Project Management migration

Migrate from ActiveCollab to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between ActiveCollab and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

ActiveCollab logo

ActiveCollab

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

64%

7 of 11

objects map 1:1 between ActiveCollab and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Migrating from ActiveCollab to Microsoft Project is a shift from a collaboration-first task manager to a schedule-driven scheduling engine. ActiveCollab organizes work around Projects, Tasks, and Subtasks with integrated time tracking and invoicing; Microsoft Project organizes around Tasks, Summary Tasks (subtasks), Dependencies, and Resources with a Gantt chart as the primary interface. We resolve the structural mismatch by treating ActiveCollab Subtasks as Summary Tasks in Microsoft Project, preserving the task dependency graph as Finish-to-Start predecessors, and carrying Time Entries as custom cost and work fields on tasks. Project Templates in ActiveCollab migrate as new Projects with a template-origin naming convention. Invoicing, Workflow Automations, and the full attachment history do not migrate through the API; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to handle separately.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

ActiveCollab logo

ActiveCollab

What's pushing teams away

  • Some teams outgrow the platform when they need deep customization, advanced reporting, or a richer marketplace of integrations beyond Zapier, Slack, and webhooks.
  • The mobile application receives criticism for being less complete than the desktop experience, with some features unavailable on iOS and Android.
  • Power users from enterprise-grade PM tools report that reporting and analytics dashboards lack the depth needed for executive-level project visibility.
  • Workflow automation rules are functional but limited compared to dedicated automation platforms, causing teams focused on process-heavy operations to look elsewhere.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How ActiveCollab objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a ActiveCollab object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

ActiveCollab

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Projects map to Microsoft Project files (.mpp via Project Desktop) or Project for the Web Projects. Each ActiveCollab Project carries category, status, budget, and owner assignment metadata. We extract these as project-level fields (Name, Start Date, Finish Date, Cost, Notes) and map ActiveCollab's project status (Active, Archived, On Hold) to the Project Summary Task's custom Status field. Project Templates in ActiveCollab migrate as new Project files with a [Template] prefix in the name and all tasks preserved as a starting structure.

ActiveCollab

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Tasks map directly to Microsoft Project Tasks. Name, Start Date, Due Date, Priority, Description, and completion percentage transfer to the equivalent Task fields. ActiveCollab's task Recurrence Rule is not replicated as a recurring task in Microsoft Project; instead we generate discrete task instances for each occurrence date. Dependencies originating from ActiveCollab's finish-to-start model map as Predecessor Links with FS type. Moving a task between ActiveCollab Projects disconnects it from its dependencies; we confirm the intended outcome with the customer before migration and log every dependency-break event.

ActiveCollab

Subtask

maps to

Microsoft Project

Summary Task (Task with child outline level)

1:many
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Subtasks are hierarchical children of Tasks. Microsoft Project uses outline levels within a single Task object rather than a separate object. We reconstruct the hierarchy by promoting the parent Task to a Summary Task and indenting the Subtask rows beneath it as child tasks. The Summary Task's Start and Finish dates auto-calculate from the earliest and latest child task. We preserve Subtask assignees as task-level assignment resources.

ActiveCollab

Discussion

maps to

Microsoft Project

Note (on Task)

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Discussion threads attached to Projects or Tasks migrate as Note text on the corresponding Microsoft Project Task. Discussion author and timestamp are stored in a custom Note field alongside the content. Microsoft Project does not have a native threaded comment object, so the flat Note representation preserves the content but not the thread structure. Project-level Discussions migrate as Notes on the Project Summary Task.

ActiveCollab

Note

maps to

Microsoft Project

Note (on Task or Project Summary Task)

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab free-form Notes attached to Projects migrate as Notes on the Project Summary Task in Microsoft Project. Note content, author, and creation date transfer. Notes are not a separate object in Microsoft Project; they are a field on tasks and the project summary task. Project-level Notes with no specific task association land on the Project Summary Task for organizational visibility.

ActiveCollab

Time Entry

maps to

Microsoft Project

Assignment Work and Cost fields

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Time Entries (billable and non-billable, with job type and stopwatch/manual entry source) map to Microsoft Project Task Assignment Work and Cost fields. We convert the duration-unit time values to hours, apply the resource's Standard Rate to compute Cost, and set the Assignment Units to reflect the time logged relative to the task duration. Billable flag from ActiveCollab transfers to a custom Cost field or a flag field in Project. Time Entry Notes migrate as Assignment Notes.

ActiveCollab

Expense

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Cost fields

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Expenses (amount, category, date, receipt attachment reference) map to Microsoft Project task-level Fixed Cost and Fixed Cost Accrual fields. Expense categories become Cost Category custom fields. Receipt attachment references are preserved as a text URL field pointing to the migrated attachment location. Project-level Expenses accumulate into a Fixed Cost on the Project Summary Task.

