limits and quota values are not publicly documented, making migration pacing hard to pre-configure.
  • BIDSS analytics and PALS training records are not exportable artefacts—they are runtime-generated and cannot be migrated.
  • Critical Chain terminology and workflow model imposes a learning curve that simpler teams find excessive.
  • Free and Standard tiers cap Activities at 50 per month, which can bottleneck large project portfolios.
  • Some standard PM objects (Dependencies in detail, Attachments, Comments) are not clearly enumerated in the public API reference.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Exepron and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Exepron: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Exepron doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Exepron to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Exepron to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Exepron to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Exepron to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for portfolios under 25 projects and 500 Activities with no Activity Bundle nesting or Linked Projects. Migrations with deep Activity Bundle hierarchies, cross-project Critical Chain dependencies, Resource Type hierarchies requiring team mapping, or an Enterprise-tier Exepron source with What-If Analysis Projects move to four to eight weeks because of the dependency mapping, section flattening design work, and custom field schema configuration required in Asana.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Exepron.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day