HRMS migration

Migrate from The Applicant Manager to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between The Applicant Manager and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

The Applicant Manager logo

The Applicant Manager

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between The Applicant Manager and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-8 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from The Applicant Manager to Bullhorn is an ATS-to-staffing-platform migration that requires handling TAM's unusual data export architecture before Bullhorn's API can accept records. TAM provides no documented REST API; the export is a password-protected Standard Applicant Data CSV paired with a separate zip archive of applicant files. We download both packages, unpack them, re-associate files with applicant records using applicant ID cross-references, and map TAM's customer-defined workflow stages to Bullhorn pipeline stages. We migrate Job Postings to Bullhorn JobOrder, Applicants to Candidate, and carry resume and cover letter files as Bullhorn Candidate attachments. Bullhorn's Candidate object supports custom fields and Custom Objects (edition-gated: 2 on ATS Growth, 10 on Front Office Growth and Enterprise) for TAM's custom application questions. Workflow stages, automations, and onboarding document collections do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's Bullhorn admin to rebuild.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

The Applicant Manager logo

The Applicant Manager

What's pushing teams away

  • Staffing agencies explicitly identify TAM as unsuitable for their high-volume, agency-specific workflows, prompting a switch to platforms like Greenhouse or Jobvite designed for agency use.
  • Users report limited filtering capabilities, wishing the search and filter tools were more powerful for managing larger applicant pools efficiently.
  • The platform is missing some integrations commonly expected in modern ATS platforms, requiring workarounds or manual processes for teams with complex tech stacks.
  • A dashboard navigation limitation frustrates users—clicking on a position from the main dashboard does not link directly to the job posting, requiring an extra step to reach the job listing.
  • As teams grow, the relatively simple feature set may no longer meet the advanced analytics, reporting, and customization needs of scaling organizations.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How The Applicant Manager objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a The Applicant Manager object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

The Applicant Manager

Position (Job Posting)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder

1:1
Fully supported

TAM Positions (job title, description, department, status) map directly to Bullhorn JobOrder. TAM's position-level custom application questions migrate as Bullhorn JobOrder custom fields or as Custom Objects if the Bullhorn edition supports them. We preserve position status (active, closed, on hold) so that the Bullhorn JobOrder reflects the original TAM state. JobOrder must exist in Bullhorn before any Candidate import referencing it begins, so Positions migrate first in the dependency order.

The Applicant Manager

Applicant

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

TAM Applicants map to Bullhorn Candidate records. TAM stores contact information, application date, source, and current workflow stage per applicant. We map TAM's applicant fields to Bullhorn Candidate standard fields (firstName, lastName, email, phone, address), set the dateApplied to the TAM application date, and carry the source attribution. The TAM applicant ID is preserved in a Bullhorn custom field for cross-reference. TAM Applicant custom profile fields migrate as Candidate custom fields.

The Applicant Manager

Workflow Stage

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Pipeline Stage

lossy
Fully supported

TAM organizes applicant progress through customer-defined workflow stages with no standardized vocabulary. Bullhorn JobOrder uses pipeline stages configured per record type. We collect the full TAM workflow stage configuration during discovery, map each TAM stage name to an equivalent Bullhorn pipeline stage, and preserve the original stage order so candidate progress reflects correctly in Bullhorn's Opportunity and Candidate pipeline views. Stage probabilities are set to match TAM's implied stage weights if available.

The Applicant Manager

Resume and Cover Letter Files

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Attachment (ContentDocument)

1:1
Fully supported

TAM delivers applicant files (resumes, cover letters, portfolio items) as a separate password-protected zip archive. We download and unpack both the TAM CSV and the zip, cross-reference files by applicant ID in the filename, and attach each file to the corresponding Bullhorn Candidate record via ContentDocumentLink. This two-step extraction is the highest-risk step in the migration; we validate file-to-applicant pairing against the CSV before bulk attach to avoid misattachment.

The Applicant Manager

Custom Application Questions and Responses

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Fields or Custom Object

lossy
Fully supported

TAM stores custom application questions in the position configuration and responses per applicant. Bullhorn supports custom fields on Candidate (up to 55 per Custom Object depending on edition). We extract the question schema from TAM during discovery, pre-create the corresponding custom fields in Bullhorn (or a Custom Object if question count exceeds field limits), and map responses per applicant. Bullhorn ATS Growth limits 2 Custom Objects; ATS Enterprise allows 10.

The Applicant Manager

Activity Notes and Scorecards

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Note and Task

1:1
Fully supported

TAM hiring team notes, scorecard ratings, and stage-change timestamps migrate to Bullhorn Note records (attached to the Candidate via ContentDocumentLink) and Task records (with ActivityDate set to the original TAM timestamp for timeline ordering). Scorecard ratings migrate as custom fields on the Note or as a separate scorecard object depending on the Bullhorn edition configuration. Formatting may vary between TAM's plain text notes and Bullhorn's rich text Note bodies.

