Project Management migration

Migrate from Projectworks to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Projectworks and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Projectworks logo

Projectworks

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

92%

11 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Projectworks and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Projectworks to Asana is a platform-type shift: Projectworks is a Professional Services Automation system built for consulting firms that ties time tracking, expenses, invoicing, and resource management into one live financial view, while Asana is a task and project management tool with no native time-tracking, invoicing, or capacity-planning modules. We migrate Projects, Tasks, Milestones, People, Companies, and Contacts, and we preserve historical Time Entries as Asana tasks with duration fields. We flag upfront that Invoices, Expenses, Budgets, Billable Rates, and Resource Utilization data cannot migrate because Asana does not have those objects. We also flag that Asana's Timeline view has known dependency propagation issues that Asana support has acknowledged as a software bug, affecting teams that rely on cascading date logic. Workflows, automations, custom Reporting Views, and Xero sync settings do not migrate; we deliver written inventories for admin rebuild.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Projectworks logo

Projectworks

What's pushing teams away

  • Limited reporting flexibility and lack of comprehensive expense management features frustrate power users who need deeper analytical capabilities.
  • Steep learning curve and limited customization in reporting, invoicing, and workflows make it less adaptable for specific business needs.
  • Mobile app lacks key features present in the desktop version, forcing consultants to rely on workarounds for on-site time entry.
  • Timesheet does not capture start and finish times, making it unsuitable for firms that need to track when staff begin and end work.
  • Limited forecasting and resourcing tool flexibility restricts capacity planning for complex multi-project schedules.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Projectworks objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Projectworks object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Projectworks

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Projectworks Projects map to Asana Projects with project name, description, status, start date, and end date preserved. Custom fields on the Project level (such as Client Name, Project Type, or Cost Center) map to Asana custom fields with type-matching: single-select options map to Asana enum fields, text fields map to text, and date fields map to date. Milestones nested under the Project carry their own due dates and completion status and are migrated after the parent Project exists so dependency resolution is satisfied.

Projectworks

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Projectworks Tasks map to Asana Tasks with title, description, assignee (resolved to Asana User by email), due date, and start date preserved. Subtasks under Projectworks Tasks map to Asana Subtasks within the task hierarchy. Custom fields on Tasks (such as Task Category, Priority, or Department) map to Asana task-level custom fields with type matching. Asana's Task API does not support a native billable/non-billable flag, so that value is stored in a custom field if required by the customer.

Projectworks

Milestone

maps to

Asana

Milestone

1:1
Fully supported

Projectworks Milestones map to Asana Milestones. We preserve milestone name, due date, and completion status linked to their parent Project. Asana Milestones are a project-level sub-object and must be created after the parent Project is confirmed to exist in the destination. If the customer used milestones as a project financial checkpoint (e.g., invoicing milestone), that financial context is flagged as a non-migratable note since Asana has no billing module.

Projectworks

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Task (with custom duration field)

1:1
Fully supported

Projectworks Time Entries map to Asana Tasks created under the relevant Project with the hours value stored in a custom duration field and the entry date preserved. Note that Projectworks timesheets capture duration only, not start and finish times. We flag this gap during discovery and confirm whether duration-only timesheets meet billing requirements in Asana. For firms using third-party time-tracking tools (Toggl, Harvest, Timely) post-migration, we document the time entry mapping so integrations can be configured to re-associate migrated hours with live tracking.

Projectworks

Person / Resource

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

Projectworks People records map to Asana Users with name, email, and role preserved. Billable hourly rates stored on the Projectworks People record do not have a native Asana field and are flagged for extraction to a separate CSV for re-import into a third-party time-tracking or billing tool. Capacity, utilization, and leave management data from Projectworks People records have no Asana equivalent; we document these fields for the customer's admin to handle separately in a resource management tool or HR system.

Projectworks

Company

maps to

Asana

Organization

1:1
Fully supported

Projectworks Company records map to Asana Organizations. Company name, address, billing details, and any custom fields applied to the Company object migrate. Asana's Organization object is a workspace-level entity used for grouping People, so we use the Company domain or name as the Organization identifier. If the customer used Companies as a project billing entity, that context is flagged since Asana has no native invoicing capability.

Projectworks

Contact

maps to

Asana

Person

1:1
Fully supported

Projectworks Contact records map to Asana People within the relevant Organization. Contact name, email, phone, and any custom fields migrate. The relationship to the parent Company from Projectworks maps to membership within the corresponding Asana Organization. Asana People do not support custom fields at the person level in the same way Projectworks Contacts do; we map supported custom field types and flag any that cannot be transferred.

