Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Planview AdaptiveWork and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Source
Trello
Destination
Compatibility
3 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Planview AdaptiveWork and Trello.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
2-4 weeks
Overview
Moving from Planview AdaptiveWork to Trello is a structural reduction, not a simple record copy. Planview AdaptiveWork organizes work in deep project-task-milestone hierarchies with financial tracking, resource capacity planning, and validation rules. Trello uses a flat Kanban board model (Boards, Lists, Cards) with no native financial management, no resource capacity views, and no equivalent to Planview's dependency chain logic. We map the Project structure to Trello Boards, Tasks to Cards within Lists, and Milestone dates to Card due dates. We flag that Custom Objects, Validation Rules, Workflow Rules, Time Entries, Financials, Resource Capacity, Templates, and Document links cannot migrate as functional equivalents. We deliver a written inventory of all unsupported configurations so the customer's team can rebuild them in Trello or a compatible Power-up. We do not migrate Automations or Workflows as code; Butler automations must be rebuilt from the written inventory.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Planview AdaptiveWork object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Project
Trello
Board
1:1Planview AdaptiveWork Projects map to Trello Boards. Project name becomes Board name, Project description becomes Board description, and Project status (Active, On Hold, Completed) maps to Trello's Board visibility or an Archives pattern. Custom fields on Projects (picklist type) migrate as Power-up fields or card labels; free-text custom fields cannot render in Trello card views without a Power-up such as Custom Fields. We preserve the original Planview Project ID in a card label or custom field for audit traceability.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Task
Trello
Card
1:1Planview AdaptiveWork Tasks map to Trello Cards. Task name becomes Card title, Task description becomes Card description, and Task status maps to Card list position or a label. Tasks nested under parent Tasks flatten into separate Cards within the same Board; we preserve the parent-child relationship using Card labels (e.g., parent_task_id) so the hierarchy can be reconstructed visually via Power-ups like Hierarchy or Card repeater. Unlimited nesting depth in Planview reduces to one level of parent-child labeling in Trello.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Milestone
Trello
Card due date
1:manyPlanview AdaptiveWork Milestones map to Card due dates on the relevant Project Board. Milestone name becomes Card title with a Milestone label; Milestone target date becomes the Card due date. Multiple Milestones that share the same date may result in multiple Cards or a consolidated milestone card with a checklist. We flag that Roadmap visibility (a Planview configuration) has no Trello equivalent; the customer's team should use a dedicated Roadmap Board or a Power-up such as BigPicture if portfolio-level milestone tracking is required.
Planview AdaptiveWork
User
Trello
Board Member
1:1Planview AdaptiveWork Users map to Trello workspace Members by email match. We resolve every User referenced in task assignments and resource allocations before migration. Users without matching Trello accounts go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision. We preserve Planview role and working calendar data in a Board description note for reference; Trello does not have a native working calendar or capacity view.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Custom Field (picklist type)
Trello
Custom Fields Power-up or Label
lossyPicklist-type Custom Fields in Planview AdaptiveWork migrate to Trello Custom Fields Power-up (Premium) or Labels (Standard/Free). We confirm the destination Trello plan tier during scoping because Custom Fields is a Premium feature. Free and Standard plans use Labels as the semantic equivalent, with the picklist values mapped to specific label colors and names. We note that free-text Custom Fields cannot render on Trello card faces without a Power-up; these are documented in the unsupported-config inventory.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Dependency (predecessor/successor)
Trello
Label or Checklist item
lossyPlanview AdaptiveWork task-to-task predecessor/successor dependencies have no native Trello equivalent. We migrate dependency relationships as Labels (e.g., depends_on: CARD_ID) on the dependent card. The customer's team can use a Power-up such as Dependency Grid, Card Relationships, or Planyway to visualize and manage the dependency chain in Trello. We do not guarantee functional dependency enforcement (e.g., blocking card movement until a predecessor is complete) as that requires a third-party Power-up.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Time Entry
Trello
Card checklist item (summary only)
lossyPlanview AdaptiveWork Time Entries (hours logged against Tasks and Projects) have no native Trello equivalent. We extract time entry summaries and attach them as a Card checklist item or Card description block showing hours by date and user. For full time-tracking capability post-migration, we recommend enabling a Power-up such as Card Duration, Tempo Timesheets, or Everhour. Time entry approval workflows cannot migrate.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Financial (budget, cost, revenue)
Trello
External export (CSV or BI tool)
lossyPlanview AdaptiveWork financial data (budget line items, cost types, revenue, billing) has no Trello equivalent. We export the financial dataset as a structured CSV (Project, Task, Budget, Actual, Variance, Currency) and attach it to the Board or deliver it separately. If the customer requires budget tracking inside Trello, we recommend a Power-up integration with QuickBooks, Xero, or a connected BI tool. We do not create Trello Cards representing financial line items.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Customer
Trello
Label or Power-up field
lossyPlanview AdaptiveWork Customers (external client organizations linked to Projects) map to a Trello Label (e.g., Client: Acme Corp) or a Custom Fields Power-up entry if the destination plan supports it. We extract the Customer name and project association from the source record. If the customer uses a CRM integration (Salesforce, HubSpot), we document the entity relationship for re-linkage post-migration.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Template
Trello
Board Template
lossyPlanview AdaptiveWork Project and Task Templates (workflow structure, default fields, pre-populated tasks) cannot migrate as functional templates in Trello. We export template definitions and task structure as a written document and, where feasible, create a Trello Board Template as a starting point. The customer's team rebuilds the workflow automation in Butler from the written template documentation.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Resource Capacity
Trello
Member assignment (manual)
lossyPlanview AdaptiveWork resource capacity planning (user availability, skills, workload distribution, working calendars) has no Trello equivalent. We extract user allocation data as a CSV showing capacity versus assignment per project. Trello card Members represent task assignment only, with no capacity calculation. If the customer requires capacity planning post-migration, we recommend a dedicated resource management Power-up or a separate resource planning tool.