The Applicant Manager

User and Hiring Manager

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

User

1:1
Fully supported

TAM user accounts (recruiters, hiring managers) are tied to applicant assignments and workflow actions. We map TAM users to Bullhorn User records by email match. Any TAM user without a matching Bullhorn User goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's Bullhorn admin to provision. We do not migrate TAM user permissions as Bullhorn profiles and permission sets; these are set up natively in Bullhorn post-migration. OwnerId on Candidate records is resolved via the User mapping after provisioning.

The Applicant Manager

Position Department

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ClientCorporation or JobOrder Department

lossy
Fully supported

TAM positions carry department assignments that may not map cleanly to Bullhorn's schema. If the customer uses Bullhorn's ClientCorporation model (typical for staffing firms), we map TAM departments to Bullhorn BusinessSector or a custom field on ClientCorporation. If Bullhorn is used purely as an ATS without CRM client records, department maps to a custom field on JobOrder.

The Applicant Manager

Applicant Source

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Source

1:1
Fully supported

TAM tracks applicant source (job board, referral, direct) per applicant. Source values map to Bullhorn Candidate source field. TAM's custom source categories (if any) require configuration as Bullhorn picklist values before migration so that source attribution is preserved as a structured value rather than free text.

The Applicant Manager

Onboarding Documents

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Case or Custom Object

1:1
Mapping required

TAM collects onboarding paperwork metadata. Bullhorn does not have a native onboarding module; onboarding document references and metadata migrate as Bullhorn Case records (if Service Cloud is active in the destination) or as a Bullhorn Custom Object. Actual form templates do not migrate; they must be rebuilt in Bullhorn or a separate onboarding tool. Document storage references from TAM may not resolve in Bullhorn without re-upload.

The Applicant Manager

Candidate-Targeted Job (Applicant Position Link)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Application (Candidate-to-JobOrder link)

1:1
Fully supported

TAM links each Applicant to a Position. Bullhorn links Candidate to JobOrder via an Application record (or JobSubmission depending on Bullhorn edition). We resolve the JobOrder ID from the TAM position mapping and create Bullhorn Application records linking each Candidate to the corresponding JobOrder. This relationship must be established before the Candidate record is fully usable in Bullhorn's pipeline views.

The Applicant Manager

TAM File Vault Metadata

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ContentDocument metadata

1:1
Fully supported

The TAM file vault zip contains files named with applicant ID patterns. We parse filenames, strip TAM path prefixes, and attach files to Bullhorn Candidate records by matching applicant ID segments in the filename. Any TAM files that cannot be cross-referenced to an applicant ID (orphaned files) are collected in a separate folder with a manifest and flagged in the migration report for manual disposition.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

The Applicant Manager logo

The Applicant Manager gotchas

Medium

Feature-based per-month pricing compounds with team size

High

No publicly documented REST API

Medium

Custom workflow stages lack standardized naming

Low

Resume and cover letter files are stored separately from the CSV export

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • TAM has no public REST API — data comes as CSV plus zip

    TAM does not expose a documented public API. The migration relies on TAM's Standard Applicant Data CSV and a separate password-protected zip archive of applicant files. We extract both packages, re-associate files with applicant records by applicant ID cross-reference, and ingest the flattened CSV into Bullhorn's REST API. Any fields not present in the CSV — such as custom workflow notes, internal flags, or secondary contact details — cannot be retrieved programmatically and must be identified as data gaps during scoping. This export architecture adds time to migration timelines and limits the automation options available compared to API-first migrations.

  • Resume and cover letter files are in a separate zip from the CSV

    TAM's Standard Applicant Data CSV does not embed file content. Applicant files (resumes, cover letters, portfolio items) are delivered as a separate password-protected zip archive with a different delivery mechanism from the CSV. We download and unpack both packages, then re-associate each file with its corresponding applicant record using the applicant ID embedded in the filename or applicant ID cross-reference in the CSV. Misattachment risk is highest in high-volume migrations where file naming conventions vary by TAM version or export batch. We validate file-to-applicant pairing against the CSV before bulk attachment runs.

  • Custom workflow stage names require manual mapping before migration

    TAM allows customers to define their own workflow stage names and sequences, meaning no two TAM instances share the same stage vocabulary. We cannot assume a standard set of stages exists. We collect the complete TAM workflow configuration during discovery, document each customer-defined stage with its position in the sequence, map each stage to an equivalent Bullhorn pipeline stage, and present the mapping to the customer for approval before migration runs. Bullhorn pipeline stages are configured per JobOrder record type, so multi-pipeline TAM customers require multiple stage-mapping sets.

  • TAM's per-feature pricing does not map to Bullhorn's per-user model

    TAM bills at $90 per feature per month on Basic, scaling with the number of enabled features rather than headcount. Bullhorn bills per user per month ($99-$315 depending on edition). These billing models are structurally different, and a direct cost comparison requires inventorying every TAM feature in scope. We collect the full TAM feature inventory during scoping so customers can model their Bullhorn user count against their current TAM spend. A customer paying $360/month on TAM (four features) does not directly compare to a four-user Bullhorn subscription, and we flag this gap to prevent pricing surprises post-migration.

