Project Management migration

Migrate from Project.co to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Project.co and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Project.co logo

Project.co

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Project.co and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Project.co to Asana is a structured migration constrained primarily by Project.co's lack of a public API — all data extraction happens through the in-app UI, which limits bulk export to CSV list views and per-file downloads for attachments. We choreograph sequential exports for Projects, Tasks, Discussions, Notes, and Time Entries, then re-upload files to Asana with the same folder structure. Asana's custom fields, subtasks, and recurring task rules accept the migrated data, but per-project role permissions in Project.co do not map directly to Asana's team-based membership model and require manual reconstruction by the customer's admin. Automations, forms, and reporting dashboards do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of these for rebuild.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Project.co logo

Project.co

What's pushing teams away

  • Integration ecosystem is narrow — no native two-way sync with CRMs, accounting software, or popular dev tools, forcing teams to maintain workarounds or duplicate data entry.
  • Reporting and analytics are basic at every tier. Teams needing dashboards, custom reports, or resource utilization views find Project.co insufficient for data-driven decisions.
  • Scalability becomes a constraint for growing agencies. As the number of concurrent projects and users increases, the flat project structure without nesting or programme-level grouping creates organizational friction.
  • Advanced project management features common in competitors — Gantt charts, resource management, automation rules, and dependency tracking — are absent or limited, pushing complex teams toward more capable tools.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Project.co objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Project.co object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Project.co

Projects

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co Projects map directly to Asana Projects. We extract project name, description, status, created date, and custom field values per project, then create a corresponding Project in Asana. The Project co value from Project.co migrates to the Asana Project's Notes or a custom field. Active and archived status maps directly; completed status translates to an archived Asana Project.

Project.co

Tasks

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co Tasks map to Asana Tasks with title, description (notes), assignee, due date, and status preserved. Task status in Project.co maps to the corresponding Asana section within the destination Project or to the task's completion state. Subtasks in Project.co are not a distinct object — we preserve the parent-child relationship by creating Asana subtasks under the migrated parent task. Task custom field values migrate to matching Asana custom fields on the task.

Project.co

Discussions

maps to

Asana

Task Comments

1:many
Fully supported

Project.co Discussions are per-project threaded message feeds. We flatten each thread as a chronological list of comments with author, timestamp, and body text, then attach each comment as an Asana Task comment on the corresponding migrated task. File attachments referenced in discussion threads migrate as separate file attachments on the task. The thread structure is not preserved as a distinct object in Asana; the chronological comment sequence on the task provides the equivalent content.

Project.co

Notes

maps to

Asana

Project Notes or Task Notes

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co Notes are standalone rich-text documents attached to projects. We create an Asana Project or Task note with the same title, content, and project association. Rich-text formatting is preserved where the destination supports it; Asana task notes accept HTML-formatted content. The customer specifies during scoping whether Notes map to Project-level notes or to notes on the primary task within the project.

Project.co

Files

maps to

Asana

Project Attachments or Task Attachments

1:1
Mapping required

Project.co files stored in project-level folders are downloaded as binary content and re-uploaded to Asana with the same folder path maintained as the attachment target. We map file uploads to the corresponding migrated Project or Task. File metadata (uploader, upload date) is preserved in the upload attribution in Asana. Version history beyond the current file is not preserved as Asana attachments do not track revision history. The 100MB per-file limit in Asana applies; we flag any source files exceeding this threshold during scoping.

Project.co

Time Entries

maps to

Asana

Time Tracking Entries (Premium) or Custom Fields

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co time entries (duration, date, billable flag, task association) map to Asana time tracking entries if the destination Asana organisation has a Premium tier subscription that includes time tracking. Duration and billable flag transfer; hourly rate data is absent in Project.co and is not migrated. If the destination Asana org is on a lower tier, time entries migrate as a custom field on the task (duration in minutes) and a boolean billable flag. The customer configures the hourly rate separately in Asana.

Project.co

Recurring Tasks

maps to

Asana

Recurring Tasks

1:1
Mapping required

Project.co recurring tasks store a recurrence rule and next-run date. We create the task in Asana with the same title, description, assignee, and due date, then apply the recurrence pattern as an Asana native recurrence rule. The recurrence syntax differs between platforms; we convert Project.co's rule to the nearest Asana-supported recurrence pattern (daily, weekly, monthly, yearly) and flag any complex or non-standard recurrence patterns for manual verification during the sandbox migration.

Project.co

Custom Fields

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

Project.co custom field definitions (name, type, options) and values per Project and Task record migrate to Asana custom fields. We pre-create the custom field definitions in the destination Asana organisation before any data import, matching field names and types. Asana's single-select fields are capped at 500 options; we flag any Project.co fields exceeding this during scoping. Multi-select, number, date, and text types map directly. Note that removing a custom field value option in Asana does not remove existing values from tasks — this differs from Project.co's behaviour.