ActiveCollab

User / Member

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource

1:1
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Members (paid seats) and Clients (free collaborators) map to Microsoft Project Resources. Name, email, timezone, and active/archived status transfer. ActiveCollab Member rate information (from Pro tier) maps to the Resource Standard Rate. We resolve Users by email match. Any ActiveCollab Member without a matching Microsoft identity is held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before the resource assignment phase.

ActiveCollab

Label

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Text Field (Task)

lossy
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Labels are tag strings applied to Tasks and Projects. Microsoft Project does not have a native label or tag field, so we create a Custom Text Field (Text1) on Tasks and populate it with the comma-separated label values from ActiveCollab. If labels exceed the single-text-field capacity, we create multiple Text fields (Label1, Label2) or a Flag field per label for filtering. The customer chooses the labeling strategy during scoping.

ActiveCollab

Task Dependency

maps to

Microsoft Project

Predecessor Link

lossy
Fully supported

ActiveCollab finish-to-start dependencies map to Microsoft Project Predecessor Links of type FS (Finish-to-Start). ActiveCollab's automated downstream date updates when a predecessor shifts are native behavior in Microsoft Project. Lag time, if specified in ActiveCollab, converts to the Microsoft Project Lag field (positive for lag, negative for lead). Finish-to-finish, Start-to-start, and Start-to-finish dependency types are not natively available in all ActiveCollab tiers; if any exist in the source data, we map them to the equivalent Microsoft Project predecessor type or flag them for manual review if the type is unsupported.

ActiveCollab

Invoice (Pro+ tier)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Not migrated (flagged separately)

lossy
Fully supported

ActiveCollab Invoices exist only on the Pro+ tier ($17/user/month) and include line items, tax codes, payment status, and client information. Microsoft Project has no native invoicing or billing object. We scan the workspace plan before migration to determine whether Invoice records exist. If present, we flag them as a mapping-required object and discuss the customer's preferred handling: export as a CSV, archive in a document store, or map to an external accounting tool. We do not delete invoice data; we hold it as a separate export deliverable.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

ActiveCollab logo

ActiveCollab gotchas

High

Task move-vs-copy disconnects from source project

High

APPLICATION_UNIQUE_KEY required for self-hosted migrations

Medium

UTF8MB4 encoding must be preserved through the export and import pipeline

Medium

Pro+ tier gates invoicing data — not all workspaces have it

Medium

Cloud migration requires SSH and MySQL credentials to ActiveCollab support

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Task move-vs-copy disconnects dependencies before import

    ActiveCollab's Move Task operation severs the task from all existing dependencies in the source project, and Comments move with the task while the original dependency graph is left incomplete. Copy Task creates a new, unrelated task in the destination project. We confirm the intended behavior with the customer before migration: which tasks should move, which should copy, and which dependency chains should be preserved intact. The dependency graph is reconstructed in Microsoft Project as Predecessor Links, so any breaks in the source graph will surface as missing predecessor assignments in the destination and are logged for manual review.

  • No native collaboration or comments in Microsoft Project Desktop

    ActiveCollab Discussion threads and @-mentions are first-class collaboration objects. Microsoft Project Desktop is a single-user scheduling file with no native comment or conversation feature. Project for the Web and Project Online support comments on tasks via the web interface and Teams integration, but this is a functionally different model from threaded discussions. We migrate Discussion content as Notes on tasks, but the @-mention thread and real-time notification context does not survive the migration. If collaboration depth is a core workflow, we flag it during scoping and recommend Project for the Web as the destination instead of Project Desktop.

  • Project Online retirement complicates destination selection

    Microsoft Project Online (the cloud PWA) retires on September 30, 2026. New sales ended October 1, 2025. Teams migrating to Microsoft Project as a destination must choose between Project for the Web (modern cloud), Project Plan 3 (web + Windows desktop), Project Plan 5 (full feature set), or Project Desktop perpetual (standalone, no cloud sync). We confirm the destination SKU during discovery because the migration mechanics differ: Project Desktop uses .mpp file import, while Project for the Web uses the Microsoft Graph API. Migrating to a retired platform is not a recommended path, and we flag any legacy Project Online destination explicitly.