Projectworks

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Projectworks custom fields on Projects, Tasks, People, Companies, and Contacts map to Asana custom fields of the corresponding type. Single-select options in Projectworks map to Asana enum fields; text fields map to text; number fields map to number; date fields map to date. Dropdown and multi-select field values require a pre-migration enumeration review because Asana enum fields must be created with their options before task import. Custom field schema varies per firm; we enumerate all custom fields during discovery and produce a type-matched mapping table before any data moves.

Projectworks

Invoice

maps to

Asana

(no direct equivalent)

1:1
Fully supported

Projectworks Invoices (with fixed-fee and hourly rate line items) cannot migrate to Asana because Asana has no invoice generation or financial document object. We extract invoice headers, line items, amounts, and status to a CSV for re-import into the customer's chosen accounting platform (typically Xero, QuickBooks, or DEAR Systems). We flag any Xero sync settings configured in Projectworks so that the customer's finance team can re-establish the Xero connection in the accounting tool without duplicate invoice pushes.

Projectworks

Expense

maps to

Asana

(no direct equivalent)

1:1
Fully supported

Projectworks Expenses (reimbursable and non-reimbursable) cannot migrate to Asana because Asana has no expense tracking module. We extract expense records with category, amount, reimbursement status, linked Project, and linked Person to a CSV for re-import into the customer's accounting tool. If Projectworks is connected to Xero for expense export, we flag the Xero connection credentials and sync rules for re-establishment in the destination accounting system.

Projectworks

Budget

maps to

Asana

(no direct equivalent)

1:1
Fully supported

Projectworks Budgets (planned vs. actual revenue and cost tracking per project) cannot migrate to Asana because Asana has no financial budget or burn-rate object. We extract budget line items with planned amounts, actuals, and variance data to a CSV for the customer's finance team to re-import into a reporting or budgeting tool. Budget data is purely financial and is outside Asana's work management scope.

Projectworks

Quote

maps to

Asana

(no direct equivalent)

1:1
Fully supported

Projectworks Quotes with custom fields and line items are extracted to a CSV for re-import into the customer's CRM or accounting system. Asana does not have a quote or proposal object. We enumerate all quote fields during discovery and flag any custom field schema that requires mapping in the destination system.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Projectworks logo

Projectworks gotchas

Medium

Timesheet records duration only, not clock-times

Medium

Xero sync settings and reimbursable expense exports do not transfer

Low

Custom reporting views have undocumented schema

Low

Pricing tiers introduced April 2025 may affect feature availability

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Invoices, Expenses, and Budgets have no Asana equivalent

    Projectworks is a PSA with native invoicing, expense reimbursement, and budget tracking. Asana is a task and project management tool with no financial objects. We cannot migrate Invoices, Expenses, or Budgets as records into Asana. We extract this data to CSV for re-import into the customer's chosen accounting platform (Xero, QuickBooks, DEAR Systems, or similar). If the firm relies on Projectworks for billable hour tracking, the time entry extraction must be re-associated with a third-party time-tracking tool post-migration. Skipping this step leaves the finance team with no billing data and forces manual recreation of every invoice.

  • Timesheet entries capture duration only, not clock-times

    Projectworks timesheets do not capture start and finish times, only the duration entered. Staff who used separate tools like Memtime to compensate for this gap will have duplicate records to reconcile. We flag this gap during discovery and ask customers to confirm whether duration-only timesheets meet their billing requirements in the destination system. For firms migrating to Toggl or Harvest for live time tracking, we document the time entry mapping so integrations can be configured to re-associate migrated hours with live tracking tools.

  • Asana Timeline dependency propagation has known software bugs

    Asana's Timeline view has documented dependency propagation issues where dependent tasks do not move to the correct date when the predecessor task is shifted. Asana support has confirmed this as a software bug affecting finish-start, start-finish, and multi-dependency chain configurations. Teams that rely on cascading date logic in Projectworks (where budget or milestone date shifts automatically propagate downstream) will need to manually adjust dates in Asana Timeline or use a workaround. We document which of the customer's projects used dependency-driven scheduling so the admin is aware before cutover.

  • Resource utilization and capacity data do not migrate

    Projectworks People records carry capacity settings, utilization rates, skills matrix, leave management, and billable hourly rates. Asana has no native resource management or capacity planning module; the Workload view shows only task assignments. We migrate People as Asana Users with name and email preserved, but capacity, utilization, and rate data are flagged for extraction to a separate CSV for use in a dedicated resource management tool (Float, Resource Guru, or similar). Firms that depend on Projectworks' capacity heat-map for multi-project scheduling must plan a replacement tool as part of the migration scope.