Project.co

Role Permissions

maps to

Asana

Team Membership

lossy
Mapping required

Project.co uses granular per-user roles scoped to individual projects. Asana does not support project-level per-user role assignments; access is controlled through Team membership and project sharing settings. We extract all role assignments per user per project during discovery and surface them in a written permission matrix. The customer's admin reconstructs the access model by adding users to the appropriate Asana Teams and configuring project sharing. Client portal access requires separate setup in Asana (Guest user type or external collaboration).

Project.co

Clients (external users)

maps to

Asana

Guest Members

1:1
Mapping required

Project.co clients access projects via a client portal link and are not counted as paid seats. We create Guest user accounts in Asana for each migrated client and map their project invitations to Asana project sharing permissions. Client email addresses and names migrate; client-specific custom fields transfer if the destination custom fields exist. Asana Guest accounts have limited permissions and cannot access all Asana features; we document these constraints in the scoping report.

Project.co

Assignees (internal team members)

maps to

Asana

Workspace Members

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co team member accounts (team members scoped to the project) map to Asana workspace members. We match users by email address during import. Any assignee without a corresponding Asana account is held in a reconciliation queue; the customer provisions the account before the relevant task import phase. Seats consumed in Project.co may differ from Asana seats because the two platforms price differently; this is surfaced during scoping but is a commercial decision for the customer.

Project.co

File Folders

maps to

Asana

Project Sections

lossy
Fully supported

Project.co file folders are a foldering layer within Projects used to organise file attachments. Asana does not have a native file folder concept. We map folder structure to Asana Sections within the Project, with a note in each Section description indicating the original folder name. File attachments attach to the relevant Section's primary task or to the Project directly. Large attachment libraries with deep folder hierarchies may require manual reorganisation in Asana post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Project.co logo

Project.co gotchas

High

No documented public API constrains migration approach

High

Per-tier team member seat cap is a hard ceiling

Medium

Time tracking lacks hourly rate data

Medium

Custom domain and branding settings are not exportable

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • No Project.co API means CSV-based export with sequential file downloads

    Project.co does not publish a public REST API for programmatic data extraction. All export must be performed through the in-app interface, typically via CSV downloads for list views and individual file downloads for attachments. We handle this by choreographing sequential UI exports for Projects, Tasks, Discussions, Notes, and Time Entries, and by downloading file attachments one by one. We flag the total attachment volume during scoping because large file counts extend the export timeline significantly. Any destination that requires API-based import receives a staged approach: CSV load followed by file re-upload via the destination's own upload mechanism. The lack of a bulk file download also means we cannot export file version history beyond the current version.

  • Asana does not migrate an organisation to a Personal Projects workspace

    Asana's data migration guide specifies that a Personal Projects organisation cannot be used as a source or destination domain. Additionally, Asana does not support migrating an organisation into a workspace — only the reverse (workspace to organisation) is permitted. We confirm the Asana destination type during scoping. If the destination is a Personal Projects workspace, the customer must create an Asana Organisation before migration begins. Migrations where either the source or destination is a Personal Projects workspace cannot proceed through Asana's native migration tooling and require a custom CSV-based approach.

  • Asana single-select custom fields cap at 500 options; deleted values persist on tasks

    Asana's custom field single-select fields are limited to 500 distinct options. We flag any Project.co custom fields with more than 500 options during scoping and propose splitting them into multiple fields or converting to a free-text field in Asana. Additionally, Asana's behaviour differs from Project.co when a custom field value option is removed: tasks that previously used the deleted value retain it in the right pane and cannot revert to the deleted option. This is surfaced in scoping so the admin can decide whether to clean up values before migration or accept the orphaned value in Asana.

  • Role-based permissions in Project.co do not map to Asana's team model

    Project.co supports granular per-user role assignments (client, freelancer, team member) scoped to individual projects. Asana controls access through Team membership and project sharing, with limited per-user role granularity at the project level. We extract the full permission matrix from Project.co during discovery and deliver it as a written document. The customer's admin must manually reconstruct the access model in Asana by adding users to appropriate Teams and configuring project sharing settings. Client portal access requires setting up Asana Guest accounts separately, which have feature restrictions compared to full members.

