Project Management migration

Migrate from Project.co to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Project.co and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

Project.co logo

Project.co

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

70%

7 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Project.co and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Project.co and Microsoft Project take fundamentally different approaches to project organization. Project.co uses Projects as top-level containers for flat task lists, discussions, file folders, and time entries. Microsoft Project uses Tasks as the atomic scheduling unit within a Project, with custom fields, dependencies, baselines, and resource assignments at the task level. We resolve this structural difference by parsing Project.co's task order and assignee data into Microsoft Project's task dependencies and resource allocation model. Project.co has no documented public API, so all data extraction proceeds through in-app CSV exports and individual file downloads, which we choreograph in sequence and validate before re-uploading to SharePoint and Microsoft Project Online. We do not migrate Project.co's automations, recurring task rules as active schedules, or client portal settings; these require manual rebuild or reconfiguration post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Project.co logo

Project.co

What's pushing teams away

  • Integration ecosystem is narrow — no native two-way sync with CRMs, accounting software, or popular dev tools, forcing teams to maintain workarounds or duplicate data entry.
  • Reporting and analytics are basic at every tier. Teams needing dashboards, custom reports, or resource utilization views find Project.co insufficient for data-driven decisions.
  • Scalability becomes a constraint for growing agencies. As the number of concurrent projects and users increases, the flat project structure without nesting or programme-level grouping creates organizational friction.
  • Advanced project management features common in competitors — Gantt charts, resource management, automation rules, and dependency tracking — are absent or limited, pushing complex teams toward more capable tools.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How Project.co objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a Project.co object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Project.co

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project (PWA)

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co Projects map directly to Microsoft Project Online Project sites (PWA). Each Project.co project name, description, status, created date, and custom field values migrate to the corresponding Project Online project. Project.co's flat project list has no native hierarchy in Microsoft Project either, but Microsoft Project's project site structure provides SharePoint integration for associated content. We preserve the project created date as the project start date in Microsoft Project; due date from Project.co maps to a custom finish date field if the destination org uses custom fields.

Project.co

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co Tasks migrate to Microsoft Project Tasks within each project. We map task title, description, assignee, due date, and status. Project.co's task status values (To Do, In Progress, Done) map to Microsoft Project's percent complete or state model. Project.co has no task dependencies or scheduling fields natively, so we reconstruct a basic schedule by ordering tasks chronologically by due date and creating Finish-to-Start dependencies between tasks in sequence order as a starting point; the customer refines dependencies post-migration in Microsoft Project's Gantt view. Custom field values on tasks migrate as Project Online custom fields.

Project.co

Discussion

maps to

Microsoft Project

SharePoint Page or Teams Channel Post

lossy
Fully supported

Project.co Discussions are per-project threaded message feeds with author, timestamp, and body text. Microsoft Project Online has no native discussion object. We flatten each discussion thread as a chronological list of comments and create a SharePoint page within the associated project site that contains the full discussion history in reverse-chronological order, with author names and timestamps preserved. Alternatively, if the customer uses Microsoft Teams, we can create a Teams channel post per project with the same content. The customer chooses the target during scoping.

Project.co

File

maps to

Microsoft Project

SharePoint Document Library

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co files stored in project-level folders migrate to SharePoint document libraries attached to the Microsoft Project Online site. We download each file binary from Project.co, preserve the folder path as a SharePoint library folder structure, and re-upload using the SharePoint REST API. File metadata (uploader name, upload date) migrates as SharePoint column values. Large file counts extend the migration timeline proportionally because each file requires an individual download-reupload cycle; we surface total file volume during scoping so the customer can plan the export window accordingly.

Project.co

Note

maps to

Microsoft Project

SharePoint Page or OneNote

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co Notes are standalone rich-text documents attached to projects. We create SharePoint pages within the project site with the same title and rich-text body. Formatting is preserved where the destination supports basic HTML; complex formatting may require minor manual cleanup post-migration. We note the total count of Notes during scoping because each is a separate content migration item.

Project.co

Time Entry

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Hours or Resource Assignment

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co time entries (task association, duration, billable flag, date) migrate to Microsoft Project as hours logged against the corresponding task. We convert the duration to hours and create a task assignment with hours in the resource plan. The billable flag from Project.co migrates as a custom field on the task or as a column in the associated SharePoint list; Microsoft Project Online does not have a native billable flag at the task level. Hourly rates are not present in Project.co and must be configured manually per user in Microsoft Project Online or in an associated timesheet system.