  • Custom Reporting Views have undocumented schema and cannot migrate

    Projectworks exposes a Custom Reporting Data Model article in their Help Center, but the actual Reporting View definitions (the saved report configurations the firm created) are not publicly accessible via API or documentation. We cannot migrate custom report configurations automatically. We extract the underlying data so customers can rebuild reports in Asana's reporting module or in a BI tool, and we document which reports they had configured so nothing is forgotten. The customer receives a report inventory list during the handoff phase.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Projectworks to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and financial data scoping

    We audit the source Projectworks instance across Projects, Tasks, Milestones, People, Companies, Contacts, Time Entries, Invoices, Expenses, Budgets, and Custom Fields. We also enumerate Reporting Views and Xero sync settings. During this phase we confirm which tier features the customer uses (Build, Scale, or Unleash post-April 2025 restructuring) to ensure the destination system scope is clear. The discovery output is a written migration scope that explicitly separates migratable records (Projects, Tasks, People, Companies, Contacts, Time Entries) from non-migratable financial records (Invoices, Expenses, Budgets, Rates) that will be extracted to CSV for downstream re-import.

  2. Financial data extraction and accounting re-import planning

    Before any task migration begins, we extract Invoices, Expenses, and Budgets to CSV with all line items, amounts, status, and linked Project and Company references. We also extract billable hourly rates from People records. The customer confirms their chosen accounting tool (Xero, QuickBooks, DEAR Systems) and we deliver the CSV alongside a field mapping guide for their finance team or bookkeeper to re-import. This step happens first because downstream task migration will reference Projects and People, and the financial extraction must be isolated before task reassignment begins.

  3. Asana workspace setup and custom field pre-creation

    We create the Asana workspace, Projects, and custom fields before any task migration. Custom fields in Asana must be created at the portfolio or project level before tasks are imported, because enum field options must exist before data referencing them can be inserted. We create Projects in Asana matching the Projectworks project structure, including any section or bucket groupings that correspond to Projectworks project modules. Milestones are created at the project level first so that tasks referencing them can resolve the dependency.

  4. User provisioning and People-to-User resolution

    We extract every distinct Projectworks Person and match by email against the Asana destination workspace's User table. Any Person without a matching Asana User goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision. Billable rate data is noted for extraction to the financial CSV, not for import to Asana User records. This step must complete before task import because task assignees require a valid Asana OwnerId.

  5. Task migration with dependency and custom field resolution

    We migrate Projects and Tasks in dependency order: parent Projects first, then Milestones, then Tasks with assignees and custom field values resolved. Asana Task assignees are resolved by email match against the Asana User table. Custom fields are type-matched (single-select to enum, text to text, date to date) and pre-created in Asana before import. Subtasks under tasks are migrated as Asana Subtasks within the task hierarchy. Time Entries from Projectworks are migrated as separate Asana Tasks with duration stored in a custom field, linked to the relevant Project.

  6. Company and Contact migration

    We migrate Projectworks Company records to Asana Organizations and Contact records to Asana People within the corresponding Organization. Custom fields on both objects are type-matched and pre-created in Asana before import. The relationship between Contact and Company from Projectworks maps to Organization membership in Asana. We validate record counts against the source before closing this phase.

  7. Cutover, validation, and reporting inventory handoff

    We freeze Projectworks writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record for project and task management. We deliver the financial data CSV (Invoices, Expenses, Budgets, Rates) with a re-import guide to the customer's finance team. We deliver the Reporting Views inventory document listing every custom report the customer had configured so their admin can rebuild them in Asana's reporting module or in a BI tool. We do not rebuild workflows, automations, or Xero sync rules; those are separate engagements documented in the handoff packet.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Projectworks logo

Projectworks

Source

Strengths

  • Real-time budget transparency across multiple simultaneous projects
  • Out-of-the-box Xero and QuickBooks integration with multi-instance support
  • User-friendly interface with role-based onboarding and training
  • Combined fixed-fee and hourly invoicing on a single invoice
  • Effective resourcing overview providing at-a-glance capacity visibility

Weaknesses

  • Limited reporting flexibility and restricted customization in dashboards and exports
  • No start and finish time capture in timesheet entries
  • Basic document management without advanced version control or collaboration
  • Steep learning curve despite ease-of-use branding
  • Mobile app missing key features from the desktop version
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Projectworks and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Projectworks: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Projectworks doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Projectworks to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Projectworks to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Projectworks to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Projectworks to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for firms under 10,000 tasks and 500 projects with no complex custom field schema. Migrations with extensive custom fields, multi-level task hierarchies, large People/Resource records (over 1,000 team members), or legacy invoice and expense extraction for a separate accounting tool move to seven to twelve weeks because of the financial data flagging scope, custom field type mapping across a large schema, and the parent-project dependency resolution required for nested task structures.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Projectworks.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day