  • Bullhorn Custom Objects are edition-gated — migration scope depends on tier

    Bullhorn Custom Objects are limited by edition: ATS Growth includes 0 Custom Objects, Bullhorn ATS includes 2, and Front Office Growth and Enterprise include 10 Custom Objects with up to 55 fields each. TAM customers with extensive custom application question schemas or onboarding metadata may exceed Bullhorn ATS Growth limits. We scope the custom field and Custom Object requirements during discovery, confirm the destination Bullhorn edition, and advise if the edition choice constrains what migrates as native structured data versus notes or unstructured fields. Bullhorn's Custom Object limit does not include Custom Objects created by marketplace integrations or compliance functionality.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful The Applicant Manager to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Export package collection and TAM feature inventory

    We collect the TAM Standard Applicant Data CSV and the TAM file vault zip from the customer's TAM instance. We simultaneously inventory all enabled TAM features (hiring pipelines, custom questions, onboarding modules, user roles) and document the complete workflow stage configuration with names and ordering. This inventory drives both the migration scope definition and the Bullhorn edition recommendation. We also request the TAM support team credentials for the file archive if the zip is password-protected.

  2. TAM-to-Bullhorn object mapping and stage translation

    We design the TAM-to-Bullhorn object mapping based on the discovery output. TAM Positions map to Bullhorn JobOrder. TAM Applicants map to Bullhorn Candidate with Application records linking to JobOrder. TAM's customer-defined workflow stages are translated to Bullhorn pipeline stages with the original order preserved. Custom application questions are mapped to Bullhorn custom fields (or Custom Objects if the TAM question count exceeds single-object field limits). Bullhorn edition is confirmed during this step so that Custom Object allocation is locked before schema creation.

  3. Bullhorn schema preparation and sandbox validation

    We provision the Bullhorn schema in a sandbox: JobOrder record types and pipeline stages, Candidate custom fields, Custom Objects (within edition limits), and picklist values for source attribution. We pre-create the workflow stage mapping in Bullhorn Pipeline configuration. The customer validates the schema and mapping before production migration begins. We do not create Bullhorn workflows, automations, or email templates during migration scope; these are documented in the handoff inventory for the customer's Bullhorn admin.

  4. File re-association and CSV normalization

    We unpack the TAM zip archive and cross-reference each file against the TAM CSV using applicant ID in filenames. We build a normalized CSV with Bullhorn field names replacing TAM field names, populate Bullhorn-required fields with defaults where TAM data is absent, and flag any applicant records with missing required fields for the customer's TAM admin to resolve. Orphaned files (no matching applicant ID) are collected and reported separately.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We migrate Bullhorn JobOrder records first so that parent references exist for Candidate-to-JobOrder Application records. Bullhorn Candidate records are created with custom field values populated. Application records link Candidates to JobOrders. Files are attached to Candidate records via Bullhorn ContentDocument API. Activity notes and scorecards migrate as Bullhorn Note and Task records with original timestamps preserved. User mapping (TAM owner to Bullhorn User by email) is validated before record import so that OwnerId references resolve on insert.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow rebuild handoff

    We freeze TAM write access during cutover, run a delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, and enable Bullhorn as the system of record. We deliver a reconciliation report comparing TAM record counts to Bullhorn record counts and a spot-check validation of 25-50 candidate records against the TAM source. We provide a written inventory of TAM workflow stages, automations, and onboarding configurations requiring rebuild in Bullhorn. Bullhorn workflows, automation rules, and email templates are outside standard migration scope and require separate configuration or a Bullhorn implementation partner.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

The Applicant Manager logo

The Applicant Manager

Source

Strengths

  • Intuitive, workflow-based interface that corporate recruiting teams can adopt without extensive training
  • Affordable per-feature pricing that remains competitive against enterprise ATS platforms
  • Highly responsive customer support that implements feature requests rapidly
  • Centralized applicant data storage combining resumes, cover letters, and screening information in one place
  • Strong suitability for SMB corporate recruiting across hospitality, construction, nonprofit, and government contracting sectors

Weaknesses

  • No free plan—fully paid platform limits initial evaluation without a demo or trial commitment
  • Staffing agencies find the platform unsuitable due to lack of high-volume, agency-specific workflow features
  • Limited filtering capabilities frustrate users managing large applicant pools
  • Fewer integrations than competitors require manual workarounds for complex HR tech stacks
  • Dashboard navigation requires extra steps to access job postings directly from the main view
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. All 7 core objects map 1:1 between The Applicant Manager and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across The Applicant Manager and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    A

    All 7 core objects map 1:1 between The Applicant Manager and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    The Applicant Manager: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    The Applicant Manager doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your The Applicant Manager to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about The Applicant Manager to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during The Applicant Manager to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your The Applicant Manager to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and eight weeks for straightforward cases with under 5,000 applicants, clean file packaging (CSV and zip fully cross-referenceable), and a TAM workflow stage configuration that maps directly to Bullhorn pipeline stages. Migrations with high-volume file archives (thousands of resume and cover letter files), complex custom application question schemas, TAM customers using multiple workflow pipelines, or a destination Bullhorn edition that requires Custom Object configuration within edition limits move to ten to fourteen weeks because of file re-association time, stage-mapping design, and schema setup.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from The Applicant Manager.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day