Project.co

Recurring Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task (flagged)

lossy
Fully supported

Project.co recurring tasks store a recurrence rule and next-run date. We create the recurring task as a standard Microsoft Project Task and flag it as recurring in the notes field with the original recurrence rule text. Microsoft Project Online does not have a native recurring task scheduler equivalent to Project.co's recurrence model; the recurrence pattern must be manually re-established post-migration using Microsoft Project's recurring task feature or Power Automate.

Project.co

Custom Field

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Field (PWA)

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co custom field definitions (name, type, options) and their values per record migrate to Microsoft Project Online custom fields. Project.co field types (text, number, date, dropdown) map to equivalent Project Online field types. Custom fields are scoped to the PWA site in Project Online; we configure them before record import so that values load during the main migration phase.

Project.co

Role Permission

maps to

Microsoft Project

SharePoint Group or Entra ID Group

lossy
Fully supported

Project.co's per-user roles scoped to individual projects (team member, client, freelancer, project-specific admin) map to SharePoint group membership on the project site. We extract every role assignment from Project.co and create corresponding SharePoint groups in the destination Microsoft Project Online site. Client portal access (Project.co's no-paid-seat client access) maps to an Entra ID guest account or an external SharePoint group, depending on the customer's tenant settings. Role mapping requires coordination with the customer's M365 admin during scoping.

Project.co

Client (external user)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Entra ID Guest User or SharePoint External User

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co clients access projects via client portal links without consuming a paid seat. We extract client email addresses and names and create Entra ID guest accounts or configure SharePoint external access links on the project site, depending on the customer's security policy. Client viewing permissions are mapped to SharePoint read-level access on the associated project site's document library and project details page.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Project.co logo

Project.co gotchas

High

No documented public API constrains migration approach

High

Per-tier team member seat cap is a hard ceiling

Medium

Time tracking lacks hourly rate data

Medium

Custom domain and branding settings are not exportable

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Project.co has no public API — all export is UI-based

    Project.co does not publish a REST or Graph API for programmatic data extraction. All migration data comes from sequential in-app CSV exports (Projects, Tasks, Discussions, Notes, Time Entries) and individual file downloads from project file folders. Large file counts extend the export timeline because each attachment requires a separate download. We choreograph the export sequence to maintain referential integrity (Projects before Tasks, Tasks before Time Entries) and validate record counts after each export. Any destination import that relies on a source API will not apply here; the entire migration uses file-based export followed by SharePoint and Project Online import.

  • Microsoft Project Online is retiring October 2026

    Project Online's retirement date is September 30, 2026. Organizations migrating from Project.co to Microsoft Project Online must account for this timeline and plan to migrate either to Microsoft Planner (which absorbs Project for the web's features) or Project Server Subscription Edition. Project desktop is not affected by this retirement and remains a standalone option. We confirm the customer's chosen Microsoft Project variant (Online, Planner, or desktop) during scoping because the destination object model and import mechanism differ significantly across these products.

  • Task dependencies and scheduling must be manually rebuilt

    Project.co stores task order and due dates but has no dependency or scheduling model. Microsoft Project is built around task dependencies, critical path, and resource leveling. We reconstruct a basic sequential schedule from Project.co's task due dates as Finish-to-Start dependencies, but this is a starting approximation. The customer must review and refine the dependency structure in Microsoft Project's Gantt view post-migration. Teams relying on Project.co's simple due-date model will need to invest time in Microsoft Project's scheduling setup to realize the tool's full capability.

  • Discussions have no native Microsoft Project equivalent

    Project.co's per-project threaded discussion feeds have no direct object in Microsoft Project Online. We flatten each thread and host the content in a SharePoint page or Teams channel post, but threaded conversation structure (with replies nested under parent comments) is lost in the linearized format. Teams that rely heavily on Project.co discussions for project communication should plan to use Microsoft Teams project channels as the replacement communication layer post-migration.