  • Deleted objects, custom field name collisions, and URL breaks in Asana

    Asana's own migration guide notes that deleted objects (teams, projects, tasks) are not copied during a migration, and that all Asana object IDs change after import. Custom fields with the same name as existing fields in the destination receive a code suffix, which can break Asana form share links and externally shared URLs. We apply a naming convention to prevent collisions during import, but any Asana forms or shared links referencing migrated custom fields will require URL updates post-migration. We document these breaks in the post-migration handoff checklist.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Project.co to Asana data migration

  1. Scoping and export choreography plan

    We audit the Project.co account across all projects, tasks, discussions, notes, files, time entries, and custom field definitions. Because Project.co has no API, we design the export choreography — CSV download sequence for list objects, file download batch sizes, and the ordering needed to satisfy parent-record dependencies. We flag seat cap status (are team member accounts at or near the current tier limit), large attachment volumes, and any Project.co custom fields exceeding Asana's 500-option limit. The output is a written migration scope with record counts, a file manifest, and an export sequence document for the customer to execute during the scoping call.

  2. Destination schema preparation in Asana

    We create the destination schema in Asana before any data import. This includes creating custom field definitions (matching Project.co field names and types), setting up Projects (as top-level containers), and configuring Section structure where Project.co file folders require a structural equivalent. We configure the Asana Organisation type (not Personal Projects workspace) during scoping. If the destination is a new Asana org, we set up the initial Team structure aligned with the customer's organisational units. We validate custom field limits and flag any fields that exceed Asana's 500-option single-select cap.

  3. Data export from Project.co

    The customer executes the export choreography we define during scoping, downloading CSV files for Projects, Tasks, Discussions, Notes, and Time Entries from the Project.co UI. We download file attachments in batches, maintaining the project-folder path as metadata. We extract user assignments (team member and client email addresses) and role assignments per project. Time entry exports include duration, date, and billable flag but not hourly rate; we document this gap in the scoping report. The customer shares the exported files via a secure transfer before migration begins.

  4. Sandbox migration and validation

    We run a full migration into a sandbox or non-production Asana environment using production-like data volume. This validates that all custom fields resolve, parent-child task relationships import correctly, file attachments re-upload successfully, and Asana's object ID reassignment is handled properly. The customer spot-checks 20-30 records against the Project.co source and validates the permission matrix document. Any mapping corrections, missing custom field definitions, or file re-upload failures are resolved in the sandbox before production migration. We do not migrate into the production Asana org until sandbox sign-off is received.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Projects first (as top-level containers), then Tasks with parent-subtask relationships resolved, then Discussions as task comments, Notes as task or project notes, Time Entries as time tracking or custom fields, then file attachments re-uploaded to the corresponding Projects and Tasks. Custom field values apply per record during the relevant import phase. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. File re-upload uses Asana's file attachment API with batch handling for large volumes. Role permission data is delivered as a written matrix; the customer's admin reconstructs the access model in Asana Teams and project sharing settings.

  6. Cutover, delta sync, and rebuild handoff

    We freeze Project.co writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then hand off Asana as the system of record. We deliver the role permission matrix, the automation and reporting inventory (documenting Project.co automations, forms, and dashboards that require rebuild), and a post-migration checklist covering custom domain reapplication, Asana Guest account setup for clients, and recurring task rule verification. We support a five-business-day hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Project.co automations or reporting dashboards as Asana automations or dashboards; those are documented separately for the customer's admin to rebuild.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Project.co logo

Project.co

Source

Strengths

  • Per-seat pricing with unlimited client and freelancer access keeps external collaboration affordable across all tiers.
  • Time tracking, recurring tasks, and custom fields are included on every plan without feature gating.
  • Per-project role-based permissions provide fine-grained control over what clients, freelancers, and team members can see and do.
  • Unlimited projects, tasks, discussions, file folders, and notes on all plans remove arbitrary caps that frustrate growing teams.
  • 14-day free trial with full feature access and no credit card required lowers the barrier to evaluation.

Weaknesses

  • No documented public API — all data export relies on the in-app interface, making programmatic or bulk migration contingent on UI-based extraction.
  • Basic reporting and analytics across all tiers leaves data-driven teams without built-in dashboards or exportable performance metrics.
  • Limited third-party integrations. Native integrations are listed as 'coming soon' on the roadmap, creating uncertainty about the platform's expansion roadmap.
  • Per-tier user seat caps (3 / 10 / 30 / 100 team members) mean growing teams must upgrade or leave when they exceed the limit, rather than paying overages.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Project.co and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Project.co: Not applicable..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Project.co doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Project.co to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Project.co to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Project.co to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Project.co to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts under 200 projects and 5,000 tasks with manageable file volumes. Migrations with large attachment libraries (500+ files), complex custom field schemas, or recurring task rules requiring manual pattern conversion move to four to eight weeks because sequential file re-uploads and custom field schema recreation in Asana extend the timeline. The lack of a Project.co API means the export phase depends on UI-based CSV downloads, which adds time that API-based migrations do not have.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Project.co.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day