Project Management migration

Migrate from Matilda Workspace to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Matilda Workspace and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

Matilda Workspace logo

Matilda Workspace

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

90%

9 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Matilda Workspace and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Matilda Workspace to Microsoft Project is a structural migration where an AI-driven, permission-aware knowledge graph collapses into a traditional hierarchical project plan. Matilda organizes work into Teamspaces containing Projects, Tasks, Docs, and Chat threads; Microsoft Project organizes work into sites, projects, and tasks with Gantt charts, critical path, and resource management. The central challenge is the auto-schedule and AI Copilot data: Matilda's engine generates task sequences and dependencies automatically, but those derived dates cannot be imported as static values into Microsoft Project without risking orphaned constraints. We treat AI-generated start dates as informational, preserve the explicit dependency links Matilda exposes, and translate them to predecessor relationships in Microsoft Project. Docs migrate as Notes with content preserved in structured text. We do not migrate Chat threads, Tables, or the Customers CRM module since Matilda lists these as coming-soon features with no stable schema. Workflow automations and AI Copilot prompt templates do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in the destination.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Matilda Workspace logo

Matilda Workspace

What's pushing teams away

  • Users report missing features compared to mature tools like Jira, particularly around advanced reporting, custom workflows, and enterprise-scale integrations.
  • The platform's recent launch (2024) raises concerns about long-term reliability, customer support responsiveness, and whether the product roadmap will be sustained.
  • Some users express frustration that promised features like Tables and Customers CRM are still marked as "coming soon" after initial launch timelines passed.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How Matilda Workspace objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a Matilda Workspace object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Matilda Workspace

Teamspace

maps to

Microsoft Project

SharePoint Site or Project Online Workspace

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda Teamspaces define permission boundaries and contain all child objects. We map each Teamspace to a separate SharePoint Online site or Project Online workspace depending on whether the destination uses Project Plan 3/5 or Project Server SE. If the customer uses a single Microsoft 365 tenant and expects all projects to share a portfolio view, we can map multiple Teamspaces to a single site with separate folders or project plans. The mapping decision is made during discovery based on the customer's existing Microsoft 365 structure and PMO governance model.

Matilda Workspace

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda Projects with start/end dates, status, and linked tasks map to Microsoft Project plans. Project name, description, start date, finish date, and status migrate directly. Custom properties on Matilda Projects map to enterprise custom fields in Project Online or to columns in the associated SharePoint list. We create the project in the destination site before importing tasks so that all task-to-project lookups are satisfied at insert time.

Matilda Workspace

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda Tasks carry assignees, due dates, status, subtasks, and descriptions. We map task name, start date, finish date, duration, percent complete, priority, and assignee. Subtasks in Matilda are either flattened into a linked hierarchy with predecessor relationships in Microsoft Project or grouped as summary tasks with indent levels. The customer's admin chooses the subtask strategy during scoping.

Matilda Workspace

Task Dependencies

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Predecessors

lossy
Fully supported

Matilda's auto-schedule engine infers task sequencing from the dependency graph it generates. We extract the explicit dependency links Matilda exposes via API and translate them to Microsoft Project predecessor relationships (Finish-to-Start by default, with Lead/Lag time preserved where present). AI-generated inferred start dates are stored as informational notes on tasks rather than as static date values, allowing Microsoft Project's scheduling engine to recalculate from the explicit predecessor chain.

Matilda Workspace

Doc

maps to

Microsoft Project

Note or Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda Docs are rich-text documents embedded within Projects and linked to Tasks. We export doc content as structured HTML and attach it as a Note on the related Project or Task in Microsoft Project. Links between Docs and Tasks are preserved as note references. Customers should review doc content after migration since formatting fidelity depends on the HTML structure Matilda exports.

Matilda Workspace

Chat Thread

maps to

Microsoft Project

Not migrated

1:1
Fully supported

Chat threads are integrated per-project in Matilda. We do not migrate chat threads to Microsoft Project because Project Online has no native chat-log object equivalent and no supported import path for threaded messaging. We provide a plain-text export of thread metadata and message content with timestamps as a reference file for the customer's records. This gap is surfaced in the pre-flight report before migration begins.