  • Billable flag and hourly rate require manual reconfiguration

    Project.co records time entries with a billable/non-billable flag and duration, but stores no hourly rate per user or per project. When migrating to Microsoft Project Online, the billable flag must be reimplemented as a custom field, and hourly rates must be entered manually per resource. We preserve the duration and billable flag from every time entry so the log is complete; the rate gap is surfaced in the scoping report and is not silently dropped.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Project.co to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Discovery and variant selection

    We audit the Project.co workspace for total project count, task count, file attachment count, discussion thread count, note count, time entry count, custom field definitions, role assignments, and client portal user list. We pair this with a Microsoft Project variant decision: Project Online (PWA with SharePoint) if the customer needs full scheduling and resource management; Microsoft Planner if the customer prioritizes Microsoft 365 integration and the transition from Project for the web aligns with their timeline; or Project desktop if the customer needs offline capability and the migration scope is a small number of complex project plans. The discovery output is a written migration scope document and a variant recommendation.

  2. Export choreography and file extraction

    We perform sequential UI-based exports from Project.co: Projects CSV first, then Tasks, then Discussions, then Notes, then Time Entries. We extract file attachments from each project folder individually, preserving folder paths as SharePoint library folder structure. We validate record counts at each export step and compare against the scoping estimate. Any volume discrepancy triggers a re-export before proceeding. This phase is the longest in a UI-based export because file extraction does not support bulk download; we provide the customer with a progress estimate during scoping based on total file count.

  3. Destination schema setup

    For Microsoft Project Online destinations, we configure the PWA site schema: Enterprise Project Types, custom fields (with Project.co field types mapped to PWA field types), lookup tables, and SharePoint document libraries. For Microsoft Planner destinations, we configure the Planner plan structure and custom fields. We create SharePoint groups mapped from Project.co role assignments, provision Entra ID guest accounts for external clients, and configure external sharing settings. All schema setup happens in the destination environment before any record import.

  4. Record import in dependency order

    We import records in referential integrity order: Projects first (establishing the project site structure), then Tasks (linked to their parent project), then Custom Field values (on both project and task records), then Time Entries (linked to tasks), then Discussions (as SharePoint pages), then Notes (as SharePoint pages), then Files (as SharePoint document library content). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report comparing import count to export count. File import uses the SharePoint REST API with batch chunking for large volumes.

  5. Permission and access configuration

    We assign SharePoint group membership to match Project.co role assignments: internal team members to the project site's Members group, project admins to the Owners group, clients and freelancers to the Visitors group with read-level access. We configure Entra ID guest access for external clients and validate that client portal users can access the correct project sites post-migration. This step requires coordination with the customer's M365 admin to confirm SharePoint external sharing settings and Entra ID B2B configuration.

  6. Cutover, validation, and rebuild handoff

    We freeze writes to Project.co during the cutover window, run a final delta export of any records modified since the main export, and close out the migration. We validate a random sample of records in Microsoft Project against the source data and deliver a migration completion report with record counts, any exceptions, and unresolved items. We deliver a written inventory of Project.co recurring task rules, automation patterns, and client portal configurations that require manual reapplication in the destination. We do not rebuild recurring tasks as active schedules or reconfigure SharePoint workflows as part of the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Project.co logo

Project.co

Source

Strengths

  • Per-seat pricing with unlimited client and freelancer access keeps external collaboration affordable across all tiers.
  • Time tracking, recurring tasks, and custom fields are included on every plan without feature gating.
  • Per-project role-based permissions provide fine-grained control over what clients, freelancers, and team members can see and do.
  • Unlimited projects, tasks, discussions, file folders, and notes on all plans remove arbitrary caps that frustrate growing teams.
  • 14-day free trial with full feature access and no credit card required lowers the barrier to evaluation.

Weaknesses

  • No documented public API — all data export relies on the in-app interface, making programmatic or bulk migration contingent on UI-based extraction.
  • Basic reporting and analytics across all tiers leaves data-driven teams without built-in dashboards or exportable performance metrics.
  • Limited third-party integrations. Native integrations are listed as 'coming soon' on the roadmap, creating uncertainty about the platform's expansion roadmap.
  • Per-tier user seat caps (3 / 10 / 30 / 100 team members) mean growing teams must upgrade or leave when they exceed the limit, rather than paying overages.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Project.co and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Project.co: Not applicable..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Project.co doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Project.co to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Project.co to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Project.co to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Project.co to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts with fewer than 50 projects, 2,000 tasks, and under 500 file attachments. Migrations with high file attachment counts (over 1,000 files), extensive custom field definitions, or complex permission structures requiring SharePoint group design extend to six to ten weeks. The file extraction phase from Project.co is the primary variable because it relies on individual downloads with no bulk-export option; we estimate this phase from the total file count during scoping.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Project.co.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day