  • Time entries require work-field conversion before import

    ActiveCollab time entries are discrete records with billable/non-billable flags, job type, and duration. Microsoft Project represents time as task-level Work and Cost fields tied to Resource assignments. A bulk time entry migration without transformation produces orphan Timephaseline data in Project. We extract each time entry's duration and assign it to the correct task-resource combination in Microsoft Project, converting the billable flag to Cost fields and job type to a custom Text field. Large time entry volumes (more than 10,000 entries) increase migration time significantly because each entry requires a task-resource resolution step.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful ActiveCollab to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Discovery and destination SKU confirmation

    We audit the source ActiveCollab workspace across tier (Plus/Pro/Pro+), active project count, task and subtask volume, time entry count, label vocabulary, dependency graph complexity, and whether Invoice records exist. We pair this with a destination confirmation: Project for the Web (web-only), Project Plan 3 ($30/user/month, web + Windows desktop), Project Plan 5 ($55/user/month, full features including resource management), or Project Desktop perpetual (standalone .mpp files). The discovery output is a written migration scope with a destination recommendation.

  2. Attachment staging and UTF8MB4 validation

    ActiveCollab files are uploaded via the /upload-files API endpoint and referenced by UUID. We download all file attachments to our staging storage, preserve the original file names, and create a mapping table of ActiveCollab file UUID to staging path. For self-hosted ActiveCollab instances, we extract the APPLICATION_UNIQUE_KEY from config/config.php before initiating the database export. We validate UTF8MB4 character encoding on all project names, task descriptions, and user names and flag any encoding issues before import.

  3. Sandbox migration and dependency reconstruction

    For Project for the Web destinations, we run a full migration into a test environment. For Project Desktop destinations, we generate a prototype .mpp file with the first three projects. The customer reconciles task hierarchy (subtask to Summary Task mapping), predecessor links (dependency graph), and time entry placement. We validate that dependency breaks from the ActiveCollab move-vs-copy disambiguation are reflected correctly in the Microsoft Project predecessor field. Any mapping corrections happen here before the production migration.

  4. Owner-to-resource reconciliation

    We extract every distinct ActiveCollab Member referenced on tasks, time entries, and expenses and match them against the destination Resource list. ActiveCollab Members with an email matching a Microsoft 365 account map directly to the corresponding resource. Members without a match go to a reconciliation queue. The customer's admin provisions any missing resources before record migration resumes. Resource Standard Rates are populated from ActiveCollab Pro tier member rates where available.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in this sequence: Resources (validated), Projects (with Summary Task metadata), Tasks (with predecessor links resolved after all source projects are imported to capture cross-project dependencies), Subtasks (as Summary Task child indent), Time Entries (as Work and Cost fields on task-resource assignments), Expenses (as Fixed Cost on tasks), Discussions and Notes (as Task Notes), Labels (as Custom Text fields), then Attachments (uploaded to SharePoint for Project Plan 3/5 destinations, or linked via file path for Project Desktop). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report.

  6. Cutover, validation, and non-migrated inventory handoff

    We freeze ActiveCollab writes during cutover, run a delta migration of any records modified during the window, then enable Microsoft Project as the system of record. We validate the critical path is intact, that resource assignments are populated, and that time entries landed on the correct task-resource combinations. We deliver an inventory document listing every Workflow Automation, Invoice record, and Attachment that was flagged as non-migratable, with instructions for manual handling. We do not rebuild ActiveCollab automations in Microsoft Project; Power Automate is the equivalent platform but the rebuild scope is outside standard migration.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

ActiveCollab logo

ActiveCollab

Source

Strengths

  • Combines task management, time tracking, invoicing, and reporting under one subscription without requiring third-party add-ons.
  • Self-hosted deployment gives teams full control over their data and infrastructure while using the same feature set as the cloud version.
  • Project templates, task dependencies, and recurring tasks are native features that require no configuration or scripting.
  • Roles and permissions system supports five predefined roles with per-project overrides, making client onboarding straightforward for agencies.

Weaknesses

  • The mobile app is functionally limited compared to the web interface, with several features absent on iOS and Android clients.
  • Workflow automation is basic trigger-action logic; teams requiring complex conditional logic or multi-step process automation find it insufficient.
  • Reporting and analytics are focused on operational metrics; executive-level dashboards and data exports are limited in scope.
  • The platform lacks a native marketplace or plugin ecosystem, meaning integrations beyond Zapier, Slack, and Google Workspace require custom API work.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across ActiveCollab and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    ActiveCollab: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    ActiveCollab doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your ActiveCollab to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about ActiveCollab to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ActiveCollab to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your ActiveCollab to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for up to 20 active projects with fewer than 500 tasks per project and no complex cross-project dependency graph. Migrations with over 20 projects, large time entry histories (more than 10,000 entries), or a full Project Template library move to six to ten weeks because of dependency reconstruction and time-entry-to-cost-field transformation. Self-hosted ActiveCollab instances with database export requirements add one to two weeks for credential coordination and UTF8MB4 validation.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from ActiveCollab.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day