Matilda Workspace

Custom Field

maps to

Microsoft Project

Enterprise Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda supports custom fields on Projects and Tasks. We inventory all custom field names, types, and values during discovery and generate a field-mapping table mapping each Matilda custom field to a Microsoft Project enterprise custom field of matching type (text, number, date, flag, or lookup). Custom fields are deployed to the destination Project Online or Project Server instance before any record import.

Matilda Workspace

User Assignment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource Assignment

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda task assignees and project members map to Microsoft Project resource assignments. We resolve assignees by email address against the destination Microsoft 365 tenant's user directory. Resource names, email addresses, and assignment units migrate. If a Matilda user has no matching Microsoft 365 account, we flag them in the reconciliation report for the customer's admin to provision before migration resumes.

Matilda Workspace

Attachment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

File attachments on Matilda Tasks and Docs are exported with their metadata and reattached to the corresponding Task in Project Online or to the associated SharePoint document library. We preserve the original filename, upload date, and uploader. File content is uploaded directly to SharePoint and linked from the task or project record.

Matilda Workspace

Customers

maps to

Microsoft Project

Not migrated

1:1
Not supported

Matilda's Customers CRM module is listed as coming soon with no stable schema. We do not migrate Customers records. This is surfaced in the pre-flight report and deferred until the feature reaches general availability and the schema is publicly documented.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Matilda Workspace logo

Matilda Workspace gotchas

High

Tables and Customers modules are not yet generally available

Medium

Early-stage platform with limited public API documentation

Medium

Auto-schedule and AI Copilot generate derived data that may not export cleanly

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • AI-generated scheduling dates do not import as static values

    Matilda's AI Copilot and auto-schedule engine generate task sequences and infer start dates without explicit predecessor links in every case. Importing these derived dates as static constraint dates in Microsoft Project creates an inconsistent schedule that cannot be recalculated cleanly when dependencies change. We treat AI-generated start dates as informational notes and build the schedule from explicit predecessor relationships only, allowing Microsoft Project's scheduling engine to calculate forward from the true start date. Customers who prefer to keep the AI-generated dates as fixed constraints must explicitly request this and accept that the schedule will not self-correct when dependencies are modified.

  • Matilda API is undocumented and may change between product updates

    Matilda Workspace was founded in 2024 and its public API surface area is not well-documented in third-party sources or the vendor's own developer portal. Export workflows relying on API access may face undocumented rate limits, authentication changes, or schema shifts between product updates. We validate API availability during discovery and fall back to UI-based export where API access is restricted or undocumented. Customers with large workspaces should request early access to any developer preview APIs before scoping begins. This gotcha is pair-specific because the undocumented API directly affects our export methodology for this migration path.

  • Tables and Customers modules have no migration path

    Matilda advertises Tables (Airtable-style data collections) and Customers (CRM) as upcoming features. These modules lack a stable, publicly documented schema. If a customer's workspace references these objects, we skip them during migration scoping and surface the gap in the pre-flight report. Attempting to migrate incomplete or schema-undefined object references can create orphan records in the destination. We flag these as deferred objects and revisit once general availability is confirmed.

  • Docs lose embedded links and live references after migration

    Matilda Docs support rich text with live links to other Tasks and Projects. After export and import, these internal links break because Microsoft Project Notes do not maintain cross-record hyperlinks. We preserve the doc content as structured text but customers should review embedded references post-migration and update any hyperlinks that point to Matilda-specific URLs.

  • Chat threads have no Microsoft Project destination object

    Chat threads in Matilda are integrated per-project and carry contextual links to tasks. Microsoft Project Online has no native chat-log object and no supported import path for threaded message history. We provide a plain-text chronological export of thread metadata and message content as a reference file, but the contextual linking to specific tasks does not transfer. This is a content-loss gap we flag in the pre-flight report before migration begins.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Matilda Workspace to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Discovery and source audit

    We audit the source Matilda Workspace across all Teamspaces, capturing the object inventory: Projects, Tasks, subtasks, Docs, Chat threads, custom fields, and user assignments. We validate API availability and export capability during this phase, falling back to UI-based export if the API lacks documented endpoints or rate limits for the customer's data volume. We identify any Tables or Customers references that lack GA schema and flag them as deferred objects. The discovery output is a written migration scope with object counts, a custom field inventory, and the chosen export methodology.