Planview AdaptiveWork
Document link
Trello
Power-up attachment
lossyPlanview AdaptiveWork document links (SharePoint, Box) reference files stored in the source document system. We migrate the URL references as Card attachments pointing to the original location. The actual file content remains in SharePoint or Box and must be transferred separately via the source document system. We flag the document transfer as a separate workstream in the migration plan.
| Planview AdaptiveWork | Trello | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Board1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Card1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Milestone | Card due date1:many | Fully supported | |
| User | Board Member1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field (picklist type) | Custom Fields Power-up or Labellossy | Fully supported | |
| Dependency (predecessor/successor) | Label or Checklist itemlossy | Fully supported | |
| Time Entry | Card checklist item (summary only)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Financial (budget, cost, revenue) | External export (CSV or BI tool)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Customer | Label or Power-up fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Template | Board Templatelossy | Fully supported | |
| Resource Capacity | Member assignment (manual)lossy | Mapping required | |
| Document link | Power-up attachmentlossy | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Planview AdaptiveWork gotchas
Picklist custom fields render on cards, free-text fields do not
Validation Rules and Workflow Rules do not fire on the mobile app
Mobile app limitations create split data-entry behavior post-migration
Document management requires dual-track migration via SharePoint or Box
Custom Objects gated behind Business and Enterprise plan tiers
Trello gotchas
Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint
Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData
API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration
Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership
Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and record audit
We audit the source Planview AdaptiveWork instance across edition tier (Professional, Business, Enterprise), entity types in use (Projects, Tasks, Milestones, Custom Objects), custom field definitions (picklist vs free-text), active Workflow Rules and Validation Rules, dependency chain count, financial line item volume, time entry records, document link references, and user count. We pair this with a Trello plan assessment (Free, Standard, Premium, Enterprise) based on the customer's feature requirements. The discovery output is a written migration scope defining what migrates as records, what migrates as exports, and what goes to the unsupported-config inventory.
Board structure design and hierarchy flattening strategy
We design the Trello destination structure: one Board per Planview Project, Lists within each Board mapped to Planview task statuses or phases, and Cards mapped from Planview Tasks. We define the flattening strategy for nested Tasks, the label scheme for parent-child relationships, the due date population from Milestone dates, and the Custom Fields Power-up configuration if the destination plan supports it. We confirm the Board visibility (private, workspace, public) against the Planview Project visibility settings. Schema is validated in a Trello test Board before production migration begins.
User reconciliation and workspace provisioning
We extract every distinct Planview AdaptiveWork User referenced in task assignments, resource allocations, and document permissions, and match by email against the Trello destination workspace Members. Users without a matching Trello account go to a reconciliation queue. The customer's Trello admin provisions any missing Members (active or inactive depending on whether the original Planview user is still active). We do not provision Trello users; that is an admin action. Migration cannot proceed past card import because Trello requires valid Member references for card assignment.
Sandbox migration and record reconciliation
We run a full migration into a Trello test workspace using production-like data volume. The customer's project management lead spot-checks 25-50 Cards against the Planview source for field accuracy, dependency label completeness, due date correctness, and member assignment. The lead signs off on the mapping and labeling scheme before production migration begins. Any mapping corrections happen in the sandbox, not in production. We also validate that the Custom Fields Power-up configuration (if applicable) renders correctly on Cards.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record order: Board creation (from Planview Projects), List configuration (mapped from Planview task statuses or phases), Card migration (with parent-child labels, dependency labels, Custom Fields, and due dates from Milestones), Member assignment, attachment URL injection (SharePoint/Box links), and financial/time data export attachment. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Custom Objects are migrated as Cards with Custom Fields or Labels depending on the destination plan tier.
Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff
We freeze Planview AdaptiveWork writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Trello as the system of record. We deliver the Workflow Rule, Validation Rule, and Template inventory document to the customer's admin team with Butler-equivalent recommendations. We do not rebuild Planview Workflow Rules as Butler rules; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task. We do not provide post-migration admin support, training, or workflow rebuild as standard scope.
Platform deep dives
Planview AdaptiveWork
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Trello
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Planview AdaptiveWork and Trello.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Planview AdaptiveWork: Not publicly documented by Planview for AdaptiveWork; enterprise accounts receive elevated limits on request.
Data volume sensitivity
Planview AdaptiveWork exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Planview AdaptiveWork to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Planview AdaptiveWork to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Planview AdaptiveWork
Other ways to arrive at Trello
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.