  2. Destination environment assessment

    We assess the customer's existing Microsoft 365 tenant and Project Online or Project Server SE environment. This includes confirming the Project plan type (Project Plan 3 or Plan 5, Project Server SE), identifying the SharePoint site or site collection that will host the migrated projects, reviewing any existing enterprise custom fields and lookup tables, and confirming the resource pool structure. If no Project Online environment exists, we document the licensing requirement and site-provisioning steps as a prerequisite to migration.

  3. Schema design and dependency mapping

    We design the destination schema in the target Project Online environment. This includes provisioning enterprise custom fields to match Matilda's custom property types, defining lookup tables if Matilda uses multi-value or categorized custom fields, mapping Teamspaces to SharePoint sites or site folders, and designing the task hierarchy and predecessor chain from Matilda's explicit dependency links. We treat AI-generated scheduling dates as informational notes and build the predecessor chain from explicit links only, so the destination schedule can self-correct when modified. Schema is validated in a sandbox or test Project Online site before production migration begins.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into the test Project Online site using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager or PMO lead reconciles record counts, spot-checks task hierarchies, dependency chains, and custom field values against the Matilda source, and validates that the predecessor relationships produce the expected schedule. The customer signs off the sandbox validation before production migration begins. Any dependency mapping corrections, custom field type adjustments, or hierarchy flattening decisions happen here.

  5. Production migration in project-by-project sequence

    We migrate projects in dependency order, starting with the projects that have no predecessors in Matilda. Each project is created in Project Online, tasks are imported with duration, start dates, and explicit predecessor links resolved, custom fields are populated, resources are assigned from the Matilda user roster, and attachments are uploaded to SharePoint and linked. Docs are attached as Notes to their parent projects or tasks. Each project emits a row-count and field-count reconciliation report. Chat threads are exported as plain-text reference files and delivered alongside the migration package.

  6. Cutover, validation, and handoff

    We freeze Matilda writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any tasks or projects modified since the initial export, then mark the Matilda Workspace as read-only in the customer's tenant. We deliver the full migration package including the Project Online backup, doc export files, chat reference files, and custom field mapping documentation. We do not rebuild AI Copilot prompt templates or auto-schedule rules in Microsoft Project as those features do not exist in the destination; we deliver a written inventory of Matilda automation patterns for the customer's admin to evaluate for manual rebuild or third-party scheduling tools.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Matilda Workspace logo

Matilda Workspace

Source

Strengths

  • Combines Docs, Projects, Tasks, Chat, and Customers in a single interconnected workspace
  • AI Copilot auto-generates task hierarchies, project outlines, and subtasks from minimal input
  • Auto-schedule engine handles task sequencing and dependency resolution automatically
  • Free tier with unlimited users reduces barrier to entry for small teams
  • Context Engine maintains permission-aware relationships between all workspace objects

Weaknesses

  • Platform launched in 2024 with a small team—long-term product stability is unproven
  • CRM (Customers) and database (Tables) modules are still marked as "coming soon"
  • Limited public API documentation makes programmatic export and migration more complex
  • Smaller user base means fewer community templates, integrations, and third-party resources than established PM tools
  • G2 reviews note missing enterprise features compared to Jira or monday.com for complex workflow requirements
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Matilda Workspace and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Matilda Workspace: Not publicly documented..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Matilda Workspace doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Matilda Workspace to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Matilda Workspace to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Matilda Workspace to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Matilda Workspace to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for organizations with fewer than 50 active projects and straightforward task hierarchies. Organizations with complex subtask nesting, extensive custom field sets, multiple Teamspaces requiring separate Project Online sites, or large attachment volumes move to eight to twelve weeks because of dependency mapping, custom field type resolution, and sandbox validation time.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Matilda Workspace.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day